Columbia's $221 million deal with Trump may predict what comes next
Learn more: How other colleges are dealing with pressure.
"It is our hope that this is going to be a template for other universities around the country," said Education Secretary Linda McMahon.
"Numerous other Higher Education Institutions that have hurt so many, and been so unfair and unjust, and have wrongly spent federal money, much of it from our government, are upcoming," Trump posted on Truth Social in announcing the settlement.
A number of high-profile universities have had federal money withheld while being investigated by the administration.
Which colleges have been targeted?
Can't see our graphics? Click here to view them.
The administration is investigating a number of U.S. universities, including high-profile institutions like Harvard, on accusations that include antisemitism amid protests of the war in Gaza after Hamas invaded Israel in 2023. Those investigations have been going on since March. They include:
Columbia University
Accusation: Jewish students weren't protected from antisemitism and discrimination.
Jewish students weren't protected from antisemitism and discrimination. When: March 2025. A settlement was announced July 23.
March 2025. A settlement was announced July 23. Columbia will pay: $221 million in legal settlements.
$221 million in legal settlements. Columbia will get: $400 million in federal funds reinstated.
University of Pennsylvania
Accusation: Violating administration policy on transgender athletes.
Violating administration policy on transgender athletes. When: March 2025
March 2025 Penn could have lost: $175 million in federal funds had been suspended.
$175 million in federal funds had been suspended. Status: Funding was restored in July 2025 after Penn apologized and changed its policy.
Brown University
Accusation: Failing to stem antisemitism on campus.
Failing to stem antisemitism on campus. When : April 2025
: April 2025 Brown may lose: Administration has paused $510 million in federal contracts and grants.
Administration has paused $510 million in federal contracts and grants. Status: Pending
Cornell University
Accusation: Failing to protect civil rights and failing to restrain antisemitism and racial discrimination.
Failing to protect civil rights and failing to restrain antisemitism and racial discrimination. When? April 2025
April 2025 Cornell may lose: $1 billion in federal funding has been halted.
$1 billion in federal funding has been halted. Status: Pending
Northwestern
Accusation: Failing to protect civil rights and fight antisemitism and racial discrimination.
Failing to protect civil rights and fight antisemitism and racial discrimination. When? April 2025
April 2025 Northwestern could lose: $790 million in federal funding has been halted.
$790 million in federal funding has been halted. Status: Pending
Princeton University
Accusation? Failing to restrain antisemitism on campus.
Failing to restrain antisemitism on campus. When? April 2025
April 2025 Princeton could lose: Nearly $210 million in federal research grants have been suspended.
Nearly $210 million in federal research grants have been suspended. Status: Pending
Harvard
Accusation: Failing to fight antisemitism on campus.
Failing to fight antisemitism on campus. When? June 2025
June 2025 Harvard may lose: $2.6 billion in federal grants.
$2.6 billion in federal grants. Status: Harvard is appealing in federal court.
New investigations announced
Additional investigations by the State Department and the Department of Education were reported on July 23.
The State Department is investigating whether Harvard is still eligible to be a sponsor for the Exchange Visitor Program.
The Education Department said it will investigate whether five universities that have scholarships specified for undocumented students are discriminating against those born in the United States.
The universities are:
University of Louisville
University of Nebraska, Omaha
University of Miami
University of Michigan
Western Michigan University
The administration has accused elite universities of antisemitism and ideological indoctrination, according to The New York Times. But it has made no secret of its disdain for many universities, especially the richest and most selective ones.
CONTRIBUTING Zachary Schermele and George Petras
SOURCE USA TODAY Network reporting and research; Reuters; Center for American Progress; doge.gov
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump administration denies daily quota for immigration arrests
In a new court filing, attorneys for the Trump administration denied the existence of a daily quota for immigration arrests, despite reports and prior statements from White House officials about pursuing a goal of at least 3,000 deportations or deportation arrests per day. In May, reports from both the Guardian and Axios revealed that during a meeting with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) leaders on 21 May, the White House adviser Stephen Miller and the Department of Homeland Security secretary, Kristi Noem, demanded that immigration agents seek to arrest 3,000 people per day. Following that report, Miller appeared on Fox News in late May and stated that 'under President Trump's leadership, we are looking to set a goal of a minimum of 3,000 arrests for Ice every day.' He added that Trump 'is going to keep pushing to get that number up higher each and every day'. However, in a court filing on Friday, lawyers representing the US justice department said that the Department of Homeland Security had confirmed that 'neither Ice leadership nor its field offices have been directed to meet any numerical quota or target for arrests, detentions, removals, field encounters, or any other operational activities that Ice or its components undertake in the course of enforcing federal immigration law.' The filing is part of an ongoing lawsuit in southern California, where immigrant advocacy groups have sued the Trump administration, accusing it of conducting unconstitutional immigration sweeps in the Los Angeles area. In mid-July a judge issued a temporary restraining order barring immigration agents from detaining individuals based on factors such as race, occupation or speaking Spanish anywhere in the central district of California, which includes Los Angeles. On Friday, an appeals court upheld that order. Politico reported that during a hearing earlier this week in the case, the justice department lawyers were pressed on the reports regarding the alleged arrest quota, and a judge reportedly asked whether it was a 'policy of the administration at this time to deport 3,000 persons per day?'. An attorney for the justice department, Yaakov Roth, reportedly responded 'Not to my knowledge, your honor' per Politico. And in the government's filing on Friday, the attorneys for the government said that the allegations of that the 'government maintains a policy mandating 3,000 arrests per day appears to originate from media reports quoting a White House advisor who described that figure as a 'goal' that the Administration was 'looking to set''. 'That quotation may have been accurate, but no such goal has been set as a matter of policy and no such directive has been issued to or by DHS or ICE' the attorneys added. The discrepancy was first reported by the Los Angeles Daily News and Politico. Neither DHS or Ice immediately responded to a request fro comment from the Guardian. In a statement to Politico, a White House spokesperson did not directly respond to questions about the discrepancy, but said that 'the Trump Administration is committed to carrying out the largest mass deportation operation in history by enforcing federal immigration law and removing the countless violent, criminal illegal aliens that Joe Biden let flood into American communities.' A justice department spokesperson told the outlet that there is no disconnect between the DoJ's court filings and the White House's public statements. The spokesperson added that 'the entire Trump administration is united in fully enforcing our nation's immigration laws and the DoJ continues to play an important role in vigorously defending the president's deportation agenda in court.' At various points during his 2024 election campaign, Trump claimed that he would target between 15 and 20 million people who are undocumented in the US for deportation. As of 2022, there were 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the US.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Photos from 'In Women's Words' exhibition that showcases modern Iranian women artists
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Protest held outside Canary Wharf hotel housing asylum seekers
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
