‘I Don't Want It,' Trump Says About Regime Change In Iran
President Donald Trump speaks to the press before his departure at the White House to The Hague on ... More June 24, 2025, in Washington D.C. (Photo by Celal Gunes/Anadolu via Getty Images) Anadolu via Getty Images
Trump made the statement hours after blasting Israel and Iran and accusing them of violating the terms of a ceasefire agreement.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Deadly Israeli strikes continue in Gaza
Israeli strikes in Gaza have killed at least 21 people late on Tuesday and into early Wednesday, health authorities said. More than half of those killed were women and children. Desperation is mounting in the Palestinian territory of more than two million, which experts say is at risk of famine because of Israel's blockade and nearly two-year offensive. People in #Gaza, including UNRWA staff, are fainting due to starvation and severe hunger. People including children are dying from severe malnutrition. People are being starved. UNRWA alone has thousands of trucks in neighbouring countries waiting to enter Gaza – banned by… — UNRWA (@UNRWA) July 23, 2025 A breakdown of law and order has led to widespread looting and contributed to chaos and violence around aid deliveries. More than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces since May while trying to get food in the Gaza Strip, mostly near aid sites run by an American contractor, the UN human rights office said on Tuesday. More than 100 human rights groups and charities signed a letter published on Wednesday demanding more aid for Gaza and warning of grim conditions causing starvation. More than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed during the Israel-Hamas war, according to Gaza's health ministry, which is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals. Its count does not distinguish between militants and civilians, but the ministry says that more than half of the dead are women and children. The UN and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties. The Israeli military said in a statement on Wednesday that forces were operating in Gaza City, as well as in northern Gaza. It said that in Jabaliya, an area hard-hit in multiple rounds of fighting, an air strike killed 'a number of' Hamas militants. "Silencing voices. As if banning international media is not enough. Humanitarian workers are also banned when they report on atrocities committed in #Gaza and elsewhere in the occupied Palestinian territory. The denial of a visa to our colleague from @OCHAopt is the latest in… — UNRWA (@UNRWA) July 22, 2025 Troops struck roughly 120 targets throughout Gaza over the past day, including militant cells, tunnels and booby-trapped structures, among others, the military said. One Israeli strike hit a house on Tuesday in the north-western side of Gaza City, killing at least 12 people, according to the Shifa Hospital, which received the casualties. The dead included six children and two women, according to the health ministry's casualty list. Another strike hit an apartment in the Tal al-Hawa area in northern Gaza, killing at least six people. Among the dead were three children and two women, including one who was pregnant. Eight others were wounded, the ministry said. A third strike hit a tent in the Naser area in Gaza City late on Tuesday and killed three children, Shifa Hospital said. The Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the strikes. It blames Hamas for civilian casualties because the militants operate from populated areas.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CT council member in garbage business pledges $500K of his own money on congressional run
Jack Perry admits that he does not have the normal pedigree for a member of Congress. After spending a career in the garbage hauling business, Perry said that he is running as a Democrat against 77-year-old U.S. Rep. John B. Larson in a potential multi-candidate primary in 2026. Perry, 35, also gained attention by pledging to spend $500,000 of his own money against Larson, using part of the proceeds from selling his family-owned garbage business that he started in 2008. 'I'm not a typical politician. I mean, seriously, how many can drive a garbage truck?' Perry asked. 'I'm a working-class guy who is unafraid to take on big challenges and stand up for people. I'm not trying to climb a political ladder for myself. I want to make sure everyone has ladders to climb and can afford to live and retire comfortably in Connecticut. I'll fight for the people, not the powerful.' As a Democratic member of Southington's Republican-controlled town council, Perry is not well known statewide. But he gained additional name recognition in his hometown when running for state Senate in 2020 against conservative firebrand Rob Sampson of Wolcott. Sampson won by 54% to 46% in the year that incumbent President Donald Trump ran strongly in the district despite losing in Connecticut and nationwide to Democrat Joe Biden. CT US congressman in seat for decades might have a Democratic challenger Perry spent 16 years in the family business, HQ Dumpsters and Recycling, before it was sold last year to trash hauler CWPM in Plainville. While no longer the owner, he still oversees the daily operations for the new owner, the Manafort family, in a position he says is far less stressful. As a relative political newcomer, Perry understands it will be difficult running against veteran Democrats with high name recognition like Larson and former Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin, who is seriously considering joining the race. 'It's a heavy lift, and that's where I'm trying to make it viable and showing people how passionate I am,' Perry told The Courant in an interview. 'Anyone that knows me knows that when my heart's in it, I will work endless hours, and that's just who I am as a person. Passion is everything. That's how I was able to build a successful garbage business. I started in 2008 during the Great Recession. It was passion, determination and work ethic. Nothing I've gotten in life has been easy, but it's very rewarding.' Perry added, 'I'm looking to be a fresh voice with new energy and advocate for the working class, the middle class, and those that are retiring that can't afford to stay in our state because of the cost. It goes back to inflation, grocery bills, electric costs, housing — all those things. It's hard.' With a mother who was an immigrant from Poland and a biological father who was absent from his life, Perry was raised with the help of his stepfather. He started working in the family's landscaping business at the age of 13, and has continued working ever since. Through the years, he has watched housing costs skyrocket, along with food and many other items. 'I was reading the other day in the paper that the average age for a first-time homebuyer is 38 years old,' Perry said. 'I'm 35. I bought my first home at 25 on a single income. It was hard for me, and it was a fixer-upper. But you can't do that in Southington on a single income of $60,000. It's just not doable. In 2015, it was.' He added, 'Inflation is hurting people, and they're now picking and choosing what they can afford to buy. Over the years, I've seen employees struggle. As an employer, I was able to help my employees. I remember an employee couldn't afford his insulin. This was before they made insulin affordable. We got him a different plan and coverage to be able to afford his insulin. I'm the type that, when I see issues, I stand up, regardless of how big the fight may be and regardless of what the obstacles are to get there.' Larson's campaign spokesman, Charles Perosino, said that democracy ensures that anyone seeking to run can do so, adding that the voters will make the final decision on their representative. 'John is proud to have secured billions in federal funding for the First District, including over $34 million for the town of Southington, and remains focused on taking on the Trump Administration as they raise the cost of living for working families by attacking access to health care, imposing cost-raising tariffs, and threatening Americans' hard-earned benefits,' Perosino said. 'When Democrats take the majority in 2026, John will serve as chair of the Social Security committee, and has been recognized as a national leader to protect and expand benefits, so that all Americans can retire — as FDR intended — with dignity.' Perry's entrance into the race comes as the political dam has broken in the battle against Larson. As more opponents step forward, there is little downside in challenging an established incumbent because others have already jumped into the race. The first official opponent was Hartford school board member and attorney Ruth R. Fortune, who filed official paperwork with the Federal Election Commission to run against Larson. After emigrating to the United States at age 12 from Haiti, Fortune grew up in the Nassau County town of Westbury on Long Island. She graduated from Baruch College in Manhattan and later received a law degree from the University of Connecticut. A Hartford resident since 2012, she has two children attending the Hartford public schools and a younger sibling starting pre-K this year. A former financial advisor at Merrill Lynch, she now works at the law firm of Wiggin and Dana in the trust and estates department. The best-known opponent is Bronin, who is seriously considering running and has been talking to fellow Democrats about the possibility. Larson, who turned 77 on Tuesday, personally told Bronin during an hour-long, face-to-face meeting that he is running again. Bronin would be the highest profile challenger in years for Larson, who has won 14 consecutive elections. As a graduate of Yale Law School, a Rhodes Scholar and a former U.S. Navy intelligence officer in Afghanistan, Bronin has a wide range of contacts and has shown his fundraising prowess when he won the Democratic primary for mayor in Hartford by unseating incumbent Pedro Segarra. State Rep. Jillian Gilchrest, a West Hartford Democrat, told The Courant on Tuesday that she is considering running but does not have a timeframe on when her final decision will be made. 'I think I would be great holding that seat in Congress,' said Gilchrest, who serves as co-chair of the state legislature's human services committee. 'While the sitting Congressman is still in the race, there's a sense that some respect should go his way, but with more and more people getting in, it's hard not to want to be a part of it if you think you're qualified to do the job.' Among the top issues in the race, she said, are wages, public education, access to health care, and concerns about the environment, among others. 'For Democrats, they're looking for voices who will be speaking about the issues that impact them and not waiting to feel out how best to say something,' Gilchrest said. 'They want to hear from leaders who are direct and listen to them and then speak on the issues of importance that impact their daily lives.' Larson's family, which has supported him in all races since even before he won a key primary for Congress in 1998, is already gearing up for another race. Arianna Larson, a Manchester resident who is one of Larson's nieces, sent an email to multiple supporters to rally support for the incumbent. 'I'm writing to say one thing loud and clear: it's game on,' she wrote in the email obtained by The Courant. 'This is not a fundraising email. It's a rallying cry. A call to action. A moment to get off the sidelines and get behind our candidate. For the first time in a long time, my Uncle John may be facing a more competitive primary challenge. And while I respect the value of new voices and fresh ideas — believe me, I'm part of the next generation of Democrats eager to make change — I also know that this is not the moment to be testing the bench.' She added, 'This election is happening in the second half of a Trump presidency. The stakes are enormous. We don't need a reset — we need results. And no one delivers like John Larson. He's a lifelong public servant who knows this district, knows how to lead, and never forgets who he's fighting for. He doesn't seek the spotlight — he just gets to work and gets things done. … My Uncle John is ready. The campaign is ready. The family is ready. And today, as he celebrates his birthday, and another year of life dedicated to public service, I can't think of a better way to honor that than by showing up for him – just like he's always shown up for us!' Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@ Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A judge blocked a rule to drop medical debt from credit reports. What now?
A recent federal court ruling overturned a Biden-era ban on medical debt in credit reports just as access to healthcare and health insurance is becoming more fragile. The decision could thwart the hopes of an estimated 15 million Americans who might have seen some relief ahead of expected hikes to healthcare premiums, the end of enhanced marketplace subsidies, and an anticipated increase in the number of Americans without insurance. 'We're really concerned that with the loss of insurance altogether, or healthcare becoming more expensive, we're just going to see more medical debt,' said Mona Shah, the senior director of policy and strategy at Community Catalyst, a national nonprofit healthcare advocacy organization. 'With this protection removed around credit reporting, it's going to impact people's overall economic well-being and ability to thrive.' A $49 billion reversal Earlier this month, a federal judge blocked a rule from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which had never taken effect, that would have stopped medical bills from appearing on credit reports and barred lenders from using such data to make lending decisions. The CFPB estimated the change could raise impacted consumers' credit scores by an average of 20 points. Healthcare providers typically don't report missed medical bills directly to credit bureaus, according to Equifax, so medical debt often doesn't wind up on a credit report until it's been reported to a collections agency. However, two trade associations successfully argued that the CFPB had overstepped its authority. Under the Trump administration, the CFPB also asked for the rule to be thrown out. In a July 11 ruling, Judge Sean Jordan of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas agreed with the trade groups. The ruling comes at an especially precarious time in healthcare. The tax bill signed into law by President Trump this month is expected to leave 10 million Americans without health insurance by 2034, largely due to changes in Medicaid. Meanwhile, enhanced premium tax credits that helped make Affordable Care Act marketplace coverage more affordable will expire at the end of this year after they were not extended in the tax bill, a change that will help contribute to the largest premium increases seen in years in 2026. The end of the subsidies is expected to leave an estimated 4.2 million people uninsured. 'Having more people lose Medicaid and become uninsured, and also lower-income adults losing subsidized marketplace coverage and becoming uninsured, is going to significantly increase medical debt,' said Fredric Blavin, a senior fellow and researcher at the Urban Institute, a Washington-based think tank. Under the Biden administration, the CFPB estimated that removing medical bill information could have wiped $49 billion off the credit reports of about 15 million Americans, noting that medical billing information often contained errors and was a poor predictor of a consumer's creditworthiness. Lower credit scores can damage a person's ability to rent a home, obtain a credit card with a favorable rate, and even impact their job search. In public comments supporting the rule, many Americans shared stories of how medical bills had weighed on their credit, including cancer patients, people who had been in car wrecks, and more. Read more: How are credit scores calculated? Sign up for the Mind Your Money weekly newsletter By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy What should consumers do now? Credit reporting agencies had already voluntarily decided in April 2023 to wipe medical collection debt from consumer credit reports if the balance was below $500. A year earlier, paid medical collection debt was also dropped from credit reports, and consumers were given one year to pay down medical collection debt before it started appearing on their credit reports, rather than six months. Additionally, the CFPB noted that FICO and VantageScore had previously both 'decreased the degree to which medical bills impact a consumer's score.' These combined changes dropped medical debt in collections from most consumers' credit reports, the Urban Institute found, leaving about 4.1% of adults with such data on their records in August 2024, down from 12.6% in February 2022. Additionally, 14 states have provisions in place to remove medical collection debt from credit reports. 'We expect more states to take the same initiative moving forward,' said Breno Braga, a senior fellow and researcher at the Urban Institute. Still, consumers are left with the onerous job of keeping up with these changes and staying on top of their credit as they face mounting bills — along with the resumption of delinquent student loans hitting credit scores. Consumers should regularly check their mail and email for information concerning their credit, while also carefully examining the bills to determine what they owe and what they might be able to contest. When it comes to unaffordable medical care, consumers can ask healthcare providers about financial assistance options. Read more: How to check your credit score for free 'It's really just vigilance and trying to understand what's available in terms of assistance,' said Sarah Chenven, the CEO of Working Credit, a nonprofit organization that helps people build good credit. Consumers should also be cautious about signing up for medical credit cards with a 'deferred interest', said Shah with Community Catalyst, which may subject them to high, retroactive interest charges if they don't pay their bill in a certain promotional period. 'When patients are now faced with these difficult decisions of not being able to pay off these bills right away — worried about how it's going to impact their credit scores, losing their insurance, still needing healthcare — they may be lured into signing up for one of these payment products,' said Shah. Emma Ockerman is a reporter covering the economy and labor for Yahoo Finance. You can reach her at Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
