logo
Breakups, booty calls and bare-all balladry: SZA's 20 best songs – ranked!

Breakups, booty calls and bare-all balladry: SZA's 20 best songs – ranked!

The Guardian17-07-2025
A bit of a buried treasure: Hit Different was coolly received on release – SZA ceded the song's hook to guest Ty Dolla $ign – but it deserved better: the Neptunes' production is beautifully atmospheric, her vocal is fantastic, the lyrics – in which she perplexingly finds a partner sexier when they're arguing – are great.
For a moment early on in her career, it looked as if SZA might become a kind of avant-R&B figurehead. That wasn't how it panned out, but Ice Moon, the single from her second EP, S, is evidence of where she once seemed to be headed: a poppy, but distinctly psychedelic swirl of blissful vocals and electronics.
Prom might be the most overlooked track on SZA's debut album. Another painfully drawn saga of insecurity, it's equipped with a fabulous, incongruously buoyant melody, set to music that underlines the breadth and diversity of SZA's vision: the clipped beat and guitar owes as much to alt-rock as R&B.
Her debut EP, See.SZA.Run, has evaded streaming services, but it's worth seeking out: different to the music that made SZA famous but still great. The supremely spaced-out wash of synths on standout Time Travel Undone explains why the Guardian compared it to not just the Weeknd, but the Cocteau Twins.
A smart take on PartyNextDoor's hit Come and See Me: SZA takes on the role of the woman on the receiving end of the original's booty call, slowly realising that her suitor's only after one thing. It revealed a more straightforward and earthy SZA, but was curiously dropped from the tracklisting of CTRL.
More fabulous left-field arcana from SZA's early years: Terror.Dome opens with a chunk of dialogue from horror movie Rosemary's Baby, the perfect complement to the eerie, echo-drenched sound of what follows: sparse synths, booming drums, cooing vocals at odds with the lyrics, in which infatuation has clearly turned to worrying obsession.
Signed up by Top Dawg Entertainment – the label that gave the world Kendrick Lamar – SZA scored her first hit with Child's Play, a Chance the Rapper collab from her EP Z. But its real stand out is the deep cut Sweet November: a dreamy delight that samples a Marvin Gaye obscurity.
Joni had a tortuous gestation: SZA leaked a version online in 2020, fans leaked another in 2023, prompting SZA to announce she wouldn't release it officially. She changed her mind: a good thing, given how utterly lovely its Joni Mitchell-inspired melody and sample of the late Elliott Smith's guitar playing sound.
20 Something draws CTRL to a sombre, soul-bearing conclusion driven by acoustic guitar: SZA's life's a mess, she's alone, fearful of adult responsibilities that she doesn't feel ready to accept, a situation to which, evidently, millions of fans could relate. It ends, winningly, with a faintly exasperated pep talk from her mum.
The first single from SOS suggested things hadn't improved much emotionally in SZA's world: the line about 'trying to get my mind together before the end of the world' struck a particularly resonant note on release, in the midst of the pandemic. The sparkling, summery prettiness of the music somehow amplifies the gloom.
The deluxe version of SOS, Lana, appended an entire album's worth of new material to the original: quite why it wasn't released as an album in its own right is a mystery when the new songs were as good as Saturn, a shimmering ballad that's the match of anything on the original album.
The brilliance of Garden lies in the tension between the music – trap drums beneath a haze of electronics and vocal samples spiked with euphorically bubbling electronic tones – and the rawness of SZA's vocal and the emotions it draws: yearning and pleading for emotional reassurance and commitment amid a burst of insecurity.
One of several songs on SOS in which SZA makes no bones about how aggrieved she feels after a breakup, I Hate U sets its 4am drunk-dialling despair and bile – 'It's shitty of you to make me feel like this!' – to a superb musical backdrop made of equal parts murky lo-fi R&B and smooth yacht rock.
Snooze came in two, equally great versions – the original is classic R&B that would have been a hit at any point in the last 30 years ('aunties approve of its authenticity,' as one critic put it); the acoustic version is woozily dreamy and features Justin Bieber. Both are poignant, confessional and softly powerful.
Just a guest appearance, but let's bend the rules a little: this surprisingly slick contribution to the Black Panther soundtrack is worth it. It's theoretically Kendrick's show, but it gifts SZA an absolute monster of a chorus, which she totally nails: they feel like equal partners, which is quite some feat.
The point which you might suggest SZA as we now know her came into being, Drew Barrymore is direct, relatable and witty – 'with her mom jeans and her new Vans, she's perfect and I hate her' – and musically striking: spare beats, twanging guitar. The titular movie star was apparently impressed.
Performed live while SZA soared above the audience in a boat (!), Nobody Gets Me takes an intriguing route to anthemic ballad territory: it's alternately crestfallen, raunchy, intimate and subject to some spectacular vocal pyrotechnics. The chorus is key: it's got a definite slice of Natalie Imbruglia's Torn in its DNA, but it really works.
Classic cheating soul – 'my man is your man … you like 9 to 5, I'm the weekend' – retooled for today: slow beats, soft synths, a sample from Justin Timberlake's Set the Mood (Prelude). Calvin Harris's excellent remix, meanwhile, recasts it as mid-tempo disco. Both versions are great – take your pick.
Wikipedia describes 2023's third biggest-selling single as a murder ballad. It is, although that doesn't capture how engagingly witty its fantasies of offing an ex are – she follows him 'at the farmer's market, with your perfect peach' – amplified by the pure pop sweetness of its chorus.
If you had to pick a song that summed up SZA's multi-platinum appeal, Broken Clocks would be it. The lyrics exemplify her brand of confessional, no-filter intensity, depicting a life on the brink of chaos: still haunted by the memory of an ex from years ago, not even she can work out how she feels. The music blends R&B classicism with trap beats and a distinct note of chillwave-derived fogginess. Her voice feels powerful and natural: it has an unaffected, almost conversational quality, as if she's confiding in the listener. And the chorus is superb, built for an audience who know how she feels to howl along to.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jennifer Aniston says she and Gwyneth Paltrow discuss mutual ex Brad Pitt
Jennifer Aniston says she and Gwyneth Paltrow discuss mutual ex Brad Pitt

BBC News

time27 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Jennifer Aniston says she and Gwyneth Paltrow discuss mutual ex Brad Pitt

Friends star Jennifer Aniston has said she and fellow actress Gwyneth Paltrow still discuss their mutual ex Brad Pitt, giving a rare glimpse into the Hollywood stars' and Pitt were engaged for a few months during 1996 and 1997, and he was then married to Aniston from 2000 to was asked by Vanity Fair if she and her close friend Paltrow ever discuss their ex, and responded: "Oh, of course. How can we not? We're girls."However, their actual conversations were left to the reader's imagination, with the interviewer saying the pair "trade wellness intel more than gossip". Both women are known for being health-conscious, and Aniston added: "We're always swapping advice - 'What are you doing for this?' 'What are you doing for that?' 'Do you have a new doctor for that?'"However, Aniston did refer to her hugely publicised split from Pitt 20 years ago as "such a vulnerable time", adding: "Ironically, I went to her [Paltrow] and Brad's engagement party."The actresses met when Paltrow and David Schwimmer, Aniston's Friends co-star, were filming 1996 film The Pallbearer. 'We'd already been mourning Matthew Perry' Aniston also touched on the 2023 death of Friends star Matthew Perry, whose addiction problems have been well-documented. A post-mortem examination found a high concentration of ketamine in his blood, and determined that "acute effects" of the drug had killed him."We did everything we could when we could," she said, referencing the Friends stars' efforts to help him with his addictions."But it almost felt like we'd been mourning Matthew for a long time because his battle with that disease was a really hard one for him to fight. "As hard as it was for all of us and for the fans, there's a part of me that thinks this is better."I'm glad he's out of that pain."Aniston and Perry played two of the six young friends living in New York City in the globally popular series, which ran from 1994 until 2004. The Emmy and Bafta-winning show had a sustained resurgence in popularity after it debuted on Netflix in 2015. Michelle Obama friendship Aniston is most famous for playing Rachel Green in the show, but has also appeared in romantic comedy films with co-stars including Adam Sandler, Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson. She also stars in US TV series The Morning Show with Reese Witherspoon, about a network news morning the Vanity Fair interview, she also touched on being the subject of tabloid rumours, such as one linking her romantically to President Barack Obama, which she scotched last year on the Jimmy Kimmel said she knows Michelle Obama better than the former president, adding: "I was lucky enough to have dinner with Michelle a month ago," but said the rumour "wasn't even brought up" during their time together."I don't think anyone really pays attention to reports like that if you're the subject of them," she added.

All the signs Brooklyn Beckham has 'quit the family' after 'not inviting a single relative to his vow renewal' with Nicola Peltz
All the signs Brooklyn Beckham has 'quit the family' after 'not inviting a single relative to his vow renewal' with Nicola Peltz

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

All the signs Brooklyn Beckham has 'quit the family' after 'not inviting a single relative to his vow renewal' with Nicola Peltz

Brooklyn Beckham and his wife Nicola Peltz said 'I do' for a second time on August 2 in Westchester County in front of her family, with the Beckham clan nowhere in sight amid their 'feud'. The couple, who first wed in 2022, failed to invite any members of Brooklyn's family, with reports David and Victoria heartbreakingly found out about their big day after reading about it on a US website. It's a stark contrast to Nicola's family, who had key roles at the second wedding, with her father Nelson, 83, officiating, wearing her mother Claudia's, 70, vintage wedding gown and letting her parents take centre stage once again at the after party. Brooklyn's family has been in turmoil in recent months as it has been claimed the superstar offspring, 26, has become increasingly estranged from his parents after failing to attend any of his father David's 50th birthday celebrations in May. The lack of Beckham presence at Brooklyn's vow renewal is the latest sign Brooklyn and Nicola, 30, have washed their hands with his family. Even at their butterfly-themed afterparty, it appears not one of Brooklyn's childhood friends and family was in attendance - making for a glaring signal that Brooklyn has quit both his family and former life altogether. The Beckhams were said to be upset by the Peltzes during Brooklyn and Nicola's first wedding in 2022, as they felt they were taking over the wedding. The two families have not reunited since and Nicola has rarely been pictured with the Beckhams. A BOLD SNUB A clear sign Brooklyn and Nicola have washed their hands with his family is that fact that none of the Beckham's were invited to the low-key ceremony. A source told The Sun: 'This was the final kick in the teeth for David and Victoria. Seeing Nelson having such a pivotal role at the ceremony was heartbreaking for David especially. Not one member of the 30-plus extended family knew about the wedding, or were invited. 'His grandparents are devastated too as Brooklyn has always been so close to them.' The source added: 'It feels cruel and spiteful. This is no longer a game. It has gone beyond all that. This is a family who feel they have lost their precious boy - and see no way back. 'Honestly, they are now questioning why he even wants to keep the 'Beckham' surname - will he revert to Peltz? August 2nd 2025 - is this the day Brooklyn formally declared himself no longer a part of the Beckham family? It certainly feels like it.' Daily Mail contacted Brooklyn, Nicola and the Beckhams' representatives for comment at the time. Another sign, Nicola appeared to send a poignant message to the Beckhams with her butterfly themed afterparty - the butterfly is a powerful symbol that represents transformation, rebirth, and freedom, a telling symbol given the family feud THE DRESS Another sign, Nicola appeared to send a poignant message to the Beckhams with her butterfly themed afterparty. The butterfly is a powerful symbol with multifaceted meanings, most notably representing transformation, rebirth, and freedom. Its life cycle, from caterpillar to chrysalis to butterfly, mirrors profound personal change and growth which is a telling symbol given that there is thought to be no way back for Brooklyn and his famous family. And that wasn't the only dress that carried weight. After shunning a dress made by her fashion designer Victoria in favour of a Valentino gown at her first wedding in 2022 - a choice which wasn't well received - Nicola once again snubbed her mother-in-law and wore her mother Claudia's vintage bridal gown. Brooklyn and Nicola first tied the knot in a lavish £3million ceremony in 2022, when relations first began to sour with his parents in the run-up to the big day. Nicola's father officiating her second big day appears to dig at Brooklyn's father David, who wasn't able to attend. With Nicola and Brooklyn heavily involving the billionaire Peltz family and snubbing the Beckham's, it's sends a clear message the wedding was the last straw in the heartbreaking family feud. Another sign that the couple are severing ties is that Brooklyn and Nicola's Instagram accounts no longer follow his younger brothers Cruz and Romeo. However, Brooklyn's friends told Daily Mail that Cruz and Romeo have actually blocked them on the social media platform. Cruz, 20, and Romeo, 22, were still following Brooklyn and Nicola in mid-July but appeared to take action after Brooklyn posted a birthday tribute to sister Harper, sharing a family photo without them in it, which Nicola reposted. Brooklyn also didn't wish either his mum Victoria or dad David a happy birthday on social media - an unusual move for the Beckhams, who are known for their loving posts. David and Victoria's 26th wedding anniversary also passed without mention, despite the former Manchester United and England footballer referencing Brooklyn in his own post. This was in stark contrast to a post Brooklyn shared recently for his father-in-law and wrote on a picture of himself and Nicola with the billionaire: 'Happy birthday Nelson x We love you.' Rumours of a rift between the eldest son and his parents began when Brooklyn was noticeably silent on his former Spice Girl mother's birthday, a far cry from his usual sweet posts about her. Neither the former photographer nor his wife wished Victoria a happy 51st, while David, Romeo and Cruz posted gushing messages. And as well as snubbing dad David's birthday online, he also was notably absent from all of his 50th birthday celebrations - including a boys' fishing trip. Despite flying to London at the time, Brooklyn and Nicola also didn't attend the big family party at the Beckhams' Cotswolds home or an idyllic trip to France or a meal at Notting Hill restaurant, Core. Brooklyn reportedly 'told his famous family that he wants no contact' with them earlier this year in the latest devastating turn of their ongoing feud. According to reports, the eldest Beckham boy has had no communication with his family following father David's knighthood being announced and only learned of the news in the media alongside the rest of the world.

Harry and Meghan's £75m Netflix deal has been an 'expensive failure' for streaming giant, admit insiders - and miffed bosses feel 'undercut' by Duke's memoir Spare
Harry and Meghan's £75m Netflix deal has been an 'expensive failure' for streaming giant, admit insiders - and miffed bosses feel 'undercut' by Duke's memoir Spare

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Harry and Meghan's £75m Netflix deal has been an 'expensive failure' for streaming giant, admit insiders - and miffed bosses feel 'undercut' by Duke's memoir Spare

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are said to be 'absolutely over the moon' with their new Netflix deal - but behind the scenes there are claims the couple have been an 'expensive failure' for the streamer. The Duke of Sussex's biography 'Spare' is said to have 'upset' Netflix executives who felt it was 'undercutting' the docu-series that they had paid a fortune for, it has also been claimed by insiders. 'The $100million deal has been an expensive failure for Netflix, however they want to dress it up', one source told the Daily Mail today. An insider with knowledge of the deal told The New York Times the Sussexes' new deal is less lucrative and 'a sign that the high-profile 2020 deal may not have met expectations'. Archewell Productions, Meghan and Harry's media company, had said it would make 'inspirational family programming' in documentaries, docu-series, films, scripted shows and children's television when the $100million (£75million) deal was announced in 2020. But in those five years, Archewell has not made any children's television, feature films or scripted shows at all. Pearl, the working title for the Markle-created animated show about a 12-year-old, was cancelled in 2022. The Sussexes then announced in August 2023 that they would be producing a film of romantic novel Meet Me At The Lake - but two years on Archewell is reportedly yet to hire a director or pick a cast. Sources have claimed 'it may never happen'. Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are said to be 'absolutely over the moon' with their new Netflix deal Meghan said in a statement that she and Harry are 'proud' and 'inspired' to extend their 'creative partnership' - but experts have said their relationship has been 'downgraded' because it is a 'first look' deal - meaning Netflix will have first refusal on Sussex projects but is not compelled to make them. The Duchess of Sussex in her Netflix series With Love, Meghan which came out in March. Season 2 is on the way The couple yesterday signed a new 'multi-year' contract with the streaming giant, however, it is understood to be worth much less for the pair than their previous contract. Experts have pointed out that their relationship has been 'downgraded' deal because it is a 'first look' - meaning Netflix will have first refusal on Sussex projects but is not compelled to make them. Meghan said in a statement that she and Harry are 'proud' and 'inspired' to extend their 'creative partnership'. Bela Bajaria, Netflix's Chief Content Officer, insisted: 'Harry and Meghan are influential voices whose stories resonate with audiences everywhere. But three sources at the streaming giant have told the New York Times of 'tensions' over the years. There were similar reports of tensions between the Sussexes and Spotify before their deal ended, with one executive branding them 'grifters'. The NYT has claimed that Netflix bosses were upset when they only found out about the release date of Harry's bestselling memoir 'Spare' a matter of months before the docu-series come out over consecutive weekends in December 2022. Spare came out on January 2023 but this 'upset some Netflix executives because the book covered some of the same ground as the series, undercutting the exclusive nature of the show', the newspaper said. Spokesmen for Archewell and Netflix have said there 'was no tension between the two companies', calling the notion 'false'. The 'first-look' arrangement announced yesterday means Netflix can say yes or no to new film or television projects before anyone else - allowing them to pick and choose what they invest in. PR expert Mark Borkowski described the new deal as a 'downgrade', claiming it falls a long way from the jackpot figure of Harry and Meghan's original contract in 2020. He told the Daily Mail: 'I think Netflix has done a very neat job of pivoting away from two very expensive people who didn't deliver, and they've taken that deal off the table, and they've given them a modest one. 'It's not like they're gradually uncoupling – it's a downgrade. Netflix are not going to expose themselves to those budgets again. It's Netflix saying, 'Let's have a look at your content, but we'll pick and choose, mate'.' He believes the pair will be paid for each production selected by Netflix rather than receiving an overall fee, such as the reported $100million of their first deal. 'I would be surprised if it's not pay-as-you-go and it's well, well below that first mark,' he added. The couple's new output will include a second season of the Duchess's 'With Love, Meghan' lifestyle show later this month, as well as a Christmas special in December. The Sussexes are also working on 'Masaka Kids, A Rhythm Within' - a documentary about orphaned children in Uganda, where the 'shadows of the HIV/Aids crisis linger'. There is also 'active development' on other projects with Netflix which 'span a variety of content genres', including an adaptation of romantic novel Meet Me At The Lake. But Mr Borkowski said the couple will not be granted the same budget as they were under their previous contract with the streaming service. 'They have shot the golden goose of 2020 - more of a 'we'll call you' than 'here's the chequebook',' he said. 'It's a first-look deal, which means Netflix gets first dibs but no obligation to bankroll every semi-royal whim. 'I reckon Netflix is trimming fat industry-wide, so this is less carte blanche, more curated cameo. 'They're still in business together - Meghan's. As ever brand and seasonal specials keep them in the Netflix shop window but make no mistake, this is a slimmed-down sequel to the blockbuster original. So Harry and Meghan's new Netflix chapter [is] less champagne budget, more Prosecco by the glass.' The couple's new output will include a second season of the Duchess's 'With Love, Meghan' lifestyle show later this month, as well as a Christmas special in December Netflix has already released the first series of With Love, Meghan as well as Polo, Heart of Invictus, Live to Lead and the couple's bombshell documentary Harry & Meghan as well as being a business partner on Meghan's lifestyle brand, As Ever. Five years ago, Harry and Meghan secured a lucrative contract thought to be worth $100million (£74million) with Netflix after quitting as senior working royals in 2020. The renewed deal was described by the Sussexes - who made the announcement with Netflix - as 'extending their creative partnership' through Archewell Productions. But the new terms are understood to be worth less for Harry and Meghan than their previous contract, according to a person familiar with the deal, and represent Netflix loosening its ties with the couple. In a statement, Meghan said: 'We're proud to extend our partnership with Netflix and expand our work together to include the As Ever brand.' Netflix chief content officer Bela Bajaria said: 'We're excited to continue our partnership.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store