
Honolulu City Council advances sewer fees bill
The Council's five-member Budget Committee voted 4-1 Tuesday, with Radiant Cordero dissenting, to approve passage of a committee draft of the city-initiated Bill 60.
Budget Committee Chair Tyler Dos Santos-Tam's version of the measure, which shaves the city's decade-long span for increased rates down to about six years, will start Jan. 1, 2026 and run through 2031.
Dos Santos-Tam's Bill 60 proposes sewer fee increases for a household that uses about 6, 000-gallons per month—deemed 50 % of all single-family households in Honolulu—equates to a 6 % increase in sewer fees in fiscal year 2026, 7.5 % in fiscal year 2027, 8.5 % in fiscal year 2028, followed by 9 % over the remaining three fiscal years.
If adopted, Bill 60 would see a 60 % base charge—a fixed monthly fee—and a 40 % volumetric charge, or fees based on monthly water usage.
Currently, city and county sewer bills calculate a 70 % base charge—a fee of $77.55 for all single-family homes—and a 30 % volumetric rate, which is applied equally for every 1, 000 gallons used, the city Department of Environmental Services states.
ENV indicates that a household using 6, 000 gallons per month pays $99.77—with the base of $77.55 plus $22.22 for the volumetric rate.
Dos Santos-Tam's version of Bill 60 also will align with ENV's 6-year capital improvement projects plan. 'So we can get through a full CIP cycle, ' he added. 'And then we can deal with what happens in the out years thereafter.'
Under Dos Santos-Tam's Bill 60, the budget committee voted to allow 'rule-making authority ' for ENV to set up a program called Customer Assistance for Residential Environmental Services, or CARES, to help with 'affordability and equity ' of increased sewer fee rates.
Sewer customers who qualify based on household income of less than 80 % area median income will be eligible for a $20 to $25 credit on their monthly base fee.
The program will be funded at $10 million per year. Customers will have to apply for the program to prove eligibility and then be re-verified every six months, ENV states.
Bill 60 is scheduled to return for a third and final reading before the full Council on June 4.
In October, ENV initially proposed to increase sewer fees annually for the next 10 years—by 9 % over the first six years, followed by smaller annual increases of 8 %, 7 %, 6 % and 5 % over the subsequent four years.
But by April, ENV Director Roger Babcock presented to the Council's Budget Committee the so-called 6 % option—which sees sewer rates rise by 6 % on July 1.
Those rates would increase by 7.5 % in 2027, 8.5 % in 2028, 9 % in the following four years, then rise by 8 %, 7.5 % and 7 % in the final three years, ending in 2035.
City officials say proposed sewer fee hikes are necessary to support ongoing wastewater operations and maintenance efforts, as well as a $10.1 billion capital improvement program for Oahu's wastewater collection and treatment system that is planned through 2040.
The fee hikes also will fund projects to prepare the city's wastewater infrastructure for climate change and sea-level rise, city officials say.
And they assert the work includes a $2.5 billion upgrade to the Sand Island Wastewater Treatment Plant as required under a 2010 federal consent decree.
Previously, Council Chair Tommy Waters—who does not sit on the budget committee—offered his version of Bill 60, a 6.75 % increase for the first five years, starting July 1.
The initial increases would be followed by an 8.75 % increase for the next two years, then a decrease to 7.75 %, 6.75 % and 5.5 % over the remaining years, 'thereby creating savings, ' Waters said previously, adding instead of a 100 % increase over the decade, 'it would amount to approximately about a 70 % increase over 10 years.'
But at Tuesday's hearing, Waters admitted his version of the bill was found to have calculation errors. 'We started from 2012 rather than 2016 … which is the last date that sewer increases took effect, ' he explained.
During a presentation, ENV Director Roger Babcock highlighted that Waters' proposed Bill 60 in fiscal year 2026 would provide less revenues—about $397.5 million, a 13 % drop—compared with the city's current revenues of $457.03 million devoted to sewer funding.
'So that's a $60 million decrease, ' Babcock said, 'which would be very problematic for the program.'
In contrast, Babcock noted the city's proposed 6 % option would provide $484.4 million in revenue needed to support required sewage system upgrades.
Initially stating he'd resubmit a corrected version of his measure, Waters later backed Dos Santos-Tam's draft of Bill 60.
Still, Waters noted households using 6, 000 gallons of water or less per month could see their sewer bills rise by over 61 %, from $99.77 per month to $160.85 per month.
'And those using 9, 000 gallons per month, which is the typical user—a family with two kids, a dog, maybe in-laws—that would go up from $110 to $204 ' per month, an over 85 % increase, said Waters. 'I mean that's really what we're voting on.'
At the meeting, city Department of Budget and Fiscal Services Director Andy Kawano favored Dos Santos-Tam's measure as 'revenue calculations will meet our required minimums going forward through 10 years.'
However, 'there could be an option, if it's more palatable for Council members, to truncate the (10-year ) term to five to seven years, that's possible, ' Kawano claimed. 'If we do that, we would meet our required minimums for every year, for one through five or one through seven, depending on what Council members decide.'
Ways to defray the overall cost of the city's wastewater operations also were touched on at the meeting.
During public testimony, Frank Doyle, a former city and county ENV director, testified the Council and city should work together to end the 2010 federally-mandated consent decree that included upgrading the island's sewage treatment plants to 'secondary treatment.'
Although secondary treatment does not make the water drinkable, it does turn it into recycled water that can be used for things like landscaping, city officials say.
'Since entering the consent decree the city has spent billions of dollars for improvements of our wastewater system, and has essentially completed almost all of the requirements of the decree except for the one, largest project—a $2.5 billion (secondary treatment ) project for Sand Island, ' Doyle said. 'If secondary treatment was required at Sand Island (Wastewater Treatment Plant ) in 2010—because it really holds some significant public health or environmental concern—that project would have been prioritized immediately.'
'Instead, it comes in last, not needed until 2030, ' he said, adding no real public health concern occurred in 2010. 'And there isn't any today.'
Doyle requested the Council 'urge the administration to continue to pursue a discussion with EPA ' on the consent decree. 'And if the administration doesn't want to do it, the Council should do it, ' he added.
In 2010 the negotiated consent decree included three phases and a 25-year implementation schedule, the city says.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the work was meant to reduce the public health risk caused by exposure to pathogens in raw sewage and the amount of harmful pollutants affecting the island's marine environment.
At the time, overflows caused millions of gallons of untreated sewage to be discharged into water off Oahu. The city had to pay a total fine of $1.6 million to be split between the federal government and state to resolve violations of the Clean Water Act and Hawaii's water pollution law, the EPA states.
Those violating acts included the March 24, 2006, Beachwalk force main break which spilled about 50 million gallons of sewage into the Ala Wai Canal, according to the EPA.
For his part, Waters stated 'as a Council, we've asked the administration to discuss with the EPA removing the need for secondary treatment or extending the term of the consent decree.'
'We need to extend the sewer fees, but not for the full 10 years, as requested, ' he added, 'to give us time to work with the EPA and find alternatives to funding the wastewater system.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
6 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Heritage Advisory Committee Opening Offers Chance to Guide Local Preservation
● The Town is seeking at least one new member for its Heritage Advisory Committee (HAC). ● HAC advises Council on heritage designations, site alterations, and heritage building demolitions. ● The Committee meets monthly, and members are unpaid volunteers. ● Applicants with backgrounds in local history, architecture, or urban design are encouraged. ● Heritage interests and strong communication skills are key selection factors. ● Applications must be submitted by August 8, 2025. The Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville is seeking at least one new member for its Heritage Advisory Committee (HAC), and applications are now open to interested residents. Composed of up to six community members and one member of Council, HAC serves as an important advisory body on matters related to heritage preservation . In many decisions involving heritage properties, Stouffville's Council is required to consult HAC. This includes before designating a heritage property, considering alterations that may impact heritage features, or reviewing demolition requests. HAC is also consulted when an area is being considered for designation as a heritage conservation district, or when a heritage designation is proposed for repeal. 'HAC is an advisory committee of Council established by by-law to make the identification, conservation, and preservation of Whitchurch-Stouffville's cultural heritage properties,' the Committee's mandate reads. 'HAC shall act in an advisory capacity to Council through reports to Council.' Meeting monthly in Council Chambers, HAC members receive relevant development applications and materials from Town Staff for review. The Committee is also asked to provide input on the inventory of salvaged heritage artifacts and to recommend properties that may be eligible for recognition under the Town's Commemorative Plaque Program . Members also participate in public-facing roles outside of regular meetings, helping to engage the community on heritage conservation issues. This includes attending Town-led events such as public meetings, Jane's Walks, and Doors Open. Additional meetings may be scheduled as needed to address time-sensitive matters. Following a resignation in June, only three public members currently serve on HAC alongside Councillor Hugo Kroon. While the Town is working to fill the vacant seat, additional appointments may be considered depending on the number and qualifications of applicants. As a volunteer advisory committee, HAC members do not receive remuneration. This differs from quasi-judicial committees such as the Committee of Adjustment, where members receive $100 per meeting plus mileage. The Town is looking for applicants from a range of backgrounds, prioritizing those with knowledge of the Ontario Heritage Act, local history, or architectural heritage. Individuals with experience in construction, development, urban design, or landscape architecture are also encouraged to apply. Appointments are based on a combination of experience, availability, and demonstrated interest in heritage and community matters. Collectively, members should bring a variety of qualifications, including familiarity with cultural, archaeological, or environmental preservation, as well as strong communication skills. Experience in public programming, tourism, or planning is considered an asset. Applications are due by Aug. 8, 2025. Those selected will serve until the end of the current Council term next year. Committee members interested in continuing beyond that point will be required to reapply for the next term. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Hamilton Spectator
8 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Renowned Political Journalist Vassy Kapelos Joins Community Living Toronto's Patron's Council
TORONTO, July 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Community Living Toronto is proud to welcome Vassy Kapelos, acclaimed political journalist and national television and radio host, as the newest member of its Patron's Council — a group of distinguished leaders who lend their influence and voice to champion the rights and inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities. A respected name in Canadian journalism, Kapelos brings a wealth of experience and a deep commitment to civic engagement. She is currently the Chief Political Correspondent for CTV news, hosts Question Period on CTV, Power Play on CTV News Channel, and The Vassy Kapelos Show on the iHeartRadio Canada Talk Network. 'It's an honour to join Community Living Toronto's Patron's Council. I was first introduced to the organization over 20 years ago as a volunteer where we rowed with participants of the youth to work program, and that early experience left a lasting impression,' said Vassy Kapelos. 'Their mission to build a society where everyone belongs and is valued resonates deeply with me, and I am looking forward to support their work and amplify their impact.' The Patron's Council plays a vital role in increasing awareness, advancing public policy, and mobilizing resources that help support over 4,000 people with intellectual disabilities and their families across the city. Council members serve as champions of inclusion and change, helping to break down barriers and foster understanding. 'We are thrilled to welcome Vassy Kapelos to our Patron's Council,' said John Tory, Chair of the Patron's Council. 'Vassy's national presence, credibility, and passion for civic leadership will bring fresh energy to our mission. Her support helps us continue shaping a future where people with an intellectual disability are fully included and respected.' Brad Saunders, CEO, Community Living Toronto, echoed the sentiment: 'Vassy's experience and advocacy are powerful additions to our efforts. Her understanding of policy and people will help us open more doors in the media, in our communities, and in decision-making spaces.' Board Chair Stephanie Gawur added: 'Vassy embodies the kind of leadership we need at this moment — informed, principled, and compassionate. We are fortunate to welcome her as we continue to grow our impact and deepen our commitment to belonging.' Kapelos joined Community Living Toronto's Patron's Council on June 20, 2025. About the Patron's Council The Patron's Council plays a crucial role in supporting Community Living Toronto's mission of fostering inclusive communities by supporting the rights and choices of people with an intellectual disability. Established in 1998, to celebrate Community Living Toronto's 50th anniversary, the Council collaborates with community partners, business leaders, and philanthropists to make a significant impact on the lives of people with intellectual disabilities and their families. The Council members have shown exemplary leadership, dedication, and vision in making an impact both within and beyond the Community Living Toronto community. About Community Living Toronto Celebrating 75 years of belonging, Community Living Toronto has long been a source of support for people with an intellectual disability and their families. Community Living Toronto offers a wide range of services including respite, person-directed planning, employment supports, supported living, and community-based activities. Community Living Toronto is proud to support over 4,000 individuals and their families in more than 80 locations across Toronto. The 'community living movement' began with families who wanted their children to live in the community, rather than institutions. Today, Community Living Toronto continues to advocate for inclusive communities and support the rights and choices of people with an intellectual disability. Photos accompanying this announcement are available at:


Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
D.C. Council waters down I-82, affecting local restaurants
The D.C. Council voted Monday to gut Initiative 82, settling on what lawmakers billed as a compromise between fair-wage advocates and many in the restaurant industry — and sparking intense backlash. Why it matters: The city has struggled with I-82's implementation for years. The new measure aims to balance working wages with business survival — especially for independent D.C. restaurants, which are struggling. Driving the news: Eliminating the tipped minimum wage — as the original ballot measure promised — is off the table. Instead, the I-82 amendment introduced by Council members Christina Henderson and Charles Allen preserves the tipped minimum wage and stretches base wage hikes over the next decade at a fraction of the standard minimum wage (currently $17.95/hour). The measure passed 7-5 during a tense hearing that began with protestor interruptions and ended with a lockdown of council chambers as protestors shouted and banged on doors. 📅 New timeline: Now through July 2026, a $10/hour tipped wage (56% of regular minimum wage). That'll increase every two years, capping off at 75% of the minimum wage in 2034. Catch up quick: The hospitality industry struggled to adjust to I-82. Many cited skyrocketing labor costs that coincided with inflation, rising rents and plummeting patronage due to mass DMV layoffs. Workers complained of diminished tips, especially as businesses implemented service fees to cover costs. Meanwhile, the city has been inconsistent with I-82's rollout. Mayor Muriel Bowser recently pushed for a full repeal, which the council voted down. Friction point: Tempers in the council chambers ran high as I-82 supporters chanted, "Blood is on your hands." After the vote, the Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington hailed the decision as a "win for the industry," one that "brings immediate relief to operators" in a statement sent to Axios. One Fair Wage, the primary lobby behind I-82, called it a "betrayal of democracy and a gift to the restaurant lobby" in another statement. Meanwhile, there was concern over going against voters' will. "The voters told us what they wanted. And this is not it," said Council member Brianne Nadeau, who voted against the amendment. "This council should stop telling voters they don't know what's best." How they voted: ✔️ For the amendment: Charles Allen, Christina Henderson, Brooke Pinto, Phil Mendelson, Kenyan McDuffie, Wendell Felder, Anita Bonds ❌ Against: Brianne Nadeau, Janeese Lewis George, Robert White, Matt Frumin, Zachary Parker What's next: The amendment aims to provide more wage transparency. Starting in 2026, pay stubs must list all sources — including tips, bonuses, service charges, etc.