logo
Honolulu City Council advances sewer fees bill

Honolulu City Council advances sewer fees bill

Yahoo28-05-2025

Mayor Rick Blangiardi administration's proposed 10-year, 115 % sewer fee rate increase that's expected to begin this summer has been countered by the Honolulu City Council.
The Council's five-­member Budget Committee voted 4-1 Tuesday, with Radiant Cordero dissenting, to approve passage of a committee draft of the city-initiated Bill 60.
Budget Committee Chair Tyler Dos Santos-­Tam's version of the measure, which shaves the city's decade-­long span for increased rates down to about six years, will start Jan. 1, 2026 and run through 2031.
Dos Santos-Tam's Bill 60 proposes sewer fee increases for a household that uses about 6, 000-gallons per month—deemed 50 % of all single-family households in Honolulu—equates to a 6 % increase in sewer fees in fiscal year 2026, 7.5 % in fiscal year 2027, 8.5 % in fiscal year 2028, followed by 9 % over the remaining three fiscal years.
If adopted, Bill 60 would see a 60 % base charge—a fixed monthly fee—and a 40 % volumetric charge, or fees based on monthly water usage.
Currently, city and county sewer bills calculate a 70 % base charge—a fee of $77.55 for all single-family homes—and a 30 % volumetric rate, which is applied equally for every 1, 000 gallons used, the city Department of Environmental Services states.
ENV indicates that a household using 6, 000 gallons per month pays $99.77—with the base of $77.55 plus $22.22 for the volumetric rate.
Dos Santos-Tam's version of Bill 60 also will align with ENV's 6-year capital improvement projects plan. 'So we can get through a full CIP cycle, ' he added. 'And then we can deal with what happens in the out years thereafter.'
Under Dos Santos-Tam's Bill 60, the budget committee voted to allow 'rule-­making authority ' for ENV to set up a program called Customer Assistance for Residential Environmental Services, or CARES, to help with 'affordability and equity ' of increased sewer fee rates.
Sewer customers who qualify based on household income of less than 80 % area median income will be eligible for a $20 to $25 credit on their monthly base fee.
The program will be funded at $10 million per year. Customers will have to apply for the program to prove eligibility and then be re-verified every six months, ENV states.
Bill 60 is scheduled to return for a third and final reading before the full Council on June 4.
In October, ENV initially proposed to increase sewer fees annually for the next 10 years—by 9 % over the first six years, followed by smaller annual increases of 8 %, 7 %, 6 % and 5 % over the subsequent four years.
But by April, ENV Director Roger Babcock presented to the Council's Budget Committee the so-called 6 % option—which sees sewer rates rise by 6 % on July 1.
Those rates would increase by 7.5 % in 2027, 8.5 % in 2028, 9 % in the following four years, then rise by 8 %, 7.5 % and 7 % in the final three years, ending in 2035.
City officials say proposed sewer fee hikes are necessary to support ongoing wastewater operations and maintenance efforts, as well as a $10.1 billion capital improvement program for Oahu's wastewater collection and treatment system that is planned through 2040.
The fee hikes also will fund projects to prepare the city's wastewater infrastructure for climate change and sea-level rise, city officials say.
And they assert the work includes a $2.5 billion upgrade to the Sand Island Wastewater Treatment Plant as required under a 2010 federal consent decree.
Previously, Council Chair Tommy Waters—who does not sit on the budget committee—offered his version of Bill 60, a 6.75 % increase for the first five years, starting July 1.
The initial increases would be followed by an 8.75 % increase for the next two years, then a decrease to 7.75 %, 6.75 % and 5.5 % over the remaining years, 'thereby creating savings, ' Waters said previously, adding instead of a 100 % increase over the decade, 'it would amount to approximately about a 70 % increase over 10 years.'
But at Tuesday's hearing, Waters admitted his version of the bill was found to have calculation errors. 'We started from 2012 rather than 2016 … which is the last date that sewer increases took effect, ' he explained.
During a presentation, ENV Director Roger Babcock highlighted that Waters' proposed Bill 60 in fiscal year 2026 would provide less revenues—about $397.5 million, a 13 % drop—compared with the city's current revenues of $457.03 million devoted to sewer funding.
'So that's a $60 million decrease, ' Babcock said, 'which would be very problematic for the program.'
In contrast, Babcock noted the city's proposed 6 % option would provide $484.4 million in revenue needed to support required sewage system upgrades.
Initially stating he'd resubmit a corrected version of his measure, Waters later backed Dos Santos-Tam's draft of Bill 60.
Still, Waters noted households using 6, 000 gallons of water or less per month could see their sewer bills rise by over 61 %, from $99.77 per month to $160.85 per month.
'And those using 9, 000 gallons per month, which is the typical user—a family with two kids, a dog, maybe in-laws—that would go up from $110 to $204 ' per month, an over 85 % increase, said Waters. 'I mean that's really what we're voting on.'
At the meeting, city Department of Budget and Fiscal Services Director Andy Kawano favored Dos Santos-Tam's measure as 'revenue calculations will meet our required minimums going forward through 10 years.'
However, 'there could be an option, if it's more palatable for Council members, to truncate the (10-year ) term to five to seven years, that's possible, ' Kawano claimed. 'If we do that, we would meet our required minimums for every year, for one through five or one through seven, depending on what Council members decide.'
Ways to defray the overall cost of the city's wastewater operations also were touched on at the meeting.
During public testimony, Frank Doyle, a former city and county ENV director, testified the Council and city should work together to end the 2010 federally-mandated consent decree that included upgrading the island's sewage treatment plants to 'secondary treatment.'
Although secondary treatment does not make the water drinkable, it does turn it into recycled water that can be used for things like landscaping, city officials say.
'Since entering the consent decree the city has spent billions of dollars for improvements of our wastewater system, and has essentially completed almost all of the requirements of the decree except for the one, largest project—a $2.5 billion (secondary treatment ) project for Sand Island, ' Doyle said. 'If secondary treatment was required at Sand Island (Wastewater Treatment Plant ) in 2010—because it really holds some significant public health or environmental concern—that project would have been prioritized immediately.'
'Instead, it comes in last, not needed until 2030, ' he said, adding no real public health concern occurred in 2010. 'And there isn't any today.'
Doyle requested the Council 'urge the administration to continue to pursue a discussion with EPA ' on the consent decree. 'And if the administration doesn't want to do it, the Council should do it, ' he added.
In 2010 the negotiated consent decree included three phases and a 25-year implementation schedule, the city says.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the work was meant to reduce the public health risk caused by exposure to pathogens in raw sewage and the amount of harmful pollutants affecting the island's marine environment.
At the time, overflows caused millions of gallons of untreated sewage to be discharged into water off Oahu. The city had to pay a total fine of $1.6 million to be split between the federal government and state to resolve violations of the Clean Water Act and Hawaii's water pollution law, the EPA states.
Those violating acts included the March 24, 2006, Beachwalk force main break which spilled about 50 million gallons of sewage into the Ala Wai Canal, according to the EPA.
For his part, Waters stated 'as a Council, we've asked the administration to discuss with the EPA removing the need for secondary treatment or extending the term of the consent decree.'
'We need to extend the sewer fees, but not for the full 10 years, as requested, ' he added, 'to give us time to work with the EPA and find alternatives to funding the wastewater system.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

El Rancho water tower bowl now in place
El Rancho water tower bowl now in place

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

El Rancho water tower bowl now in place

A new landmark can now be seen in Duncan after the bowl for the El Rancho water tower was raised into place this week. Crews began work at 8 a.m. Monday, June 2 and spent most of the day raising the bowl, according to Loisdawn Jones, director of communications for the City of Duncan. She said workers 'hoisted the bowl more than 80 feet and affixed it to the tower, a process that took several hours.' 'Completing the eye-catching step of raising the bowl on the new El Rancho Water Tower is a significant milestone in City of Duncan's continuing efforts to update city water infrastructure,' a release from Jones' office states. Construction began on the water tower project in summer 2024. The first step in the project was establishing the foundation and tower pedestal. 'The full tower stands almost 100 feet tall, and the bowl is 40 feet tall and about 70 feet in diameter,' according to City of Duncan. The El Rancho water tower, which sits on the city's north end, 'holds 1 million gallons of water and replaces an aging water tower that is adjacent to the site,' according to the City of Duncan. While the bowl is now in place, the water tower will become fully functional later on in the year and provide water to 'almost 30,0000 residents across approximately 40 square miles with improved water supply, quality, and pressure.' City Manager Chris Deal said the raising of the bowl was a significant mile stone for the Duncan community. 'It is a proud day for Duncan and its citizens, as this is another piece of the overall efforts by Mayor Armstrong and Council to provide the best quality water for our community,' Deal said. City paperwork shows the El Rancho water tower funds come from a loan under the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Financial Assistance Program.

Jackie Goodman, former Austin City Council Member and environmental advocate, has died
Jackie Goodman, former Austin City Council Member and environmental advocate, has died

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Jackie Goodman, former Austin City Council Member and environmental advocate, has died

AUSTIN (KXAN) — Former Austin City Council Member and Mayor Pro Tem Jackie Goodman died, according to a social media post by current Mayor Pro Tem Vanessa on Wednesday. Goodman served as a city council member between 1993 and 2005 and a term as Mayor Pro Tem. Prior to joining the city council, she worked as an early childhood educator. Beginning in the 1970s, she contributed to environmental causes as part of the 'Zilker Park Posse,' according to the Austin History Center. She was also a member of the Save Barton Creek Association for more than 30 years, a steering committee member of Save Our Springs, and worked with other local environmental groups. During her time on the city council, Goodman successfully led a petition effort to remove term limits on council members. The Austin Commission for Women inducted Goodman into its Hall of Fame in 2016. Fuentes said she was 'saddened' by Goodman's passing. 'Jackie served our city with distinction for 12 years on Council (1993-2005) and as Mayor Pro Tem. She was a passionate advocate for environmental protection, underserved communities, and thoughtful growth,' Fuentes said. 'Our thoughts are with her family. Jackie's legacy of public service will continue to inspire Austin.' Former Austin Mayors Lee Leffingwell (2009-2015) and Will Wynn (2003-2009) also sent statements. 'Jackie was an incredibly savvy political and policy operative,' Leffingwell wrote. 'She would navigate the Council dais, and the community, as she championed the important issues around our regional growth. Her dedication to our community set a high standard. I would count on her to have the deepest understanding of the most complicated issues, and the solutions to go with them.' 'I learned so much from Jackie over the five years we served together. She was such an important voice for so many Austinites. I will miss her,' Wynn wrote. Former Travis County Tax Assessor-Collector Bruce Elfant wrote on social media that he and Goodman had been friends for over 40 years. 'She was passionate and pushy in her quiet way when it came to how the City of Austin should address growth and our environment,' Elfant said. 'I last spoke with Jackie just a few weeks ago when she was attempting to resolve an issue for a neighborhood association. Jackie's work on and off the council dais helped make Austin a better place. May her memory be a blessing.' The Travis County Democratic Party and Friends of Armadillo Park also posted tributes to the former council member. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Valemount Council: municipal award, wildfire fuel management, cemetery fees
Valemount Council: municipal award, wildfire fuel management, cemetery fees

Hamilton Spectator

timea day ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Valemount Council: municipal award, wildfire fuel management, cemetery fees

Valemount Council presented an award to former MLA Shirley Bond, discussed wildfire fuel management, and new cemetery fees during its May 27th regular meeting. Mayor Owen Torgerson called the meeting to order at 7:14 p.m., after the evening's public hearing ended Council adopted the agenda for the night's meeting, and adopted the minutes of its April 22nd regular meeting as well as the May 8th special meeting. Former MLA Shirley Bond has been a familiar face in the Robson Valley for over two decades. She served as MLA for the Prince George-Valemount riding from 2001 until August 2024, when she announced she would not be running for re-election after BC United leader Kevin Falcon suspended the party's election campaign. Throughout her time in office, Bond advocated for improved rural healthcare, education and infrastructure – which is why Valemount councillors voted to give her the Freedom of the Municipality award, the highest honour a B.C. municipality can give to someone. The award recognizes a person's public service and leadership in a community, and dozens of residents packed into Council chambers to watch Torgerson present the award. 'Shirley Bond's illustrious career and her profound connection to the Robson Valley have undoubtedly earned her this distinction,' Torgerson said. 'Her impact is particularly noteworthy in her efforts to enhance rural healthcare, infrastructure and economic development, which are fundamental for the well-being of smaller communities like ours. Shirley has been a tireless advocate for us all.' He added that with the award comes an invitation to every future municipal event, as well as the ability to cast votes in Valemount elections. A tearful Bond thanked councillors and Valemount residents for the recognition. She said Torgerson and the rest of Team Valemount – a group of government and business leaders who advocate for the community at the provincial and federal level – are an example she holds up when speaking about effective political advocacy. 'I can't begin to thank you for the lessons that I've learned about public service because of the honour I've had to represent all of you,' Bond said. 'While I appreciate the honour I was given to represent Prince George-Valemount, what means the most to me is that I know people by name… I think that's what serving is really about. I'm incredibly humbled and deeply honoured, and I'm thrilled that I get to vote in another municipality.' Local mill Cedar Valley Holdings is set to close in June, which will result in the layoff of 14 people. Employees allege that the mill's financial hardship is owed to difficulty in getting an adequate supply of cedar from the Valemount Community Forest (VCF), and claim VCF has been sending usable cedar to pulp mills in Prince George. VCF says it is in compliance with its timber and fibre supply agreements with Cedar Valley, but has not provided a comment on the claims made by the mill. Cedar Valley employee Simon Heiniger began circulating a petition calling for more transparency among the VCF board of directors and a guarantee that local companies are prioritized in timber sales in early May. He presented the petition – which he says has garnered over 300 signatures – to councillors. Council did not have any questions about the petition for Heiniger. 'I just hope that we can hear something expediently and publicly, a public meeting or something,' Heiniger said at the end of his delegation. 'There's been a lot of support on that petition.' Torgerson thanked Heiniger for presenting his petition. Council received his petition for information. BC Wildfire Service proposed a fuel management plan to the Village in early May which suggests clearing hazardous trees and debris along 13th Avenue. Wildfire Service staff could assist with the project during times of low fire activity, clearing the area of crowded trees and picking up debris, according to the staff report. Village staff recommended using up to $10,000 in existing grant funds from the Municipal Insurance Association of BC to rent a wood chipper for the project. Councillor Pete Pearson said he is in support of the fuel management project, but added that it may make more financial sense to purchase a wood chipper, rather than renting it – especially since staff estimate it would cost about $1200 a day. He said he has found several Canadian-made wood chippers which are within the $10,000 budget. 'This is not going to be a one-time thing where we go in and have to do this cleanup,' Pearson said. 'I think it would be beneficial for staff to look at the purchase of a chipper versus a daily rental.' Torgerson asked CAO Anne Yanciw if purchasing a woodchipper would delay the start of the fuel management project, given that the project depends on when BC Wildfire Service staff are available to assist. 'It may,' Yanciw said. 'Another consideration is that someone needs to operate the woodchipper. Our Public Works staff are very busy this time of year.' Pearson said the woodchipper will need an operator regardless of whether it is rented or purchased permanently. 'It's six of one, a half dozen of the other,' he said. 'I think there will be more purposes [for the woodchipper] in this community – chipping Christmas trees as a fundraiser and that kind of thing. I think there's other opportunities, versus throwing rental money out.' Yanciw added that rental of the chipper comes with an operator, whereas Public Works staff will have to learn to operate the chipper themselves if the Village purchases one. Council voted to rent the chipper, with Pearson voting in opposition. Council gave third reading to an updated version of the Village's traffic regulation bylaw. The updates include changing the speed limit on 5th Avenue from 30 kilometres an hour to 40 kilometres an hour, and includes new references to the Bylaw Notice Enforcement and Dispute Adjudication bylaw, which outlines the fines for violating Village bylaws. The bylaw has been reviewed by the Public Works Superintendent and Valemount RCMP, and can be considered for adoption at Council's next meeting on June 10th, according to the staff report. B.C. municipal governments are guided by Official Community Plans, which outline land use practices and long-term objectives for the community. The Village is amending its zoning bylaw in accordance with new provincial legislation on short-term vacation rentals, and staff say the Official Community Plan's section on short-term rentals now has minor inconsistencies with proposed updates to the zoning bylaw. Staff recommended amendments to the Official Community Plan to resolve these inconsistencies. These amendments include allowing two additional dwelling units per lot – the current plan only allows one per lot – and removing the requirement that the owner of a property needs to occupy the principal residence on the property in order to operate a short-term rental on the same lot. Additionally, the current plan does not permit short-term rentals in a detached additional dwelling unit, although this is permitted in the proposed amendments to the zoning bylaw. Staff recommended updating the plan to allow this. Staff have recommended minor updates to the Village's zoning bylaw in response to new provincial legislation. The updates include changing the definition of a minor short-term vacation rental to mean an attached or detached accessory dwelling unit or room in the home. A major short-term vacation rental is only permitted in the principal dwelling on the property, rather than in additional dwelling units, under the updated bylaw. Additionally, staff recommend changing the minimum height of fencing around a home from three feet to four feet, and allowing two additional dwelling units per land parcel, whereas the current bylaw only permits one. Council voted to give third reading to the bylaw. Staff will send the proposed amendments to the Ministry of Transportation for approval. Council gave first and second reading to the updated Cemetery Bylaw. The amendments suggest removing an appendix to the bylaw which includes fees and charges pertaining to the cemetery, since these fees are included in the Village's Fees and Charges Bylaw. New cemetery fees will be in effect this fall when the new columbarium – an area to display cremated remains – is in place, and the Fees and Charges bylaw is being updated to reflect this, according to the staff report. Council gave first and second reading to amendments to the Fees and Charges Bylaw. The amendments add fees previously included in the Cemetery Bylaw to the Fees and Charges Bylaw, which consolidates the Village's fees for using municipal services. Additionally, the amendments add a $1,000 fee for residents to purchase a place in the columbarium, and a $1,500 fee for non-residents. Torgerson adjourned the open meeting of Council at 7:56 p.m. Council proceeded to a closed meeting for consideration of three items under Section 90 (1) (c) and (g) of the Community Charter to discuss matters related to: (c) labour relations or other employee relations, and (g) two items pertaining to litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store