logo
Florida judge suspended from bench after reportedly telling ‘G-rated dad jokes' in court

Florida judge suspended from bench after reportedly telling ‘G-rated dad jokes' in court

New York Post15-05-2025
A Broward County, Florida, circuit court judge will be suspended effective next week after an advisory panel to the state Supreme Court determined he was unfit to serve after telling 'exceptionally bad jokes,' was biased and had poor attendance.
Court filings show the Investigative Panel of the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission (FJQC) is suspending Broward Circuit Court Judge Gary Farmer, a former Florida state senator and Democrat, from office without pay, pending a disposition hearing.
Advertisement
The suspension becomes effective 11:59 p.m. Monday.
The decision comes about a month after the FJQC recommended Farmer's suspension.
The commission's panel called for an investigation in October 2024 into comments made by Farmer. After a probable cause hearing in December 2024, the panel determined there was probable cause to continue with the investigation.
The investigation discovered several instances in which Farmer made what some would consider inappropriate remarks.
Advertisement
'Through his extensive misconduct, occurring over a lengthy period of time, Judge Farmer has damaged the public's perception of the judiciary and the judicial branch in such a way that he has demonstrated a present unfitness to serve,' investigators said.
4 Broward County Circuit Court Judge Gary Farmer poses for a portrait with the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit.
Seventeenth Judicial Circuit of Florida
According to the allegations, Farmer was presiding over a felony case Aug. 15, 2024, and was informed the defendant was expecting the birth of three children.
Court documents say Farmer laughingly mocked the man who was expecting three children with different women.
Advertisement
'OK, you've been busy. You were just shooting all over the place!' Farmer told the man. 'That's good. Do you know their names? First and last? Romantic, are you? Don't tell Susie about Jane. Don't tell Jane about Mary. God bless you, man. One's enough.'
4 Judge Farmer poses for a photo with others while holding a Florida LGBTQ Democratic Caucus sign.
State Senator Gary Farmer / Facebook
Farmer later allegedly told the defendant he was going to put him on pretrial release.
'I'm going to order that you wear a condom at all times,' Farmer told the defendant. 'For your own good, OK? Probation is going to check. No, I'm kidding. I'm kidding.'
Advertisement
Later during the proceeding, Farmer recommended the defendant get a particular female attorney, though he warned him not to get her pregnant.
While presiding over the case of State v. Georgia Smith, Farmer is accused of singing a song about 'Sweet Georgia,' and telling the defendant, 'You're supposed to say 'peachy.' How you doin' Georgia? Peachy!'
4 Farmer speaks at the Pride Center at Equality Park in Wilton Manors, Florida.
State Senator Gary Farmer / Facebook
He also told Smith to sing 'She gets her peaches down in Georgia' and 'You get your weed in California.' Farmer then apologized to one of the attorneys, telling him making him laugh was a challenge.
Farmer was presiding over another felony case when he allegedly referenced and quoted 'extensively' from an 'In Living Color' comedy sketch making fun of gay people.
The panel also brought up another instance from Aug. 15, 2024, when Farmer said, 'Spring is here. I got so excited I wet my plants' and 'What did the shirt say to the pair of pants? Wassup britches!'
'Apparently, these are some of what you referred to as your 'exceptionally, exceptionally bad jokes,'' the court filing said.
Advertisement
Along with telling 'exceptionally bad' jokes, Farmer was accused of devoting his full time and attendance to his judicial duties after exceeding the 30 days of judicial leave he is allowed to take.
He was also accused of failing to respect and comply with the law by denying due process to litigants and lawyers and demonstrating a bias or predetermination for certain cases.
Farmer did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment on the matter.
Still, Farmer's attorney filed a response with the court after a suspension was recommended, saying Farmer 'generally admits to having made the jokes or remarks.'
Advertisement
'These jokes were said to lighten tension, reduce stress for criminal defendants, and show a sense of humanity,' the attorney wrote. 'They generally are G-rated dad jokes that are corny but not offensive and were not degrading to the solemnity of the proceedings.'
4 The Broward County Judicial Complex in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Google Maps
The attorney added that some of the jokes were 'racy.' After reflecting on the matter, Farmer found they were 'inappropriate.'
Farmer apologized for the 'racy' jokes during a probable cause hearing, the attorney added, noting he was again apologizing for the jokes.
Advertisement
As for the 'In Living Color' jokes, Farmer claimed he forgot his microphone was still on, though he recognized the remarks were inappropriate and apologized.
The Florida Supreme Court's commission suspended Farmer without pay.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan
California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

San Francisco Chronicle​

time17 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

The state Supreme Court opened the door Wednesday to plans by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats to redraw California's congressional districts in a gerrymander designed to pick up five seats, rejecting a Republican legal challenge. A lawsuit Monday by legislative Republicans contended the hastily drafted ballot measure, scheduled for votes in both houses on Thursday, has not been published long enough to meet the public-notice requirements in the state Constitution. But the court dismissed the suit Wednesday in a brief order with little explanation. The Republican lawmakers 'have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under (the) California Constitution,' the court said. Six justices, all appointed by Democratic governors, endorsed the order, while Justice Carol Corrigan, the only Republican appointee, was absent and did not participate, the court said. Newsom proposed the ballot measure, titled the Election Rigging Response Act, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott introduced legislation to redraw the state's House districts and enable Republicans to pick up five seats in next year's elections. Democrats currently hold 43 of California's 52 House seats. The governor's measure, if approved by two-thirds majorities in both the Assembly and state Senate — where Democrats hold more than two-thirds of the seats — would redesign California's House seats for the rest of this decade in response to changes in Texas or any other state. Ballot measures approved by the voters in 2008 and 2010 established a bipartisan, independent commission to draft congressional and legislative districts in California, a task previously left up to state legislators, who design districts in most states. Newsom's proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, would temporarily suspend that commission if approved by a majority of the voters in November. While California law does not allow legislative action on a proposed measure until 30 days after it has been introduced, Democrats apparently sidestepped that deadline with a longstanding practice known as 'gut and amend' — using other legislation that had been pending for more than 30 days, erasing the contents and replacing them with the redistricting language. That was apparently enough to defeat the Republicans' lawsuit. Other Republican lawmakers, and the National Republican Congressional Committee, have promised additional challenges under the California Constitution and federal election laws.

Brazilian police say ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum
Brazilian police say ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

Brazilian police say ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum

BRASILIA, Brazil — Brazil's federal police said that messages found on the telephone of embattled former president Jair Bolsonaro showed that at one point he wanted to flee to Argentina and request political asylum, according to documents seen Wednesday by the Associated Press. Bolsonaro is currently awaiting a Supreme Court ruling about an alleged coup attempt and on Wednesday found out he might face another case as police formally accused him and one of his sons, Eduardo Bolsonaro, of obstruction of justice in connection with his pending trial. The AP had access to the police investigation, messaging app exchanges, voice messages and reviewed the documents, which were sent to Brazil's Supreme Court. The 170-page police report said that Bolsonaro had drafted a request for political asylum from Argentine President Javier Milei's government dated Feb. 10, 2024. Bolsonaro saved the document two days after authorities searched his home and office as part of an investigation into an alleged coup plot. In a 33-page letter addressed to Milei, Bolsonaro claimed he was being politically persecuted in Brazil. 'I, Jair Messias Bolsonaro, request political asylum from Your Excellency in the Republic of Argentina, under an urgent regime, as I find myself in a situation of political persecution in Brazil and fear for my life,' the former Brazilian leader wrote. Argentina's presidential spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Bolsonaro did not make comments about the investigation either. On Feb. 12, Bolsonaro reportedly spent two nights at the Hungarian Embassy in Brasília, fueling speculation among critics that he may have been attempting to avoid arrest. Brazilian federal police investigators also said in their report that Bolsonaro's decision to ignore precautionary measures established for his house arrest and spread content to his allies 'sought to directly hit Brazilian democratic institutions, notably the Supreme Court and even Brazil's Congress.' With regards to Wednesday's obstruction of justice accusations, Eduardo Bolsonaro, a lawmaker who has lived in the United States, said in a statement that he 'never aimed at interfering in any ongoing proceedings in Brazil.' He added the conversations with his father that are part of the investigation are 'absolutely normal' and its publication has a political bias. Silas Malafaia, an evangelical pastor who is a staunch ally of Bolsonaro's, was also targeted by police. He had his passport seized by investigators but was not formally accused of obstruction of justice. Several messages exchanged between Bolsonaro and his son show their interest in praising U.S. President Donald Trump to affect legal proceedings in Brazil. Last month, Trump imposed 50% tariffs on some Brazilian exports and claimed the trial of the former president was the main reason for his sanctions. 'You won't have time to reverse the situation if the guy here turns his back on you. Everything here is very touchy, every little thing affects you,' Eduardo Bolsonaro told his father in one of the exchanges. 'In today's situation, you don't even need to worry about jail; you won't be arrested. But I'm afraid things will change here (in the United States). Even inside the White House, there are people telling (Trump): 'OK, Brazil is gone. Let's move on',' Eduardo Bolsonaro said. Some exchanges also show frictions sauced with expletives between father and son. Eduardo, who moved to the U.S. earlier this year despite holding a seat in Brazil's congress, calls Bolsonaro 'ungrateful' for his efforts to influence the Trump administration in their favor.

‘When they go low…we go lower?' North Bay official rails against California redistricting maps
‘When they go low…we go lower?' North Bay official rails against California redistricting maps

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

‘When they go low…we go lower?' North Bay official rails against California redistricting maps

Sonoma County Supervisor Lynda Hopkins had been loving Gov. Gavin Newsom's full-throated, all-caps trolling of President Donald Trump on social media. But then she plugged her rural Sebastopol address into California's newly proposed congressional maps. Her fellow Democrats' effort to counter Trump's push to gain more U.S. House seats in Texas for Republicans had proposed cleaving her Russian River community into separate districts. Sebastopol, Forestville and Santa Rosa would be lumped with Chico and Oroville in the Sierra foothills. Guerneville, Monte Rio and Jenner would be placed in a sprawling district running from Marin to the Oregon border. She was angry. 'When they go low… we go lower?' Hopkins began writing on Facebook Saturday afternoon. 'What hurts my heart the most here isn't that we're turning red districts into blue districts,' she continued in a 1,705-word post. 'It's that we're doing it by DILUTING THE RURAL VOTE.' The staunchly progressive Democrat (and former farmer who still grows vegetables and raises goats, ducks and geese) didn't stop there, rallying against inflexible government vaccine policies and government regulations that seem to lack common sense. She declared that crunchy west Sonoma County is home to the original 'Make America Healthy Again' movement, and not Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 'We're real MAHA, not fake MAHA… I'm still waiting for RFK Jr. to grow a pair and actually get those crappy additives out of our kids' food!' she wrote. Her rant hit a nerve – or many — drawing praise and criticism. 'Preach, sister!' wrote Santa Rosa resident Deb McGauley, who criticized 'the tit-for-tat, chest beating behavior between these men in power,' and said it is 'NOT going to help anyone in the long run.' 'F that,' wrote Jeniffer Wertz, a Guerneville resident, who held the opposite view. 'They've been punching us in the face and winning, and it's time to punch back while we still have the right to vote!' 'Wow Linda, you seem to be out of touch with the crisis of the current moment,' wrote Gina Cuclis, a Sonoma County Board of Education trustee (who ran an unsuccessful bid in 2012 for a supervisory seat). The post garnered nearly 200 comments and was shared 65 times. The next day, Hopkins deactivated the account but brought it back Monday. Hopkins told the Chronicle that she temporarily took the account down after multiple suspicious login attempts. California's redistricting plan – which could bring Democrats five more seats in the U.S. House in the 2026 midterms – is not finalized. Democrats are racing to clear procedural hurdles and get a redistricting measure onto a special ballot for a November vote. As it stands, Newsom is proposing to use these new maps through the 2030 elections, after which the congressional maps are slated to be re-evaluated by the state's independent redistricting commission. Hopkins, in an interview on Wednesday, said she would vote for the redistricting plan 'because I think that we do need to fight this bigger battle against authoritarianism,' even though she is frustrated that Sonoma County had been 'carved up for parts.' 'When we have to stoop to the level of gerrymandering in order to save our country, that should give us heartburn,' Hopkins said. To get more Democrats into Congress, Newsom and his allies must dilute the populations that have elected Republican legislators including Doug LaMalfa and Kevin Kiley in northern California, said David McCuan, a professor of political science at Sonoma State University. Those Republicans' districts were redrawn to pick up Democratic strongholds further to the west, like Santa Rosa. Bruce Cain, a political scientist at Stanford University, said that Hopkins 'has a valid point' that rural interests are being sacrificed, although the arguments are also strong for Democrats to take every measure necessary to get more representatives into Congress. Cain said part of the goal of the state's independent commission to draw congressional district lines is to ensure that different community interests aren't drowned out – and that includes rural interests, such as health care wildfires, air quality, drug abuse and farming issues. 'Once you stick large rural areas together with urban areas, you're going to swamp out those interests,' Cain said. Hopkins said Wednesday she often writes paragraphs and paragraphs to solidify and express her thoughts. She doesn't always post them. But this time, she did. 'To the city Dem politicians who consider the rest of the state a nice place to visit or fly over: you're welcome for the clean water, the flood control, the food you eat, the wood that builds your homes, the gravel that makes up the roads you drive on,' Hopkins wrote. 'Because all of that, the very basis of life in cities, COMES FROM RURAL COMMUNITIES. And you know what? It's not just owls in these woods. People live here, too."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store