Harvard researcher accused of smuggling frog embryos indicted on more charges
A Harvard University researcher detained by Ice for months after being accused of smuggling frog embryos into the US was indicted on Wednesday on additional criminal charges.
Kseniia Petrova, a Russian-born scientist conducting cancer research for Harvard Medical School, was indicted on Wednesday by a federal grand jury in Boston on one count of concealment of a material fact, one count of false statement and one count of smuggling goods into the United States. She had originally been charged with smuggling in May.
Petrova was stopped at Boston's Logan airport by US authorities on her way back from France in February, over what appeared to be an irregularity in customs paperwork related to a packet from a specialist lab of superfine spliced sections of frog embryos, for research.
She was arrested and ended up in detention in Louisiana. Petrova was told her visa was being revoked and she was being deported to her native Russia, despite saying she feared persecution for opposing the invasion of Ukraine
She was ordered released on bail in May and transferred back to Massachusetts to face the federal charges. Despite the additional charges on Wednesday, Petrova will remain on pretrial release. A lawyer for Petrova could not be reached for comment.
She said in an interview with the Associated Press in April that she did not realize the items needed to be declared and was not trying to sneak anything into the country.
If convicted of the smuggling charge, Petrova faces a sentence of up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. She also faces a sentence of up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 on the charges of concealment of material fact and false statements.
Her colleagues at Harvard have been dismayed at her treatment, saying her expertise in their research is 'irreplaceable', while Petrova said foreign scientists 'enrich' the US. She had described conditions in detention as overcrowded, with extremes of temperatures, constant noise and terrible food.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE My terrifying encounter with Barry Morphew while I was searching for my missing friend Suzanne
In the days after Suzanne Morphew vanished on Mother's Day 2020, her friend Tisha Leewaye led a group of volunteers through the wooded hills near the Morphew family home, searching for any sign of where she might have gone. Suzanne, 43, had been reported missing by neighbors on May 10 after her husband, Barry Morphew, who had left that morning for an out-of-town work trip, raised the alarm that neither he nor their two daughters could get hold of her.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Cassie, Jane, Cudi and freak-offs: How Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial has played out
Jurors at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial were barely seated on the trial's first day when they were shown a video of the hip-hop mogul viciously attacking his longtime girlfriend, the R&B singer Cassie. Over the next seven weeks, jurors heard from 34 witnesses. All were called to the stand by prosecutors, but each was questioned by defense lawyers as they tried to challenge the portrayal of Combs as an out-of-control, violent boss who drove his employees and associates to fear him as he demanded their help in carrying out vendettas, getting drugs and fulfilling his sexual fantasies. After cross-examinations that often lasted longer than the questions posed by prosecutors, defense lawyers spent only a half hour more presenting evidence once prosecutors finished their side of the case. A relaxed and seemingly satisfied Combs himself confirmed he would not testify. Now, jurors are set to hear closing arguments Thursday and Friday in the closing stages of a trial in which they have watched videos of drug-fueled 'freak-offs' and 'hotel nights' where Cassie and another ex-girlfriend, ' Jane,' said Combs forced them to have sex with strangers as he watched. They also have heard testimony from Cassie and Jane, from personal assistants who said they witnessed Combs' violence and from other women who also accused him of abuse. They saw text and social media messages and travel records. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty. If convicted, he could spend the rest of his life in prison. Here's how the trial has played out so far: Cassie: 'I'm not a rag doll' Cassie, whose real name is Casandra Ventura, dated Combs from 2007 to 2018 after he signed her to his Bad Boy Records label. Over four days, she told jurors Combs beat her and ordered her to have 'disgusting' sex with male sex workers during multi-day 'freak-offs,' his term for sexual marathons. She also said Combs raped her after she said she was ending their relationship. In 2016, security cameras captured Combs hitting, kicking and dragging Cassie as she left his room at the Intercontinental Hotel in Los Angeles. The video was shown at the trial's start. A hotel guard testified that Combs paid $100,000 to hide the video. It remained secret until CNN aired it in May 2024. After the assault, Cassie texted Combs: 'I'm not a rag doll. I'm somebody's child.' Cassie first detailed her allegations in a lawsuit against Combs in 2023. He settled the next day for $20 million. Jane: 'You beat the love out of us' Jane, testifying under a pseudonym, dated Combs from 2021 until his arrest last September. The model said she repeatedly told Combs she didn't want to have sex with other men — pleading with him, 'I'm not an animal. I need a break' — but that he kept pressuring her. She said she felt 'obligated' in part because he paid her rent. Jane said she tried to end the encounters, texting him in 2023: 'Ever since I opened Pandora's box, I haven't been able to close it.' He responded: 'Girl, stop.' Another time, she told him: "You beat the love out of us.' Last year, Jane said, Combs put her in a chokehold, punched her in the face and forced her into an encounter with a sex worker. She said he told her: 'You're not going to ruin my night like this.' Both women said Combs threatened to release their sex videos if they refused his demands. Kid Cudi and others who say Combs wronged them Rapper Kid Cudi testified that Combs broke into his home in late 2011 after learning he and Cassie were dating. His car was firebombed a few weeks later. Cudi, whose legal name is Scott Mescudi, said he knew Combs 'had something to do' with it, but Combs told him he wasn't involved. Ex-Combs employee Capricorn Clark said Combs came to her home waving a gun the day of the break-in and demanded she get dressed and go with him because 'we're going to kill Cudi.' A former personal assistant testifying under the pseudonym 'Mia' said Combs put his hand up her dress and forcibly kissed her at his 40th birthday party in 2009, forced her to perform oral sex on another occasion and raped her in 2010. His lawyers say the claims are false. Cassie's friend Bryana 'Bana' Bongolan testified that Combs dangled her over the railing of Cassie's 17th floor balcony and threw her onto patio furniture in September 2016, leaving her bruised and traumatized. Baby oil, lubricant and AR-15s Six of Combs' former personal assistants testified. George Kaplan said he'd toss out liquor bottles and drugs and clean up baby oil from Combs' hotel rooms. He said he quit after seeing Combs fighting with Cassie but didn't report it to authorities. David James testified that Combs had him stock hotel rooms with baby oil, condoms, Viagra and other supplies. James said he saw Combs with three handguns on his lap as they drove to confront Combs' record industry rival Suge Knight in 2008. Brendan Paul said he bought drugs for Combs including cocaine, ketamine, ecstasy and marijuana. Federal agents testified that they found 'freak-off' supplies during raids last year on Combs' Los Angeles and Miami-area homes and in the New York City hotel room where he was arrested. They said they also found AR-15 rifles, other guns and ammunition at Combs' homes. Playing defense with prosecution witnesses Combs is charged with racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking — one for Cassie, one for Jane — and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. His defense case lasted all of 30 minutes. Combs waived his right to testify, as defendants often do, and his lawyers didn't call witnesses of their own. Instead, they sought to undercut the credibility of his accusers through cross-examination. They seized on inconsistencies in witness accounts, highlighted accusers' willingness to continue seeing him and warm messages they exchanged with him after alleged abuse. They also accused women of trying to cash in on 'the #MeToo money grab against Sean Combs.' Reluctant witnesses proved valuable to the defense It wasn't all bad for Combs. Jane acknowledged that despite everything she endured she still loves Combs. Other prosecution witnesses showered him with praise. Kaplan said he still sends Combs birthday greetings and invited him to his wedding. Kaplan told jurors he was grateful to work for Combs and still has 'a great deal of respect' for him. Combs' lawyers confronted celebrity stylist Deonte Nash with messages he sent expressing love for Combs. Some of them were from 2019 and 2020, two years after their professional relationship ended. Missing pieces: Gina, KK and D-Roc Originally, prosecutors built their case around four main witnesses: Cassie, Jane, Mia and Gina, a former Combs girlfriend who was referred to in his charging documents as 'Victim-3.' But Gina, who dated Combs from 2014 to 2019, was quietly dropped from the case and never testified. Still, she figured prominently in the trial. Cassie noted she was really upset when she found out Combs was cheating with Gina. Kaplan said he once saw Combs hurling apples at Gina. Others from Combs' orbit who were mentioned but not seen in court included his former chief of staff, a bodyguard and other members of his security staff.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Experts pinpoint shocking cancer trigger in TAP WATER as map shows worst-affected areas of the US
A silent killer is lurking in tens of millions of faucets nationwide, with families in agricultural areas of the country at greatest risk. A mixture of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and livestock manure are leaching into the groundwater, creating nitrates - compounds naturally found in the environment that can be harmful in large amounts - which can cause methemoglobinemia, a potentially fatal condition in infants commonly known as blue-baby syndrome. Long-term exposure to this chemical in water — even below the EPA's maximum safety limit of 10 mg/L — is linked to thyroid, kidney, ovarian, bladder, and colon cancers, DNA damage, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and rising colon cancer rates in young people. New research from the Des Moines University College of Health Sciences zeroed in on the effects that a pregnant woman's exposure to the chemical has on her unborn baby. Nitrate levels as low as just one percent of the EPA's safety limit increased the risks of preterm birth and low birth weight, conditions that have been linked to a higher risk of chronic disease, learning disabilities, and mental health struggles in the baby's future. Dr Jason Semprini, the study's author, said that exposure to nitrate in pregnancy causes about 15 percent as much harm as smoking during pregnancy. 'I do not want to diminish the importance of efforts to prevent smoking during pregnancy,' he said. 'But, I must ask, do we give nitrates 15 percent of the attention we give to smoking?' An estimated 60 million Americans rely on tap water that is, unbeknownst to them, laced with nitrates. They tend to live in states and rural areas where agriculture is central to the economy, such as Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, central California, Texas, and Oklahoma. Dr Semprini added: 'Our work adds to the evidence base that the current regulatory threshold (more than 10mg/L) may be insufficient for protecting the in utero transmission of water-based nitrate during the first trimester of pregnancy.' His research was published in the journal PLOS Water. Nitrate pollution affects larger cities, as well. An analysis by the Environmental Working Group highlighted the problem in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Miami, and the suburbs of New York City. Drinking water in 43 states had nitrate levels of 3 mg/L or higher in major water systems, while 39 states had at least one large system with levels at or above 5 mg/L, according to the group's latest report. While still below the EPA's maximum safety limit, public health experts argue the standards should be stricter. When the safety limit was first established in the 1950s, scientists discovered that levels as low as 11 mg/L could cause blue baby syndrome. Blue Baby Syndrome, clinically known as methemoglobinemia, is a rare but serious condition where an infant's blood cannot carry enough oxygen, leading to a bluish skin discoloration, particularly around the lips, fingers, and toes. The most well-known cause is nitrate contamination in drinking water, which is sometimes mixed with formula. It's very rare, with fewer than 100 cases reported in the US, but it is more common in parts of the world where well water is not tested. According to former Wisconsin state toxicologist Dave Belluck, the standard was set at 10, right up to the edge of safety. 'It's akin to a cliff,' he said. 'When you're standing on the edge of the cliff, you're safe. You take one step, and it's just like the Road Runner.' But Belluck dove deeper into the research that informed safety designation, finding that some infants in the study became sick at nitrate levels nearly 30 times lower, just 0.4 mg/L. He now believes the EPA's standards should be stricter, arguing that the science clearly shows nitrates are more harmful than previously thought. Other studies on the subject have come to similar conclusions. Researchers from Nova Scotia, Canada, tracked major birth defects recorded in the area between 1998 and 2006 and found they were twice as likely in areas where drinking water nitrate levels were between 1 and 5.56 mg/L. Exposure over time to nitrates could also increase a person's risk of a variety of cancers and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified the compounds as 'probably carcinogenic to humans'. A 2008 study of women in rural Wisconsin found that women drinking water containing 10 mg/l or more were nearly three times as likely to get a deadly cancer that affects the first part of the colon. Even nitrate levels between one and 5.9 mg/l increased the risk of cancer by 1.4 times. Meanwhile, in Spain and Italy, scientists identified a connection between nitrates in drinking water and colorectal cancer. Analyzing nearly 5,400 participants, the study revealed that people who consumed more than 10 mg of nitrate per day from water – roughly equivalent to drinking two liters of water containing 5 mg/L of nitrate – had a 49 percent higher risk of colorectal cancer compared to those who drank half that amount. In Iowa, researchers uncovered links between nitrate exposure and thyroid cancer in older women. Tracking nearly 22,000 women for decades, researchers found that those who drank water with nitrate levels above 5 mg/L for at least five years faced a 2.6 times higher risk of thyroid cancer. And a long-term study of over 28,000 postmenopausal women in 2015 found that those with the highest nitrate levels in their public water supply (2.98 mg/L or above) had twice the risk of developing ovarian cancer compared to those with the lowest levels. Private well users also saw a moderately elevated risk – 1.5 times – due to agricultural runoff contaminating groundwater. In total, researchers found 315 cases of ovarian cancer over 24 years of follow-up. Nitrate is highly soluble in water, making it difficult and expensive to eliminate. Individual homes or municipal water supply systems could be fitted with reverse osmosis and ion exchange filters to remove toxins from their drinking water. Still, those are expensive and out of reach for many. In addition to stemming from agricultural run-off, leaky septic systems can release untreated wastewater containing nitrates. Landfills, factories, and food processing plants can also leach nitrates over time.
