logo
Big Short investor Michael Burry liquidates entire portfolio - except for one stock

Big Short investor Michael Burry liquidates entire portfolio - except for one stock

Daily Mail​3 days ago

Michael Burry, the investor who famously bet against the US housing market before the 2008 crash, has once again sounded the alarm and dumped all of his stock - except one.
In a dramatic move revealed by recent SEC filings, Burry's Scion Asset Management has slashed its portfolio to just seven positions.
Six of them are aggressive short bets: bearish put options against some of the biggest names in tech and Chinese equities, including Nvidia, Alibaba, and Baidu.
Only one company appears to have managed to retain Burry's faith: Estee Lauder, where Burry has doubled down, boosting his holdings to 200,000 shares valued at $13.2 million.
While cosmetics may be an unusual choice ahead of a potential financial meltdown, it's not without logic.
In times of economic distress, consumers often indulge in small luxuries even as they forego big-ticket items - a phenomenon known as the 'lipstick index.'
When wallets tighten, lipsticks replace dresses; with small indulgences offer a balm for economic wounds.
Under new CEO Stephane de La Faverie, Estee Lauder is trying to reassert itself in a struggling global beauty market, particularly in North America and China.
Bearish has taken out aggressive short bets: bearish put options against some of the biggest names in tech and Chinese equities, including Alibaba and Baidu
Only one company appears to have managed to retain Burry's faith: Estee Lauder, where Burry has doubled down, boosting his holdings to 200,000 shares valued at $13.2 million.
Product launches have accelerated. Luxury price tiers have been introduced.
Still, Estee's stock is down 15% year-to-date, although it did gain 2% on Friday amid broader market turmoil.
'Burry's bet suggests belief in Estee Lauder's ability to reclaim its status as a beauty powerhouse in an increasingly competitive global market,' said Angeli Gianchandani, a global brand marketing expert at New York University.
Burry appears to be bracing for a hard crash when it comes to the market and there are warning signs that have not been seen since the depths of the 2008 crisis.
Burry rose to fame with his bets against the US housing market before the 2008 financial crisis. Michael Lewis' nonfiction book The Big Short was released in 2010 and the movie version came out in 2015.
He also profited in the early 2000s by shorting high-flying tech stocks during the peak of the Dot Com bubble.
However, his bets have sometime appeared to misfire. In late 2020, he initiated short positions against Tesla stock, but later said it was just 'a trade' and he'd exited the position after Tesla's stock continued to soar.
This also isn't the first time Burry has gutted his portfolio. In 2023, he famously dumped most of his holdings only to later admit he was wrong.
Markets are also seeing a flight to alternative assets. Gold has surged 24% year-to-date, outperforming Bitcoin's 12% gain, as investors hedge against a weakening U.S. dollar down 8% this year.
Bitcoin has caught a second wind as well, bolstered by adoption from both corporations and state governments.
Arizona and New Hampshire have passed legislation establishing strategic Bitcoin reserves and wwo dozen more states are considering similar measures.
Not everyone is convinced, however, and JPMorgan's analysts recently noted that while Bitcoin may offer high returns, gold remains the safer bet for risk-averse investors seeking protection against geopolitical risks and currency debasement.
'We are skeptical that Bitcoin and other crypto assets offer the potential to improve portfolio resilience. Despite their low correlations to traditional assets, crypto assets have historically made portfolios more fragile,' JPMorgan analysts wrote.
In the bond market, yields on the 10-year Treasury note have surged to 4.54%, while 30-year bonds are touching pre-2008 crisis levels above 5%.
The moves can be seen unsettling because of their cause - the fear that Washington is about to unleash a new wave of new debt.
With Moody's recently downgrading America's credit rating, concerns about fiscal instability have only deepened, reinforcing investor skepticism about the sustainability of Washington's approach.
House Republicans, steered by Speaker Mike Johnson and under the watchful eye of Donald Trump, muscled through the so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill' - a sprawling package of tax cuts and spending increases that could, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, add $3.8 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.
Christian Bale portrayed Burry in the 2015 film The Big Short. Burry rose to fame with his bets against the US housing market before the 2008 financial crisis but has not always been right
With yields rising, equities look increasingly vulnerable as a place to park cash.
The S&P 500 has clawed back most of the losses incurred when Donald Trump introduced his tariffs back in April.
Mortgage rates are at highs not seen since the Great Recession with the average contract interest rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage close to 6.92%.
Credit card and auto loan rates are surging. Households and businesses are feeling the squeeze.
And while politicians in Washington plays games with tax breaks and entitlement cuts, real Americans are bracing for impact.
Cuts to Medicaid and food stamps loom on the horizon. Healthcare for millions could be stripped away. SNAP benefits could shrink hitting low-income Americans the hardest.
'This bill is a debt bomb ticking,' warned Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.).
'I'd love to stand here and tell the American people, "We can cut your taxes and increase spending and everything's going to be just fine." But I can't do that because I'm here to deliver a dose of reality. This bill dramatically increases deficits in the near term but promises our government will be fiscally responsible five years from now. Where have we heard that before? How do you bind a future Congress to these promises? This bill is a debt bomb ticking.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oregon high school star reveals shocking message from officials after protesting trans athletes
Oregon high school star reveals shocking message from officials after protesting trans athletes

Daily Mail​

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Oregon high school star reveals shocking message from officials after protesting trans athletes

Oregon track star Alexa Anderson has revealed she was ordered away from the high jump podium by angry officials after she protested the inclusion of a trans athlete. Anderson and fellow competitor Reese Eckard were filmed refusing to step onto the podium during the medal ceremony, in an apparent protest of a fifth-place finisher who is reportedly transgender. Rather than taking their spots on the podium, footage obtained by Fox News showed the girls turning their backs to the crowd before being ushered away from the ceremony by an official. Now, Anderson has revealed that the official was apparently deeply unimpressed by the gesture. She told Fox: 'We stepped off the podium in protest and, as you can see, the official kind of told us "hey, go over there, if you're not going to participate, get out of the photos". 'They asked us to move away from the medal stand, so when they took the photos, we weren't even in it at all.' Anderson had finished third in the competition while fellow protestor Eckard had just clinched fourth place. Anderson continued: 'It's unfair because biological males and biological females compete at such different levels that letting a biological male into our competition is taking up space and opportunities from all these hardworking women. 'The girl in ninth who should have came in eighth and had that podium spot taken away from her, as well as many others.' She added: 'This was my first time competing against a transgender individual and the first public stand I have taken in this issue. 'But I have privately supported all the other girls who have done the same.' Anderson insisted at the time, in a separate interview with Fox, that she was not trying to stir hatred towards the trans community. 'We didn't refuse to stand on the podium out of hate,' she said. 'We did it because someone has to say this isn't right. 'In order to protect the integrity and fairness of girls sports we must stand up for what is right.' Daily Mail has reached out to the Oregon School Activities Association for comment on the controversy. Oregon is one of several states challenging President Donald Trump's 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports' executive order, which threatens to deny federal funding to rogue governments. The American Medical Association and American Psychiatric Association have both stated that gender is a spectrum and not a binary structure, as the White House argued in its January 20 executive order 'defending women from gender ideology.'

Wind opponents sue Trump administration to block New York wind project
Wind opponents sue Trump administration to block New York wind project

Reuters

time37 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Wind opponents sue Trump administration to block New York wind project

June 3 (Reuters) - Fishing companies and offshore wind opponents filed a lawsuit on Tuesday challenging the Trump administration's decision to reverse course and allow construction to resume on Empire Wind, a $5 billion wind farm project off New York's coast. Protect Our Coast New Jersey, Clean Ocean Action, ACK for Whales and 12 fishing industry participants in a lawsuit, opens new tab filed in federal court in Trenton, New Jersey, sought to reinstate a stop work order Interior Secretary Doug Burgum issued in April halting construction of Equinor's ( opens new tab wind project. Burgum issued that order after Republican President Donald Trump on his first day back in office on January 20 directed his administration to halt offshore wind lease sales and stop the issuance of permits, leases and loans for both onshore and offshore wind projects. He did so while also moving to ramp up the federal government's support for the fossil fuel industry and maximize output in the United States. Trump as a candidate last year promised to end the offshore wind industry. But weeks after Burgum signed the stop-work order, the administration in a turnabout on May 19 allowed work to resume on Empire Wind, which is being developed by Norway's Equinor and is expected to provide power for half a million homes from 2027 onward. The administration did so in a compromise with New York that could also see canceled plans for a gas pipeline revived. Burgum said he was encouraged that New York Governor Kathy Hochul will now allow new gas pipeline capacity to move forward. Tuesday's lawsuit argued that the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management did not adhere to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to provide a basis for restoring the work permits. Bruce Afran, the plaintiffs' lawyer, said the administration had properly recognized the lack of investigation about serious environmental harm from Equinor's project. "The administration correctly pulled the Empire Wind work permit because of these concerns and had no basis to reinstate the work orders a month later," he said in a statement. "This lawsuit seeks to restore the stop work order." Equinor declined to comment on the lawsuit itself but in a statement said the project "has undergone years of rigorous permitting and studies, and secured all necessary federal, state and local approvals to begin construction in 2024." The agency did not respond to a request for comment.

UK appears to have been spared immediate hit of Trump's 50% steel tariffs
UK appears to have been spared immediate hit of Trump's 50% steel tariffs

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

UK appears to have been spared immediate hit of Trump's 50% steel tariffs

The UK appears to have been spared from the immediate hit of Donald Trump's 50% steel and aluminium tariffs. The US President has decided to 'provide different treatment' to the UK after a deal that was struck between Washington and London last month. Levies will remain at 25% for imports from the UK, however Britain could still be subject to the higher 50% rate from July, according to a version of the order confirming the tariff increase posted by a White House X account on Tuesday. According to the text of the order, Mr Trump has 'further determined that it is necessary and appropriate to allow for the implementation of the U.S.-UK Economic Prosperity Deal of May 8, 2025 (EPD), and to accordingly provide different treatment, as described below, for imports of steel and aluminum articles, and their derivatives, from the United Kingdom'. The order later says that rates will for now stay at 25% and adds: 'On or after July 9, 2025, the Secretary may adjust the applicable rates of duty and construct import quotas for steel and aluminum consistent with the terms of the EPD, or he may increase the applicable rates of duty to 50 percent if he determines that the United Kingdom has not complied with relevant aspects of the EPD'. The 50% tariff rate more widely is due to come into force from 12.01am Washington DC time on Wednesday, which is shortly after 5am in the UK. A Government spokesperson said: 'The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel as part of our plan for change. 'We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs. 'We will continue to work with the US to implement our agreement, which will see the 25% US tariffs on steel removed.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's trade deal with the US, struck last month, included relief on the steel and aluminium tariffs, but the implementation has not yet been finalised. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds met White House trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. According to the Department for Business and Trade, Mr Reynolds and Mr Greer discussed a desire to implement the deal struck between London and Washington as soon as possible, and committed to working closely to make it happen. The general terms for the agreement between the UK and US were published in May when the deal was announced, and outline the intended plans. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked if there was a text of the full deal ready to be released, and told reporters on Tuesday: 'There 's most definitely text with this deal, there is language that this side has seen. 'You'll have to ask the UK Parliament why they haven't seen it from their own Government, I obviously can't answer that question.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store