logo
Couple outraged over five-minute Carlisle parking charge

Couple outraged over five-minute Carlisle parking charge

BBC News19-02-2025
A couple issued with a £100 charge after falling foul of a five-minute parking guideline have called for firms to show "compassion".Ceris and Oliver Blomfield entered Carlisle's privately-owned Heads Lane site on a shopping trip, but then decided to park elsewhere due to poor weather.Having looked online for alternatives, they triggered a parking charge notice due to having been there for five minutes and 40 seconds - just over the five-minute consideration period set out in the industry's code of practice.Parkingeye, which operates the payment system at Heads Lane, said Mr and Mrs Blomfield "did not provide any mitigating factors for failing to adhere to the terms and conditions".
The couple, from Penrith, Cumbria, said they changed their minds about where to park due to "torrential rain" and having their two small children with them so left the site without getting out of their car, in February 2022.Their appeal against the charge was rejected by an industry watchdog and they say they are now receiving letters from a debt recovery agency suggesting legal action may be taken against them if they do not pay a charge which has now risen to £170.
'Not fair'
Mr Blomfield told BBC Radio Cumbria: "There's no compassion. [We're told] it's a rule and its black and white."Anyone with a heart would go, 'it makes total sense [to waive the charge]'."You can't speak to the company that owns the car park. We just thought someone would read our response and realise the charge is not fair."Technically, yes, we were 40 seconds over, but we just figured it would be put aside."That wasn't the case and we feel it's really wrong. I'm sure there are other people out there in similar situations."
'Charge upheld'
Parkingeye said the Heads Lane site was monitored by ANPR camera systems and had seven "highly visible signs that give motorists clear guidance on how to use the car park responsibly".For motorists considering whether to park, it said "a five-minute consideration period is applied, as per the British Parking Association (BPA) and International Parking Community joint code of practice".A spokesperson said: "The motorist correctly received a parking charge for parking for longer than the consideration period and not making a payment."Parkingeye operates a BPA-audited appeals process, which motorists can use to appeal their parking charge. If anyone has mitigating circumstances, we would encourage them to highlight this by appealing."The motorist did not provide any mitigating circumstances for failing to adhere to the terms and conditions of the car park and their appeal was rejected. The charge was also upheld by Popla, the independent appeals service."The case has now been escalated to debt recovery."
Popla said that although the Blomfields had not parked in a bay, they "stopped for a period of time to find elsewhere to park and in doing so utilised the site".It added: "As such a parking event has occurred and the appellant entered the contract stated on the signage."Some changes to private parking rules were introduced this week after the BBC reported on the case of Rosey Hudson, who was taken to court by Excel Parking over a £1,906 claim after taking longer than five minutes to pay at a car park in Derby due to poor signal on her phone.The Private Parking Scrutiny and Advice Panel (PPSAP), which brought them in, says they will ensure "motorists who face genuine difficulties in paying in a short timeframe are treated fairly".
Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. Send your story ideas here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Car parks must prove they cancel fines, says RAC
Car parks must prove they cancel fines, says RAC

Auto Express

time30-07-2025

  • Auto Express

Car parks must prove they cancel fines, says RAC

Ever wondered whether car parks actually repeal any of the thousands of fines they issue? After claims that this is definitely the case, car park operators have been called upon to publish data to prove they are treating drivers fairly. The RAC says operators must provide 'full and transparent' information regarding how many fines are issued and what proportion of them are cancelled following complaints. At the time of writing, neither of the big car parking industry trade bodies – the British Parking Association (BPA) and the International Parking Community (IPC) – actively publish data on complaints. Furthermore, two of the main appeal bodies that were set up and paid for by the industry to process complaints are infamous for taking time to provide their insights. The BPA's Parking on Private Land Appeals (POPLA) service is still to publish its findings from 2024, for example. Advertisement - Article continues below In 2023, POPLA says 43 per cent of appeals were upheld, but look closer and it's a little more nuanced than that. Of those that appealed, 17 per cent went to adjudication and 25 per cent were simply cancelled by the operator with no contest. However, four in five (78 per cent) of cases reaching the adjudication stage were dismissed. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below With RAC research showing that private car parking firms are submitting almost 40,000 DVLA vehicle keeper requests per day – almost all of these likely resulting in a fine being sent out – head of policy Simon Williams said, 'Stories of drivers being treated poorly are all too common'. Williams called on the industry to publish complaints data in full, saying: 'We believe the industry should have to publish the volume of complaints made to operators, including the reasons tickets were issued and the nature of the complaints, and whether or not they were cancelled.' This comes soon after the Government said it plans to consult on a new state-backed Private Parking Code of Practice; there were plans to introduce one years ago, but its implementation was prevented by a legal challenge from car parking firms. The industry has since introduced its own code but, as you might expect, this leans heavily in the favour of operators. While the Government says that its plans will 'tackle misleading tactics and confusing processes, bringing vital oversight and transparency to raise standards across the board', there are concerns that it doesn't go far enough – particularly in the case of limiting maximum fines. The AA has since accused Labour of 'bending the knee to the private parking industry,' while the BPA told Auto Express, 'Without proper enforcement, parking quickly becomes a free-for-all, with some people taking advantage at the expense of others.' Did you know you can buy a used car with Auto Express? Choose from tens of thousands of cars with trusted dealers around the UK. Click here to buy used with Auto Express now... Find a car with the experts Hyundai reduces prices across its entire EV range Hyundai reduces prices across its entire EV range Korean brand acts swiftly to cut prices on all its electric cars, amid confusion over Government's grant scheme New Citroen C5 Aircross SUV undercuts the Volkswagen Tiguan by a huge £7k New Citroen C5 Aircross SUV undercuts the Volkswagen Tiguan by a huge £7k Citroen's revamped flagship C5 Aircross SUV is available to order now with hybrid or electric power Car Deal of the Day: Polestar 4 is a head-turning EV for a super cool price Car Deal of the Day: Polestar 4 is a head-turning EV for a super cool price The 'car with no rear window' is looking seriously cheap on lease right now. It's our Deal of the Day for July 28

Motorists hit with nearly £4m in private parking fines every day
Motorists hit with nearly £4m in private parking fines every day

The Independent

time10-07-2025

  • The Independent

Motorists hit with nearly £4m in private parking fines every day

Private parking firms issued a record 14.4 million tickets last year as motorists urged the government to crack down on the 'bandit' practice. The number of parking fines issued by private parking companies has skyrocketed since they successfully challenged a Conservative bill three years ago that enacted a proper code of practice for handing out fines. For years, these firms have been accused of profiting off misleading and confusing signs, as well as refusing a grace period to drivers if they do not return to their cars, even if it is not their fault. Data provided by the RAC shows that the number of requests made by parking management companies to the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency for information on offending vehicles has more than tripled since the Tory bill was passed and later watered down. It increased by 13 per cent from 2023. Firms issued a record 1,640 tickets every hour last year, according to the data. As each ticket can be up to £100, the total daily cost to drivers could be close to £4 million. The five parking companies that issued 46 per cent of penalty charge notices (PCNs) between them last year were ParkingEye (2,300,360), Euro Car Parks (1,733,493), APCOA Parking (960,482), Horizon Parking (875,833) and Civil Enforcement Ltd (684,864). The British Parking Association (BPA), which represents the parking and traffic management sector, says the rise is a reflection of the growing number of sites, as opposed to an increase in the number of tickets being handed out. They claim that only 0.3 per cent of private land parking events result in a parking charge. But the RAC has disputed these claims and called for the Labour government to reintroduce laws cracking down on the penalty practice. RAC head of policy Simon Williams said: 'Too many unfair tickets are still being handed out by operators who haven't been forced to adhere to stricter rules, and too many drivers are still being hounded by debt collection companies. 'And, we still don't have a single, truly independent appeals service that drivers can go to if their initial appeal to the operator concerned is rejected. 'We don't believe the parking industry's argument that PCNs are only at record levels purely because they're managing more car parks. 'We urge the Government to ensure the official code is launched this year with all the protection it was intended to have so that we don't see these figures go even higher in the future.'

Can I be fined for parking in a parent and child space?
Can I be fined for parking in a parent and child space?

North Wales Chronicle

time25-06-2025

  • North Wales Chronicle

Can I be fined for parking in a parent and child space?

The parking spaces often featuring a graphic of a happy family or a pram are typically larger and closer to stores to make the experience easier and safer for parents with young children. While there are often plenty of parking spaces to choose from, sometimes the limited amount of spaces can result in you parking in a parent and child space. But like any designated space, it can leave you to panic that you may be handed a ticket or fine for parking in a certain space. Check to see if you could get fined. (Image: Getty) Typically found in private car parks, often supermarkets, parent and child bays are wider spaces made to help parents move their young children. With space for large pushchairs and child carriers, the parents and child spaces are often key for busy parents. The parking spaces are normally close to the front of the car park and feature a graphic of an adult or child. According to the RAC, it is not illegal to park in a parent-and-child space if you don't have a child under 12 years old. However, you could still be hit with a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) in some cases. Recommended Reading Is it illegal to park your car in front of UK driveways? DVLA fine warning for drivers who passed before 2015 Driving with a dog in your car could land you £5000 fine As most supermarket car parks are private, rules are enforced by the landowners or the firm allocated to look after the car park. The RAC shares that most firms are part of the British Parking Association (BPA) and follow their rules and code of practice, meaning you could receive a fine for breaking their rules. If the car park is not part of the BPA, it could be part of the Accredited Trade Association (ATA), which has its own set of rules. If you are worried about receiving a fine for parking in a parent and child space, it's best to avoid the parking bay or check with the car park owner on their own rules.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store