Meet the new species of giant stick insect that weighs about the same as a golf ball
Oceania
GolfFacebookTweetLink
Follow
In a remote rainforest in Australia, home to deadly snakes, spiders and creepy-crawlies, scientists have discovered a new species of stick insect they believe is the heaviest ever found in the country.
The new species weighs 44 grams (1.55 oz), about the same as a golf ball, and is 40 cm (15.75 inches) long.
James Cook University's Angus Emmott, who helped identify the new Acrophylla alta species, said the creature's large size could be an evolutionary response to its cool, wet habitat.
'Their body mass likely helps them survive the colder conditions, and that's why they've developed into this large insect over millions of years,' he was quoted as saying in a media release.
'From what we know to date, this is Australia's heaviest insect.'
The new stick insect was discovered in the canopies of the mountainous Wet Tropics region of Far North Queensland, in Australia's northeast.
The remote habitat was probably also why it had remained undiscovered for so long, Emmott said.
'It's restricted to a small area of high-altitude rainforest, and it lives high in the canopy. So, unless you get a cyclone or a bird bringing one down, very few people get to see them,' he said.
The stick insect's distinctive eggs also helped scientists identify it as a new species.
'Every species of stick insect has their own distinct egg style,' Emmott said.
'They've all got different surfaces and different textures and pitting, and they can be different shapes. Even the caps on them are all very unique.'
Two specimens have been added to the Queensland Museum's collection to aid future research.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
3 hours ago
- Medscape
CLL: More Protection, More Problems?
TOPLINE: In a 14-year study of 6217 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), regular immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) was associated with higher infection rates during treatment periods than during nontreatment periods. Monthly infection-related hospitalizations doubled, while IgRT use quadrupled over the study period. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis of 6217 patients diagnosed with CLL between 2008 and 2022 in Victoria, Australia, using linked hospital and death data. Analysis included Kaplan-Meier survival analyses to estimate survival, infection incidence, and IgRT use, while Cox survival analyses explored associations between infections and IgRT in regular prophylactic users. Investigators tracked 753 patients (12.1%) who received IgRT, with 524 (8.4%) receiving regular treatment, defined as at least three IgRT sessions within a 5-month period, with no gaps longer than 3 months. TAKEAWAY: Patients experiencing serious infections showed significantly higher mortality rates (0.090; 95% CI, 0.074-0.110) than those without infections (0.008; 95% CI, 0.007-0.009). Regular IgRT users demonstrated higher infection incidence during treatment periods (0.056; 95% CI, 0.052-0.060) vs nontreatment periods (0.038; 95% CI, 0.035-0.042). Serious infections were strongly associated with IgRT initiation (hazard ratio [HR], 31.91; 95% CI, 24.94-40.82) and cessation (HR, 3.81; 95% CI, 2.71-5.35). The median survival time from CLL diagnosis was 10 years, with infection-related hospitalizations doubling, while IgRT use quadrupled over the 14-year follow-up period. IN PRACTICE: 'Given the increasing use and costs of IgRT, these results highlight the need to evaluate the causal association between IgRT and infections and determine which patient subgroup, and at what point during their disease course, may benefit the most from IgRT treatment. Further research, particularly randomized controlled trials, is needed to fully understand the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IgRT in this patient population,' wrote the authors of the study. SOURCE: The study was led by Sara Carrillo de Albornoz, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University in Melbourne, Australia. It was published online in Blood Advances. LIMITATIONS: According to the authors, the retrospective design and potential selection bias were significant limitations. The study lacked key clinical prognostic factors, disease severity data, and cancer treatment-related information. Additionally, researchers could not stratify patients or adjust for infection risk, particularly underlying hypogammaglobulinemia. The analysis was limited to serious infections, while outpatient infections and oral antibiotic treatments outside of hospital were not captured. DISCLOSURES: The study was funded by the Medical Research Future Fund Value-Ig Study. Erica Wood and Zoe McQuilten disclosed receiving grant funding from CSL Behring unrelated to this study and research funding to their institution from Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Celgene, Janssen, New Zealand Blood Service, Novartis, Sanofi, and Takeda. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists say the Great Barrier Reef is 'worth fighting for' after shocking report
A new report has found that parts of the Great Barrier Reef have suffered the largest annual decline in coral cover since records began almost 40 years ago. According to the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), the sharp declines in coral cover and increased instances of coral bleaching are directly linked to heat stress caused by climate change–but scientists are warning Aussies that despair isn't the answer. The AIMS research team leader for reef monitoring, Dr Mike Emslie, told Yahoo News Australia that while the latest report does highlight the seriousness of increased coral bleaching, the reef is still 'worth fighting for.' 'It is by no means dead, but it is certainly under stress from continuous cumulative impacts… if we do give it a chance by taking meaningful action on greenhouse gas emissions and getting the warming trend under control, it will continue to flourish into the future.' Video transcript A new report has found that parts of the Great Barrier Reef have suffered the largest annual decline in coral cover since records began almost 40 years ago, according to the Australian Institute of Marine Science. The sharp decline in coral cover and increased instances of coral bleaching are directly linked to heat stress caused by climate change, but scientists are warning Aussies that despair isn't the answer. The AIMS research team leader for Monitoring, Dr. Mike Emsley told Yahoo News Australia that while the latest report does highlight the seriousness of increased coral bleaching, the reef is still worth fighting for. It is by no means dead, but it is certainly under stress from continuous cumulative impacts. If we do give it a chance by taking meaningful action on greenhouse gas emissions and getting the warming trend under control, it will continue to flourish into the future.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Signs of million-year-old ancient humans found in Indonesia
Archaeologists have found stone tools that could have been used by early humans more than one million years ago. The artefacts—discovered under a corn field on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi—suggest that ancient humans may have inhabited the region 800,000 years earlier than previously known. But, according to the study's co-author Professor Adam Brumm, how these ancient humans even got to Sulawesi remains a mystery. Professor Brumm told Yahoo News Australia, 'I think it's more likely that [they got there by] some freak geological event, involving hominoids being washed out to sea by a tsunami from mainland Asia, and clinging to floating trees. 'Other species, including rats, monkeys, and even early elephants, have also conquered new islands by sea.' While the stone tools themselves couldn't be directly dated, researchers were able to calculate that the age of the sediments and pig fossil that surrounded the tools were between 1.04 and 1.48 million years old. Video transcript Archaeologists have found stone tools that could have been used by early humans more than 1 million years ago. The artefacts discovered under a cornfield on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi suggest that ancient humans may have inhabited the region 800,000 years earlier than previously known. But according to the study's co-author, Professor Adam Brum, how these ancient humans even got to Sulawesi remains a mystery. Professor Brum told Yahoo News Australia, I think it's more likely that they got there by some freak geological event involving hominoids being washed out to sea by a tsunami from mainland Asia and clinging to floating trees. Other species, including rats, monkeys, and even early elephants have also conquered new islands by sea. While the stone tools themselves couldn't be directly dated, researchers were able to calculate that the age of the sediments and pig fossil that surrounded the tools were between 1.04 and 1.48 million years old.
