logo
Can list trans couple as parents in birth certificate: Kerala high court

Can list trans couple as parents in birth certificate: Kerala high court

Hindustan Times2 days ago

The Kerala high court on Monday ruled that a transgender couple can be listed simply as 'parents', rather than 'mother' and 'father', on their child's birth certificate, in a decision that marks a significant moment in the legal recognition of non-traditional families and gender identity in official documents.
The order was passed by a vacation bench of justice Ziyad Rahman AA, who directed Kozhikode municipal authorities to replace gendered parental terms with the gender-neutral designation 'parent' for both individuals.
The petitioners —Zahhad, a trans man, and Ziya Paval, a trans woman —are believed to be Kerala's first openly transgender couple to have a biological child. Their journey to parenthood captured national attention in February 2023 when Zahhad gave birth, a first for India's transgender community.
Initially, the Kozhikode civic body issued a birth certificate listing Zahhad as the 'mother' and Ziya as the 'father,' ignoring their self-identified genders. Their plea to be recognised solely as 'parents' was denied, prompting them to move the high court for redress.
The couple was represented by Padma Lakshmi, Kerala's first transgender lawyer, who argued that the refusal to accommodate their request violated their fundamental right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution.
Article 14 does not restrict the meaning of the word 'person' only to male or female, and transpeople too were entitled to legal protection and had rights in 'all spheres of state activity,' she told the high court at the time. They also claimed that their prayer was in line with the principles laid out in the Supreme Court's 2014 NALSA judgement, which upholds the rights of transgender individuals to self-identify their gender.
The high court concurred, directing the civic body in Kozhikode to issue a birth certificate to the couple's child by incorporating both their names only as parents, without referring to their specific genders.
'This writ petition is disposed of directing the fifth respondent (civic body) to issue birth certificate with the modification by removing the columns of names of father and mother and by incorporating the names of the petitioners as parents without referring to their genders,' the operative part of the order, as read out by the judge, stated. The full judgment is awaited.
The couple explained in their petition that Zahhad, despite being the biological parent who gave birth, has long identified and lived as male. Forcing them to label themselves as 'mother' and 'father' not only contradicted their lived identities but also risked subjecting their child to lifelong confusion and discrimination in situations such as school admissions and the issuance of official documents such as Aadhaar, PAN cards, and passports.
'The petitioners made such a request to the Kozhikode Corporation to avoid the name of father and mother on the birth certificate because the biological mother of the child has identified herself as male years ago and is living as male member in the society. Since scientifically there's some contradiction in the fact that male giving birth to a child, the petitioners requested the authorities to avoid the name of father and mother but simply writing 'Parent'…' their petition in the court read.
Their legal team further contended that denying the couple gender-neutral recognition would not only infringe upon the parents' rights but also breach their child's fundamental rights -- a view the court ultimately upheld while setting a precedent on the affirmation of the rights of transgender individuals and their families.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tatkal Ticket Booking Rule Change Alert: Indian Railways To Soon Use....Passengers To Get Confirmed Ticket With...
Tatkal Ticket Booking Rule Change Alert: Indian Railways To Soon Use....Passengers To Get Confirmed Ticket With...

India.com

time19 minutes ago

  • India.com

Tatkal Ticket Booking Rule Change Alert: Indian Railways To Soon Use....Passengers To Get Confirmed Ticket With...

Booking a confirmed tatkal ticket with Indian Railways has been a dream for many train travellers in India. The Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC)'s website often hangs, slows down and delays booking by individual passengers. This often leads to outrage among passengers who get waitlisted tickets despite efforts and payment deductions. Notably, the Indian Railways and IRCTC have been working to resolve this issue and make tatak ticket booking by individual passengers smooth. Now, Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw has announced a change in the booking rules for tatkal tickets. The rule will come into effect soon, said Vaishnaw. "Bharatiya Railways will soon start using e-Aadhaar authentication to book Tatkal tickets. This will help genuine users get confirmed tickets during need," said the minister on X. With e-Aadhar authentication, the passenger will get OTP on their mobiles and they will have to verify it on the IRCTC ticket booking website. This will weed out fake users/passengers/agents who often book tickets and sell it in black at higher prices to those in need. Aadhaar authentication will help the railways verify the passenger's info and thus, reduce the burden on servers by removing fake users.

LGBTQIA+ couples have right to find a family: Madras high court
LGBTQIA+ couples have right to find a family: Madras high court

Time of India

time19 minutes ago

  • Time of India

LGBTQIA+ couples have right to find a family: Madras high court

Madras high court CHENNAI: Though Supreme Court has not legalised same-sex marriage, individuals can still form a family, Madras high court has said, adding: 'Marriage is not the sole mode to find a family. The concept of a 'chosen family' is now well settled and acknowledged in LGBTQIA+ jurisprudence.' A division bench of Justices G R Swaminathan and V Lakshminarayanan made the observation on May 22, while setting at liberty a 25-year-old lesbian woman, who was forcefully separated from her partner and subjected to harassment by her family. 'Not every parent is like Justice Leila Seth. She could acknowledge and accept her son's sexual orientation,' the judges said. 'The mother of the detenue is no Leila Seth. We could understand her feelings and temperament. She wants her daughter to be like any other normal, heterosexual woman, get married and settle down in life. We endeavoured in vain to impress upon her that her daughter, being an adult, is entitled to choose a life of her own,' they added. Also, deprecating the use of the word 'queer' to identify non-heterosexual individuals, the judges said: 'We feel a certain discomfort in employing the expression 'queer'. Any standard dictionary defines this word as meaning strange or odd. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 가상화폐 3개이상 가지고 있다면 '이렇게'해라 크립토시그널 더 알아보기 Queering one's pitch means spoiling the show.' 'To a homosexual individual, his/her/their sexual orientation must be perfectly natural and normal. There is nothing strange or odd about such inclinations. Why then should they be called queer?' they asked. The court further placed on record that the jurisdictional police behaved in an insensitive manner in the issue by forcing the detenue to go with her parents. 'We censure the rank inaction on the part of police and the insensitivity shown by them. We hold that govt officials, in particular the jurisdictional police, have a duty to expeditiously and appropriately respond whenever complaints of this nature are received from the members of the LGBTQIA+ community,' the court said. The court then restrained the detenue's family members from interfering with her personal liberty and issued a writ of continuing mandamus to the jurisdictional police to afford adequate protection to the detenue and her partner who moved the habeas corpus petition.

Muslim Law Board Warns Of Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Waqf Portal
Muslim Law Board Warns Of Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Waqf Portal

NDTV

time20 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Muslim Law Board Warns Of Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Waqf Portal

New Delhi: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has taken exception to the Centre's move to activate the Waqf Umeed Portal from June 6. In a statement, the board alleged that the government's move is illegal and amounts to contempt of court since the law backing it - the Waqf (Amendment) Act of 2025 - has been challenged before the Supreme Court. The statement also appealed to Muslims and State Waqf Boards not to use the portal until the Supreme Court delivers its verdict. The Muslim Law Board also said it would approach the Supreme Court against the government move by filing a contempt of court petition. According to the law board, all Muslim organizations have opposed the law, and it has also drawn criticism from Opposition parties, human rights groups and minority communities including Sikh and Christian bodies. The law board also alleged that though the matter is pending before the Supreme Court, the government has proceeded to launch the portal and made registration of Waqf properties mandatory through it. The law board has contended that such a move constitutes contempt of court as the very basis of the portal - the validity of the amended Waqf law - is sub judice. The Supreme Court has heard a clutch of petitions challenging Waqf Amendment Act of 2025. Last month, the court had reserved its order on the question of interim stay on certain provisions of the UMEED Act of 2025 till it takes a call on the legality of the new law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store