Trump says he fired museum director as his budget targets Smithsonian
President Donald Trump announced Friday that he has fired the director of the National Portrait Gallery, Kim Sajet, whom he called 'highly partisan.' The dismissal marks the first action Trump has taken against the Smithsonian Institution since an executive order he signed earlier this year that promised to eliminate 'divisive narratives' and 'anti-American ideology' from the museum and research body, which is partially funded by the federal government.
'Upon the request and recommendation of many people, I am herby terminating the employment of Kim Sajet as Director of the National Portrait Gallery,' Trump wrote in a post on his social media platform Truth Social. 'She is a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI, which is totally inappropriate for her position. Her replacement will be named shortly.'
Hours after Trump's post, Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie G. Bunch III told staff that the White House also sent new details of proposed cuts to the Smithsonian's budget, in an email obtained by The Washington Post. The president's request to Congress proposed a 12 percent reduction of the institution's budget and excluded funding for its Anacostia Community Museum and its forthcoming National Museum of the American Latino, Bunch said.
It is unclear if the president has authority to dismiss Sajet. The Smithsonian's programming is not under the purview of the executive branch, and personnel decisions for senior-level Smithsonian museum positions are made by Bunch. Neither the museum, the institution nor the White House immediately responded to a request for comment.
Thomas Berry, the director of the Cato Institute's center for constitutional studies, said presidents have the authority to hire and fire top officials in the executive branch who then have the powers to make their own hiring and firing decisions, with the understanding that they could lose their jobs if the president is not satisfied with their decisions.
'The shorthand for this that is often used as a good rule of thumb is that the power to fire goes to whoever has the power to appoint,' Berry said. In the National Portrait Gallery's case, top personnel decisions are made by the Smithsonian's secretary, who is appointed by the board of regents.
The National Portrait Gallery, established in 1962 by an act of Congress, houses portraits of distinguished Americans, including every president. Its collection includes more than 26,000 works. An independent institution, the Smithsonian has operated as a public-private partnership since 1846, with the federal government covering about 62 percent of its expenses.
On March 27, the president issued an executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,' which aims to 'restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness.' A 35-year-old special assistant and senior associate staff secretary, Lindsey Halligan, was among the order's architects — instigated, in part, by her early-2025 visit to the show 'The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture,' an exhibition at the Smithsonian American Art Museum, which shares a building with the Portrait Gallery.
The order calls for Halligan and Vice President JD Vance to 'remove improper ideology' from the Smithsonian and 'prohibit expenditure on exhibits or programs that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race.'
Trump's unprecedented order was foreshadowed by a Nov. 25 Wall Street Journal opinion piece co-written by the Heritage Foundation's Mike Gonzalez, one of the contributors to Project 2025, which called for the president to 'retake control' of the Smithsonian's museums. The institution, Gonzalez wrote, had 'forsaken their mission of spreading knowledge and instead are trying to 'decolonize' society.'
Sajet, who formerly served as president and chief executive of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, was selected to lead the Portrait Gallery in 2013 — becoming the first woman to serve in the role.
As director, Sajet has focused on diversifying the gallery's collection and programming by acquiring works that reflected a broader range of artists and subjects and integrating Spanish into the museum's communications strategy. In 2017, she was the first Smithsonian director to name a choreographer-in-residence to create dance performances based on the museum's exhibitions. She also hosted the museum's 'Portraits' podcast series, now in its sixth season, to engage the public with conversations about art, history and identity.
Sajet was 'fair minded, and interested in all kinds of projects,' says a former National Portrait Gallery historian who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of professional repercussions. 'I've never thought of her as politically motivated.'
Born in Nigeria, Sajet is a citizen of the Netherlands who has worked in the United States for 30 years.
'A big part of my job [at the Historical Society] was being able to talk about American identity and what this amazing country has done,' Sajet told The Washington Post in 2013. 'Americans sometimes forget how much they are observed by other people around the world. I'm looking forward to reminding people of the larger global context. It's something the Smithsonian values.'
On Saturday, the Portrait Gallery and Smithsonian American Art Museum plan to host their family Pride festival.
Meryl Kornfield contributed reporting to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Kids are ditching traditional college for career tech programs. Parents are concerned.
Kids are ditching traditional college for career tech programs. Parents are concerned. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump signs order to combat 'woke' university accreditation process President Donald Trump directed the Justice and Education Depts. to investigate universities for 'unlawful discrimination' and 'ideological overreach. More teens are showing interest in vocational training and other non-college options after high school. Parents tend to favor traditional four-year colleges over non-degree career paths, according to a new survey from nonprofit American Student Assistance. Financial concerns and a desire for hands-on work are driving some students toward technical education. Nush Ahmed, 22, said she was "stubborn" when she went against her parents' wishes and chose to attend a career technical program 800 miles from home instead of enrolling in a traditional four-year college nearby. Her parents, who live in Buffalo, New York, and immigrated from Bangladesh, said they believed a bachelor's degree was the only path to success. But Ahmed insisted. She's one of a growing number of high school graduates turning to technical schools over two or four-year colleges at a time of spiraling student debt and new incentives for vocational education. Ahmed's choice to forego college and pursue a career working in manufacturing made her an outlier in her South Asian immigrant community, where most parents expect young women to attend college near home, she said. "I was hoping that time she would go to either medical school or engineering college to become a doctor or engineer," said her father, Shuhel Ahmed. "But she really wanted to go into to this career, so I finally decided to let her go." By the numbers: How do kids and parents feel about career technical education programs? New survey data from the nonprofit American Student Assistance shows that teen interest in college is down while interest in nondegree paths is on the rise. Meanwhile, parents are skeptical of options outside of the traditional college pathway to work. Nearly half of all students surveyed – 45% – weren't interested in going to college. About 14% said they planned to attend trade or technical schools, apprenticeships and technical bootcamp programs and 38% were considering those options. Some 66% of teens surveyed said parents supported their plans to pursue a nondegree route compared with 82% whose parents encouraged them to attend college. More: In emergency appeal, Trump asks Supreme Court to let him gut Education Department Seventy percent said their parents were more supportive of foregoing education altogether right after high school rather than pursuing a nondegree program. Young people told USA TODAY that finances, along with the desire to enter the workforce without more classroom-type academics, were among their reasons for choosing technical education. The financial burden of college was on Andrew Townsend's mind when he opted out of college. Townsend graduated from high school in Golden, Colorado, this June and decided against college, saying he wanted to go to work right away. The choice was easy for Townsend, 19, because he was offered an apprenticeship as a manufacturing technician for printer manufacturer Lexmark during his senior year through his school's career and technical education program. That turned into an 18-month internship. "When I went into high school I anticipated going to college and going into biology or sports management," Townsend said. "But I can't sit still in a class, and I want to get my hands dirty and get into work. It's financially best for me right now." More: Is the push for career education prioritizing business over students? His dad, construction worker Corey Townsend, wasn't sure what path his son would take, but he supports Andrew's choice. "My family doesn't have the most amount of money," Andrew Townsend said. "Maybe if I want to go to college later on in life, that's a choice. But for now I want to focus on myself and make my life better for me." College costs vs. career technical education costs At the nation's public colleges and universities, the average cost for in-state tuition is $9,750 per year and and the average cost for out-of-state tuition is $28,386, according to researchers at the Education Data Initiative. The price tag is higher at private colleges. The average cost of tuition and fees at those schools is $38,421,. The Education Data Initiative estimates college tuition has doubled in the 21st century. The costs of career technical education varies widely by trade and program. The average cost of a complete trade school program's tuition and fees was $15,070 during the 2022-2023 school year, according to data from the federal Education Department's National Center for Education Statistics. The Trump administration advances non-college options As parents and teens navigate their post-college options, President Donald Trump and his administration have championed career technical programs as a viable alternative to traditional two-year and four-year colleges. "Under my leadership, America will once again champion a culture where hard work is rewarded and equip our people with real skills for real careers that our communities are in desperate need to fill," Trump said in a Feb. 3 statement. "By offering more alternatives to higher education, we will train college-aged kids in relevant skills for the 21st century economy." More: Colleges report widespread problems with financial aid since Education Department layoffs During Trump's first term, he signed a bill called the Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act into law. The law allows the federal government to provide states and local communities funding to enhance career and technical education programming. This term, the Trump administration announced it is reversing two Biden-era regulations that require states and local career technical education programs at high schools and community colleges to change the way they report on student progress to receive federal funding. What to do after high school ...if you're not heading straight to college 'They should let them follow their dreams' New survey data from Gallup, Walton Family Foundation and Jobs for the Future of 1,327 teens shows that most high school students and their parents are unaware of their post-high school options outside of the traditional four-year college path. The uncertainty resonated with Ahmed's father, who saw college as the only pathway to success for his daughter. Father and daughter now agree the path she chose has afforded her immense opportunity. If she could go back in time, Ahmed said, she would be less harsh on her parents for pushing college. Ahmed is enjoying the success that has come from completing a technical education program at the Universal Technical Institute, formerly known as NASCAR Technical Institute, in North Carolina. She works at a precision manufacturing company that specializes in metal and polymer 3D printing and has a podcast that highlights young people pursuing trade options after high school. She earns about $60,000 a year at her day job. "With the way she has gone through this and how she is doing now, I would say to parents that if kids want to try a short term school they should let them do and then see how it goes," Ahmed's father said. "If it goes well then great and if not, there's time to change. But they should let them follow their dreams." Contact Kayla Jimenez at kjimenez@ Follow her on X at @kaylajjimenez.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
This Vermont Town Loves Its Canadian Neighbors. Trump Made Things Complicated.
On the front porch of her tidy yellow house on Canusa Street — so named because it runs along the border with Canada in tiny Beebe Plain, Vt. — Jan Beadle recently removed the American flag and hung a Canadian one in its place. Ms. Beadle, who has lived along the border for 71 years, hoped that the red maple leaf rippling in the breeze would send a message to her neighbors in the country across the way: I stand with you. And I'm sorry. 'I do feel like it reflects on me, somehow,' she said of President Trump's frequent jabs at Canada, including his imposition of steep new tariffs and his talk of making it the 51st state. 'As a kid, my family went to church in Canada. I went to the movie theater there, and to a youth club. We were just a group of kids together. We weren't labeled as Canadian or American.' The economic impact of Mr. Trump's trade war with Canada is already palpable on both sides of the border. Economic data shows a steep drop-off in spending by Canadians at Vermont hotels and restaurants; normally, 750,000 Canadian visitors spend $150 million in the state each year. Governors of New England states plan to meet on Monday in Boston with leaders from five Canadian provinces to strategize about the strain in their trade relations. But in the Northeast Kingdom of Vermont, where many towns and villages sit close by the border, residents also fear the loss of a kinship that has run deep for as long as they can remember. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
After Decades of Atrophy, Canada Vows to Beef Up Its Military. Can It Deliver?
At the end of World War II, Canada boasted one of the world's largest navies, with 95,000 uniformed members and 434 ships. The current Royal Canadian Navy is far less impressive — about 11,500 members and 40 vessels. Only one of its four diesel submarines, which were bought secondhand from Britain in the 1990s, is operational. And Canada's armed forces as a whole are about 16,000 people short of an approved head count of 101,500, including reserves. Prime Minister Mark Carney, seeking to reverse what he characterized as the atrophying of Canada's military, is directing billions of dollars to the armed forces, with the goal of reaching a NATO spending commitment this year, seven years ahead of schedule. And while the move comes after repeated claims by President Trump that Canada was effectively sponging off the United States to ensure its defense, Mr. Carney also cast the spending as part of his effort to loosen Canada's ties with its neighbor after Mr. Trump's repeated comments about making it the 51st state. Many of Canada's allies in Europe, including Britain and Germany, are also expanding their militaries in the face of Mr. Trump's isolationism. Mr. Carney has yet to say where the 9.3 billion Canadian dollars, about $6.8 billion, he has added to the defense budget will come from. Many people also question whether the armed forces will be able to actually spend that extra money so quickly. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
