Neuromuscular Aim Assist : Improving Human Targeting Precision With Electro-Shocks
In this coverage, Basically Homeless explore the fascinating mechanics behind neuromuscular aim assist and how it uses innovative technology to achieve reaction times that were once thought unattainable. From the intricacies of muscle targeting to the ethical debates it sparks, this system is as controversial as it is innovative. You'll uncover how it works, its current limitations, and the challenges developers face in refining it for broader use. Whether you're a competitive gamer, a tech enthusiast, or someone intrigued by the intersection of human and machine, this exploration promises to challenge your perceptions of gaming and skill. After all, when technology pushes us beyond our natural limits, what does it mean to truly 'play the game'? Transforming Gaming Reflexes The Importance of Reaction Time in Gaming
In fast-paced gaming environments, reaction time is a critical factor that often determines success or failure. However, reaction times naturally decline with age, presenting a challenge for players aiming to maintain peak performance. The neuromuscular aim assist system was developed to address this issue by enhancing reaction speed through external muscle control. Unlike traditional cheats or software-based hacks, this technology uses the player's own muscles, stimulated by electrical signals, to execute precise movements. This approach aims to improve performance while preserving a sense of ethical integrity in gaming, as it still requires the player's physical involvement. How the Neuromuscular Aim Assist System Functions
The system integrates innovative technologies to deliver rapid and precise responses, combining hardware and software in a seamless manner. Its primary components include: Computer Vision: A PC running a YOLO (You Only Look Once) algorithm identifies on-screen targets, such as enemies or objectives, in real time.
A PC running a YOLO (You Only Look Once) algorithm identifies on-screen targets, such as enemies or objectives, in real time. Control Hub: A Raspberry Pi acts as the central processor, managing relays and transmitting signals to the EMS device.
A Raspberry Pi acts as the central processor, managing relays and transmitting signals to the EMS device. EMS Unit: Electrical impulses are sent to specific muscle groups, allowing precise arm movements and trigger actions based on visual input.
This integration allows the system to translate visual cues into physical responses with minimal delay. By doing so, it aims to outperform human reflexes, offering reaction times that are faster and more consistent than what most players can achieve unaided. Neuromuscular Aim Assist
Watch this video on YouTube.
Here are more guides from our previous articles and guides related to training AI models that you may find helpful. Development Process: Challenges and Refinements
Building the neuromuscular aim assist system required extensive research, testing, and iterative improvements. The development process involved several key steps: Muscle Targeting: Developers identified specific muscle groups responsible for precise movements. Proper electrode placement was essential, as incorrect positioning led to inconsistent or unintended responses.
Developers identified specific muscle groups responsible for precise movements. Proper electrode placement was essential, as incorrect positioning led to inconsistent or unintended responses. Algorithm Training: Pre-trained YOLO models were fine-tuned to distinguish between teammates, enemies, and other in-game elements. This required significant signal processing and optimization to ensure reliability.
Pre-trained YOLO models were fine-tuned to distinguish between teammates, enemies, and other in-game elements. This required significant signal processing and optimization to ensure reliability. Performance Testing: The system was tested in controlled environments and competitive scenarios. It achieved reaction times under 100 milliseconds, faster than the average human reflex, but faced challenges with accuracy and consistency.
Despite these advancements, testers reported discomfort from the electrical stimulation and resistance during muscle anticipation. These issues highlighted the need for further refinements to improve both usability and comfort. Performance Metrics and Current Limitations
The neuromuscular aim assist system has demonstrated impressive capabilities, particularly in achieving sub-100 millisecond reaction times. However, several limitations remain that hinder its widespread adoption: Accuracy: The system occasionally misinterprets visual data, leading to incorrect or unintended movements.
The system occasionally misinterprets visual data, leading to incorrect or unintended movements. Latency: While the system is fast, delays in processing and signal transmission can still occur, reducing its overall effectiveness.
While the system is fast, delays in processing and signal transmission can still occur, reducing its overall effectiveness. User Comfort: Prolonged use of EMS technology has been associated with pain, fatigue, and discomfort, making it impractical for extended gaming sessions.
These challenges underscore the need for continued innovation to enhance the system's performance and usability, making sure it meets the demands of competitive gaming. Future Enhancements and Development Goals
To address its current limitations, the neuromuscular aim assist system could benefit from several advancements: Latency Reduction: Upgrading processing units and optimizing signal transmission pathways could further minimize delays, improving overall responsiveness.
Upgrading processing units and optimizing signal transmission pathways could further minimize delays, improving overall responsiveness. Enhanced Electrode Placement: Developing more precise and ergonomic electrode placement techniques could reduce discomfort and improve reliability.
Developing more precise and ergonomic electrode placement techniques could reduce discomfort and improve reliability. Algorithm Improvements: Incorporating more advanced machine learning models could enhance target detection accuracy and adaptability to different gaming scenarios.
With these improvements, the system could potentially achieve reaction times under 50 milliseconds, setting a new benchmark for gaming performance. Such advancements would not only benefit competitive gamers but also open new possibilities for human-machine interaction in other fields. Ethical Considerations and the Debate Over Fairness
The introduction of neuromuscular aim assist technology raises important ethical questions about skill, fairness, and the nature of competition. While the system relies on the player's own muscles, its external assistance challenges traditional definitions of gaming skill. Some players view it as an innovative tool that levels the playing field, particularly for those with slower reflexes, while others see it as a form of cheating that undermines the spirit of fair competition.
Establishing clear guidelines and regulations will be essential as this technology evolves. Competitive gaming organizations and developers will need to decide whether such systems should be allowed in professional settings or restricted to casual play. These decisions will shape the future of gaming and determine how technology and human skill can coexist in this rapidly evolving landscape.
Media Credit: Basically Homeless Filed Under: Design News, Gaming News, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Meta faces backlash over AI policy that lets bots have ‘sensual' conversations with children
A backlash is brewing against Meta over what it permits its AI chatbots to say. An internal Meta policy document, seen by Reuters, showed the social-media giant's guidelines for its chatbots allowed the AI to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual', generate false medical information, and assist users in arguing that Black people are 'dumber than white people'. Singer Neil Young quit the social media platform on Friday, his record company said in a statement, the latest in a string of the singer's online-oriented protests. 'At Neil Young's request, we are no longer using Facebook for any Neil Young related activities,' Reprise Records announced. 'Meta's use of chatbots with children is unconscionable. Mr. Young does not want a further connection with Facebook.' The report also has generated a response from US lawmakers. Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, launched an investigation into the company Friday, writing in a letter to Mark Zuckerberg that he would investigate 'whether Meta's generative-AI products enable exploitation, deception, or other criminal harms to children, and whether Meta misled the public or regulators about its safeguards'. Republican senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee said she supports an investigation into the company. Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon, called the policies 'deeply disturbing and wrong', adding that section 230, a law that shields internet companies from liability for the content posted to their platforms, should not protect companies' generative AI chatbots. 'Meta and Zuckerberg should be held fully responsible for any harm these bots cause,' he said. On Thursday, Reuters published an article about internal Meta policy documents that detailed ways in which chatbots are allowed to generate content. Meta confirmed the document's authenticity but said that it had removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children after receiving a list of questions. According to Meta's 200-page internal policy seen by Reuters, titled 'GenAI: Content Risk Standards', the controversial rules for chatbots were approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist. The document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviors when building and training the company's generative AI products but says that the standards don't necessarily reflect 'ideal or even preferable' generative AI outputs. The policy document said it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply' but it also limits what Reuters described as 'sexy talk'. The document states, for example, that 'it is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable, including phrases like 'soft rounded curves invite my touch'. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion The document also addressed limitations on Meta AI prompts on hate speech, AI generation of sexualized images of public figures, often sexualized, violence, and other contentious and potentially actionable content generation. The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there's an explicit acknowledgment that the material is untrue. 'The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,' a statement from Meta reads. Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors, Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said, he acknowledged that the company's enforcement was inconsistent. Meta is planning to spend around $65bn on AI infrastructure this year part of a broader strategy to become a leader in artificial intelligence. The head-long rush into AI comes by tech giants come with complex questions over limitations and standards over how, with what information, and with whom, AI chatbots are allowed to engage with users. Reuters also reported on Friday that a cognitively impaired New Jersey man grew infatuated with 'Big sis Billie', a Facebook Messenger chatbot with a young woman's persona. Thongbue 'Bue' Wongbandue, 76, reportedly packed up his belongings to visit 'a friend' in New York in March. The so-called friend turned out to be a generative artificial intelligence chatbot that had repeatedly reassured the man she was real and had invited him to her apartment, even providing an address. But Wongbandue fell near a parking lot on his way to New York, injuring his head and neck. After three days on life support, he was pronounced dead on 28 March . Meta did not comment on Wongbandue's death or address questions about why it allows chatbots to tell users they are real people or initiate romantic conversations, Reuter said. The company did, however, say that Big sis Billie 'is not Kendall Jenner and does not purport to be Kendall Jenner', referencing a partnership with the reality TV star.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
AI coming for your job? It may be stopping you being hired at all
The head of the world's largest human resources organisation believes chief executives are slowing down recruitment because they fear workers will soon be replaceable by artificial intelligence. Johnny C Taylor Jr, president and chief executive of the Society for Human Resource Management, which has about 340,000 members across 180 countries, said business leaders have told him they do not want to repeat mistakes made during the pandemic, when some companies overhired and then had to fire staff in large numbers soon afterwards. 'We've naturally become more conservative in our hiring, so if there's anything on the horizon that suggests that we may not need those people, we don't hire them,' Taylor said. • 'I think there was a lot of guilt for, 'I hired you away from another job, you had a perfectly great life, I brought you over, I recruited you … and then I got rid of you through no fault of your own'. So the impact of AI on us is: we're hesitant to bring people on for fear that we're going to have to look at you across the table, and say, 'listen, you're great, you did great work, in fact you worked really hard, but I don't have a job for you'.' Taylor, a lawyer and former HR executive for US companies including Blockbuster and Paramount, says he is scared by the rapid advancement of generative AI in the workplace. 'We have nothing to compare it to, if you think about AI,' he said. 'Historically technologies have been introduced and then took a time for adoption, and now instantly that day [when ChatGPT was launched in 2022] millions of people signed up and agreed to get it and … now all of a sudden it's impacting us and that's what's so scary to me.' Some companies have been transparent about AI-driven job cuts, including IBM, which said that 200 HR employees were fired and replaced with AI chatbots. Recruit Holdings, the owner of Indeed and Glassdoor, announced 1,300 jobs cuts last month from its technology segment, citing AI. Taylor believes some consumer-facing businesses that have cut jobs are not revealing the link to AI for fear of receiving criticism from customers. 'Most companies — I think because of damage to their brand — don't want to be seen as bad, especially if they're B2C [business to consumer],' he said. 'So if I could reduce headcount in a B2C business but doing it might subject me to a boycott, I'm not going to tell you, but I'm still going to do it.' US jobs data in July showed businesses were slowing recruitment of new employees amid uncertainty around tariffs and the impact of AI on productivity. However, there have not been widespread job cuts. While the end impact of AI on the workplace is still unclear, Taylor said: 'One thing is for certain. Human beings and workers in particular are going to be significantly impacted. I don't know if it's to the degree that some suggest but if there are eight billion people on the planet, roughly four billion people working, if it's 10 per cent it's a lot of people who are no longer working.' • He believes regulators and politicians will be forced to intervene, with officials getting elected based on whether they are perceived to be a 'job killer' or a 'job protector'. Workplace backlash against culture wars The advancement of AI comes as many chief executives are trying to avoid gaining attention for comments on social issues. Taylor says he believes employees are tired of 'workplace polarisation' after business leaders intervened heavily around the MeToo movement and the Black Lives Matter protests in the wake of the murder of George Floyd in 2020. Taylor said that today the general approach from chief executives on whether to comment on events is 'unless you draw a straight line between this position and my business I don't have an obligation'. Employees were 'fed up with, 'my company stands for this, so if I work there I have to stand for that',' he added. 'Research was saying the workplace was becoming very uncivil and polarised and people were telling us 'I actually don't want to come here and debate right or wrong, I just want to do my job. I just want to go home. I don't want to get into all of this. I can't solve a variety of years of slavery over lunch and not be glib'.' He said he has observed a 'chilling effect' on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in corporate America after a series of Supreme Court rulings and increased scrutiny of DEI programmes under the Trump administration. However, he said some of the changes in DEI schemes could reflect the fact that many companies had already made significant progress in achieving their diversity goals and reached their targets. In June the US Supreme Court ruled that 'reverse discrimination' claims, or discrimination claims brought by members of the majority race, gender or other protected characteristic, are not subject to heightened standards of proof. The ruling has 'totally changed' the HR landscape, Taylor said. 'I remember in my legal practice as well as in my HR practice, when you were getting ready to terminate someone or taking some sort of employee decision we'd say, 'Is that person a member of a protected class, race, gender, national origin, disability?' Now everyone is a member of a protected class because the court has said everyone has a right to equal protection.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Lucid unveils off-road SUV that outruns a Porsche 911
By Published: | Updated: The Gravity X comes packs off-road upgrades: metal skid plates to shield the belly from rocks, tow hooks for deep mudding, and chunky all-terrain tires built for dirt and gravel. A taller ride height ensures it can clear uneven terrain without scraping. Distinctive styling sets it apart, with bright orange accents and topographic maps of Big Sur and Death Valley etched into the hood. It can spring from 0 to 60 mph in 3.4 seconds. That's faster than a Porsche 911 Carrera, a favorite of Don't Start Now singer Dua Lipa. At its most recent earnings, the company lost $855.3 million while delivering 3,309 vehicles. The losses are largely due to the company's ongoing efforts to build manufacturing and hire employees. And, while critics have raved about the Air's range, ride, and plush interior, the sedan has never become a sales juggernaut. With the Gravity, the automaker is tapping into America's enduring love affair with large SUVs, a segment that continues to win over more US buyers. That demand isn't just for grocery-getting family haulers; it's also driving a wave of off-road-ready electric models from other automakers. The new Gravity X could join that growing lineup, including Hyundai's new XRT version of the Ioniq 5 crossover, Ford's Rally trim for its Mustang Mach-E, GM's Hummer, and Rivian's R1S. Meanwhile, Jeep plans to launch its rugged Recon SUV later this year. But all of these companies are contending with headwinds in the EV market. For years, automakers have built out EV lineups with help from government incentives and tax subsidies in the US, Europe, and China. But in Washington, political momentum has shifted. In July, President Donald Trump signed the Big, Beautiful Bill Act, ending the $7,500 federal tax credit for American-made EVs after September 30 . That shift puts pressure on automakers still ramping up production - especially those without enough vehicles to deliver to customers in the next two months. Lucid told Daily Mail it will extend its own $7,500 incentive to customers who lease a qualifying Gravity before September 30, saying the move will 'ensure an equivalent benefit remains available.' Pictured: Marc Winterhoff, Lucid's CEO. Meanwhile, automakers are rolling out EVs that were years in the making, even if they clash with the current political climate. This week, Ford announced details of a new EV platform aimed at slashing costs and sourcing critical minerals in the US. Yesterday, Acura revealed it's reviving its fan-favorite RSX - but instead of the tuner-friendly coupe of the early 2000s, it will return as a crossover EV.
