Japanese shipping firm NYK acquires Kadmos, a salary payment platform for seafarers
Japanese shipping company Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, or NYK Line, is acquiring Germany's salary payment platform for seafaring workers, Kadmos, as it seeks to further expand the reach of its fintech services in the maritime sector.
The companies did not disclose the financial terms of the acquisition deal, which is expected to be completed in the next few weeks.
MIT alumni Justus Schmueser and Sasha Makarovych founded Kadmos in 2021, aiming to provide businesses, including shipowners and ship management companies, with affordable and transparent options for transferring salaries internationally, specifically for seafaring workers.
In 2019, NYK launched a financial services platform called MarCoPay in Manila, the Philippines, offering loans and insurance for Filipino seafaring workers and their families. Since then, it has collaborated with shipowners and ship management companies, and has even acquired an Electronic Money Issuer (EMI) license from the Philippine central bank.
NYK approached Kadmos for the acquisition in line with its plan to grow its digital payment business beyond the Philippines. It plans to incorporate the Kadmos platform into MarCoPay, providing payroll solutions to seafaring workers of all nationalities.
'Our plan is to leverage Kadmos' global reach and coverage while using advantages that MarCoPay has in the Philippines,' Makarovych told TechCrunch. 'Beyond that, we are planning to use the NYK brand and reputation to grow faster in shipping and sign customers quicker – they are a widely respected brand globally recognized by the whole industry.'
Kadmos also plans to expand its capabilities beyond payroll to offer cross-border B2B payments and corporate cards. The company intends to expand its remit to also service the cruise industry, and wants to offer additional financial services for shipping companies and seafarers through a partnership with NYK, Makarovych added.
Makarovych said Kadmos' team will stay with the company, with slight adjustments to the management structure.
There are several digital payment platforms available for maritime companies, such as MarTrust, ShipMoney and Brightwell.
Makarovych, however, thinks Kadmos stands apart thanks to its end-to-end reach, listing as examples its features that let companies operate completely cashless on vessels, including virtual point-of-sale devices and peer-to-peer transfers.
'Our cards are non-personalized and have the widest acceptance, which allows companies to roll out Kadmos to their ships very quickly without complicated card logistics,' Makarovych said. 'Kadmos pricing is built in an extremely flexible way, allowing companies to cover fees for their crew in a very personalized way while staying compliant with regulations by the Maritime Labor Convention — our competition simply charges a monthly SaaS fee.'
Kadmos most recently raised a $29.5 million Series A round in 2022. The round brought Kadmos' total capital raised to $38 million. It now has more than 40 enterprise customers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can PayPal Stock Hit $125 in 2025?
Digital payment giant PayPal's (PYPL) story has been anything but smooth. After soaring in 2020 and carrying the momentum into early 2021, PYPL stock stumbled, ending three consecutive years in the red. While 2024 brought a much-needed rebound, 2025 has seen shares slip once again. Much of PayPal's decline can be traced to rising competition. Newer, faster fintech rivals have outpaced the company with sleeker, more intuitive payment solutions. Still, PayPal isn't going down without a fight. In response, PayPal brought in CEO Alex Chriss in 2023 to reset its strategy. Under his leadership, the company has launched features like one-click and express checkout while sharpening its focus on profitable growth and operational efficiency. Dear Nvidia Stock Fans, Watch This Event Today Closely A $2 Billion Reason to Sell Super Micro Computer Stock Now 3 ETFs Offering Juicy Dividend Yields of 15% or Higher Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! PayPal's ever-expanding partner network — featuring giants such as Amazon (AMZN), Shopify (SHOP), Apple (AAPL), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Meta Platforms (META) — also remains a powerful asset. With Wall Street's highest target pegged at $125 for the stock, can PayPal rally hard enough to hit that mark before the year wraps? PayPal runs a global technology platform that connects merchants and consumers through a dynamic two-sided network. Whether shopping online or in-person, users can pay, get paid, transfer, or withdraw funds using a wide range of options, including bank accounts and cards, PayPal and Venmo balances, cryptocurrency, and more — making digital payments seamless and accessible worldwide. With its market capitalization currently hovering around $71 billion, PayPal remains a major player in the fintech space. However, its stock performance tells a different story. Delivering a 25% return over the past one year, the stock has taken a 14% hit so far in 2025, underperforming the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) by a wide margin, with the benchmark up 4.4% year-to-date (YTD). PYPL stock touched a YTD high of $93.25 in January but has since fallen more than 21% from that peak. Considering its sluggish price action, PayPal now appears to be a potential value play. The stock is trading at just 14 times forward earnings and 2.25 times sales, which is significantly below its five-year averages. For investors hunting for discounted fintech names, PayPal's current valuation could offer an attractive entry point. PayPal delivered its fiscal 2025 first-quarter earnings on April 29. The results were a mixed bag, showing a slight revenue miss but a strong profit beat. Sales rose just 1% year-over-year (YOY) to $7.8 billion, falling short of expectations. However, the company made it clear this was by design. PayPal emphasized its strategic pivot toward profitability, deliberately phasing out lower-margin revenue streams. That shift paid off on the bottom line. Adjusted EPS came in at $1.33, up 23% from a year ago and beating Wall Street estimates by an impressive 15.7% margin. PayPal continued to strengthen its financial footing in Q1, with transaction margin dollars — the company's core profitability metric — rising 7% to $3.7 billion. Active accounts grew 2% YOY to reach 436 million, reflecting steady user engagement. Backed by a strong balance sheet with $15.8 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and investments, PayPal also returned $1.5 billion to shareholders through share repurchases, underscoring its commitment to capital returns. Reflecting on the Q1 performance, Chriss noted, 'PayPal had a great start to the year and our strategy is working. This is our fifth consecutive quarter of profitable growth with progress across branded checkout, PSP, omnichannel, and Venmo.' Looking ahead, PayPal offered a dose of optimism with strong Q2 guidance, projecting adjusted EPS between $1.29 and $1.31, signaling continued momentum on the profitability front. For the full year, the company took a more cautious stance. Citing ongoing global macroeconomic uncertainty, PayPal reaffirmed its earlier guidance, expecting full-year EPS to land between $4.95 and $5.10. By comparison, analysts tracking PayPal project the company's profit to grow 9.3% annually to $5.08 per share in fiscal 2025, followed by an even stronger 11% rise to $5.64 in fiscal 2026. Overall, Wall Street sentiment toward PYPL stock remains cautiously upbeat, with analysts giving it a consensus 'Moderate Buy' rating. Of the 44 analysts offering recommendations, 16 give it a solid 'Strong Buy" rating, two suggest a 'Moderate Buy,' 22 give a 'Hold,' and the remaining four advocate for a 'Strong Sell" rating. PYPL stock's average analyst price target of $79.81 indicates 9% potential upside. But the Street-high target of $125 tells a more bullish story, implying a potential rally of 70% if the company's turnaround strategy hits its stride. On the date of publication, Anushka Mukherji did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Market Sentiment Around Loss-Making Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:OESX)
With the business potentially at an important milestone, we thought we'd take a closer look at Orion Energy Systems, Inc.'s () future prospects. Orion Energy Systems, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, researches, designs, develops, manufactures, markets, sells, installs, and implements energy management systems for commercial office and retail, area lighting, industrial applications, and government in North America and Germany. The US$22m market-cap company announced a latest loss of US$12m on 31 March 2025 for its most recent financial year result. As path to profitability is the topic on Orion Energy Systems' investors mind, we've decided to gauge market sentiment. Below we will provide a high-level summary of the industry analysts' expectations for the company. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. Consensus from 2 of the American Electrical analysts is that Orion Energy Systems is on the verge of breakeven. They expect the company to post a final loss in 2027, before turning a profit of US$467k in 2028. So, the company is predicted to breakeven approximately 3 years from today. What rate will the company have to grow year-on-year in order to breakeven on this date? Using a line of best fit, we calculated an average annual growth rate of 67%, which signals high confidence from analysts. If this rate turns out to be too aggressive, the company may become profitable much later than analysts predict. Underlying developments driving Orion Energy Systems' growth isn't the focus of this broad overview, however, take into account that by and large a high growth rate is not out of the ordinary, particularly when a company is in a period of investment. See our latest analysis for Orion Energy Systems One thing we would like to bring into light with Orion Energy Systems is its relatively high level of debt. Typically, debt shouldn't exceed 40% of your equity, which in Orion Energy Systems' case is 87%. Note that a higher debt obligation increases the risk around investing in the loss-making company. There are too many aspects of Orion Energy Systems to cover in one brief article, but the key fundamentals for the company can all be found in one place – Orion Energy Systems' company page on Simply Wall St. We've also compiled a list of key aspects you should further examine: Historical Track Record: What has Orion Energy Systems' performance been like over the past? Go into more detail in the past track record analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of our analysis for more clarity. Management Team: An experienced management team on the helm increases our confidence in the business – take a look at who sits on Orion Energy Systems' board and the CEO's background. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here. — Investing narratives with Fair Values A case for TSXV:USA to reach USD $5.00 - $9.00 (CAD $7.30–$12.29) by 2029. By Agricola – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: CA$12.29 · 0.9% Overvalued DLocal's Future Growth Fueled by 35% Revenue and Profit Margin Boosts By WynnLevi – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $195.39 · 0.9% Overvalued Historically Cheap, but the Margin of Safety Is Still Thin By Mandelman – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: SEK232.58 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
My wife and I have $7,000 in pensions, $140,000 cash, plus $3,500 in Social Security. Can we afford to retire?
I am contemplating retiring at the end of the year. I'm married and will receive two monthly pension payments; $3,600 from military service and $1,500 from civil service. Our total projected monthly cost of living will be covered by these, making our $3,500 in joint Social Security income completely disposable for savings, travel, etc. I don't have much savings, only about $140,000 between cash savings and a Thrift Savings Plan. Our take-home total each month will be just over $7,000 and, after taxes, medical, dental, vision expenses, and life insurance, our total cost of living will be around $4,000. My wife will be 65 in January, and I'll hit that age 13 months later. My brother stole $100K from my mom to buy bitcoin. Do I convince her to sue him? Most American weddings are a lot more extravagant than the nuptials of Amazon's Jeff Bezos 'He doesn't seem to care': My secretive father, 81, added my name to a bank account. What about my mom? S&P 500 scores record high for first time in 4 months. What could push stocks higher from here? What drove stock market's record-breaking week? Don't overlook growing rate-cut expectations. My wife of 20 years is a Japanese national and lives in the U.S. as a permanent resident. She has not worked in the U.S. and did not have enough work years in Japan to qualify for her Social Security. Her only income once I retire will be the spousal benefit from my Social Security. I will enroll my wife in survivor-benefit plans for my military pension and civil service annuity. These, combined with the increase in Social Security, will give her about $5,000 per month if I predecease my wife, plus a one-time $240,000 life-insurance payment. She will also receive spousal benefits, based on my working record, while I am still alive. Due to my military service, we have Tricare to cover costs above Medicare. We are both currently reasonably healthy. I think we're good financially to retire. What is your advice? Contemplating Related: I'm 75 and have a reverse mortgage. Should I pay it off with my $200K savings — and live off Social Security instead? My answer falls on a razor's edge. Military service can take a lot more of a toll physically and mentally. You deserve this time. I have a theory on your letter. You put a lot of hard work and due diligence into your military and civilian careers, and you are putting the same consideration into your decision about whether to retire. The answer, of course, is yes, you can support yourself and your wife in retirement, given your pension and Social Security benefits, which are based, I assume, on settling for less than your full Social Security income by claiming them before the age of 70. If you can retire and delay claiming your Social Security, all the better. Ordinarily, I would urge people to hang on until they're 70 before claiming Social Security, especially if they are healthy. The rise in the cost of living will eat into your income over 30 years. What's more, you and/or your wife may require long-term care. But you and your wife have more than 40% of your total monthly income left over after all your essential expenses are paid. Your wife will benefit from Social Security spousal benefits while you are both living, and survivor benefits if you die before her. Given that you have been married for 10 years, your wife would qualify for 50% of the value of your Social Security, even if she did not work and/or only worked for a limited time. She will get 100% of her Social Security benefit at full retirement age, which is 67 for anyone born in 1960 or after, and she would receive a lesser amount if she claimed at any time from the age of 62 until full retirement age. If she waits until 70, your wife would receive roughly 8% more per year. Two years of expenses in cash are often recommended for retirees, but I'm waving an amber flag: You still may be leaving yourself a little stretched in case you need money for maintenance on your home or other unexpected expenses. Most retirees with IRAs and/or 401(k)s want to have a cash cushion to avoid drawing on their investment accounts in bear markets like those of 2000-2002 (tech bubble) and 2007-2009 (subprime mortgage crash). You won't be worrying about the ebbs and flows of the stock market like the millions of Americans nearing retirement age with a 401(k) or IRA, given that you have a guaranteed, fixed military and civil-service pension. That's a huge weight off your minds, and should give you both confidence when you finally decide to hang up your work boots and enjoy having all your time together, which I hope includes travel and discovering new hobbies. Don't miss: Should I take a $61,000 lump sum or $355 a month for life? For those who will be drawing on investments, T. Rowe Price recommends retirees have a portfolio composed of 60% stocks and 40% bonds, which recovered from the aforementioned bear markets within two years. 'The exact amount you want to have also depends on your risk tolerance and the amount you have saved,' it adds. 'Another advantage of taking a balanced approach is that during a bear market stocks and bonds are rarely in decline at the same time.' There's a lot to be said about the benefits of a military pension on your investing strategy and peace of mind. 'Having more guaranteed income means you won't have to withdraw as much money from your investments,' according to First Command, a broker-dealer based in Fort Worth, Texas. 'That may affect how you choose to allocate those funds, potentially allowing you to focus less on short-term liquidity and more on long-term growth.' 'Your military retirement income may also give you more options when it comes to constructing a budget,' it adds. 'One approach to consider is using guaranteed sources of income — like a military pension and Social Security — to pay for your fixed expenses, and using the income generated by your investment portfolio to pay for discretionary expenses. The idea is simple: to match fixed expenses to fixed sources of income and variable expenses to variable sources.' Of you and your wife's three main sources of income — guaranteed (pensions), variable (investments) and one-off (inheritance or lump sum payment from a former employer) — your biggest source, happily, is guaranteed. That's a nice place to be. 'If your anticipated expenses significantly exceed your anticipated income,' First Command says, 'it might be a sign that you need to make adjustments to your goals or push back your planned retirement date.' Don't miss: We're living in 'end times' when you can't retire on $1 million But here's a recap so you know what's at stake by claiming Social Security early. You get 100% of your Social Security benefit at full retirement age, which is 67 for anyone born in 1960 or after, and you receive a lesser amount if you claim at any time from the age of 62 until full retirement age. If you wait until age 70, you receive roughly 8% more per year. Some advisers say it can work out roughly the same whether you start taking your benefits at 62 or at 70. As you suggest, your wife, even if she has no work record or a low benefit entitlement on her own work record, is eligible to receive one-third to one-half of your Social Security benefit while you are both living, according to the Social Security Administration. Survivor benefits are more generous. 'A widow is eligible for between 71% (at age 60) and 100% (at full retirement age) of what the spouse was getting before they died.' You can learn more here about such benefits. The financial argument suggests people should delay their Social Security benefits as long as possible, especially if they are in good health, as you seem to be. Virtually all workers between 45 and 62 should wait until beyond 65 to collect Social Security, according to this working paper from researchers at Boston University and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. More than 90% of people should wait until they reach the age of 70, yet only 10% appear to do so, they added. To put that in context for your retirement: Claiming Social Security early reduces household lifetime discretionary spending by $182,370 for the median worker nearing retirement, the paper concluded. 'Optimizing would produce a 10.4% increase in typical workers' lifetime spending,' the researchers wrote. 'For one in four, the lifetime spending gain exceeds 17%. For one in 10, the gain exceeds 26%.' But not everyone has a $5,100 combined pension. The longer you can wait, the better. There's no great rush to retire tomorrow. That would seem to make a powerful case for waiting to claim your Social Security benefit, but that's not necessarily true for everybody,' First Command adds. 'For those with health issues, it may make more sense to claim their benefits early. And those who need Social Security to retire may place a higher value on being able to quit working while they are still relatively young.' You both know your own lifestyle. If you feel 100% ready, go for it. Related: My friend, 83, wants to add me to his bank account to pay his bills. What could go wrong? Previous columns by Quentin Fottrell: 'She acted as a mother to me growing up': My stepmother remarried after my father died. How can I claim my inheritance? 'My wife and I are very grateful': Our son wants to pay off our mortgage before we retire. Will this backfire? 'Is this ethical?' I want to leave my home to my children from my first marriage — and not to my second husband. JPMorgan has a new way of forecasting the stock market — and there's a surprising finding My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum or $355 a month for life? Coinbase's stock is up over 40% this month as Wall Street projects amazing profit growth There's an important market indicator that suggests investors remain wary. It's good news for stocks. 20 banks expected to increase their dividends the most following the Fed's stress tests Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data