Lisa Murkowski Stares Down Reporter for 10 Seconds After Being Confronted Over ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Vote
'Sen. [Rand] Paul said that your vote was a bailout for Alaska at the expense of the country,' Nobles told Murkowski on-camera.
More from TheWrap
Lisa Murkowski Stares Down Reporter for 10 Seconds After Being Confronted Over 'Big Beautiful Bill' Vote | Video
CNN Argues Its Report on ICE Location App Did 'Nothing Illegal' as Trump White House Threatens Prosecution
Senate Approves Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' With VP Vance as Tiebreaker
Trump: CNN, New York Times Demean the 'Great Soldiers' Who Bombed Iran
Nobles' inquiry stemmed from remarks Paul reportedly made about Murkowski after the Senate passed the legislation on Tuesday. Per the Daily Beast, Rand stated that Republicans 'chose subsidies and carveouts for the Senator from Alaska,' claiming the party modified the bill to benefit the state of Alaska in exchange for Murkowski's vote.
'Oh my…' Murkowski replied, in apparent shock.
'That's what Sen. Paul said,' Nobles responded.
Murkowski, who appeared to be irritated by the question, blinked her eyes one last time at Nobles before launching into a stare down. Breaking the silence, Nobles shared the first word, which was a him clarifying that he did not make the statement himself, though he still wanted a response.
'I didn't say it, ma'am. I'm just asking for your response,' Nobles noted.
After a second more of nothing, a visibly frustrated Murkowski answered. 'My response is, I have an obligation to the people of the state of Alaska, and I live up to that every single day,' she said, adding that this has been an 'agonizing' experience. 'I fight for my state's interest and I make sure that Alaskans are understood. I work hard to take care of a state that has more unique situations, more unique people and it's just different. So when people suggest the federal dollars go to one of our 50 states in a quote, 'bailout,' I find that offensive.'
Another brief moment of silence between the two then set in. Murkowski eventually continued to explain her reasons for voting 'Yes' on the bill while acknowledging that the bill will allow Alaskans to reap benefits that Americans in other states will not.
'I advocated for my state's interest. I will continue to do that, and I will make no excuses for doing that. Do I like this bill? No. I tried to take care of Alaska's interests, but I know that in many parts of the country there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill. I don't like that,' she explained. 'I don't like the fact that we moved through an artificial deadline, artificial timelines to produce something to meet a deadline, rather than to actually try to produce the best bill for the country. But when I saw the direction that this was going … you can either say I don't like it and not try to help my state or you can roll up your sleeves.'
On Tuesday, the Senate voted 51-50 in favor of the controversial spending bill, with the tie-breaking vote cast by Vice President JD Vance after a handful of Republicans sided with Democrats and Independents against it. Some of the unique privileges Alaska will receive that differ from the other 49 states will be an exemption from new Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (S.N.A.P.) requirements and state cost-sharing, only if the state implements a plan to reduce administrative errors as the state has had the highest S.N.A.P. payment error rate in the country for the past two years.
Republican Sens. Rand, Susan Collins and Thom Tillis voted 'No' against the legislation, while zero Democrats voted in favor of it. The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' will now head back to the House of Representatives for approval, following some alterations that came during a marathon weekend session that stretched into the early hours of Tuesday.The post Lisa Murkowski Stares Down Reporter for 10 Seconds After Being Confronted Over 'Big Beautiful Bill' Vote | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
26 minutes ago
- CNBC
Healthy Returns: FDA launches program to streamline creation of new U.S. drug manufacturing sites
A new program from the Trump administration aims to make setting up manufacturing plants in the U.S. less of a headache for the pharmaceutical industry. The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday announced a new "PreCheck" program, which will use a two-phase approach to help boost domestic drug manufacturing after it shrunk dramatically over the past two decades. The announcement is a direct response to President Donald Trump's executive order in May calling on the FDA to reduce regulatory hurdles for domestic drug production in the U.S.. That order asked the agency to cut the amount of time it takes to approve new plants by eliminating unnecessary requirements, while also increasing the fees for and inspections of manufacturing facilities abroad. It follows a flurry of plans for new U.S. manufacturing investments from several drugmakers, such as Johnson & Johnson, AbbVie and Eli Lilly, in a bid to build goodwill with Trump. Still, the president could impose tariffs on pharmaceuticals imported into the U.S. any day now — a move that the industry argues could harm innovation and patient access to certain treatments. So, why has Trump made reshoring drug production a key facet of his trade policy? More than half of pharmaceuticals distributed in the U.S. are manufactured overseas, according to a release from the FDA. Only 11% of companies that produce active pharmaceutical ingredients are based in the U.S., while a significant share are in China and India, the agency added. The White House also estimates that it can currently take five to 10 years to build new manufacturing capacity for pharmaceuticals, which it previously called "unacceptable from a national-security standpoint." "Our gradual overreliance on foreign drug manufacturing has created national security risks," FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary said in the release on Thursday. "The FDA PreCheck initiative is one of many steps FDA is taking that can help reverse America's reliance on foreign drug manufacturing and ensure that Americans have a resilient, strong, and domestic drug supply." Here's how the two phases of the program work: The FDA will host a public meeting on Sept. 30, where it will present on the program and discuss other proposals to "overcome current onshoring challenge," among other issues. Until then, concrete details on the program are sparse. It's unclear what requirements the FDA could eliminate, and how much less time it could take to approve new sites. We'll continue to watch as this program gets finalized and implemented, so stay tuned for our coverage! Feel free to send any tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Annika at Like it or not, more and more patients are turning to OpenAI's artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT to answer questions about their health care. And the company is paying attention. OpenAI launched its latest large-scale AI model called GPT-5 last week, and the startup said it's the "best model yet" for health-related queries. The product is designed to proactively flag health concerns, ask relevant questions and generate more precise and reliable responses, the company said in a blog post. "Health care is maybe the area where there's the strongest improvement of any (is this one extra?) of any category," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told CNBC's "Squawk Box" in an interview about GPT-5 on Friday. Altman said health-related questions make up a "huge fraction" of ChatGPT usage. In a post on X, he said he hopes GPT-5's health capabilities will "provide real service to people." OpenAI said GPT-5 scores "significantly higher" than previous models on its health-care AI benchmark called Health Bench. The company released Health Bench in May, and it's designed to measure how well AI models perform in realistic health scenarios. HealthBench was developed alongside 262 doctors from 60 countries. OpenAI said it's based on 5,000 conversations that simulate interactions between individual users or clinicians and AI models. OpenAI is also touting GPT-5 as a helpful tool for medical research. The company released a two-minute-long video with Dr. Derya Unutmaz, a professor and human immunologist, which demonstrates how he has been using the model. Unutmaz said GPT-5 is able to help him brainstorm, interpret data and save him time by predicting outcomes of potential experiments. "I think GPT-5 will help the patients to advocate for themselves, and I think that will empower the patients to feel more confident when they talk to their doctors," Unutmaz said in the video. Feel free to send any tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Ashley at
USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
Newsom mocks Trump in all-caps post promising a 2026 Democratic victory
California Gov. Gavin Newsom mocked President Donald Trump with an all-caps tweet amid a heated redistricting effort in Texas. WASHINGTON − California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom mocked President Donald Trump with an all-caps tweet amid a heated redistricting effort in Texas that could give Republicans up to five more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives next year. Mimicking Trump's all-caps social media style, Newsom trolled the president as "DONALD 'TACO' TRUMP," and suggested California would soon go forward with its own redistricting effor to offset the Republican effort in Texas. The post comes as Newsom urged Trump in an Aug. 11 letter to stop the redistricting efforts, arguing that Trump was 'playing with fire' and 'risking the destabilization of our democracy.' Newsom added that if Trump doesn't stand down, he would redraw the congressional map in California to counter the Texas effort. 'DONALD 'TACO' TRUMP, AS MANY CALL HIM, 'MISSED' THE DEADLINE!!! CALIFORNIA WILL NOW DRAW NEW, MORE 'BEAUTIFUL MAPS,' THEY WILL BE HISTORIC AS THEY WILL END THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (DEMS TAKE BACK THE HOUSE!). BIG PRESS CONFERENCE THIS WEEK WITH POWERFUL DEMS AND GAVIN NEWSOM — YOUR FAVORITE GOVERNOR — THAT WILL BE DEVASTATING FOR 'MAGA.' THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER! — GN,' Newsom wrote on X, imitating Trump's language in his Truth Social posts. "TACO," an acronym for "Trump Always Chickens Out," is a reference to Trump's ever-shifting tariff deadlines. Newsom's post received more than 3.2 million views. Democratic governors Kathy Hochul of New York and J.B. Pritzker of Illinois have also previously threatened to launch their own redistricting efforts that could give Democrats a boost, sparking a tit-for-tat. Redistricting is required by federal law every 10 years following the release of new U.S. Census Bureau figures. However, Trump encouraged Texas Republicans to jumpstart the process in the middle of the decade. The Texas Senate on Aug. 12 approved the new set of congressional lines by a vote of 19-2, according to the Texas Tribune. The Texas redistricting effort is stalled in the state House, where most Democratic representatives have fled the state, denying majority Republicans a quorum needed to pass the measure. Trump said Aug. 5 that Republicans "are entitled to five more seats" in Texas because of his 2024 election victory there. Republicans currently hold the U.S. House by a razor thin margin. Newsom said that he is eyeing a special election in November so voters could weigh in on a ballot measure that would allow for a new House map in California ahead of the 2026 midterms.
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Wes Moore knocks ‘lack of seriousness' in National Guard decision
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D) on Tuesday slammed President Trump's move to deploy the National Guard to Washington, DC, as lacking 'seriousness' amid the president's push to combat crime in the nation's capital. 'This decision is being made by people who frankly have never worn the uniform themselves,' Moore told CNN's Anderson Cooper on Tuesday. 'The only uniform they have worn are Brooks Brothers suits,' he continued. 'And so there's a lack of seriousness that is going to the decision making process about what you are doing and how you are impacting the lives of these men and women and their families.' Moore invoked his own background in the Army, arguing that he takes how the U.S. uses its citizen soldiers 'very seriously.' The governor said there is a cost to deploying the National Guard, referring to the financial cost as well as the resources of the guard being taken away from other situations like natural disasters. Moore also noted that members of the National Guard have families and other jobs to keep in mind. 'The people of Maryland know that while I will be unafraid to utilize and mobilize the National Guard when there is a case of emergency, I will also not use it as some type of political ploy or some type of political tool,' he said. Trump announced Monday that the Justice Department (DOJ) would take over oversight of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), declaring a crime emergency in the nation's capital under the city's Home Rule Act. The president said the actions are meant to combat crime in Washington, DC, but Democrats and critics argue that violent crime is down in Washington, DC.
