
IMO urges ships to check Strait of Hormuz security measures
The International Maritime Organisation has said there were no indications of any increased threat to shipping in the Arabian Gulf, despite Iranian calls for international measures to prevent escalation in the Strait of Hormuz.
Fears over a move to close the waterway after Israel's targeting of Iran's nuclear infrastructure are rising.
Closure of the strait would disrupt global supply chains, as a fifth of global oil shipments pass through the channel that connects the Gulf to the Arabian Sea.
Speaking at the IMO's annual safety meeting on Wednesday, secretary Arsenio Dominguez said no signs of closure or disruption had appeared yet. 'We're not at that stage,' he said, answering a question from The National.
Mr Dominguez urged shipping companies to carry out security assessments before attempting to cross the strait. 'You need to carry out the security assessment and then make the decision whether it is appropriate and it is safe for the vessel to transit,' he said.
Seyed Ali Mousavi, Iranian representative to the IMO – and also ambassador to the UK – warned in the morning session that increasing danger for ships was becoming apparent, after accusing Israel of attacking an oil refinery and gas field on the coast of Asalouyeh.
'These actions directly endanger international maritime security and the global energy supply chain,' he said. "If the international community fails to take urgent and concrete measures to halt this unlawful aggression, the risk of escalation at sea becomes imminent."
The IMO's position is there no sign of a crisis point as yet. 'There's no indication that ships [or] seafarers are being targeted or any expected disruption right now in the region when it comes to maritime trade,' Mr Dominguez said.
Mr Mousavi said the IMO was 'mandated to protect' Iran from attacks on its port and maritime infrastructure and criticised Israel for attacks on Iranian oil tankers and ports he said had been taking place since 2019.
'These hybrid threats – combining physical and cyber aggression – represent a multifaceted assault on maritime safety, port security and the freedom of navigation, which this organisation is mandated to protect,' he said.
Iranian state TV told the world to brace itself for a major attack, reporting on Wednesday that "tonight, a great surprise will occur – one that the world will remember for centuries". Israel and India also made statements about the war in their addresses to the convention.
Mr Dominguez said addressing the conflict was not within the agency's remit, but that it was equipped to act in the event of a 'negative impact' on shipping, as it did during the Red Sea crisis, when the Iran-backed Yemeni militia the Houthis targeted commercial ships crossing the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden in response to Israel's war in Gaza, notably when it negotiated the release of the crew of the stricken MV Galaxy Leader last year.
'There's no room for IMO or specific role for IMO to come in at this stage. If things evolve, I will be the first one to start speaking to the countries,' he said.
'I demonstrated clearly, when the ships were targeted in the Red Sea, that's when I spent considerable amount of time in actually talking to the countries, bringing the parties together to address the negative impact that this situation was having on shipping, seafarers, the environment, ships and the economy."
Oman – a member state of the agency - served as an intermediary for the Houthis. 'Oman was a country that helped me greatly,' Mr Dominguez said.
The Houthis entered a ceasefire agreement with the US in May after an aggressive military campaign.
The latest statements Mr Dominguez received from the group since the dea, which they also sent to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, featured 'no indication of targeting ships'.
Mr Dominguez addressed the dis r uption to commercial cargoes in the Red Sea. 'The way that trade starts to flow back into the Red Sea is not something that will happen overnight,' he said. 'But we have seen an increase already on trade going through the Red Sea and the Suez.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Will he, won't he? The world waits as Trump considers attacking Iran
In a speech while visiting Riyadh last month, US President Donald Trump attacked America's foreign policy record in the Middle East, saying the neocons who had tried to 'nation build' had wrecked far more countries than they had constructed. 'The interventionalists were intervening in complex societies that they did not even understand,' he told the Arab Islamic American Summit. The President's remarks found a receptive audience from Arab observers, who hope America's future ties to the Middle East will be based primarily on investment partnerships rather than destabilising military entanglements. But barely one month later, Mr Trump appears poised to let loose America's dogs of war and intervene in a complex society, by joining Israel as it strikes Iran. For now, Mr Trump is maintaining a degree of strategic ambiguity, saying he ' may or may not ' strike Iran. But he has dropped some very heavy hints that the US will be helping Israel as it strikes suspected Iranian nuclear sites. On Tuesday, he demanded the ' unconditional surrender ' of Tehran's government and said the US could kill supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – but prefers not to, 'for now'. Mr Trump has consistently said that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, but his increasingly bellicose tone marks a departure from his previous insistence that a deal could be reached with Tehran over its nuclear programme. On Wednesday, he said it was 'very late to be talking' and seemed to rebuff what he claimed was an Iranian attempt to restart talks. The vibe in Washington definitely feels more war-war than jaw-jaw. Iran denied it had asked to 'grovel at the gates of the White House', and the Ayatollah has called Mr Trump's remarks 'unacceptable'. Much has been made of another potential restraining factor ahead of a war announcement, namely Mr Trump's Make America Great Again base, which has long insisted the US must not enter another costly overseas conflict. Maga maven Marjorie Taylor Greene said this week that anyone wishing for war with Iran was ' disgusting ' and lamented America's previous military engagements in the Middle East. 'Anyone slobbering for the US to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/Maga,' she wrote on X. 'Wishing for murder of innocent people is disgusting. We are sick and tired of foreign wars. All of them.' Although he has said he wants to be remembered as a unifier and peacemaker, Mr Trump seems to be leaning into joining Israel's war – and to an extent already has. The Pentagon has assets positioned across the Middle East and is helping to defend Israeli skies from Iranian missiles. And as we saw during his military parade at the weekend, which depending on your viewpoint was either a badly attended embarrassment or a patriotic triumph of military might, he loves looking at American materiel in action. 'Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA,' he said on Tuesday when extolling American military gear, saying that 'we' had complete control of Iranian skies, hinting at close co-ordination with Israel as it bombs Tehran. When asked whether he was concerned a new war would alienate his Maga base, Mr Trump shrugged it off, rightly surmising that there is very little he can do to upset his true believers. 'My supporters are more in love with me today, and I'm in love with them more than they were even at election time,' he said. Some members of Congress have also begun to assert that they should have a say in whether America goes to war, with bipartisan legislation being introduced to force a vote on military action. But any prospect of the rubber-stamp Republicans opposing in a meaningful way is remote. For now, it appears Republican hawks and Israel have more of the President's ear than the Maga wing of his party. 'I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between fighting and having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do," he said in the Oval Office on Wednesday.


The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Iran calls on UN chief to take Israeli conflict to Security Council
Iran on Wednesday called on UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres to invoke Article 99 of the UN Charter as the conflict with Israel continues. Article 99 of the charter empowers the secretary general to bring to the Security Council 's attention any matter that may threaten international peace and security. The clause is rarely used and allows the UN chief to independently initiate action by the 15-member body in response to a potential crisis. 'Failure to act at this pivotal and perilous moment would constitute a profound abdication of the Security Council's responsibilities,' said a letter sent to the UN, seen by The National. In December 2023, Mr Guterres invoked Article 99 for the first time during his tenure to warn of the global threat posed by the escalating conflict between Israel and Hamas. It was only the fourth formal invocation of the article in UN history, with the previous instance occurring in 1989. Official UN documents describe Article 99 as having a preventive function, raising awareness at an international level that an already severe crisis could worsen. Iran's letter pointed to 'mounting and undeniable evidence of direct United States involvement in this unlawful campaign of aggressive war', listing in particular US President Donald Trump's implied threat to assassinate supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 'These reckless and inflammatory statements, especially when issued by the head of state of a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, constitute a grave and flagrant violation of international law,' the letter reads. Iran also requested an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, amid a 'dangerously escalated situation'. 'The Security Council cannot remain a passive bystander,' it said. Meanwhile, Mr Guterres expressed profound alarm over the escalation in the conflict between Israel and Iran, and warned against any military interventions in the Middle East. 'I strongly appeal to all to avoid any further internationalisation of the conflict,' Mr Guterres said in a statement, repeating his call for a ceasefire. 'Any additional military interventions could have enormous consequences, not only for those involved, but for the whole region and for international peace and security at large.' He also condemned the 'tragic and unnecessary loss of lives and injuries to civilians, and damage to homes and critical civilian infrastructure". 'Diplomacy remains the best and only way to address concerns regarding Iran's nuclear programme and regional security issues,' Mr Guterres said.


The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Senator Ted Cruz clashes with Tucker Carlson over Iran
Senator Ted Cruz has been grilled by Tucker Carlson over Iran, with the former Fox News anchor accusing the Republican legislator of knowing nothing about the country where he apparently supports regime change. The interview clip, with the full video airing on Thursday, comes as cracks have shown in President Donald Trump 's Make America Great Again (Maga) movement over the possibility of US military intervention in Iran. 'How many people live in Iran, by the way?' Mr Carlson asked the Texas conservative. Mr Cruz responded: 'I don't know the population.' Mr Carlson then said: 'You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?' The Republican senator has voiced support for regime change in Iran, saying in a Fox News interview on Sunday that 'it is very much in the interest of America'. 'How could you not know that?' Mr Carlson asked. Mr Cruz said he does not 'sit around memorising population tables'. Last week, Israel launched a 'pre-emptive' strike on Iran's nuclear infrastructure and other military targets, claiming the country was days away from creating a nuclear weapon. Tehran responded by firing a barrage of missiles and drones at Israel. The conflict has entered a sixth day, with the exchange of aerial fire killing scores of people, including several top Iranian military figures. Mr Trump appears to be working with members of his cabinet to decide whether to enter the Israel-Iran conflict, saying on Wednesday: ' I may do it, I may not do it – I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Mr Carlson continued to press Mr Cruz on Iran in the interview, telling him he does not 'know anything about Iran' after the senator was asked to, and correctly identified, the demographic make-up of the country. A flustered Mr Cruz said 'we are carrying out military strikes today', which Mr Carlson pointed out was contrary to the White House narrative that the US is not currently involved. Mr Cruz then said Israel was striking Iran with US support. The possibility of the US entering the war has divided Republicans, with some eager to disable Iran's nuclear programme and others pointing out that Mr Trump campaigned on ending costly foreign wars. The President went on the attack against Mr Carlson this week, saying in post on his Truth Social platform: 'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!' The post was apparently in response to an earlier interview Mr Carlson held, in which he asked if a war with Iran would spell the end of the Maga movement. Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a strong supporter of Mr Trump, expressed support for Mr Carlson in a post on X. 'Foreign wars/intervention/regime change put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction,' she said. In a previous post, she said: 'Anyone slobbering for the US to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/Maga.' The President, however, seemed unfazed. 'My supporters are more in love with me today, and I'm more in love with them, more than they even were at election time where we had a total landslide,' he said.