logo
Muhyiddin wins High Court nod to transfer RM232.5m graft and RM200m money laundering case to High Court

Muhyiddin wins High Court nod to transfer RM232.5m graft and RM200m money laundering case to High Court

Malay Mail16-06-2025
KUALA LUMPUR, June 16 — The High Court today allowed Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin's application to transfer his seven charges of abuse of power and receiving funds from unlawful activities from the Sessions Court to the High Court.
Justice Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin granted the application after hearing submissions from Muhyiddin's counsel, Datuk Hisyam Teh Poh Teik, and deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin.
'I have considered the arguments from both parties and find that the applicant has met the threshold under Section 417(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code for the case to be transferred to the High Court. The three questions of law arising from the charges are of exceptional complexity.
'While I have full confidence in the Sessions Court judge's legal competence and ability to conduct the trial, it is more appropriate for the High Court to determine these legal issues,' the judge said.
The court then fixed July 14 for case management.
Earlier, Hisyam submitted that the application had satisfied the necessary threshold, and there were sufficient merits for the court to exercise its additional powers under Section 12 of the Schedule to the Courts of Judicature Act 1964.
'In the applicant's affidavit in support, (it is stated that) a number of critical questions of law of unusual difficulty are likely to arise in these criminal proceedings, and that for the ends of justice, the case should be transferred to and tried before the High Court,' he said.
Hisyam said the first legal issue is whether the learned Sessions Court judge may invoke both statutory presumptions against the applicant, or is limited to relying solely on the presumption under Sections 23(2) and 50(1) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act.
'The second issue is whether, in law, the monies allegedly received by Bersatu constitutes unacceptable gratifications or legitimate political donations, and the third legal issue is whether the word 'organisation' in the context of the MACC Act can be interpreted and construed to also include a political party like Bersatu,' he said.
Meanwhile, Wan Shaharuddin submitted that the prosecution had no doubts regarding the competence and capability of the Sessions Court judge to adjudicate all legal issues raised, including those advanced by Muhyiddin in the present application.
'The Sessions Court judge has served on the bench for over 13 years and has nearly three decades of experience in public service. The fact that the applicant is a former Prime Minister does not, by itself, entitle him to choose the court in which his case should be heard,' he said, appearing with DPP Wan Nur Iman Wan Ahmad Afzal.
Muhyiddin, 78, who was then prime minister and Bersatu president, was charged with four counts of abuse of power for allegedly soliciting RM232.5 million in bribes for the political party from Bukhary Equity Sdn Bhd, Nepturis Sdn Bhd, Mamfor Sdn Bhd, and Datuk Azman Yusoff in connection with the Jana Wibawa project.
He was accused of committing the offence at the Prime Minister's Office, Bangunan Perdana Putra, Federal Government Administration Centre in Putrajaya between March 1, 2020, and August 20, 2021.
The Pagoh member of parliament also faces three charges of receiving RM200 million in illegal proceeds from Bukhary Equity Sdn Bhd, which were deposited into Bersatu's Ambank and CIMB Bank accounts.
The offence was allegedly committed at AmBank, Amcorp Mall branch, Petaling Jaya on January 7, 2022, and CIMB Bank, Menara KL Branch, Jalan Stesen Sentral, between February 25 and July 16, 2021, and February 8 and July 8, 2022.
Meanwhile, speaking to reporters after the proceedings, Wan Shaharuddin said the prosecution will file an appeal against the decision by the High Court today. — Bernama
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Akmal to face charge for ‘disrupting public order' over Facebook content
Akmal to face charge for ‘disrupting public order' over Facebook content

Free Malaysia Today

time2 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Akmal to face charge for ‘disrupting public order' over Facebook content

Dr Akmal Saleh said police had informed him that he would be charged at the magistrates' court in Bukit Mertajam, Penang, on Friday at 8am. PETALING JAYA : The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has decided to charge Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh over statements he made on his Facebook page, 'Akmal Saleh', which were said to disrupt public order. In a statement, the AGC said it would proceed to charge Akmal under Section 505(b) of the Penal Code for making statements conducing to public mischief. However, it did not specify the Facebook content in question. In a Facebook video, Akmal said police had informed him that he would be charged at the magistrates' court in Bukit Mertajam, Penang, on Friday, at 8am. He said he would cut short his trip to Mecca, after arriving there just yesterday, to face the charge against him. Last Friday, it was reported that police had launched a probe into a viral Facebook video featuring Akmal making statements that were considered to be 'hate speech' that could disturb public peace. It was not clear which video is the subject of the investigation. However, in recent days, Akmal has posted videos concerning a Jalur Gemilang mishap at a Penang hardware store, where the national flag was hoisted upside down. In one of Akmal's videos, he said prosecutors had two days to charge the shop owner, failing which he said he would personally 'teach this 'Ah Pek' (uncle) how to correctly put up a flag'. The AGC also confirmed that Bersatu Youth chief Hilman Idham would be charged under the same section over remarks he made in a video posted on the TikTok account ' Earlier, Bersatu Youth information chief Harris Idaham Rashid said the wing's chief is expected to be charged at the magistrates' court in Kuala Lumpur tomorrow over a speech he delivered during a gathering outside the Dang Wangi police headquarters last month. The AGC today said it had also decided to charge a woman named Siti Hajar Aflah Sharuddin under the same section as Akmal and Hilman, and S Chandrasegaran under the Communications and Multimedia Act for posting offensive content online. 'All charges will be brought before the magistrates' court with the appropriate local jurisdiction in due course.'

Safeguard constitution to ensure nation's wellbeing, says Tengku Maimun
Safeguard constitution to ensure nation's wellbeing, says Tengku Maimun

Free Malaysia Today

time2 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Safeguard constitution to ensure nation's wellbeing, says Tengku Maimun

Former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat warned that the erosion of constitutional boundaries will have consequences that extend beyond the realm of legal doctrine. KUALA LUMPUR : Constitutional adherence plays a critical role in shaping perceptions of Malaysia as a secure and stable environment for economic activity, former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said today. Speaking at a lecture here, Tengku Maimun said there was an intrinsic connection between strong constitutional governance and the broader stability and wellbeing of a nation. Adding that the Federal Constitution clearly defines the roles and limits of each branch of government, she warned that when constitutional boundaries are eroded – whether through legislative overreach, executive interference or the weakening of institutional safeguards – the consequences extend far beyond the realm of legal doctrine. 'They strike at the heart of our constitutional order, which upholds the rule of law, separation of powers and, ultimately, legitimacy of public authority,' she said. 'Investors, businesses and financial institutions base their long-term investments and economic planning on expectations of legal certainty, impartial adjudication and the protection of property and contractual rights. 'A judiciary that is independent and consistent in applying the law reinforces these expectations. Conversely, when laws are applied inconsistently or when institutions appear vulnerable to external pressure, investors' confidence is undermined.' She was speaking at the Allianz Centre for Governance's Distinguished Speaker Series inaugural lecture titled 'The Sanctity of Malaysia's Federal Constitution: Threats, Solutions and Impact on National Governance'. Tengku Maimun said there would be less room for the arbitrary exercise of power when each branch of government operates within its prescribed limits and respects the institutional independence of the others. She said this, in turn, fosters public trust in the government and strengthens the credibility of public institutions. 'When this constitutional framework is disrupted, when one branch seeks to dominate or silence another, the rule of law is placed at risk,' she said. 'In such moments, the judiciary is not merely permitted but obligated to act in accordance with the solemn oath to protect, preserve and defend the Federal Constitution.' Tengku Maimun served as the country's top judge from May 2019 to July 1 this year.

Govt files appeal against negligence ruling in Ivana Smit's case
Govt files appeal against negligence ruling in Ivana Smit's case

New Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Govt files appeal against negligence ruling in Ivana Smit's case

KUALA LUMPUR: The government has filed a notice of appeal against the High Court's ruling that found the government and police negligent in their investigation into the death of Dutch model Ivana Esther Robert Smit. Attorney-General Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar confirmed the appeal when contacted today. "Yes, confirmed. We did file it yesterday," he said in a brief reply to the New Straits Times. Earlier today, in a statement released by the Smit family's lawyer, Datuk Sankara Nair, it was confirmed that the government, through the Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC), filed a notice of appeal against the judgment delivered by the Kuala Lumpur High Court on July 29, in the civil action brought by Smit's mother, Christina Carolina Gerarda Johanna Verstappen, on behalf of herself and her late daughter. Sankara said the appeal was filed yesterday by the A-GC, on behalf of the inspector-general of police, investigating officer Faizal Abdullah, the home minister and the Malaysian government. "Our firm continues to act for Christina Verstappen in defending the High Court's decision, and we remain committed to ensuring that justice is pursued transparently and vigorously." On July 29, Christina Verstappen was awarded RM1.1 million in damages after the High Court ruled there was negligence by the police in handling the investigation into her daughter's death in 2017. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain ruled there were breaches in the duty of care by the authorities, including failures in crime scene management, evidence preservation and forensic procedures. Christina, who filed the suit as a plaintiff on Nov 20, 2020, had named the inspector-general of police, Faizal, the home minister and the government as defendants. Smit, who was at the home of American couple Alexander William Johnson and Laura Almazkyzy, was allegedly partying with the couple before she fell to her death. She fell from the 20th floor, and her naked body was found on a sixth-floor balcony at 10am. Smit, who had dual Dutch and Belgian citizenship, was the second runner-up in the Malaysia Supermodel Search 2014, when she was 15.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store