Nelson City Council Notifies Plan Change 29 – Housing And Hazards Decisions
Elected members voted in favour of notifying decisions on Plan Change 29 (PC29) submissions at a full Council meeting held on Thursday, 5 June 2025, a key decision aimed at facilitating more housing development and to provide for a well-functioning urban environment.
Council delegated the responsibility to hear and decide on submissions to an independent hearing panel which then made recommendations to Council on planning provisions.
The panel recently provided the Council with their reports, which recommended a number of changes that reflecte their decisions on submissions.
Councillors considered the hearing panel's recommendations, which reflected a balance between enabling growth in strategic locations (especially the city centre and fringe) and responding to community concerns about enabling widespread residential intensification, heritage protection, and hazard management. The panel ultimately recommended targeted city centre and fringe intensification that aligns with Council's city centre revitalisation goals.
How Councillors Voted:
After thorough discussion and consideration of public submissions, elected members voted as follows:
For: Councillor Sanson, Councillor Skinner, Deputy Mayor O'Neill-Stevens, Mayor Nick Smith, Councillor Stallard, Councillor Rollo, Councillor Rainey, Councillor Hodgson, Councillor Brand, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Paki Paki,
Against: Councillor Benge, Councillor Courtney
Mayor Nick Smith welcomed the decision.
'These changes support our plans to revitalise the central city by better enabling development to a greater height and over a wider area. They also improve our management of natural hazards. The intensification proposals in Nelson's suburban areas were too ambitious and were rightly declined in response to public submissions.
'Nelson does need to provide for more choices in housing such as townhouses and apartments and make development easier, but we also need to take our community with us.'
Key approved changes:
Increased building heights and revised development standards within the Inner-City Centre and Fringe zones, enabling greater residential and commercial development
Updates to flood, fault, and liquefaction hazard overlays were also supported, along with new provisions allowing enabling Papakāinga development within the Inner City and Suburban Commercial Zones
Amended provisions for the Manuka St hospital site, providing opportunities to enable the on-going operation of the hospital
The rezoning of the St Vincent and Vanguard Street industrial area from Industrial to Inner City Fringe, opening the door to more diverse and intensive land uses in this key location.
Key rejected changes:
General, Medium, and High Density Residential Zones and related rules for residential housing development
Increased building heights in suburban commercial areas
Most of the proposed changes to heritage, state highway noise and slope hazard overlays.
Next Steps:
Council will publicly notify its decisions on PC29 and serve a copy of the public notice to all submitters and make its decision available for inspection.
Submitters will have 30 working days from the date of service of the notice of decision to appeal the Council's decision on PC29 (on any part of the decision relevant to their submission) to the Environment Court.
The Council will keep the community informed as the process continues.
Full details, and the six hearing panel reports, are available on Nelson City Council's Shape Nelson website.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
UN Warns Of Steep Rise In Sexual Violence During Conflict
14 August 2025 According to the annual Report of the Secretary-General on Conflict-Related Sexual Violence, both State and non-State actors were responsible for violations in 21 countries, with the highest numbers recorded in the Central African Republic (CAR), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Haiti, Somalia and South Sudan. Women and girls made up 92 per cent of victims, but men, boys, people with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities, racial and ethnic minorities – together with some persons with disabilities – were also targeted, ranging in age from one to 75. ' These alarming figures do not reflect the global scale and prevalence of these crimes, ' the Office of the Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict said. Many attacks were accompanied by extreme physical violence, including summary executions, while stigma and harmful social reactions has often driven survivors and children born of wartime rape into deep social and economic marginalisation. Violence in detention The report pointed to a troubling rise in sexual violence in detention, often used as a tool for torture, humiliation and the extraction of information. While men and boys were most affected, women and girls were also targeted. Non-State armed groups carried out such crimes to tighten control over territory and resources, and to impose extremist ideologies. Widespread availability of small arms, mass displacement and food insecurity were cited as factors that further increased the risks. The report also noted that parties to conflict frequently blocked or restricted humanitarian access for survivors. ' The unprecedented severity and scale of destruction of healthcare facilities, and attacks, harassment and threats against frontline service providers, has severely hampered access to life-saving assistance for survivors,' said Pramila Patten, the Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict. Lack of legal compliance The report lists 63 State and non-State actors credibly suspected of or being responsible for patterns of sexual violence in armed conflicts on the Security Council's agenda. While compliance with international humanitarian law remained low, several parties have made formal commitments to address crimes. The report recommended involving Security Council sanctions committees to target persistent perpetrators, noting that sexual and gender-based violence is now explicitly sanctionable under the Council's counter-terrorism regime against Da'esh and Al-Qaida. Newly listings Newly listed groups include Résistance pour un Etat de Droit (RED) Tabara in the DRC for an egregious mass rape in 2024, and in Libya, two State actors – the Deterrence Agency for Combatting Organized Crime and Terrorism (DACOT) and the Department for Combating Illegal Migration (DCIM) – along with the non-State Internal Security Agency. Hamas was listed on the basis of information verified by the UN in 2024, indicating reasonable grounds to believe that some hostages taken to Gaza were subjected to different forms of sexual violence during their time in captivity, and clear and convincing information that sexual violence also occurred during the attacks of 7 October 2023 in at least six locations. Israel, Russia, 'on notice' For the first time, the report also names parties 'on notice' for potential listing in the next annual report. Due to 'significant concerns' regarding patterns of sexual violence perpetrated by Israeli armed and security forces, and Russian forces and affiliates, ' these parties have been put on notice for potential listing in the next reporting period ', the authoring office said. Call for accountability, access The report urged all parties to adopt clear orders prohibiting sexual violence, ensure accountability, and grant unimpeded UN access for monitoring and service provision. 'The promise expressed by the Security Council through its six dedicated resolutions on conflict-related sexual violence is prevention,' Ms. Patten said. ''
RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
LGNZ on govt's rate capping proposal
money local council 20 minutes ago The local government minister has confirmed he'll be taking a paper to cabinet before Christmas with a proposed model to cap rates. Local Government New Zealand and Selwyn mayor Sam Broughton spoke to Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira.
NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
The double tax hitting ratepayers in the pocket, another rate cut looms and concrete data shows hard times roll on
Why is it that local bodies do not receive a share of the GST spent in their area? Local government spends a lot of money providing the services to enable businesses to generate tax dollars. Why not return a portion of this to local government? At the very least, removing a tax on a tax by not charging GST on rates would help councils to keep rates down. Is there an explanation as to why this can't or won't happen? Steve Browne A: Thanks Steve, a couple of good questions there. I wrote on Sunday about the dire state of Auckland's economy. Perhaps your suggestion would offer a way forward. The idea of letting councils have a share of GST has been pitched before. In particular, the New Zealand Initiative (the economic think tank) has been a champion of the idea for several years. The New Zealand Initiative is a strong advocate for more devolved government, giving local councils more say in decision-making and funding them to do it. It has even highlighted the merits of the Swiss model of tax sharing. Switzerland operates as a confederation with three levels of government – federal, cantonal (state), and communal (local). The Government, the federal level, collects income and corporate taxes but is constitutionally required to share a portion with cantons and communes. Currently, cantons receive about 17% of direct federal tax revenue and they often pass some of this down to their communes. In a research paper published in 2019, the New Zealand Initiative's Bryce Wilkinson and Patrick Carvalho argued that local councils bear most of the new development costs, while tax revenue windfalls from the developments flow directly to central government in the form of increased income and GST collections. They advocate for central government to pay local councils for every new house completed within a specified period. 'The payments could be benchmarked on the goods and services tax (GST) charged on residential building (excluding land value), or be a fixed sum,' they said. 'Under the GST model, if each of the 9400 residential building consents issued in Auckland in 2015 resulted in construction, and each home had a build value of $200,000, Auckland ... Council would have netted $282 million.' The idea has gained some serious traction with the coalition Government, which has agreed in theory to look into some kind of GST sharing. As to your other question about paying GST on rates, well, it's a relevant one, but perhaps not for the reason you might have hoped. From what I can see, any suggestion that the Government would give up the GST on rates would likely see it returned to the council rather than to ratepayers directly. But the Government probably won't even go that far, given that it is desperate for revenue at the moment. It looks more like it will limit things to considering returning some of the tax collected on new residential builds to help with infrastructure costs. So, why not? I guess if I have a reservation about devolving power and tax revenue to local councils, it is that they haven't exactly covered themselves in glory when it comes to financial management in the past few decades. I've never had a great deal of faith in central Government to get things done, and if anything, I'm probably more sceptical about the standard of governance at a local level. Smaller councils in particular are vulnerable to the vagaries of low levels of participation in democracy (that's a nice way to say they sometimes elect weirdos and nut jobs). What happens if we divert tax funding to local councils for infrastructure, but they vote for an unrealistic blue-sky project that bankrupts them? I suspect the Government will still be expected to come to the rescue. I worry that New Zealand doesn't have the level of sophistication in local body politics that Switzerland does. These fears may be unfounded. I'm pretty sure the New Zealand Initiative would argue that the low standard of local government simply reflects the low level of influence it has in the grand scheme of things. Perhaps if we funded local government to do more of our governing, the standard would rise. It's probably a moot point, though. The answer to your question as to why this idea isn't taken more seriously is probably simply down to politics. If we can trust central government politicians, from all ends of the spectrum, on one thing, it's that they are not going to be keen to legislate away their own power. Reserve Bank to deliver verdict on economic recovery Next Wednesday, we'll get the first full Monetary Policy Statement from the Reserve Bank (RBNZ) we've had since May. In July – when the RBNZ hit pause on cuts – it was just the shorter Monetary Policy Review, which doesn't include a full set of forecasts. The market, and almost all the local economists, are picking that we'll get a 25-basis-point rate cut, taking the Official Cash Rate (OCR) to 3%. But a lot has changed since May, so most of the interest is likely to be in the new forecast rate track that the RBNZ produces. Evidence that the economic recovery stalled in the second quarter has been pretty strong. We've seen the BNZ/BusinessNZ Performance of Manufacturing and Performance of Services Index slip back into negative (contractionary) territory. Employment growth has stalled, particularly in the big cities, where unemployment is running much higher than the national average. BNZ head of research Stephen Toplis has taken an early look at what we might expect from the RBNZ next week. 'Our expectation is that the bank will print a rate track not dissimilar to what it printed back in May, namely with a decent chance of a cut to 2.75%,' Toplis said. 'We can see the argument for taking a more cautious approach, especially if the committee feels it does not want to push an incoming new governor into a corner.' 'Equally, an admission that even more work than a 2.75% low might be required is plausible. While 2.75% is our central forecast for the low, we think the odds of 2.5% are marginally higher than a 3% stall.' But Westpac chief economist Kelly Eckhold took a slightly more upbeat tone in his latest Economic Overview. Eckhold is still forecasting the RBNZ to pause again, after next Wednesday's cut, leaving the OCR at 3% for an extended period. 'The near-term economic outlook has weakened slightly since May,' he said. 'Uncertainty associated with the trade war, ongoing cost-of-living pressures and the still slow pass-through of past OCR cuts into household budgets have been weighing on activity.' But so far, the tariff damage to the global economy had not been as bad as expected. And while the pass-through of interest rate reductions had been gradual to date, they would provide 'a sizeable boost to households' disposable incomes and demand more generally over the next six to 12 months'. Here's hoping ... Hard times More evidence of the big slowdown in the second quarter came through on Tuesday with the release of the latest concrete production statistics. Concrete production is a pretty good barometer of the state of the construction sector, which we know has been struggling in the past few months. The news from Stats NZ was not good. In the June 2025 quarter, the actual volume of ready-mixed concrete produced was 891,909 cubic metres, down 10% compared with the June 2024 quarter. That is a big fall. While the completion of big projects such as Auckland's City Rail Link might have compounded the fall, it still likely represents a big slowdown in home building and commercial construction. If you want to visualise the concrete deficit (about 99,000 cubic metres), artificial intelligence (AI) tells me it would be enough to cover Eden Park's main rugby field to a depth of 14m. I'm not sure why Eden Park ... perhaps the AI thinks we should build a new waterfront stadium. But anyway, it's a lot of concrete to not get poured in just one quarter. Annual ready-mixed concrete volumes continued the downward trend which has persisted since volumes peaked at 4.78 million cubic metres in September 2022. Annual volumes of 3.70 million cubic metres in June were 23% below that peak, and the lowest since September 2014. Infometrics economist Matthew Allman noted that annual ready-mixed concrete volumes had continued on the downward trend that has persisted since volumes peaked at 4.78 million cubic metres in September 2022. Annual volumes of 3.70 million cubic metres in June were now 23% below that peak and the lowest since September 2014. The near-term outlook for construction activity remains soft, which will likely prevent a material change in the trend in concrete volumes over the next few quarters, Allman said. Infrastructure activity provides some upside risk for concrete volumes, with the Government focused on progressing major projects heading into the 2026 election. Activity is more likely to show through in 2026 as there currently seems to be a mismatch between intentions and activity in the infrastructure sector. More clues to come We'll see other high-frequency data on Friday, with new monthly numbers for electronic card spending, immigration and tourism (short-term visitors). All of these will be highly relevant to Auckland's economic recovery, given it is largely underpinned by population growth (driving the property sector) and the service sector. FYI, 'high frequency' just means the regular monthly numbers we get for second-tier economic data as opposed to the quarterly numbers we get for the biggies like GDP, inflation and unemployment. All of this stuff will be relevant to the Reserve Bank as it tries to get a handle on the extent of the slowdown. It will be fed into the RBNZ Nowcast, which is its version of the AI-driven, real-time GDP forecaster that has become popular (Massey University and Westpac have their own version). The Nowcast model has New Zealand's economy contracting again from mid to late June and it has been flatlining at about negative 0.3% ever since. It's not clear how much weight the RBNZ puts on this model, but at face value, it will only add to the case for further rate cuts this year. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003. To sign up to hisweekly newsletter, click on your user profile at and select 'My newsletters'. For a step-by-step guide, click here. If you have a burning question about the quirks or intricacies of economics send it to or leave a message in the comments section.
