logo
How Iran, US And Israel's Closest Ally In The Middle East, Became Their Bitterest Enemy

How Iran, US And Israel's Closest Ally In The Middle East, Became Their Bitterest Enemy

NDTV4 hours ago

On March 13, 1978, Iran's omnipotent monarch Mohammad Reza Cyrus Pahlavi received two visitors at his vacation residence on the island of Kish in the Persian Gulf, a few miles off the Iranian coast. These two visitors weren't just anybody. They were Uri Lubrani, the Israeli ambassador to Iran; and Reuben Morhav, the Mossad station chief in Iran.
It was a time when germs of revolution had taken seed in Iran and the country was on the brink of a historic change. But the Shah had no way of knowing any of that. Out there on Kish, with unimaginable extravagance and hedonism for company, Pahlavi was fine. He could not perceive a threat to his government.
The Shah's guests, however, had their apprehensions. Iran was simmering. The Shah's incoherent dialogue did not make much sense to the two Israelis, who were on Kish to gauge how much of a chance the regime stood, with the political situation outside rapidly changing.
A Monarch Who Wanted Iran "More Developed Than France"
Mohammad Reza Cyrus Pahlavi had come back to power after a UK- and US-backed coup helped reinstate him on the throne of Iran. That was 1953. Pahlavi became the absolute monarch in control of Iran, with one palm locked firm in a handshake with the Americans. Pahlavi also oversaw a rapid Westernisation of Iran; and wanted the country to become a land "more developed than France". Not everyone was on board with the Shah. But no voice of opposition was tolerated. Pahlavi ensured an iron fist while dealing with his opponents.
It had been 25 years of this regime in Iran when the Israeli duo dropped by to pay Pahlavi a visit.
In these 25 years, while some in Iran were looking for someone else to turn to, there appeared one from among the religious opposition in the country. The man was Ruhollah Khomeini, from the village of Khomein in Iran, a cleric who came with the hereditary title of ' sayyid ', or a descendant of Prophet Mohammed. He had also earned the highest Shiite clerical rank, that of the Grand Ayatollah. He was a well-known preacher, but had a problem: he didn't exactly possess the gift of the gab.
A Preacher With "A Message From Gabriel"
In 1962, nine years after Pahlavi was put on the throne of Iran, Ruhollah Khomeini emerged from his bedchamber after a period of isolation. Khomeini, 60, was convinced that he had been visited by the Archangel Gabriel, who had told him that Allah had great things in store for him.
Khomeini's mission of achieving this great destiny that had been destined for him began with a transformation. He gave up speaking the way he did. He fell back on the power of repetition. He chose phrases and hammered them into the minds of his followers till they took on the form of a magical incantation. Among these mantras was the famous "Islam is the solution". The world became a canvas painted in black and white; where the good of Islam had to uproot the evil that the Shah manifested as.
The Ayatollah re-shaped the Shiite world. He discarded all distinction between civil and religious authority and said that the Islamic world no longer needed rulers governed by religious sages. The religious sages could themselves be rulers. Khomeini also turned death from a dreaded punishment into a desired reward. Families that lost their sons in Iran's holy war, Khomeini declared, should celebrate them as martyrs. The state was deemed toothless. Khomeini's influence rose as Shah Pahlavi wondered what was to be done with him.
The Ayatollah In Exile
In 1964, the Shah decided that he had had enough. But killing Khomeini was not an option. He couldn't risk it. So, Khomeini was exiled.
The Ayatollah went to Turkey and Iraq before moving to France, from where he continued to fight his cause.
By 1978, Khomeini, from his Paris headquarters, had flooded Iran with over 6,00,000 cassettes of his religious sermons. People listened to the Ayatollah say that the Shah of Iran was a "Jewish spy, an American snake whose head should be crushed with a stone".
While Shah Pahlavi underwent cancer treatment, the rumblings against him rose from within the public, guided by the voice of the Ayatollah from Paris. Israel and the US refused to believe that the situation in the Middle East was fast disintegrating. They believed in the Shah's omnipotence and absolute powers when it came to crushing the opposition. They did not heed any warnings from Tehran.
From his headquarters in Paris, the Ayatollah directed thousands of protesters in cities across Iran. When it became clear that there was no stopping the Ayatollah, and that without American backing the Shah wasn't going to be around forever, Pahlavi decided to leave Iran.
The Shah Leaves Iran
On the morning of January 16, 1979, Shahpour Bakhtiar was appointed the Prime Minister of Iran. He was chosen by the Shah to govern the country.
A few hours later, Mohammad Reza Cyrus Pahlavi, tears in his eyes, along with his wife Shahbanu Farah, and a few clods of Iranian soil in a box, left the country. Iran's first couple went to exile in Egypt, never to return.
Bakhtiar dissolved SAVAK, the Iranian intelligence agency. The day after the Shah's exit, the Prime Minister went to new Mossad chief Eliezer Tsafrir with a request: will the Mossad please kill the Khomeini at his Paris headquarters?
A Request For The Mossad
The proposal was lucrative to Israel. Mossad debated the pros and cons. The biggest of the pros was that it would place the Shah of Iran in debt of the Israelis forever, and they would benefit from it. Killing the Khomeini would also perhaps change the course of history. But the Mossad hesitated. Killing a religious leader, that too on French soil, was a gamble they weren't willing to play.
In his book Rise and Kill First (Random House, 2018), author Ronen Bergman writes, "The benefits for Israel were obvious. The SAVAK would owe a deep debt of gratitude to the Israelis. Furthermore, it was possible that a hit would divert the course of history and prevent Khomeini, who had made his views on Israel and Jews quite clear, from seizing power in Iran. The attendees of the meeting discussed several points: Was the plan operationally feasible? Did the Ayatollah actually represent such a grave danger? If so, would Israel be prepared to take upon itself the risks of eliminating a top clerical figure, and to do so on French soil?"
The answer from Mossad, after much deliberation, was in the negative. They weren't going to kill Khomeini in Paris.
"History Might Have Taken A Better Course"
"Looking back," Bergman writes, "Alpher [Yossi Alpher, senior research analyst dealing with Iran at that meeting] would say that 'as early as a few months after that meeting, I realised what he [Khomeini] was all about', and that he was 'very sorry' about the decision. If the Mossad had killed Khomeini, according to Alpher, history might have taken a better course."
It was a course bitter for Israelis and the Americans that followed the departure of the Shah from Iran.
On February 1, 1979, an Air France Boeing 747 was chartered from Paris to Tehran. The Ayatollah boarded the plane for the Iranian capital. The plane circled the city of Tehran three times before landing at the Mehrabad airport, where he was met with millions of supporters. Khomeini, 78, had to be airlifted on to a helicopter after his motorcade was met with a crush of enthusiastic crowds.
Khomeini was taken to Behesht-Zahra cemetery, where many martyrs of Iran's holy revolution were buried. He prayed and delivered a half-hour oration for the martyred men. It was clear who called the shots in Iran, and it wasn't going to be the government chosen by the Shah.
Bakhtiar had hoped for Khomeini a Vatican-like sanctuary in the Iranian city of Qom. Khomeini, he hoped, would be a religious leader who would let his government be.
Iran Becomes A Theocracy
In his first speech after getting back to Iran, Khomeini thundered, "I will break their teeth. I appoint the government, I appoint the government in support of this nation." Bakhtiar's government wasn't the one the Ayatollah wanted.
The US, who Khomeini called "Great Satan", and Israel, who he referred to as "Little Satan", were also mistaken in their measurement of the Ayatollah. They thought Khomeini was going to be a passing phase.
On February 11, 1979, the non-Islamist government collapsed. Bakhtiar escaped Iran in disguise, only to be assassinated in Paris in 1991.
Iran became a theocracy. Under the reign of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran, a country with the sixth largest military force in the world and the largest arsenal in Asia, once the US' and Israel's closest ally in the Middle East, became their bitterest enemy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is a ‘regime change' in Iran possible? What happens if Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is killed?
Is a ‘regime change' in Iran possible? What happens if Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is killed?

Mint

time16 minutes ago

  • Mint

Is a ‘regime change' in Iran possible? What happens if Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is killed?

US President Donald Trump hinted at a "regime change" in Iran just hours after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Sunday, 'This mission [US attacking Iran's nuclear sites] was not and has not been about regime change.' The idea of killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei also surfaced during the Iran-Israel conflict. It was said that Trump had vetoed an Israeli plan to kill the Iranian Supreme Leader, but the US President later claimed Khamenei was an "easy target" but would not be killed, "at least for now". This left the door open for a discussion of what exactly President Trump meant by "regime change." Meanwhile, Israel, which is in conflict with Iran, has not ruled out killing Khamenei. Last week, Israel Defense Minister Israel Katz said of Khamenei: 'This man absolutely should not continue to exist.' Cambridge dictionary defines a 'regime change' as a complete change of government, especially one brought about by force. Meanwhile, Britannica says a regime change refers to the overthrow of a government considered illegitimate by an external force and its replacement with a new government according to the ideas or interests promoted by that force. Simply put, a change of regime means forming a new government. In case of Iran, a regime change would require Israel or the US having a figure in mind to replace Khamenei and send troops to the country, Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute in Washington, DC, told CNN. A delay in choosing the new Supreme Leader could fuel another possibility for a regime change in Iran. Iran's government is a unique hybrid system which has elements of a theocracy and a republic. The Supreme Leader is at the top of Iran's power structure. He is "the guardian jurist who is effectively Iran's leader for life," the CRF explained. The president is the second-highest-ranking official in Iran. Particularly, Khamenei, the 86-year-old cleric, has ruled Iran for more than 35 years as its highest authority, rising to power a decade after the 1979 Islamic Revolution overthrew a US-backed monarch. So, what will happen if Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dies? Will his death lead to a regime change? Khamenei can be replaced by a new leader, but changing the regime itself is likely to trigger unrest in the Islamic Republic. Choosing a leader on time may not necessarily lead to a "regime change" in Iran. After US strikes in Iran, The New York Times, citing sources, reported that Khamenei has chosen three successors as his replacement in case military commanders die in Israeli strikes. However, the US reportedly fears that Iran could get "somebody worse than Khamenei," a source told the New York Post. Experts reportedly said that if the Supreme Leader is killed and the Guardian Council delays naming a successor, the risk of instability could grow. Parsi from Quincy Institute in Washington also warned that "a possible outcome of Khamenei's potential killing is total regime collapse." One possible scenario is Iran's various ethnic groups vying for power after Khamenei's death. Experts say that any attempt at regime change in Iran risks collapsing the state altogether – "a scenario that could splinter Iran and send shockwaves across the Middle East," CNN reported. Earlier, The Telegraph reported that Khamenei's death could create a vacuum at the heart of the government that might trigger internal strife and civil unrest. This is because Khamenei's death is likely to create opportunities for Iran's ethnic minority groups to rise up. Reports suggest that separatist groups who have long opposed the Islamic Republic may seek to take advantage of what they may see as an opportunity. This could "potentially ignite local conflicts that could spiral into a broader civil war." If Iran's regime falls, 'there would be support for ethnic separatist groups by the Israelis, and perhaps the US,' Parsi said. This would lead to a situation where remnants of the state are going to be consumed with fighting separatists. Another possibility is "military intervention", which "rarely leads to democratisation," Hamed Mousavi, associate professor of International Relations at the University of Tehran, told CNN. "Military factions that could take over are 'not going to be the type of regime that the US may have had in mind,' Parsi said. "They are unlikely to seek diplomatic routes with Israel or the US, but could take a more hawkish approach that sees possession of a nuclear bomb as the only deterrent to more attacks," Parsi said.

'No CEASEFIRE, But...': Iran's Big Message To Trump As Israel Accepts Truce Deal
'No CEASEFIRE, But...': Iran's Big Message To Trump As Israel Accepts Truce Deal

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'No CEASEFIRE, But...': Iran's Big Message To Trump As Israel Accepts Truce Deal

/ Jun 24, 2025, 01:27PM IST Iran and Israel have finally agreed for ceasefire implementation hours after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire on Truth Social. Iran's top diplomat Abbas Araghchi praised armed forces for relentless strikes against Israel until the ceasefire deadline. He denied any ceasefire agreement exists, warning Israel to halt aggression by 4 a.m. Tehran time to avoid further retaliation. Iran launched six waves of ballistic missiles targeting central and southern Israel, killing four civilians in Beersheba when a missile hit an apartment building. Israeli forces intercepted most missiles but one made impact. The intense missile barrage occurred minutes before the proposed ceasefire phase began, reflecting high regional tensions. Araghchi stressed the final decision on ending military operations is pending, signaling uncertainty in the fragile conflict's future.#IsraelIranCeasefire #MiddleEastTensions #TrumpNews #TehranStrikes #BreakingNews #QatarMediation #IDFUpdates #IranCrisis #Geopolitics #Ceasefire2025 #WorldAtWar #PeaceOrWar #GlobalAlert #USForeignPolicy #MideastConflict

Iran denies ceasefire violation as Israel warns of ‘forceful' response
Iran denies ceasefire violation as Israel warns of ‘forceful' response

Mint

time17 minutes ago

  • Mint

Iran denies ceasefire violation as Israel warns of ‘forceful' response

News about a missile attack by Iran on Israel after the ceasefire between the two countries took effect is "denied", Iranian media reported, quoting state TV. "Victory has forced Israel to unilaterally accept defeat and stop its aggression" said Iran, as quoted by Fars News. Israeli military said earlier it detected missile launches from Iran to which Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said Israel would respond 'forcefully'. Katz said the military had now been instructed to carry out high-intensity operations against targets in Tehran. The Israeli military reported two missiles fired from Iran mid-morning on Tuesday, leading sirens to blare in the north several hours after US president Trump announced a ceasefire plan, Agence France-Presse (AFP) reports. The army initially said it had identified missiles launched from Iran 2.5 hours after the start of the ceasefire. 'Two missiles were launched from Iran and they were intercepted,' a military official told AFP on condition of anonymity, with the army saying people could leave shelters about 15 minuutes after the first alert. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday he has ordered the country's military to respond forcefully to what he said was Iran's violation of a ceasefire with Israel, Reuters reports. The directive followed an announcement by the military that it had detected missile launches from Iran towards Israel. The Israeli military said it was working to shoot down Iranian missiles after detecting the launch. Earlier, US president Donald Trump had said that the ceasefire was now in effect. Katz said the military had now been instructed to carry out high-intensity operations against targets in Tehran. He said, "In light of Iran's blatant violation of the ceasefire declared by the President of the United States – through the launch of missiles toward Israel – and in accordance with the Israeli government's policy to respond forcefully to any breach, I have instructed the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) … to continue high-intensity operations targeting regime assets and terror infrastructure in Tehran.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store