Revere man ID'd in fatal 5-car crash on I-93 in Medford
A Revere man was identified as the person killed in a five-car crash on the northbound side of Interstate 93 in Medford on Thursday, Massachusetts State Police said.
The driver was identified as Fredis Seravia-Corvera, 25, State Police said in a statement on Friday.
At around 6:20 p.m., troopers learned of the crash, located just before Exit 25, the statement read. Serious injuries were reported, and as of 7:15 p.m., at least one person had died of their injuries.
A Toyota Camry struck four other vehicles, including a Ford F350 that rolled over into the wood line next to the road, according to preliminary information from State Police. Seravia-Corvera was the driver of the Ford.
The crash prompted a closure of the northbound side of the highway for two hours, State Police said. All lanes reopened just before 11 p.m.
The crash continues to be under investigation.
At least one dead in five-car crash on I-93 in Medford
Woman dies months after being struck by Mass. State Police cruiser in Brookline
Motorcyclist killed in Walpole crash remembered as 'a kind and easygoing soul'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Joint House panel puts the screws to Marshall battery plant project
Christin Armstrong and Josh Hundt of the Michigan Economic Development Corporation take questions at a joint meeting of the House Oversight Subcommittees on Homeland Security and Foreign Influence, Corporate Subsidies and State Investments on June 11, 2025. | Kyle Davidson Members of two separate House Oversight subcommittees joined together on Wednesday as representatives continued their interrogation of incentives for battery manufacturing projects across the state. Up for discussion was the Marshall BlueOval Battery Park. Announced in 2023, the $3.5 billion project was initially expected to create 2,500 jobs, though Republicans have raised alarms about the project due to a licensing agreement between plant-owner Ford and a Chinese battery company. Earlier this year, Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. or CATL – who has agreed to license its battery technology to Ford for production at the facility – was placed on the U.S. Department of Defense's list of 'Chinese military companies' found to be operating directly or indirectly within the U.S. As a result the company is barred from entering contracts with the Department of Defense. When Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin rejected Ford's bid to establish the plant in his state due to its ties to CATL, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said he made a political determination and emphasized that Michigan would continue to compete for every economic opportunity. She later celebrated when Michigan was selected as the site for the project calling it a 'generational investment.' While the Michigan Economic Development Corporation was aware of the project's ties to CATL prior to awarding funding to Blue Oval for the project, the Chinese company's involvement was not a secret, the corporation's Chief Operating and Performance Officer Christin Armstrong said. Armstrong and the corporation's Senior Project Marketing Advisor Josh Hundt each noted China's near-monopoly on battery technology, with Ford aiming to bring that technology to the U.S. to break their control of the electric vehicle market. However, members of the committees questioned why the automaker hadn't simply partnered with companies from non-hostile nations like Japan or South Korea instead. Ford did not respond to an emailed request for comment. While it would greatly benefit the U.S. to develop its own technology to boost America's electric vehicle manufacturing, the Economic Development Corporation views the project as a way for Ford to make its vehicles more competitive, providing it with access to battery technology and employment for American workers, Hundt said. With U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Holly) introducing legislation to subject vehicles and vehicle parts manufactured in countries of concern like China to a security review, Rep. Luke Meerman (R-Coopersville) asked whether concerns at the national level factored into the economic development corporation's decision making. Hundt explained that by utilizing CATL's tech, Ford avoids the alternative of importing batteries from China, allowing the automaker to reduce its dependency on China and other foreign manufacturers. 'Our role is to help make sure that we are seeing a disruption of this current Chinese monopoly that, frankly, nobody wants to see,' Hundt said. 'We need to see both the technology and the manufacturing take place here, and this is a way to begin to make that happen.' Joe Cella, who served as the U.S. Ambassador to Fiji during President Donald Trump's first term, raised further concerns about potential threats from the Chinese government. 'I will preface my remarks by stating that China is on the hunt, and our footing nationally and the states is not commensurate with this threat,' Cella said, referencing three Chinese citizens with ties to the University of Michigan who were arrested for smuggling biological agents into the country. He pointed to requirements in Chinese law demanding Chinese-based companies, no matter where they are located, to surveil, collect and report as directed. 'In other words, conduct espionage,' Cella said, previously noting that CATL had begun hiring for positions at the Marshall plant through its U.S.-based subsidiary. Should this deal ever come to fruition in Michigan, it would only be a matter of time until espionage begins, Cella said, noting that Battle Creek Air National Guard Base and Fort Custer are located nearby. Alongside questions on Ford's deal with CATL, Armstrong and Hundt fielded questions on the specifics of the project following Ford's decision to downsize the effort. Now expected to deliver 1,700 jobs rather than 2,500, Armstrong said the project is still underway, with plans to wrap construction and start hiring by 2026. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Before Henry Ford: The forgotten Detroit pioneer who drove the first gas-powered car
Before Henry Ford: The forgotten Detroit pioneer who drove the first gas-powered car Show Caption Hide Caption The impact and history of autos in Detroit, The Motor City Here are some facts about Detroit's auto industry. Charles Brady King was a "mechanical genius" inspired by what he'd seen at the 1893 Chicago World's Fair. King caused a stir when he drove his own car on the streets of Detroit on March 6, 1896. For most people, the name Henry Ford probably springs to mind when they consider Motor City automotive pioneers. But Ford, who certainly stands out among those pioneers, wasn't the first person to drive a gas-powered car "of his own making," as it's been described, on the streets of Detroit. Ford's trip almost three months later in his Quadricycle was certainly notable, but Charles Brady King is the man recognized by the Automotive Hall of Fame, the Detroit Historical Society and other sources as the man who took that first drive in Detroit. In fact, the Detroit Free Press, part of the USA TODAY Network, according to a Hall of Fame article, described 'the first horseless carriage seen in this city' as 'the invention of Charles B. King, a Detroiter.' King, a 'mechanical genius and one of the most technically knowledgeable of the early automotive pioneers,' had caused quite a stir on the night of March 6, 1896, driving from his machine shop on St. Antoine onto Jefferson Avenue before heading up Woodward Avenue, according to the article. The Henry Ford Museum seeks rare talent: Antique vehicle mechanic wanted. Is it the right job for you? 'A crowd soon gathered, and became large enough that it halted King's progress in front of the Russell House Hotel at Cadillac Square [in Downtown Detroit]. King eventually drove his vehicle back to the machine shop, only to be greeted by a policeman who threatened to ticket him for disturbing the peace,' the article said. King, who was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2007, was inspired to design his car by what he'd seen at the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, although there seems to be disagreement in a couple of sources about which vehicle or engine gave him the nudge. King, who died in 1957, gets credit, too, from several sources for helping Ford with his Quadricycle. "Michigan: A History of the Wolverine State" called King "one of the most interesting and likable of all the automotive pioneers." Contact Eric D. Lawrence: elawrence@ Become a subscriber. Submit a letter to the editor at
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Elon Musk says his next product will be the most important Tesla has ever produced. And he says it's (finally) almost here
Will Elon Musk finally make good on six years of robotaxi promises? Musk said in a social media post this week that Tesla's long-awaited robotaxi service will roll onto the streets of Austin, Texas on June 22. The Tesla CEO is betting the company's future on autonomous vehicles (AV) and a robotaxi service – which will hopefully inject much-needed cash just as the company's sales and profits are slumping. While Musk is championing the promise of robotaxis – self-driving cars without a driver than can ferry around paying passengers – there are concerns about both safety and their viability as a business. Traditional automakers like General Motors have already abandoned plans for a similar service despite spending billions, blaming the 'considerable' resources needed and 'an increasingly competitive robotaxi market.' Ford dropped its AV efforts altogether. But even with their exit, some experts say the real competition for Tesla are the human drivers of Uber and Lyft. 'The challenge is less technological and more economic,' said Bryant Walker Smith, an affiliated scholar at the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School, an expert in autonomous vehicles. 'If a company that needs to pay engineers and mechanic and remote assistance has to compete with Uber drivers who might be making less than minimum wage to maintain their own older vehicle, that's kind of hard to do.' None of that has stopped Musk from making outsized projections about how the technology could reshape Tesla and the world. 'I don't see anyone being able to compete with Tesla at present,' Musk said during April's earning call about why he believes Tesla's robotaxi service will succeed. 'But at least as far as I'm aware, Tesla will have, I don't know, 99% market share or something ridiculous.' Musk cautioned in his social media post that the June 22 date was tentative. Whenever it does kick off, though, Tesla will be playing catch-up to far more established services. 'There are real robotaxis on the road today. None of them is a Tesla,' said Smith. That includes Google's Waymo, which is already providing 250,000 paid rides a week in four US cities – San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Austin. Companies in China also have active robotaxi services. Google parent Alphabet does not disclose the financial performance of its AV unit Waymo. But the segment of the company that includes Waymo reported a $4.1 billion loss last year, even as Alphabet poured in $5.6 billion. That loss is little more than a rounding error for a company that reported net income of $100 billion. In contrast, Tesla last year reported net income of $7 billion, down 53% from 2023. Waymo, which began as a paid service in 2020, is growing rapidly, with ridership up more than 50% in the last six months. Last month, it announced that its 1,500 vehicles had logged more than the 10 million paid rides – up from 5 million rides through the end of last year. Uber – which has a partnership with Waymo in Austin – plans to expand the alliance into Atlanta next year. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi told a Bloomberg technology forum last week that while he expects the company to rely on human drivers for years into the future, he sees a growing role for robotaxis. 'We want to help these players develop, by investing in them in some cases, and really by working with them to bring their product to market,' he said. 'These are technologies that are unbelievably promising, but they've taken billions of dollars to develop. It's one of those overnight success that has taken 20 years of development. But it's finally ready to hit the market and we want to help that ecosystem get there.' For years after automated elevators were invented, building owners paid to have human elevator operators because people were worried about riding in an elevator without one. Robotaxis could face similar safety concerns, experts say. Smith said he's seen people grow comfortable with robotaxis after giving them a try, even though it's too early to say whether the driverless cars are safer than ones with a person at the wheel. 'I often see… people are really nervous about it getting in a robotaxi. And then they get in, and within literally minutes, (they're) on their phones, and they're checked out, it's normal,' he said. Tesla's current self-driving technology, known as 'full self-driving' or FSD, uses just cameras, not radar or lasers known as 'lidar,' to detect obstacles in front of them. Musk has mocked the idea of lidar, which is used on Waymo and some other self-driving cars, writing on X in March, 'People don't shoot lasers out of their eyes to drive. Just try Tesla self-driving today, which just uses cameras and AI, and you will understand.' He described lidar as 'expensive sensors that are unnecessary' and 'friggin stupid.' While not using lidar gives Tesla robotaxis a cost advantage over Waymo, many experts consider lidar safer to detect obstacles – including people – in the road. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has announced several investigations into the safety of Telsa's FSD, including a fatal accident in which a car using the feature hit and killed a pedestrian. The car using FSD 'experienced a crash after entering an area of reduced roadway visibility…. from conditions such as sun glare, fog, or airborne dust,' said the agency's statement about the probe. Smith said that those real-world experiences show the problem with using just cameras for detection. 'If you could enable drivers to have lasers shooting out their eye to avoid sun glare and things, it would be a good thing,' he said. Tesla needs a turnaround. The company has experienced plunging sales and profits, including its first drop in annual sales last year and its biggest drop in quarterly sales, thanks in part to backlash against Musk's political activities. Tesla's stock (TSLA), which hit a record high in mid-December on expectations that Musk's close ties to President Donald Trump would lead to Tesla-friendly policies, have plunged 30% since then. Musk and his fans on Wall Street are convinced that Tesla will soon explode in value due to its AV capabilities and future robotaxi service, largely because self-driving robotaxis can operate more hours in a day than human driver. 'I think this will be the largest asset value increase in human history,' Musk told investors in January. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. Musk has repeatedly projected the service will change life on the planet by radically reordering how people move around, while Tesla owners rent out their cars for the robotaxi service to generate a cash return. But the Tesla CEO has been promising that his robotaxi service was a year away since at least 2019, only to fall short of those ambitious targets. GLJ Research analyst Gordon Johnson predicts Tesla's robotaxi launch this month will be more flash than substance. 'This is a Tesla proof of concept exercise, not a rollout or a testing of a commercial asset for sale,' Johnson, a long-time critic of Tesla, wrote in a note to clients Tuesday. And Smith doubts Musk will be able to live up to his current promises any better than the past ones. 'I don't know why anyone refers to things he says with any measure of credulity,' said Smith. 'When we're talking about the future, it's important to recognize that that future is not one that Tesla has demonstrated itself able to deliver.'
