
Tariffs And Nearshoring: Uncertainty, Strategy And A Path Forward
Jorge Gonzalez Henrichsen, Head of Business Development and Co-CEO at The Nearshore Company.
If there's one word that best describes the current climate around U.S.-Mexico trade, it's uncertainty. Ever since former President Trump announced plans to impose a 25% tariff on Mexican goods, companies with nearshoring strategies have been left wondering: What does this mean for my business? Should I keep moving forward with my plans in Mexico, or do I hit the brakes?
As a company deeply dependent on cross-border commerce, we've spent countless hours speaking with clients, trade experts and customs brokers to get a sense of what's happening on the ground. What we're seeing is a tale of two extremes: Some companies are in full-blown panic mode, while others are taking a wait-and-see approach to see if the tariffs will stick around. The truth, as always, lies somewhere in between.
One of the biggest challenges in navigating this tariff situation is that it isn't just about risk—it's about uncertainty. Businesses know how to manage risk. Insurance companies, for example, calculate and mitigate risk all the time. But uncertainty? That's a different beast. It makes planning nearly impossible.
In prior years, many companies operating under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) paid limited attention to the declared value of goods crossing the border. Duties were zero or minimal, so as long as everything was documented correctly, there wasn't much reason to worry. (At the time of this writing, goods from Mexico that aren't covered by the USMCA, as well as steel, aluminum and automotives, are subject to 25% tariffs.) With the uncertainty surrounding tariffs, our clients are scrutinizing every detail—double-checking invoices, questioning valuation methods and seeking legal counsel to understand their true exposure.
At the core of this debate is a fundamental question: Will these tariffs bring manufacturing back to the U.S.? It's hard to say. The U.S. is facing a shrinking working-age population, a trend that was previously offset by immigration. With legal immigration becoming more restrictive and increased efforts to reduce illegal immigration, some are expecting the labor shortage to become more pronounced. The reality is that no matter what happens with these tariffs, manufacturing companies still need a labor solution, so some might feel nearshoring is their best bet.
Given all this uncertainty, what's the smartest path forward for businesses considering nearshoring? My advice is simple: Do the homework.
Businesses that once had the luxury of being somewhat relaxed about cost structures can no longer afford to be. If you're considering nearshoring, conduct a deep financial analysis. Assume the worst-case scenario—a 25% tariff on the total declared value of your product—and determine whether your margins can still hold up.
In early February, some said they believe that 25% tariffs on Mexican goods are unlikely to last. Regardless of whether any do, in the short term, we may see temporary disruptions. If you can survive a few months of uncertainty, then pressing forward with nearshoring may still be a viable long-term strategy.
If the math doesn't work with a 25% tariff, you may need to explore other options. That could mean delaying your move to Mexico, considering automation investments or looking at alternative manufacturing locations. However, bear in mind that tariffs and trade restrictions will impact businesses everywhere, not just in Mexico.
Despite all the noise and political maneuvering, one thing remains clear: Nearshoring can still be a valid long-term solution for North American companies facing labor shortages and supply chain challenges. Even with short-term uncertainty, the fundamentals haven't changed. Brands will need to take the long view and ensure the benefits of nearshoring outweigh the risks.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
35 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Deportation Wars Begin
Rounding up and deporting millions of illegal migrants was never going to go down without protest. But President Trump is determined to do it, and no one can say he didn't tell voters during the campaign. But there are risks for both sides of this dispute, and especially for the country if it turns violent and triggers a military response from the White House. The weekend's clashes in Los Angeles are a sign of what could be ahead. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has been staging raids around the city hunting for migrants, including at businesses where they are thought to work. Workers, union leaders and pro-migrant activists hit the streets in protest. The clashes turned nasty in some places, some officers were hurt, and ICE and local police made arrests, including of a prominent union leader for interfering with federal officers. President Trump then invoked a little-used law to override what is typically state control and sent in 2,000 troops from the California National Guard. Cue the outrage from Democrats and cries of law-breaking on both sides.


Newsweek
37 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Scott Bessent Accuses Gavin Newsom of Threatening 'Tax Evasion'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent accused California Governor Gavin Newsom of "threatening to commit criminal tax evasion" after the Democratic leader suggested in a social media post that the state should consider withholding federal tax payments in response to possible funding cuts from the Trump administration. Newsweek has reached out to Newsom's press office for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters The Trump administration has threatened to withhold federal funding from various state programs and institutions, including research and education programs. Last week, CNN reported that the administration is considering cutting grant funding to the University of California and California State University systems. In late-May, President Donald Trump threatened to pull "large scale federal funding" from the Golden State unless it bars transgender athletes from competing in girls' sports. Bessent's remarks come amid ongoing tensions between federal, state, and local authorities as protests continue in Los Angeles, which were sparked following immigration raids during which police followed the Trump administration's directives to arrest people. Some protesters have thrown rocks at officers, with one allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail, and burning items in the streets. Agents have used tear gas on the crowds. The clashes highlight deepening conflicts between sanctuary jurisdictions and federal immigration policy, as Trump has implemented sweeping changes through executive orders and deployed the National Guard against local leaders wishes. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on May 7. Inset: California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in West Hollywood, California, on March 26. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on May 7. Inset: California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in West Hollywood, California, on March 26. Photo by Corine Solberg/Sipa USA/Aaron Schwartz/AP Images What To Know On Friday, Newsom shared a screenshot of a CNN article on X, formerly Twitter, about the Trump administration's potential move to cut federal funding to the state, writing, "Californians pay the bills for the federal government. We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back. Maybe it's time to cut that off." Californians pay the bills for the federal government. We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back. Maybe it's time to cut that off, @realDonaldTrump. — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) June 6, 2025 His post followed a CNN report that the Trump administration is targeting California's public university system over alleged antisemitism on campus. The administration has already taken similar action against Harvard University. California is the most populous state in the country with over 39 million people. It leads all the states in federal tax collection, with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) reporting that California contributed around $806 billion to total IRS collections in the 2024 fiscal year, which is about 15 percent of the national total. A recent analysis by the Rockefeller Institute of Government found the state contributed $83.1 billion more in federal taxes in 2022 than it received back. In response to the governor, Bessent, who oversees the IRS, wrote in an X post on Sunday: "Governor @GavinNewsom is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion. His plan: defraud the American taxpayer and leave California residents on the hook for unpaid federal taxes." Governor @GavinNewsom is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion. His plan: defraud the American taxpayer and leave California residents on the hook for unpaid federal taxes. (1/3) — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) June 8, 2025 In a follow up post, he wrote: "I am certain most California businesses know that failing to pay taxes owed to the Treasury constitutes tax evasion and have no intention of following the dangerous path Governor @GavinNewsom is threatening." In a third post, the treasury secretary called the governor's comments "extremely reckless." Federal law defines a willful attempt to evade or defeat federal taxes as a felony under United States law. The public clash comes as Newsom is sparring with Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over deployment of the National Guard, and potentially active-military Marines, following protests in California sparked over federal immigration enforcement operations. Hegseth wrote in a Saturday evening post on X that in addition to mobilizing guards, nearby Marines may also be called upon, writing, "And, if violence continues, active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." What People Are Saying White House spokesperson Kush Desai told CNN in a Friday statement: "No taxpayer should be forced to fund the demise of our country," in regard to certain California policies related to energy and immigration. "No final decisions, however, on any potential future action by the Administration have been made, and any discussion suggesting otherwise should be considered pure speculation." Robert Rivas, speaker of the California State Assembly, wrote in a BlueSky post about the CNN article on Friday: "This is unconstitutional and vindictive. We're the nation's economic engine and the largest donor state, and deserve our fair share. I'll use every legal and constitutional tool available to defend CA -- we must look at every option, including withholding federal taxes." What Happens Next? The tension between the Trump administration and Newsom don't show signs of easing.

Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Speaker Johnson Downplays Musk's Influence, Suggests Republicans Will Pass Budget Bill
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on June 8 downplayed tech billionaire Elon Musk's critical comments and said that House Republicans will pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act backed by President Donald Trump. Last week, Musk and Trump got into a heated back and forth after the Tesla CEO repeatedly bashed the spending bill on social media. Trump suggested that it was because of its cuts to electric vehicle mandates, and at one point floated cutting federal money to Musk's companies. Meanwhile, Musk took credit for Trump and the GOP winning the 2024 election and threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft.