Sir Chris Hoy: We must change NHS to tackle prostate cancer
Sir Chris Hoy, the six-time Olympic champion, has called for systemic change in the ways that men get tested for prostate cancer.
The 49-year-old cyclist was diagnosed with stage four prostate cancer in 2023, and was told last year that it is terminal after it spread to his bones.
NHS guidance says men over the age of 50 are at the highest risk of developing prostate cancer, but Sir Chris wants to help men get screened earlier.
He said: 'I was diagnosed with stage four prostate cancer at 47. By this age, my prostate cancer was advanced and could have been progressing from when I was 45 or even younger.
'With prostate cancer, the earlier you find it, the easier it is to treat. We need the system to change to enable more men to get diagnosed earlier, and stop them getting the news I got.'
Testing
One option is a PSA blood test, which checks the level of prostate-specific antigens in the blood. A high reading may be a sign of a prostate condition.
NHS guidance says these tests are not routinely used as they are not reliable, but men over 50 can ask GPs for one.
Sir Chris's comments came after Prostate Cancer UK urged the Government to overhaul NHS guidelines to encourage GPs to proactively speak to men who are at high risk from 45 years old.
According to the charity, around one in eight men in the UK will get prostate cancer, which occurs when cells in the prostate start to grow in an uncontrolled way. If not detected early, it risks spreading.
Sir Chris added: 'I believe men at highest risk, for example men with a family history like me or black men, should be contacted by their GP earlier on to discuss a simple PSA blood test that can check for signs of prostate cancer. Then if there are any issues, they can get it treated at an earlier stage.
'I've told my story to help raise awareness about the most common cancer in men and get more [people] thinking about their risk and what they can do, but it shouldn't all be men's responsibility.
'I've faced many challenges in my life, and going public with my prostate cancer diagnosis was certainly one of them.
'I've been incredibly lucky to have so much support from my family, friends and the general public. The kindness has lifted me up and given me a sense of purpose, and I'm committed to taking that forward and using my platform to raise awareness of the most common cancer in men and help more men at risk come forward and get tested.'
'Tour de 4'
The Scottish cyclist has launched his own charity cycling challenge, Tour de 4, with the aim of changing perceptions around stage four cancer. The challenge will take place in Glasgow on Sept 7, with a final registration phase open for riders to sign up.
Speaking about Sir Chris, Laura Kerby, the chief executive of Prostate Cancer UK, said: 'In just a few months after Sir Chris went public with his diagnosis last year, over 286,000 people used our online risk checker to learn more about the disease, find out their own risk and learn what they can choose to do about it.
'His bravery has inspired so many men to take action, and he has undoubtedly saved lives.
'One in eight men will get prostate cancer. The earlier it's found, the easier it is to treat – but there's currently no screening programme in the UK.
'So if, like Sir Chris, you have a family history of the disease, or if you're black, we strongly encourage you to speak to your GP about testing from the age of 45.
'We don't think it's right that the responsibility is all on men's shoulders, so we're calling on the Health Secretary to overhaul outdated NHS guidelines so that GPs are empowered to actually start conversations with these men at highest risk.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Assisted dying bill: how will it work and when will it come into effect?
The right to an assisted death will become law in England and Wales within four years as MPs backed a historic societal shift in parliament on Friday by a tight majority. But what does it mean for the future? It may be some years away yet – although no later than 2029. There is no timetable but, under the terms of the legislation, it needs to start within four years after the law is passed. The bill is likely to be given royal assent by the end of the year, if it passes smoothly through the House of Lords. However, there are many details about the process that are yet to be ironed out, including how the system will work either within the NHS or outside it, that could delay its implementation. Many people with terminal illnesses campaigning for a change in the law will be relieved by the legislation but are not certain to benefit from it themselves. It could take years to implement, so those with a shorter life expectancy are unlikely to be eligible for an assisted dying service. The training and qualifications of doctors is one of the points yet to be resolved, although it has been decided that medical staff will not be compelled to take part in assisted dying services. Other subjects that need to be discussed include the type of lethal substance to be administered, the forms of identification patients would have to provide, the records that would have to be kept by doctors and the codes of practice around the assisted dying process – as well as the location and type of services. There are many logistics to thrash out, with health minister Stephen Kinnock and justice minister Sarah Sackman in charge of implementation. One possibility is integrating a service into the NHS, which would oversee the process of moving from palliative care to assisted dying for those with less than six months to live. An alternative would be to have a separate unit outside the NHS available through third parties, similar to the situation in Switzerland. A hybrid model could look like the way in which abortions are carried out by separate providers such as the not-for-profit British Pregnancy Advisory Service and others, but ultimately overseen by the NHS. The bill makes provision for the service to be carried out for free, but if it is publicly funded then it would get money that is currently not wholly provided to end-of-life services such as hospices, which tend to raise money as charities. The idea was not in the Labour government's manifesto, so convention dictates that it could be killed off in the second chamber. It could also be so mired in difficulty and delay in the Lords that it ran out of time. However, given it has been voted through in the House of Commons, it is highly likely to pass at some point, as most bills do – probably before the end of the year. If it were to run out of time in this parliamentary session, then it would not be carried over to the next because it is a private member's bill. Another MP would have to put it forward and start all over again, unless the government decided to take up the cause and propose its own legislation. Undoubtedly, some peers will attempt to change the legislation, and many MPs acknowledge there is still room for improvement. There are some outright opponents of the legislation as well, such as Tanni Grey-Thompson, a disabled peer and Paralympic medallist. But the most likely outcome is that peers will refine the legislation before it is sent back to the House of Commons and then ultimately passed. Kim Leadbeater, who introduced the bill as a backbencher, said recently that she thinks the House of Lords will end up voting in favour. The bill applies to England and Wales, with the Welsh parliament denied a veto over the legislation. Scotland is currently going through the process of examining its own legislation. There are no plans for assisted dying to be introduced in Northern Ireland at the moment.
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Assisted dying: All you need to know following the crunch Commons vote
The assisted dying Bill cleared the House of Commons in a historic vote on Friday, with MPs backing moves to legalise it by a slim majority. Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the Bill and what happens next after a significant moment in its journey to become law. – What is in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill? The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The terminally ill person would take an approved substance, provided by a doctor but administered only by the person themselves. On Friday, MPs voted 314 to 291, majority 23, in favour of legalising assisted dying as they completed the mainstay of their work on the Bill. It will now face further debate in the House of Lords. – When would assisted dying be available if the Bill became law? The implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years from royal assent, the point it is rubber stamped into law, rather than the initially suggested two years. If the Bill was to pass later this year that would mean it might not be until 2029, potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's parliament, that assisted dying was being offered. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who is the parliamentarian behind the Bill and put forward the extended timeframe, has insisted it is 'a backstop' rather than a target, as she pledged to 'hold the Government's feet to the fire' on implementing legislation should the Bill pass. The extended implementation period was one of a number of changes made since the Bill was first introduced to the Commons back in October. – What other changes have there been? On Friday, MPs bolstered the Bill so people with eating disorders are ruled out of falling into its scope. Another amendment, requiring ministers to report within a year of the Bill passing on how assisted dying could affect palliative care, was also approved by MPs. Previously, a High Court safeguard was dropped, with the oversight of judges in the assisted dying process replaced with expert panels. The change was much criticised by opponents, who said it weakened the Bill, but Ms Leadbeater has argued it strengthens it. At the end of a weeks-long committee process earlier this year to amend the Bill, Ms Leadbeater said rather than removing judges from the process, 'we are adding the expertise and experience of psychiatrists and social workers to provide extra protections in the areas of assessing mental capacity and detecting coercion while retaining judicial oversight'. Changes were also made to ensure the establishment of independent advocates to support people with learning disabilities, autism or mental health conditions and to set up a disability advisory board to advise on legal implementation and impact on disabled people. Amendments added earlier this month during report stage in the Commons will also see assisted dying adverts banned if the Bill becomes law, and a prohibition on medics being able to speak to under-18s about assisted dying. – Do we know much more about the potential impact of such a service coming in? A Government impact assessment, published earlier this month, estimated that between 164 and 647 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10. The establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million and £13.6 million per year, the document said. It had 'not been possible' to estimate the overall implementation costs at this stage of the process, it added. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years. – Do healthcare staff have to take part in assisted dying? It was already the case that doctors would not have to take part, but MPs have since voted to insert a new clause into the Bill extending that to anyone. The wording means 'no person', including social care workers and pharmacists, is obliged to take part in assisted dying and can now opt out. Amendments to the Bill were debated on care homes and hospices also being able to opt out but these were not voted on. Ms Leadbeater has previously said there is nothing in the Bill to say they have to, nor is there anything to say they do not have to, adding on the Parliament Matters podcast that this is 'the best position to be in' and that nobody should be 'dictating to hospices what they do and don't do around assisted dying'. – What will happen next? Friday's vote in the Commons makes it more likely for the assisted dying Bill to become law, now that it has the backing of a majority of MPs. But this is not guaranteed, and first it must continue on a journey through Parliament. The Bill now heads to the House of Lords, as both Houses of Parliament must agree its final text before it can be signed into law. During the next stages, peers are expected to put forward amendments to the Bill. If the Commons disagrees with these amendments, this will spark a process known as 'ping pong' which will continue until both Houses agree over its text. – Will the Bill definitely become law? There is a risk that the Bill could be stuck in a deadlock between the House of Commons and House of Lords, as it goes back and forth in disagreement. If this continues until the current session of Parliament ends, then the Bill would fall. Ms Leadbeater told journalists on Friday she hoped there were no attempts to purposefully wreck it by peers. 'I really hope there are no funny games, because the process has been extremely fair,' she said. The Spen Valley MP said she did not know when the current parliamentary session would end, but suggested it could stretch into late 2025, giving her Bill the best part of six months to complete the full parliamentary process. Speaking about the end of the session to reporters, Ms Leadbeater said: 'I am not imagining that is going to be imminently, but it could be before the end of the year.' One member of the House of Lords, Bishop of London Dame Sarah Mullally, has already indicated she is against it. The Church of England bishop said peers 'must oppose' the assisted dying Bill when it reaches them because of the 'mounting evidence that it is unworkable and unsafe'. – What about assisted dying in the rest of the UK and Crown Dependencies? The Isle of Man looks likely to become the first part of the British Isles to legalise assisted dying, after its proposed legislation passed through a final vote of the parliament's upper chamber in March. In what was hailed a 'landmark moment', members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) in May voted in favour of the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill, backing its general principles. It will now go forward for further scrutiny and amendments but will become law only if MSPs approve it in a final vote, which should take place later this year. Any move to legalise assisted dying in Northern Ireland would have to be passed by politicians in the devolved Assembly at Stormont. Jersey's parliament is expected to debate a draft law for an assisted dying service on the island for terminally ill people later this year. With a likely 18-month implementation period if a law is approved, the earliest it could come into effect would be summer 2027.
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE I died after giving birth...The vision I had before doctors saved me shook my faith in the afterlife
Samantha had an uneventful pregnancy and delivery eight months ago, so it shocked everyone when she had a life-threatening complication four weeks later. In October 2024, a month after welcoming her baby, Zuma, she began to bleed profusely, eventually losing four liters of blood, almost everything in her body. As doctors rushed to save her life, her eyes closed, and everything faded to black. She could feel herself dying. 'It was silent and dark, and I was just simply at peace,' she said. 'I didn't feel anything, and in my mind, I knew that I was dying, but I wasn't scared. It felt like I was just going to sleep.' In that moment, she didn't see the tunnel of light or deceased loved ones she was expecting, but she felt an immense peace take over. Doctors found that Samantha had a pseudoaneurysm – a collection of blood outside of a blood vessel, which, given the proximity to her C-section, was considered a delayed postpartum hemorrhage - or excessive bleeding after birth. Samantha spent a week in the ICU following the emergency, missing some of the early days of her daughter's life as she slowly recovered from the ordeal. 'Once I was aware enough to realize that I was in the ICU, and that my daughter wasn't with me, it was so sad,' she said: 'She was only four weeks old and we both needed each other – we were still in the new mommy/baby phase and we were bonding. I just wanted to see her and hold her.' Samantha's pregnancy and most of her labor had gone smoothly, but an emergency C-section was needed when her baby's heart rate dropped. Although she experienced minor bleeding after the surgery, she recovered well. However, four weeks later — the morning after she and her husband marked the anniversary of their first date — she woke up in a terrifying condition. She said: 'I woke up at 5am to a wet, gushing feeling. I looked down and was absolutely covered in blood. My shorts and legs were soaked, and the blood had also soaked through my sheets, mattress topper, and mattress. 'Because I had already hemorrhaged in the hospital, I knew what was happening. This time was just so much worse.' At the hospital, doctors rushed her into surgery and administered multiple blood transfusions while she fell in and out of consciousness. 'Apparently, at some point, the bleeding got worse and I began to crash,' she said. 'My pulse dropped down to 52, my hemoglobin level dropped to a three, a crash cart was brought out, and I just knew that I was dying. 'In an awake state during this, I shouted out to my husband that I loved him more than anything and to take care of our new baby.' That was the moment she felt her life slipping away. While Samantha was unconscious, doctors rushed her into surgery. They found a blockage and weakened blood vessel (an aneurysm) in her right uterine artery, which was causing the bleeding. To stop it, they performed a procedure called a Bilateral Uterine Artery Embolisation — where the blood supply to the uterus is deliberately reduced — using an absorbable sponge to block the artery, like a temporary cork. A surgeon was kept on standby in case an emergency hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) was needed, something Samantha and her husband, Louie, hoped to avoid to preserve their chance of having more children. The four-hour surgery worked, but Samantha spent a week in intensive care, missing some of her baby's early days as she recovered. 'Once I was aware enough to realize that I was in the ICU, and that my daughter wasn't with me, it was so sad,' she added. 'I kept asking my husband to bring her to see me, but we decided together that she shouldn't be coming to the ICU around all those germs. Coming home was the best feeling ever.' Samantha described the lasting trauma she experienced after the ordeal, saying she struggled with severe PTSD. For months, she barely ate or slept, was plagued by nightmares, and felt anxious about being too far from the hospital in case she started bleeding again. She cried daily, suffered frequent panic and anxiety attacks, and constantly checked for signs of bleeding, sometimes even feeling phantom sensations. In the months that followed, she underwent several scans to ensure no new aneurysms had developed, and after six months, her blood count finally returned to normal. Still, the experience left her fearful about the risks of future pregnancies and whether something similar could happen again. 'I want more babies, and because my case was so rare, I don't really have answers,' she said. 'Could this happen to me again? Yes. Could this happen during a future pregnancy? Yes. Was this aneurysm brought on because of my pregnancy? Nobody knows.' A hemorrhage is relatively rare, affecting 0.2 percent to 2.5 percent of postpartum women. After all she has been through, the artist has a whole new appreciation for life that she is taking with her into the future. 'I know it is so cliché, but this gave me a new perspective on life. I feel like I am a lot more chill, and things really don't bother me as much, because I know what could have been,' she said. 'So what if I'm stuck in traffic or if my phone dies – I'm alive!'
