
Israeli forces restrict Palestinian worshipers access to Al-Aqsa Mosque on third Friday of Ramadan
Local sources reported a significant deployment of Israeli troops around the Qalandiya checkpoint to the north of Jerusalem, the Zeitoun checkpoint to the east, and Bethlehem to the south. Thousands of worshippers were turned back and denied access to the city under the pretext of not having the necessary permits.
The soldiers further checked citizens' IDs and prevented men under the age of 55 and women under the age of 50 who had obtained "special permits" from entering Jerusalem. Despite this, thousands of citizens have poured through the checkpoints since this morning in an attempt to reach Al-Aqsa Mosque.
The sources added that the occupation forces closed the gates of the Qalandia military checkpoint and prevented anyone from entering for about half an hour before reopening them. They detained a journalist and interrogated him on the spot after obstructing the work of the press crews at the site.
The occupation authorities have already been imposing strict restrictions on entry of worshipers to the Old City of Jerusalem and the Al-Aqsa Mosque since the outbreak of the ongoing Israeli aggression on the Palestinian people in early October 2023.--WAFA
============R.H.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Nahar Net
30 minutes ago
- Nahar Net
Mediators await Israeli response to new truce offer
Mediators were awaiting an Israeli response Tuesday to a fresh Gaza ceasefire plan, a day after Hamas accepted the proposal and signaled its readiness for a new round of talks aimed at ending nearly two years of war. The foes have held on-and-off indirect negotiations throughout the war resulting in two short truces and the releases of Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, but they have ultimately failed to broker a lasting ceasefire. The efforts have been mediated by Egypt and Qatar, backed by the United States, with frequent rounds of shuttle diplomacy aiming to break the deadlock. Egypt said Monday that it and Qatar had sent the new proposal to Israel, adding "the ball is now in its court". According to a report in Egyptian state-linked outlet Al-Qahera, the latest deal proposes an initial 60-day truce, a partial hostage release, the freeing of some Palestinian prisoners and provisions allowing for the entry of aid. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has yet to publicly comment on the plan, but said last week that his country would accept "an agreement in which all the hostages are released at once and according to our conditions for ending the war". Senior Hamas official Mahmoud Mardawi said on social media that his group had "opened the door wide to the possibility of reaching an agreement, but the question remains whether Netanyahu will once again close it, as he has done in the past". Hamas's acceptance of the proposal comes as Netanyahu faces increasing pressure at home and abroad to end the war. On Sunday, tens of thousands took to the streets in the Israeli city of Tel Aviv to call for the end of the war and a deal to free the remaining hostages still being held captive. Of the 251 hostages taken during Hamas's October 2023 attack that triggered the war, 49 are still in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. The new proposal also comes after Israel's security cabinet approved plans to conquer Gaza City and nearby refugee camps, fanning fears the new offensive will worsen the already catastrophic humanitarian crisis in the devastated territory. Israel's far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir -- who has staunchly opposed ending the war -- slammed the plan, warning of a "tragedy" if Netanyahu "gives in to Hamas". - 'Unbearable' - Gaza's civil defense agency reported that 27 people were killed Tuesday by Israeli strikes and fire across the territory. Agency spokesman Mahmoud Bassal told AFP the situation was "very dangerous and unbearable" in the Zeitoun and Sabra neighborhoods of Gaza City, where he said "artillery shelling continues intermittently". The Israeli military declined to comment on specific troop movements, saying only that it was "operating to dismantle Hamas military capabilities" and took "feasible precautions to mitigate civilian harm". Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing swathes of the Palestinian territory mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency or the Israeli military. Sabra resident Hussein al-Dairi, 44, said "tanks are firing shells and mortars, and drones are firing bullets and missiles" in the neighborhood. "We heard on the news that Hamas had agreed to a truce, but the occupation is escalating the war against us, the civilians," he added. Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's offensive has killed more than 62,004 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to figures from the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza which the United Nations considers reliable.


Nahar Net
an hour ago
- Nahar Net
Netanyahu calls Australia PM 'weak politician who betrayed Israel'
by Naharnet Newsdesk 19 August 2025, 12:11 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slammed his Australian counterpart Anthony Albanese as a "weak politician" on Tuesday, amid an ongoing row between the two countries after Canberra declared it would recognize a Palestinian state. "History will remember Albanese for what he is: A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews," read a post on the official X account of Netanyahu's office.


L'Orient-Le Jour
11 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Barrack: ‘Everyone is moving in the right direction,' urges Israeli reciprocal steps
The visit of U.S. envoys Tom Barrack and Morgan Ortagus to Beirut centered on three main points. The first was to show support for the Lebanese state following its decision to restore the monopoly on arms, adopt the American roadmap and review the proposed implementation mechanism. The second involved discussions on renewing the mandate of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), with Ortagus playing a direct role through her position at the U.S. mission to the United Nations. The third focused on ways to pressure Israel into taking measures corresponding to the "first step" already taken by Lebanon, referring to the Cabinet decision on arms monopoly. Based on his statements after the meetings, Barrack appeared relatively satisfied and delivered a clear message on the need for Israel to respect the clauses of the agreement and begin implementing measures, noting that Lebanon had accepted them and would proceed accordingly. "The Lebanese government has done their part. They've taken the first step," he said after meeting President Joseph Aoun. "Now what we need is Israel to comply with an equal handshake." Asked about the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanon and an end to "violations" of the agreement, Barrack replied: 'That is exactly the next step.' The envoy added that in the coming weeks there will be "progress on all sides," stressing that such steps would mean "a better life for the people" in the region. Barrack presented the U.S. proposal of the "step-by-step" principle in implementing the cease-fire proposal, while Lebanon had originally pushed for "simultaneous steps." Under the adopted arrangement, Lebanon began with the first move via the Cabinet decision, which Barrack highlighted as a signal that Israel must now respond with a corresponding measure. The key at Ain al-Tineh Perhaps the most telling phrase came after Barrack's meeting with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri: "Everyone is moving in the right direction, and everyone will benefit from economic improvement." At Baabda Presidential Palace, Barrack said in the same context that "When we talk about the disarmament of Hezbollah. The purpose of that is actually for the Shiites." In other words, he alluded to Israel's withdrawal, an end to strikes and assassinations, and the start of reconstruction and investment in Lebanon, which he argued would positively affect all Lebanese. During his meeting with Barrack, Berri reiterated the agreement reached between them: Israel must undertake serious measures so that the process of consolidating the state's monopoly on arms can move forward. That position was echoed by Lebanon's president, prime minister and parliament speaker, who emphasized the importance of pressuring Israel to end its attacks and begin at least a gradual withdrawal from occupied territories, in parallel with steps taken by Lebanon. In the context, President Aoun told the envoys that "what is necessary today is for the other parties to commit to respecting the contents" of the cease-fire agreement. He also called on the international community, particularly Washington and Paris, to "further support the Lebanese Army and to speed up the necessary measures at the international level to launch the reconstruction process in areas affected by Israeli attacks." Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, meeting Barrack at the Grand Serail, stressed that the Trump administration must now "take responsibility by pressuring Israel to stop its attacks, withdraw from the five points [still occupied in southern Lebanon], and release Lebanese prisoners." He said government decisions had been made in the "national interest" and underscored the priority of strengthening the army "financially and materially" so it could fulfill its mission. Still, the phrase Barrack delivered at Ain al-Tineh remains central, showing a certain convergence with the parliament speaker, who ultimately represents Hezbollah in the negotiations. His statement followed Berri's own remark that "no one in Lebanon wants civil war," an implicit but clear response to comments by Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem. Barrack's position, combined with Berri's, aligns with diplomatic indications that within Hezbollah, some are now convinced of the need to move toward a state monopoly on arms. Hezbollah aware, but waiting on Iran According to diplomatic sources, Hezbollah is now raising its rhetoric to secure maximum concessions, aware that its arsenal is on the table in negotiations. The same sources suggest the group could be willing to discuss the matter if its weapons are integrated into state power, potentially becoming part of the Lebanese Army's command structure. But this idea has yet to appear in Hezbollah's official discourse, particularly since Ali Larijani, secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, visited Beirut. That visit underscored the broader context of U.S.-Iranian negotiations at both regional and international levels. As for the outcome of Barrack's visit, sources close to the talks said he urged Lebanon to continue implementing the government's plan and assured officials he would seek a clear response from Israel regarding its commitment to the agreed measures. He pledged to return to Lebanon at the end of the month, once the army's plan is finalized and presented to the Cabinet. According to information obtained, Barrack's questions focused on concrete steps the army needed to take. In return, Lebanese officials pressed him to secure pressure on Israel to respect its commitments and called for U.S. support in obtaining aid for the army as well as organizing a conference to mobilize funds for reconstruction.