logo
Smurfs, dragons and aliens: Family movies lean into magic and wonder this summer

Smurfs, dragons and aliens: Family movies lean into magic and wonder this summer

Yahoo02-05-2025

'How to Train Your Dragon' filmmaker Dean DeBlois has heard the 'remake fatigue' concerns. In Hollywood's quest to get family audiences to movie theaters, the industry has often opted to re-package something familiar, lately in the form of a live-action, or hybrid remake. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
That's part of the reason why DeBlois, who directed the animated movies, wanted to also be the person behind the live action remake, coming to theaters June 25. He knew how to do it, and how to do it well.
'We were careful,' DeBlois said. 'We wanted to make sure that if we were going to do it, we wanted to do with a lot of integrity and love and make sure there's nothing cynical about it.'
Several of this summer's family friendly options have come from a personal place including the Rihanna-produced 'Smurfs' (July 18) and the Hawaii-shot 'Lilo & Stitch' (May 23). And a lot of them are PG-rated, including 'The Bad Guys 2' (Aug. 1); 'Freakier Friday' (Aug. 8); And the new Pixar movie 'Elio' (June 20), about a space fanatic kid whose dream of being abducted by aliens comes true.
The PG rating is having a bit of a resurgence in box office cred after years of being the 'uncool' little sibling to PG-13. Last year PG movies made up 1/3 of the annual box office, led by 'Inside Out 2.'
Smurfs nostalgia and Rihanna
Rihanna and the Smurfs might seem like an odd match, but the Grammy-winning megastar is 'steeped in Smurfs knowledge,' according to director Chris Miller. She told Miller that growing up in Barbados, her family's television had one channel, and that channel played the Hanna-Barbera show constantly.
It's why she wanted to produce and star as Smurfette in 'Smurfs,' a hybrid reboot that takes the little blue creatures on a rescue mission to save Papa Smurf. There have been other attempts (including two with Neil Patrick Harris), but for this one Miller wanted to do something different that drew on the original comics by Belgian artist Peyo.
'I thought, let's make a contemporary version and a real immersive visual experience but reference those drawings,' Miller said.
They also had a sharp, witty script from Pam Brady, best known for her collaborations with Trey Parker and Matt Stone. Plus, Rihanna would contribute music too. This, Miller thought, could be really fun.
'Rihanna's performance is so great,' he said. 'She's really funny and gets to the heart and soul of everything.'
Practically everyone in the starry voice cast (which includes Kurt Russell, John Goodman, Nick Offerman, Octavia Spencer, Amy Sedaris and Dan Levy) had some nostalgia for the Hanna-Barbera show. But no one needs a degree in 'smurfology' to take a chance on the film. Offerman said it reminds him of 'The Lego Movie.'
'It has a freshness and a sass that I think makes it appealing and kind of imperative for everybody to see,' Offerman said.
Making the dragons real
The animated 'How To Train Your Dragon' films already leaned into a live-action sensibility, but DeBlois took it to the next level for the new version, creating an immersive world where the dragons felt credible, and mythology that went deeper in telling this story of the unlikely friendship between a Viking boy Hiccup (Mason Thames) and a dragon named Toothless.
'It aspires to be and does deliver on the promise of being a crowd pleaser,' DeBlois said. 'It has thrills and it has adventure and it has wonder, which I think is kind of rare and important.'
Nico Parker, who plays the aspiring dragon hunter Astrid, was in awe of the level of detail the production put into the sets and atmosphere in making the isle of Berk feel real, from actual fire to 'horrible' ambient fish smells. The dragons too all have animal kingdom counterparts to add to the authenticity — with the exception of Toothless, who they kept a little more fantastical.
'Even though Toothless' eyes are huge and there's no animal on earth, not even a blue whale that has eyes that big, we went with it because the smaller we made the eyes, the less Toothless-like he was,' DeBlois said. 'We had to make sure that we weren't just creating photoreal dragons, but we were maintaining the personalities.'
For as popular as the books and films (which have made over $1.6 billion) are, there are also plenty of people who aren't familiar with the stories. This version might be the thing that draws newcomers in (they've already announced a sequel).
'For those who do know the stories and have seen the animated films, it is a bit of nostalgia,' DeBlois said. 'It's a way of returning to that world and seeing it through a new lens and maybe sharing that experience, perhaps with their own kids now.'
Finding something for the whole family
The struggle to find something the whole family wants to watch is real.
Jamie Lee Curtis, who reunited with her on-screen daughter Lindsay Lohan for 'Freakier Friday,' wrote in an email that theirs is a 'big spectacle film' with 'all the bells and whistles that a big comedy should have' and 'deep emotional resonance.'
'Elio' filmmaker Domee Shi also promised a blend of a wacky sci-fi adventure and 'also a deep and poignant story about loneliness, looking for connection, and finding it where you least expect.'
And no matter how many options are available for kids to watch on streaming services and YouTube, out of the home options remain a compelling draw. The box office backs it up: Last year PG movies outgrossed PG-13 movies for the first time in many years.
'PG movies really punch above their weight," said Paul Dergarabedian, the senior media analyst for Comscore. "These films could represent a huge part of the summer box office,'
'Lilo & Stich' director Dean Fleischer Camp thinks the big screen experience remains important for young moviegoers.
'I fell in love with the movies, seeing them in theaters as a kid,' he said. "I don't think there's yet any substitute for it.
___
For more coverage of this summer's upcoming films, visit: https://apnews.com/hub/movies

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The New Nintendo Is Here. It's Missing Something Crucial That the Previous Ones Have All Had.
The New Nintendo Is Here. It's Missing Something Crucial That the Previous Ones Have All Had.

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The New Nintendo Is Here. It's Missing Something Crucial That the Previous Ones Have All Had.

Of the many reasons Nintendo has flourished during its four-decade run in the video game industry—a Pixar-like dedication to quality, a memorable roster of mascots, an inherent creative brightness that cuts against the grimdark fantasies promulgated by other franchises—the company's prime advantage might be its commitment to affordability. The Nintendo Switch, a massively successful console that first made landfall in 2017, retailed for $299—a bargain compared with the $599 Xbox Series X and $699 PlayStation 5 Pro. Remember the Wii? The motion-controlled triumph that became all the rage in retirement homes during the mid-2000s? It was priced at $249, half as much as the lumbering PlayStation 3 which arrived one week prior. (It also included the eternal Wii Sports, bundled in the box, as a bonus.) It's a strategy that has sent an enduring message to consumers. Nintendo might not flex the same graphical fidelity of its rivals—Sony and Microsoft may consistently boast more impressive technical specs—but families could expect to save money when they purchased the company's hardware. And, frankly, that's what's been on my mind most as I surveyed the launch of Nintendo's latest console last week. The long-awaited Switch 2 is here, and it weighs in at an eye-popping $449. Its marquee launch title? A new Mario Kart game that costs an unprecedented $80. The Switch 2, it should be said, has an impressive design. Nintendo has outfitted the console with a gorgeous LCD screen, robust internal storage, and a motherboard powerful enough to furnish its lineup of games in glistening 4K. If you are one of the millions of people curious about the next installments of The Legend of Zelda, Metroid, or Animal Crossing, it is easy to consider its inflated price tag as a genuinely worthwhile investment in your future. And yet, like every other piece of video game machinery that has debuted this decade, the Switch 2 isn't going to shift any paradigms, because we are rapidly approaching a ceiling of what is possible with a graphics card. In the 1990s, each new console release represented a watershed moment in the industry. The Nintendo 64 arrived in 1996 with a suite of games rendered in 3D, leaps and bounds more impressive than the Super Nintendo, which imprisoned everything on-screen in a 2D plane. The justification for the cost was self-evident—a couple hundred bucks was more than worth it to unlock a whole new dimension. The Switch 2, meanwhile, functions essentially like a prettier, svelter, and more efficient update to the previous generation of hardware. The price is dramatically outpacing the novelty of the technology, and that discrepancy has been noticed by the gaming public. During the rollout of the Switch 2, when Nintendo hosted livestreams showcasing its upcoming 2025 catalog, the chat box on the side of the screen billowed up with the same message repeated ad nauseam: 'DROP THE PRICE.' It is hard to get a straight answer out of Nintendo about why its hardware has suddenly gotten so expensive, but it must be said that the company unveiled the Switch 2 on the afternoon of Donald Trump's so-called 'liberation day'—on which he announced a barrage of ill-conceived tariffs to be levied on the global population. Nintendo, recoiling from the chaos, briefly suspended preorders of its new consoles 'in order to assess the potential impact of tariffs and evolving market conditions.' The announced price tag would eventually go unchanged, because Trump, as the saying goes, chickened out, but the impact may not be over: It wasn't long before Nintendo also warned of 'price adjustments' on accessories. The United States' self-inflicted financial uncertainty may also have already been factored into the Switch 2's retail calculus. That's certainly what industry analysts think. Joost van Dreunen, who studies the business of video games at New York University, told IGN in April that with the higher price, 'Nintendo appears to be building in a buffer against these potential trade barriers,' while Piers Harding-Rolls, who studies the gaming market at Ampere Analysis, speculated that the company 'probably had a range of pricing for the US market in play up until the last minute due to the uncertainty on import tariffs.' Nintendo, naturally, has remained publicly neutral about the issue. 'Our basic policy is that for any country or region, if tariffs are imposed, we recognize them as a part of the cost and incorporate them into the price,' said Nintendo President Shuntaro Furukawa during a fiscal year report in May. (Given how open-ended Furukawa's statement was, I'm not surprised some experts believe that the Switch 2 might get even more expensive if Trump reintroduces portions of his tariff program, especially his original planned 46 percent tariff on Vietnam and 49 percent tariff on Cambodia, the countries where the company does much of its Switch manufacturing.) To be clear, Nintendo isn't the only heavy hitter jacking up its prices. Video game development is taking longer and growing steadily more expensive, and that has caused all the power brokers in the industry to print out new price tags. Just yesterday, Microsoft showed off The Outer Worlds 2, due out in October, which is a madcap sci-fi RPG that will also be the company's first $80 game. (For context, the average video game cost $60 for much of the 21st century. That number jumped to $70 in 2020, and five years later, norms are shifting again.) Similarly, remember that Xbox Series X I mentioned earlier? The one clocking in at $599? That's actually a recent phenomenon. When the console launched in 2020, it was a hundred bucks cheaper. The tech hasn't changed, but those ominous 'market conditions' certainly have, so Microsoft bumped up the cost earlier this year. This is a pretty radical departure, and it can't be explained away by simple inflation. Not long ago, video game hardware decreased in price over time, once it became sufficiently outpaced by flashier tech. But the titans of this industry have become increasingly responsive to fluctuations in the supply chain, and those old patterns have fallen by the wayside. The only question, it seems, that Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo are asking of their consumers is how much they're willing to pay. If that shift in philosophy turns their consoles into a luxury? Then so be it. Last weekend, I re-created a ritual I've savored every summer since I started playing video games. A few friends came over to fire up the latest Nintendo, down some beers, and enjoy a rousing evening of Mario Kart. The latest entry in the series hasn't altered the formula much; This is still the crowd-pleasing racing game it was in 1998, and 2007, and 2021. Gamers and nongamers alike instinctually internalized the controls, and together we jostled for position on the circuit, creating fleeting rivalries with those homing red shells. It left me a little melancholy. To think such a simple joy has become a premium experience? A new Mario Kart game is like manna from heaven for college dorms and bachelor pads. But today broke twentysomethings will need to scrounge up half a grand for the price of admission. I suppose that's just what life is like in 2025, when everything—rent, groceries, concert tickets, gym memberships—leaves us feeling gouged. No leisure goes unpunished anymore, and given the Trump economy's gloomy forecast, I fear it'll get worse before it gets better.

Disney finally owns all of Hulu, ending long tug-of-war with Comcast
Disney finally owns all of Hulu, ending long tug-of-war with Comcast

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Disney finally owns all of Hulu, ending long tug-of-war with Comcast

Walt Disney Co. has agreed to pay Comcast Corp. an additional $438.7 million to finalize the Mouse House purchase of streaming service Hulu. Disney in December 2023 initially paid Comcast $8.6 billion for NBCUniversal's one-third stake in the streaming service. The final payment, announced Monday, brings the total amount the Burbank entertainment giant will ultimately pay Comcast for its stake to $9.2 billion. This week's agreement came after an extended appraisal process as the two companies struggled over Hulu's actual value. The platform that is home to "The Handmaid's Tale" and "Only Murders in the Building" appears to be worth about $27.5 billion. The resolution also represents a major step in Disney's years-long pivot to streaming. 'We are pleased this is finally resolved," Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger said in a statement, acknowledging Disney's productive partnership with the Philadelphia-based company. "Completing the Hulu acquisition paves the way for a deeper and more seamless integration of Hulu's general entertainment content with Disney+ and, soon, with ESPN's direct-to-consumer product, providing an unrivaled value proposition for consumers," Iger said. Read more: Disney to pay at least $8.6 billion for Comcast's Hulu stake The two companies have had tense relations since Comcast launched a failed hostile takeover of Disney in 2004. Tensions flared again seven years ago after Comcast jumped into Disney's bidding process for Rupert Murdoch's entertainment assets, substantially driving up the price for Disney. Disney prevailed. It gained the majority stake in Hulu as part of its $71-billion acquisition of much of Murdoch's company in April 2019. That spring, Disney and Comcast negotiated a pact that outlined the governance of the service while it was jointly owned by the two companies and also provided a blueprint to dissolve their partnership. At the time, they agreed that Hulu would be valued at no less than $27.5 billion, making Comcast's stake worth at least $8.6 billion. Comcast's divestiture process began two years ago when Chief Executive Brian Roberts signaled that his company wanted out. The parties then entered into an appraisal process to find a value for Hulu. Disney noted the $438.7 million payment was substantially less than what Comcast had wanted. The deal is expected to close by July 24. Hulu launched as an NBCUniversal and Fox joint venture in 2008. Disney joined the following year as an equity owner. 'Hulu was a great start for us in streaming that generated nearly $10 billion in proceeds for Comcast and created an important audience for NBCUniversal's world-class content," Comcast said in a statement Monday. "We wish Disney well with Hulu and appreciate the cooperative way our teams managed the partnership." Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

‘How to Train Your Dragon' review: Live-action remake is nice, but doesn't always soar
‘How to Train Your Dragon' review: Live-action remake is nice, but doesn't always soar

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

‘How to Train Your Dragon' review: Live-action remake is nice, but doesn't always soar

movie review HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON Running time: 125 minutes. Rated PG (sequences of intense action, and peril). In theaters June 13. Over the course of two hours, the macho Vikings of the village of Berk go from despising and demonizing dragons to loving them like adorable puppies. I can't say I experienced the same abrupt about-face when it comes to the noxious trend of turning fantastic animated films into live-action remakes. But, hey, at least the decent 'How to Train Your Dragon' update is better than 'Snow White.' The transition from the DreamWorks CGI version from 2010, one of the best family flicks in years, to real human actors is thankfully smoother and not as off-putting as most of Disney's recent, pitiful princess efforts. Redoing 'Dragon' in a photorealistic way actually makes sense, even if it's just another studio ploy to plunder our wallets by rehashing their greatest hits. The heart of the story about a misunderstood boy named Hiccup and the scaly scamp called Toothless, who becomes his unlikely best friend, still beats, if a little less magically. Its relative success is because 'Dragon' was already an action-adventure story with aerial chases, fire-breathing beasts and explosions to begin with. That's a lot easier to swallow than the House of Mouse making a zoo hyena sing a song. The new movie works best when our hero is soaring through the air with his pal as John Powell's inspiring score is blared. 3 Hiccup (Mason Thames) makes an unlikely new friend in 'How to Train Your Dragon.' AP And it's tear-jerking as ever watching the very well-cast 17-year-old newcomer Mason Thames as geeky Hiccup teaching Toothless, an injured Night Fury, how to fly again. By the way, just because 'Dragon' is no longer fully animated doesn't mean the flick is 'Jurassic Park.' Toothless still has huge eyes, rather than a cold-blooded creature's beady peepers. And he's not really threatening at all, even before the duo become bros. Instead of making the lizards look like ferocious dinosaurs, director Dean DeBlois' movie keeps them toy-like and unscary. Fine. It's a movie for children — and depressed millennials. 3 The filmmakers opted not to turn Toothless into a scary dinosaur. AP Where 'Train' derails are the supposed-to-be-funny scenes in the dumb little town of Berk, the aesthetic of which is 'Game of Thrones' if Westeros was inhabited by the Teletubbies. The script is almost word-for-word the same as the original. Big mistake. Without the chipperness of animation, the jokes all fall flat. The lines are too simple, and the characters who speak them are obnoxious. I became more annoyed by the adults in this movie than their hormonal kids were. Gerard Butler as Hiccup's strict chieftain dad Stoick, who wants his loner son to become a dragon killer, is just plain dreadful as he stomps around harrumphing and brooding. He really is the haggis of actors. 3 Gerard Buter is terrible as Stoick. AP The other rascally teens training alongside Hiccup to be dragon slayers — including Nico Parker as his warrior crush Astrid — fare better. But their characters are, well, too cartoony to believe. The dialogue could've used some rewrites. Whenever the movie ventures into the forest and homes in on the sweet friendship of Thames and Toothless, even the iciest crank will melt. OK, so 'How to Train Your Dragon' is watchable. That doesn't make the live-action remake trend any less toothless.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store