
Courts service spent €1.5m on temporary courthouse in Roscommon
In a message to management, Judge James Faughnan lambasted a decision to provide just a single courtroom in Roscommon when two had been available in their old building.
Advertisement
The judge said he was sure the Courts Service would not want a 'light shone' on their lack of foresight in providing sub-par accommodation at significant cost.
Judge Faughnan said that with a general election looming and 'recent OPW disasters' over the Leinster House bike shelter and security hut, bad publicity was very likely.
In an email last September, he said he would 'never dream' of going public but said the situation was likely to come to a head in 2025.
Judge Faughnan said that when the temporary accommodation on the outskirts of Roscommon Town was being planned, he specifically asked for provision of a second courtroom.
Advertisement
He wrote: 'The Courts Service, while on notice of this, then spent over €1.5 million without providing a second courtroom.
'I can only imagine that if that got picked up by the media, there would be an awful lot of questions to answer.'
He said the expenditure on the temporary accommodation would be 'laughable if it wasn't so serious.'
In another message to court management last October, Judge Faughnan said the Courts Service had used up 'all the goodwill' extended to them by legal people working in Roscommon.
Advertisement
He pleaded for a temporary second courtroom on site which he believed could be provided at very little cost. 'It would lend itself to a timber frame type construction which could be erected speedily,' he wrote.
He said the current situation was unsustainable and that a proposed solution to provide temporary facilities in Castlerea Prison was unlikely to work.
Judge Faughnan wrote: 'I do not accept the works carried out in Castlerea to be beneficial as prior to the works, the facilities were Dickensian and have only regularised what was needed for many years.'
The judge was one of three who wrote to the Courts Service outlining serious concerns over their workplace in County Roscommon.
Advertisement
In another letter, Judge Kenneth Connolly said the old courthouse in Roscommon town had been shut down because of the 'very poor' conditions there.
However, he said the new facility on the outskirts of the town had 'not performed' and was 'unsuitable as even a medium-term option".
Judge Connolly said there was little parking, nowhere nearby for jurors or the public to buy food or drink, and that facilities for victims were 'questionable to poor".
A third judge, Keenan Johnson, said money spent on the temporary facility should have been used to restore the original courthouse.
Advertisement
He wrote: 'I have huge concerns that having vacated the courthouse it will now be allowed to deteriorate to such an extent that the feasibility of returning to it may be put in jeopardy.'
Judge Johnson added that they were now 'stuck with the current totally unsatisfactory situation' of having only one courtroom.
Asked about the correspondence, a spokesperson for the Courts Service said the old Roscommon courthouse had been closed by the OPW on health and safety grounds.
'Significant investment is required,' they said.
'Given the condition of the existing courthouse in Roscommon and the necessity to close it for health and safety reasons, the Courts Service took immediate steps to remedy the situation to ensure, firstly, that the health and safety of all court users was prioritised and secondly, to ensure that sittings continue to be facilitated in Roscommon Town.
'The Courts Service submission in respect of the forthcoming revised NDP [National Development Plan] includes Roscommon Courthouse.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
French are told they 'don't work enough' as minister launches crackdown on Le Sickie to stop country slipping into bankruptcy
Workers in France have been told to stop being in denial and accept that they 'do not work enough' as the government aims to clampdown on soaring levels of absenteeism. Prime Minister François Bayrou is cracking down on those who pull a sickie in an attempt to 'reconcile the French with work', and save the country from bankruptcy. The country has fewer people working than its neighbours and spends the most on benefits, 'yet the French are increasingly dissatisfied with their public services and we are the most pessimistic country in the world', the prime minister said last week when laying out plans for next year's budget. President Emmanuel Macron tasked Bayrou with crafting a budget that shaves costs to bring down France's staggering debt and deficit - while also adding billions in new defense spending to face what Macron says are resurgent threats from Russia and beyond. His proposed measures include scrapping two public holidays, putting pressure on doctors to stop handing out notes for non-existent symptoms and getting people off work to tell their employers the medical condition they are suffering from. The level of absence from work in France is one of Europe's highest and at least double that of Britain. Nearly six percent of employees in the private sector are off sick from work at any time, while the rate of absenteeism has soared by 40 percent over the last five years. Between 2014 and 2022, there was a 79 percent increase in public servants taking sick leave. Meanwhile, people staying off work for 'psycho-social' conditions have jumped since the pandemic. The cost of these absences is estimated at up to 80 billion euros, or £69 billion. But his plans have sparked outrage among opposition groups on the left and right sides of the political spectrum. In addition, unions have accused the government of trying to 'destroy the health of the French' as they crack down on sick leave. Parliament is set to vote on Bayrou's 2026 budget this autumn. With no parliamentary majority, Macron's centrist grouping must win support from adversaries on the left and right to pass the budget.


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EU condemns Zelensky's 'serious step back' as mass protests break out in Kyiv streets over signing of his controversial anti-corruption bill
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky has come under fire after signing a bill that strips two key anti-corruption agencies of their autonomy. The move has triggered rare mass protests in Kyiv and backlash from the European Union. Hundreds have taken to the streets in the capital to rebuke the legislation in a public display of anger that has not been seen since the start of Russia 's invasion. Critics now say the law will hand sweeping control to Zelensky and permit political interference in corruption investigations. The European Union has branded the president's decision a 'serious step back' with a senior official suggesting it could jeopardise the country's hopes of joining the bloc. Writing on X, EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos condemned the vote, saying independent anti-corruption institutions were 'essential for Ukraine's EU path'. She said: 'Seriously concerned over today's vote. The dismantling of key safeguards protecting NABU's independence is a serious step back.' The law, approved by 263 votes to 13 in Ukraine's parliament, will place the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the authority of the prosecutor general, who is appointed by the president. NABU is tasked with investigating corruption in public institutions, while SAPO handles prosecution. The Anti-Corruption Action Centre, an NGO, warned the bill would gut both bodies, saying the prosecutor general would 'stop investigations into all of the president's friends'. Protesters gathered outside government buildings to voice their outrage, and erupted in boos and jeers when news broke that it had been signed. A European diplomat speaking anonymously told reporters the decision was 'unfortunate'. According to the AFP, the official said: 'Is it a setback? Yes. Is this a point of non-return? No.' Meanwhile, the country's former foreign minister Dmytro Kuleba, who resigned from the government in 2024, called it a 'bad day for Ukraine'. He said: 'Now the President has a choice - to stand on the side of the people or not.' Just a day before the vote, law enforcement raided NABU's offices, detaining an employee accused of spying for Russia. Transparency International's office in Ukraine described the raids as an 'attempt by the authorities to undermine the independence of Ukraine's post-Revolution of Dignity anti-corruption institutions.' Critics help up signs to protest against the law, which critics say will hand sweeping control to Zelensky and permit political interference in corruption investigations Ukraine ranked 105th out of 180 countries in Transparency International's 2024 corruption perceptions index, a notable improvement from 144th in 2013. The nation's recent anti-corruption drive has been central to its push for EU membership and a condition for receiving support from Western allies.


Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Moldova is worse than Ukraine': My clash with Russian sympathisers fighting the EU
Not all battles are fought with bullets. The Telegraph have travelled to Chisinau, the capital of Moldova, during a vital geopolitical crossroads on Europe's eastern flank. To its east is Ukraine, a country fighting for its very survival. To its west is Romania, a member of Nato and the European Union. Moldova is a member of neither and for many, that puts it in Putin's sights. The Telegraph has explored the dangers facing Moldova and the ramifications not only for Ukraine and Europe, but also for the wider West. If there were such a thing as a second Cold War, Chisinau would be on the front line. To hear more about this story, listen to our award-winning podcast, Ukraine: The Latest.