
Democrats are teaching candidates how to use AI to win elections
Artificial intelligence is moving from a buzzword to a working tool in politics. The National Democratic Training Committee (NDTC), which has trained more than 120,000 Democrats since its founding in 2016, has launched its first playbook on how campaigns can use AI responsibly.
The three-part training explains how AI works and offers guidance on using it to draft speeches, phone-banking scripts, and social media posts. It also highlights clear boundaries, warning campaigns not to create deepfakes, impersonate people, or generate misleading images and videos. Candidates are encouraged to disclose when AI has been used in content creation, particularly in personal messaging or policy development, as a way to build transparency and trust.
The project was created in partnership with the Higher Ground Institute. For NDTC founder and CEO Kelly Dietrich, the goal is to make sure Democratic campaigns have the knowledge and confidence to use AI effectively. Fast Company spoke with Dietrich about the new training, the opportunities it opens, and the standards he believes campaigns must uphold. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
Why did you feel campaigns needed something like this training?
AI is increasingly becoming a part of everyday life. Politics are traditionally lagging in adoption of new technology. Candidates especially are a little tenuous about adopting new tech and strategies that aren't proven. That's because running for office is sometimes the biggest decision of someone's life, and candidates are sometimes scared to try something new and fail. That way, if they don't win, they can say, 'Well, I did everything right.'
We're constantly trying to get people to stay on the cutting edge and understand how new tools can make their campaigns more effective. The training that we've put together shows people how to understand AI. And this isn't like a college course; you don't need to understand how AI is built. But you should understand what it can and cannot do, and how you can use it ethically and most effectively on your campaign.
When most of us think about campaigns, we think about big presidential [ones] or maybe a really fancy congressional race. That's not reality for 99% of the campaigns run in our country. There's more than 518,000 elected officials. Only 537 of them are at the federal level, only 15,000 and change are at the state level. The other half million-plus are local offices: city council, school board, library board, county boards, all of these elected offices that very few people think of but have a very important and direct effect on our lives. And for 90-plus percent of those, they usually have budgets of less than $2,500. Usually, it's just the candidate and maybe one or two dedicated volunteers. In those campaigns—in addition to the big congressionals—everybody has limited time, money, and people. AI allows you to accomplish more with those three limited resources.
The training seems pretty practical, from what I've seen. Can you break down the program's approach?
Every training that we built is designed for a candidate or a staff person to be able to use immediately. So if you're going to give us a half hour of your time, you don't need just theoretical background information on AI. So, the course breaks down what AI is, but then we can show you examples of use cases and specific AI tools within the Democratic ecosphere that you can use—say, helping you to write a door-to-door script. And honestly, Republicans are already using this, and they're using it in ways that I don't think are necessarily ethical or even moral. But Democrats need to be using this or risk being left behind.
NDTC trains in three different ways. First, we have on-demand courses like the AI course, which are available 24/7. If you're running for local office, that's usually not a full-time job. So whether you're a teacher, lawyer, nurse, or anything else, you can go to work, come home, have dinner with your family, put your kids to bed, and then pull out your iPad or laptop. In 30 minutes, you can understand what AI is, how to use it, and what it can do for your campaign immediately.
Second, we do virtual live trainings. We hold a couple hundred of these each year. We don't call them webinars—webinars put everyone to sleep—but instead interactive online trainings, usually held at noon Central [time]. We've already seen interest in developing an AI live training to complement the on-demand course.
Third, we train through cohorts—multiweek live sessions. We'll be incorporating AI into those as well, making it one of the core lessons candidates and staff need to be more effective.
Can you tell me a bit more about which AI tools can be especially effective in campaigning?
You have your general-purpose AI tools, whether that's Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini. And then there are specific political AI tools, like Chorus AI, which optimizes political content for impact and engagement across platforms and audiences. And you've got Change Agent, which is more of a general language model but aligns with organizers and activism values.
Have campaigns jumped on board with the training?
We've already had more than 250 people take the course online, and it's only been up for a few days.
How do you make sure these tools aren't abused or opening up a floodgate?
Since the dawn of time, technology has been used for good and for bad, and the best we can do is educate and show people the difference. At the end of the day, everyone makes their own moral choice, and I think the values Democrats represent preclude those types of abuse.
What we need to do is create education, because most candidates know of AI but don't know how to use it. They don't understand what a powerful tool it can be. Can we make it more approachable, easier to understand, and walk people through exactly how it can help them accomplish their campaign goals? It can help them talk to more voters, win more votes—all the things that matter. Once you've laid out your campaign message and core talking points, AI can take those and help you create scripts, press releases, and a whole range of materials.
More AI coverage from Fast Company:
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge rules Alina Habba was unlawfully appointed as US Attorney in New Jersey
By Andrew Goudsward and Sarah N. Lynch WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Thursday sided with two New Jersey criminal defendants who sought to block a former personal lawyer to President Donald Trump, Alina Habba, from prosecuting them based on a claim she was unlawfully appointed as the state's top federal prosecutor. The ruling is a setback for the Justice Department under Trump, which maneuvered to keep Habba in her post and circumvent a judicial decision not to extend her 120-day interim tenure. "Faced with the question of whether Ms. Habba is lawfully performing the functions and duties of the office of the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, I conclude that she is not," wrote U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann. The case was brought by two defendants in an illegal drug case, Julien Giraud Jr. and Julien Giraud III, who challenged a series of procedural maneuvers undertaken by the Trump administration in July to keep Habba as the state's top federal prosecutor for another 210 days. Brann wrote that Habba's actions since July 1 "may be declared void, including her approval of the indictment of Defendant Cesar Humberto Pina," though that fact does not require its dismissal. The ruling is likely to spur similar legal challenges and could bring hundreds of federal criminal cases in New Jersey to a halt.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ecosia has offered to take ‘stewardship' of Chrome. And it's not a bad idea.
'It's not absurd, right?' Christian Kroll, CEO of Berlin-based non-profit search engine Ecosia, says of his company's unsolicited request to be granted a 10-year 'stewardship' of Google's Chrome browser, instead of forcing Google to sell it to a competitor. His idea is most definitely absurd, but also clever. On Thursday, Ecosia announced it had sent a proposal regarding Chrome to U.S. Judge Mehta. The judge is expected to rule this month on remedies to his 2024 landmark decision that Google has an illegal monopoly in internet search and advertising. One of the remedies the Department of Justice asked for would force Google to divest itself from Chrome. Google has not agreed to do so (and in 2024 vowed to appeal the original ruling). Still, competitors have been lining up to buy Chrome ever since. Both OpenAI and Perplexity have said they'd buy it; last week Perplexity even made an unsolicited $34.5 billion cash offer. Perplexity's offer was widely panned as being too low (not to mention, billions more than Perplexity has raised to date). 'We'd think OpenAI potentially would be prepared to pay significantly more for it,' speculated RBC analyst Brad Erickson in a research note. Ecosia believes Chrome is on track to generate $1 trillion over the next decade and an auction could price it 'in the hundreds of billions,' he said. Which is why, on face value, Ecosia asking to be handed Chrome for free – including control of about 60% of the revenue generated by its users – seems absurd. The proposal promises to spend those billions on climate projects, as is Ecosia's general mission. Founded in 2009, the non-profit donates millions per month and has relationships with local communities and NGOs in over 35 countries. It has specified projects in this Chrome proposal, including protecting rainforests, global tree-planting and agroforestry, prosecuting polluters, and investing in green AI tech. The remaining 40% ($400 billion, Ecosia says, based on that $1 trillion estimate) would be paid to Google. Google would maintain intellectual property ownership, and can even continue to be the default search engine. When the decade is up, stewardship could be passed to another, or otherwise reviewed. Ecosia, which uses Google to power its search engine, already has a revenue-share partnership with tech giant. And it already offers its own browser built on the Chromium open source engine that powers Chrome. That's why he thinks the stewardship idea isn't so out-of-line. 'We would be happy to manage Chrome for them,' Kroll says. Ecosia is even offering to maintain employment for the Chrome staff. Still, Kroll admits the bigger goal is to get the judge to consider alternatives to the typical divesture options of selling or spinning off. Those options would simply keep Chrome's power, and its billions, in the pockets of big tech. 'We hold a track record of making possible things possible,' he says. Should he get the judge thinking, 'who knows what might come out of it?'
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Palantir Just Erased $73 Billion--And Short Sellers Still Can't Catch a Break
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has shed $73 billion in market cap over just six sessionsits worst streak this year. The stock has fallen 17% since its August 12 high, briefly bouncing in Thursday trading before settling into a volatile range. For short sellers, that decline delivered a long-awaited payday: more than $1.6 billion in profits, per S3 Partners. But that's still a small recovery compared to the estimated $4.5 billion in paper losses short sellers have eaten year-to-date. Despite the drop, Palantir remains the top gainer in the S&P 500 (SPY) for 2025, up 106% so farhardly the sign of a stock that's rolled over for good. Is PLTR fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. The pullback could be less about Palantir itself and more about the broader selloff across big tech. When names like Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Meta (NASDAQ:META), and Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) get hit, it's not surprising to see high-beta stocks like Palantir fall harder. And while the slide may look like short sellers are finally in control, most of the upside this year came from long-only funds, not a short squeeze. That said, there's a subtle shift happening: short interest has crept up by about 10 million shares since June. It's still modest at 2.5% of floatdown from 5% a year agobut it's a sign that contrarian bets could be warming back up. Still, timing those shorts could be dangerous. If Palantir rallies even a bit, you will see the short seller is coming back, said Fny Capital's Vikram Rai. But he also warns: it's not the shorts driving this. It's valuation gravityand the market finally taking profits in a name many see as stretched. For now, Palantir has shown its hand: the trend might be turning. But with 2.3 billion shares outstanding and plenty of believers still in the trade, this one could stay volatile. Betting against it might work. Or it might just run you overagain. Sign in to access your portfolio