logo
I always wondered what had happened to my missing brother. Could I ever forgive my father for driving him away?

I always wondered what had happened to my missing brother. Could I ever forgive my father for driving him away?

The Guardian03-05-2025
One morning in March 1995, my father and I were having coffee at the kitchen table when somehow the conversation deviated to my brother Marshall. As always, I had questions.
'He was tall for his age,' my father said, gazing at the memory of his estranged son, as if he was standing beside us in the kitchen. 'At school they always wanted him for the football team. His hair was red, deep red like your grandmother's, and his eyes …' my father paused, searching for the right comparison. 'Copper. His eyes were copper-coloured and he'd tan so well in the summer he looked as if he'd been dipped in wood stain.'
Another memory still tickled. 'A 15-year-old kid tried to dominate him once, bragging about being 15, and Marsh stood up, towered above him and said in a manly voice, 'Well, I'm 12.'' My father's smile slowly sank as a thought passed behind his eyes. 'When he was 17,' he continued, 'Marshall won a scholarship to Harvard off the back of a short story he wrote, and he declined it! Can you imagine?' My father went quiet for a moment, the blade of that wasted opportunity still sharp. 'He was such a gifted writer.'
My father was of a generation that upheld the notion that if an establishment such as Harvard University came knocking, it was your duty to answer. Not to do so was an unforgivable waste of opportunity.
Perhaps Marshall didn't want that particular opportunity at that particular time in his life, I suggested. Perhaps it was simply bad timing. I felt my words fail the moment they left my mouth.
His voice soured: 'Then he became a hippy.'
I was well versed on the family accounts surrounding Marshall's life choices. The last time my father had seen his son was 22 years earlier. Marshall had been a homeless hippy who had hitchhiked from California to Texas in need of money.
I knew my father found it all hard to talk about. His hand trembled as he lifted his mug.
My father was 54 when I was born, and I loved him beyond measure. He had a warm American voice, and was witty and full of character. At four years old, when I asked why I had a belly button, he replied that it was for dips when eating crudites. Chocolate digestives were wedged in apple tree branches for my sister and me to pick. Hoisted on to his shoulders, we would reach for them in the belief that cookies really did grow on trees.
However, as I became an adult, I became more aware of the life he'd lived before I was born, and I wanted to know more. How could my father leave one of his children behind, allow him to disappear into a void? Was it my father's choice or Marshall's? How did my brother become linked to the Charles Manson cult, so infamous it rocked the foundations of American society? Years of research and discussions with family members have brought me closer to the answers.
My brother's story begins miles away from sunny California, love-ins and communal living, in middle-class 1950s Michigan and the emotional chaos of Marshall's mother, my father's first wife, Sally. After years of a gradual descent into psychosis, Sally was hospitalised in 1954, receiving electroshock therapy and medication. A year after admission, Sally was deemed fit enough to return home for a weekend. The moment my father went out to do the grocery shopping, she lay on the bed filled with enough sleeping pills to kill a horse, drifting so far into oblivion that her son's pleas for her to wake up failed to reach her. Marshall was 11 years old.
After this devastating upheaval, my father, with the help of my grandmother, sought structure for his teenage son, finding the solution with the Marine Corps. An ex-US marine and war veteran himself, my father knew the kind of discipline the marines could inculcate. Marshall was subsequently enrolled at the prestigious Howe school, a private military academy in Indiana, and a photograph was taken to immortalise that first day. Looking closely at that image, it's clear Marshall isn't keen. Aged 13, not yet two years since his mother took her own life, my brother stands rigid in his service uniform next to the Howe school gate, head slightly lowered, flinging the photographer a glowering stare. It is an anger my father's lens doesn't hide.
Marshall's time at Howe didn't last long. After a year, my father's job relocated them to the Netherlands where my father met his second wife. By this time, Marshall was 15 and his behaviour was becoming a problem. Unable to self-regulate, my brother became volatile, opinionated, oppositional. Modern psychology tells us that suppressed trauma will find an escape route, behaviour the most common outlet. In 1959, however, my father's emotional awareness was far less acute. Marshall was sent away again, this time to a boarding school in Switzerland. By 1962, at just 18 years old and a fully fledged marine, my brother found himself stationed in Vietnam where his days were fraught with danger. During one of those harrowing moments, an explosion changed his life for ever. The blast resulted in burn scarring on the side of his head and severely damaged the hearing in his right ear. The psychological scars would linger far longer.
Discharged in 1966, Marshall was thrust back into a turbulent America that had little regard for the sacrifices made by young veterans. In a world that seemed to have forgotten them, countless others like him were searching for a sense of purpose. Thus, at the tender age of 23, my brother entered the hippy world of California as a war veteran struggling to find his place as the country grappled with civil rights issues, anti‑war protests and counterculture movements. As traditional values crumbled, it is easy to see why vulnerable individuals would have been susceptible to manipulation by charismatic leaders, particularly sociopathic predators like Charles Manson, who preyed on those who felt marginalised or disconnected from mainstream society. And so it proved for Marshall.
For someone like my brother, who had seen the darker sides of humanity, the 1960s counterculture must have represented not just freedom but a chance to heal. It was a world far removed from the hellscape of Vietnam and the archaic rigidity of military institutions, and Marshall would have been easily swept up in it.
Spahn Ranch was the perfect place for Manson to position himself as a guru. In the middle of nowhere, it was as far from any form of social connection as it could be, isolating the 'family' from cultural norms. Yet an internal sense of community prevailed through the language of belonging. At first, it's likely that Marshall would have responded to small requests, such as attending meetings or participating in group hangouts, perhaps getting friendly with a fringe member who would pull him into the circle. He would have received a warm welcome, hugs, been shown around a sprawling compound, while its elderly owner, George Spahn, sat passive and blind in a rocking chair, a pretty girl on his lap. Communal living would present itself as a consensual family space where children were looked after, all burdens of responsibility vanished. Acid trips would create transcendental experiences.
Marshall needed family, and, for a short while, he must have felt as if he'd found one. Nine months later, however, the sky would fall. The horror of the Manson murders had exposed the workings of a deeply disturbed mind. There's relief in knowing that my brother was long gone by then. Headstrong and resistant to coercion, Marshall was again on the move, drifting in and out of familial memories until 1973, when Manson and his killers were two years into their life sentences.
The most vivid vignette in the Marshall archive occurred in June that year. It was to be the last encounter my father would have with his son. At 29 years old, my brother stepped out of the shadows to materialise on my parents' front doorstep in Houston, Texas. The oppressive heat rendered him shirtless under denim dungarees, and barefoot – a striking figure wrapped in a tattered blanket, caught between past and present. Beneath the nest of hair and unkempt beard, familiar copper eyes gleamed, and my father was pleased to see him.
Marshall was warmly welcomed into the home. My father introduced him to my mother, and showed off his new baby daughter. Marshall stayed a few days, and my mother remembers how gentle he was with my sister, helping to feed her, wiping her chin.
'Dad's a quiet man, isn't he?' Marshall said to my mother, a plastic spoon of apple sauce held aloft. She nodded. Yes, she agreed that he was. 'We Potters are a quiet bunch,' he said as my sister's little mouth opened for her spoonful.
After a week he announced his departure. My father's corporate job was a big source of contention. Marshall's dubious life choices were disapproved of, sparking defensiveness on his part. A bitter argument followed. Two generations clashed at the kitchen table. My father embodied the principled, archaic America built on religious faith, conformity, academic success and stoicism. The lost Harvard opportunity still stung. Marshall, however, came to the table as a member of a damaged generation in search of change and cultural freedom by taking a stand against conservative ideals and middle-class values. I'm told he called my father a 'corporate whore'.
'This is my life. This is how I will live it,' my brother asserted, forefinger pressing on the table.
And so, on the way to the bus station, the last time my father would ever be with Marshall, my brother demanded to be dropped off in a layby along the Katy Freeway. The car door slammed shut. As my father drove away, his rear-view mirror caught sight of a painted van pulling over. His son got in. I often think how strange it must be to see your child disappear into a void, spirited away in a dubious-looking vehicle spattered with graffiti.
August 1981. One summer evening, my sister and I were playing in the garden. It had been a warm afternoon and we were still running through the sprinkler as the day waned. The phone rang, my father answered, his demeanour shifting as he pressed his ear to a familiar voice laden with distress and urgency.
'Dad, I've done something stupid.'
We heard my father's tone change between long silences. Then he called for my mother. My sister and I looked at each other. Something was wrong. Someone named Marshall needed help, money for a lawyer.
In the early 1980s, ongoing investigations scrutinised anyone who might be linked to Charles Manson, and Marshall was caught in that trawling net. The shadow of the Manson murders loomed large. Victims' families were still grappling with the aftermath of those horrifying events, and law enforcement was desperate for answers regarding potential connections between Manson associates and contemporary cases of violent crimes taking place in New York. Many individuals linked to Manson or anyone within his organisation were apprehended and scrutinised. To me and my sister, however, none of this made sense. My parents discussed it at length, long after we had gone to bed, and it wasn't until a few days later that I summoned up the courage to ask my father who Marshall was.
But, after that phone call, all things Marshall fell deathly and irrevocably silent.
It was 11 September 2002, and my husband and I, newly embarked on our teacher training, found ourselves at home in our London studio flat. The television news that evening was centred on the first anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. We watched as representatives from more than 90 countries arrived in New York City, their sombre presence interspersed with haunting footage of the planes crashing into the World Trade Center. The profound sense of vulnerability that had enveloped the world's greatest superpower struck a chord with me – as though it mirrored a similar vulnerability in my father. This was also the year he would turn 80, and, over the coming months, I felt a sense of urgency to reassess unresolved questions about his past.
Over the years, Marshall had never been far from my mind. Still drifting in and out of our lives, my brother would appear by way of a photograph unearthed in a drawer, or a casual mention in conversation would ­trigger an anecdote. That evening, the mayor of New York City Michael Bloomberg lighting the eternal flame in Battery Park was that trigger. The desire to reconnect, to remember, to unravel the mysteries ­surrounding my brother's life launched me on a quest to find him for myself. Apart from asking distant ­relatives, I didn't know where to start.
In August 2003, a groundbreaking network called MySpace heralded a new age of online socialising. On the persuasion of a friend, I set up an account. It occurred to me that MySpace might be a way of finding my mysterious lost brother. I still wanted answers; to find out what happened to him after that phone call.
My search yielded many Marshall Potters, none of them mine, and it looked like a dead end. I turned to archive sites until I found one offering access to official documents, national census information and addresses. It claimed to have a Marshall Potter on its records. Embedded in documents and certificates, I finally unearthed my brother. His birth date matched, but there was also an additional date, the other bookend to a life: 14 September 1995. I couldn't help but think about my father fleshing out that shadowy figure at the kitchen table nine years earlier. There had been a six-month deadline to find him and I was eight years too late.
About a month later, the postman arrived with a document that required my signature. When I held the envelope in my hands, I felt a mixture of dread and anticipation. I was hoping Marshall's death certificate would provide me with the closure I needed. For a long while I didn't want to open it. A part of me didn't want to know the cause of his death. Marshall would have been 51 at the time, and I could only speculate at a heart attack or misadventure. When I finally read it, the certificate told a different story. Date: 14/09/1995. Time: 04:00. Cause of death: gunshot wound to head and brain. No pending investigation, concluded suicide.
For a long time, I found myself at odds with how my father let his only son vanish down the barrel of a gun. Still, he was upset by the news of Marshall's suicide, enough so that my mother rang to tell me not to discuss it any further. I was frustrated by this stubborn reluctance to talk. Surely, together, we could cauterise this wound; it would be of help to my father, and me, towards a positive understanding. Or perhaps my mother was right to shoo me away. Perhaps the news had weakened a dam restricting the flow of a regret too big to control. It's no secret that my father's generation had a removed regard to parenting, the misguided assumption that Marshall, being male, would survive, would 'rally round' and 'step up'; an ethos that a 1950s military school would, no doubt, brutally uphold with pride. So often I'd think of Marshall, gun poised to his temple, about to launch himself into another world where he's no longer broken. It still feels strange to mourn someone I've never met, yet my DNA tells me I do.
When my father died in 2007, it brought a profound sense of loss, not just of him, but also of Marshall. My father never had the opportunity to make amends, something I'm sure he lamented. I often reflect on my father's decisions and the societal norms that influenced him. Was my father simply a product of his time? Was Marshall a casualty of his? In the future, will our children, decades from now, look back at our parenting choices and say to us: you got that wrong?
In today's digital age, rife with toxic influencers preying on our vulnerable children, the relevance of my father and Marshall's story becomes more acute. At its heart lies the need to communicate with our children, to satiate the craving to belong and be understood. As a parent, I will embrace this responsibility, for I know the implications of inaction are far too great.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A hero who received 72 wounds but refused morphine & avoided attention – VC legend John Cruikshank dies aged 105
A hero who received 72 wounds but refused morphine & avoided attention – VC legend John Cruikshank dies aged 105

Scottish Sun

time5 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

A hero who received 72 wounds but refused morphine & avoided attention – VC legend John Cruikshank dies aged 105

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL said: 'Courage is rightly regarded as the foremost of the virtues, for upon it all the others depend.' The truth of those words is highlighted by the heroics of RAF Flight Lieutenant John Cruickshank, who has died at the age 105. 5 RAF Flight Lieutenant John Cruickshank has died at the age of 105 Credit: News Group Newspapers Ltd 5 In 2013 with a Catalina flying boat, like the one he skippered Credit: Getty 5 The brave RAF ace stands proudly in his uniform Credit: PA:Press Association It was 81 years ago that he performed an extraordinary act of sustained bravery, as he defied the agony of multiple severe injuries to bring home his badly damaged plane after a lethal encounter with a U-boat off the coast of Norway. For this deed he was awarded the Victoria Cross. He was one of four Coastal Command airmen to receive this award, but his case was unique. The other three had died in action and were honoured posthumously. He had survived but it was a mighty close-run thing. It was appropriate that this Scotsman of rock-hard resilience should hail from Aberdeen, long known as 'the Granite City'. He had left school in 1938 to become an apprentice in banking. But the drumbeat of war was echoing across Europe so he volunteered for the Territorial Army, enlisting in the Royal Artillery. Called up for service with this regiment in 1939, he transferred to the RAF two years later then went through initial flight instruction in Canada and the US. Back in Britain, having won his wings as a pilot, he continued his training until March 1943 when he was assigned to 210 Squadron in Coastal Command, based at Sullom Voe in the Shetland Islands. The Last of the Few, John 'Paddy' Hemingway has died, age 105 Man of modesty His squadron's main duty was to protect Allied ships from U-boats and they were equipped with the rugged and reliable American-built twin-engine Catalina flying boat. It was on July 17, 1944, soon after D-Day, that the incident occurred which lifted John Cruickshank into the record book, but almost killed him. He was piloting an anti- submarine patrol off Norway when his radio operator John Appleton picked up a blip on the Catalina's equipment. John began to home in on the target, whose status as a U-boat was confirmed by fire from its 37 mm gun. Appleton wrote in his memoir: 'The skipper manoeuvred into a perfect attacking position astern of the submarine, just out of range of the enemy gunfire. He gave a blast on the klaxon and started the attack run-in from about two miles.' As the plane got closer, flak from the U-boat intensified and was reinforced as its two pairs of 20mm cannon opened up. The skipper manoeuvred into a perfect attacking position astern of the submarine, just out of range of the enemy gunfire. He gave a blast on the klaxon and started the attack run-in from about two miles John Appleton John flew on and appeared to have released the depth charges at the right moment. But the bombs had hung up, so he then took the plane out of range of the U-boat, while his crew rearmed their own guns and checked the bomb-release mechanism. 'Everyone ready! Here we go again,' said John over the intercom. Of the second attack, Appleton recalled: 'This time all the flak was bursting much closer to us and I was surprised at how thick it could be. 'We seemed to be flying into a wall of black explosions.' But again, John descended upon the target without hesitation. 5 The first thing John said when he had regained consciousness in the stricken Catalina, was: 'How are my crew?' Credit: PA:Press Association 5 John was awarded the Victoria Cross for his extraordinary act of sustained bravery Credit: Alamy This time the depth charges hit their target with deadly accuracy. Seconds later, the U-boat began to sink. None of the 52 men on board had a chance of survival. But by now John's plane, caught by more enemy fire, was in serious trouble. Flames and smoke began to fill the aircraft. The radar was wrecked and the nose canopy shattered. One crewman was dead and four others were badly wounded, including John, who had been hit in his chest and legs and was bleeding heavily. But all was not lost. With the use of extinguishers, some of the uninjured crewmen put out the fire. As the co-pilot took over the controls, John was carried to the back of the plane. Throughout, he set an example of determination, fortitude and devotion to duty in keeping with the highest traditions of the service Citation from Victoria Cross ceremony Lapsing in and out of consciousness, he was in tremendous pain but refused any morphine from the emergency safety kit because he wanted to keep alert so he could help bring the Catalina boat plane home to Sullom Voe. With almost superhuman fortitude, he returned to the cockpit to oversee the final descent just as dawn was breaking. After landing successfully on the water, he ran the shattered plane on to the beach. He had to be given an emergency blood transfusion before being taken to Lerwick Hospital, where he was found to have suffered 72 wounds. Yet, by September, he was fit enough to receive the Victoria Cross from King George VI in Edinburgh, the first time Holyrood House had been used for an investiture since the reign of Queen Victoria. His citation read: 'Throughout, he set an example of determination, fortitude and devotion to duty in keeping with the highest traditions of the service.' From a generation that never sought the spotlight Barney Crockett But he was a man of profound modesty who hated talking about his exploits. Even at his investiture, he crept out of a side door afterwards to avoid the attention of the press and public. In the same vein, when he had regained consciousness in the stricken Catalina, the first thing he said was: 'How are my crew?' Though he had recuperated imp-ressively in hospital, the legacy of his injuries was too severe to allow him to return to flying duties, so for the rest of the war he held a staff job at Coastal Command HQ. Later, on demobilisation at the end of the war, he resumed his career in banking, eventually working in international finance before he retired in 1977. Happily married, he lost his beloved wife Marion in 1985. In his final years, in sheltered accommodation, he disliked any fuss, whether about his VC or his birthdays. Barney Crockett, the former Lord Provost of his native Aberdeen, once said John was 'from a generation that never sought the spotlight'. But it was also the generation that saved the world from tyranny.

A hero who received 72 wounds but refused morphine & avoided attention – VC legend John Cruikshank dies aged 105
A hero who received 72 wounds but refused morphine & avoided attention – VC legend John Cruikshank dies aged 105

The Sun

time5 hours ago

  • The Sun

A hero who received 72 wounds but refused morphine & avoided attention – VC legend John Cruikshank dies aged 105

SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL said: 'Courage is rightly regarded as the foremost of the virtues, for upon it all the others depend.' The truth of those words is highlighted by the heroics of RAF Flight Lieutenant John Cruickshank, who has died at the age 105. 5 5 It was 81 years ago that he performed an extraordinary act of sustained bravery, as he defied the agony of multiple severe injuries to bring home his badly damaged plane after a lethal encounter with a U-boat off the coast of Norway. For this deed he was awarded the Victoria Cross. He was one of four Coastal Command airmen to receive this award, but his case was unique. The other three had died in action and were honoured posthumously. He had survived but it was a mighty close-run thing. It was appropriate that this Scotsman of rock-hard resilience should hail from Aberdeen, long known as 'the Granite City'. He had left school in 1938 to become an apprentice in banking. But the drumbeat of war was echoing across Europe so he volunteered for the Territorial Army, enlisting in the Royal Artillery. Called up for service with this regiment in 1939, he transferred to the RAF two years later then went through initial flight instruction in Canada and the US. Back in Britain, having won his wings as a pilot, he continued his training until March 1943 when he was assigned to 210 Squadron in Coastal Command, based at Sullom Voe in the Shetland Islands. Man of modesty His squadron's main duty was to protect Allied ships from U-boats and they were equipped with the rugged and reliable American-built twin-engine Catalina flying boat. It was on July 17, 1944, soon after D-Day, that the incident occurred which lifted John Cruickshank into the record book, but almost killed him. He was piloting an anti- submarine patrol off Norway when his radio operator John Appleton picked up a blip on the Catalina's equipment. John began to home in on the target, whose status as a U-boat was confirmed by fire from its 37 mm gun. Appleton wrote in his memoir: 'The skipper manoeuvred into a perfect attacking position astern of the submarine, just out of range of the enemy gunfire. He gave a blast on the klaxon and started the attack run-in from about two miles.' As the plane got closer, flak from the U-boat intensified and was reinforced as its two pairs of 20mm cannon opened up. The skipper manoeuvred into a perfect attacking position astern of the submarine, just out of range of the enemy gunfire. He gave a blast on the klaxon and started the attack run-in from about two miles John Appleton John flew on and appeared to have released the depth charges at the right moment. But the bombs had hung up, so he then took the plane out of range of the U-boat, while his crew rearmed their own guns and checked the bomb-release mechanism. 'Everyone ready! Here we go again,' said John over the intercom. Of the second attack, Appleton recalled: 'This time all the flak was bursting much closer to us and I was surprised at how thick it could be. 'We seemed to be flying into a wall of black explosions.' But again, John descended upon the target without hesitation. This time the depth charges hit their target with deadly accuracy. Seconds later, the U-boat began to sink. None of the 52 men on board had a chance of survival. But by now John's plane, caught by more enemy fire, was in serious trouble. Flames and smoke began to fill the aircraft. The radar was wrecked and the nose canopy shattered. One crewman was dead and four others were badly wounded, including John, who had been hit in his chest and legs and was bleeding heavily. But all was not lost. With the use of extinguishers, some of the uninjured crewmen put out the fire. As the co-pilot took over the controls, John was carried to the back of the plane. Throughout, he set an example of determination, fortitude and devotion to duty in keeping with the highest traditions of the service Citation from Victoria Cross ceremony Lapsing in and out of consciousness, he was in tremendous pain but refused any morphine from the emergency safety kit because he wanted to keep alert so he could help bring the Catalina boat plane home to Sullom Voe. With almost superhuman fortitude, he returned to the cockpit to oversee the final descent just as dawn was breaking. After landing successfully on the water, he ran the shattered plane on to the beach. He had to be given an emergency blood transfusion before being taken to Lerwick Hospital, where he was found to have suffered 72 wounds. Yet, by September, he was fit enough to receive the Victoria Cross from King George VI in Edinburgh, the first time Holyrood House had been used for an investiture since the reign of Queen Victoria. His citation read: 'Throughout, he set an example of determination, fortitude and devotion to duty in keeping with the highest traditions of the service.' But he was a man of profound modesty who hated talking about his exploits. Even at his investiture, he crept out of a side door afterwards to avoid the attention of the press and public. In the same vein, when he had regained consciousness in the stricken Catalina, the first thing he said was: 'How are my crew?' Though he had recuperated imp-ressively in hospital, the legacy of his injuries was too severe to allow him to return to flying duties, so for the rest of the war he held a staff job at Coastal Command HQ. Later, on demobilisation at the end of the war, he resumed his career in banking, eventually working in international finance before he retired in 1977. Happily married, he lost his beloved wife Marion in 1985. In his final years, in sheltered accommodation, he disliked any fuss, whether about his VC or his birthdays. Barney Crockett, the former Lord Provost of his native Aberdeen, once said John was 'from a generation that never sought the spotlight'. But it was also the generation that saved the world from tyranny.

'I left America for UK and there are three surprising ways British gardens are different'
'I left America for UK and there are three surprising ways British gardens are different'

Wales Online

time3 days ago

  • Wales Online

'I left America for UK and there are three surprising ways British gardens are different'

'I left America for UK and there are three surprising ways British gardens are different' It's is a popular pastime for many people around the world, but it seems there are some major differences when it comes to gardening on both sides of the pond One man spotted three ways British gardens are different to American ones (stock image) (Image: Peathegee Inc via Getty Images) Gardening is a beloved pastime for many across the globe, offering a chance to connect with nature and experience the satisfaction of cultivating one's own produce. It can be a therapeutic activity for many, with no limit to the variety of plants and flowers that can thrive in home gardens. ‌ The basics of gardening involve understanding soil composition, choosing suitable plants based on climate and growing conditions, and effective planting techniques. There are certain simple tasks that every garden requires, such as sowing, weeding, watering, pest control and general maintenance such as mowing the lawn. ‌ However, there are some nuances in gardening practices depending on the country. TikTok user @grande_americano, a Texan living in Suffolk with his British wife, offered such insights. He provided his followers with snapshots of his life in the UK, including how it differs from the US. In one of his videos, he discusses the differences between American and British gardening. ‌ He then highlighted three differences he has noticed, sharing his observations with his friends back in the States. 1. Brits don't say 'yard' or 'yard work' Content cannot be displayed without consent The first difference the Texan noted was that Brits don't typically use the terms "yard" or "yard work". He explained: "Gardening means everything you do in the yard. When I grew up you did yard work, which was mowing, trimming, edging and a garden was a separate thing." Article continues below He clarified that while a garden typically refers to a space for flowers or vegetables, in Britain, the term "garden" encompasses the entire outdoor area – what he would refer to as the yard, lawn and the spots where flowers and vegetables grow. The expat also found out that when a Brit talks about having a garden party, they're actually referring to an event held in the yard. 2. The soil is 'nice' Moving on, the TikTok creator shared: "The second thing is the soil is nice. I did a little bit of gardening today and it was actually somewhat pleasant to be able to pull weeds and dig around and not be hitting rocks after a half inch of top soil, like I would be doing in Texas where I'm from." ‌ He discovered that there's no limestone or dolomite to chip through in his UK garden, unlike in Texas. The American described the soil as "nice, rich dirt". 3. No 'weird' critters in the UK The final difference he observed is the absence of "weird critters" commonly found in Texas, such as scorpions or venomous snakes. He remarked: "I did see quite a few spiders and slugs and snails, [I] even saw two newts." Despite spotting "plenty of critters wandering around" and "lots of good fishing worms" in the soil, he noticed that they go about "minding their own business". Article continues below The Texan added: "I've been told that there are some snakes here in the UK and possibly one viper, one venomous snake but I've been told that you'll be lucky to ever see a snake, much less a poisonous one." The American conceded that despite his occasional complaints about the weather, it's the mild climate, coupled with the moisture and humidity, that results in "such beautiful lush gardens and scenery and countryside that we all really love".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store