&w=3840&q=100)
'No retrospective amendment': SC dismisses CBIC tax demand on IndiGo
The tax demand was based on a 2021 government notification that sought to clarify and retrospectively amend a 2017 exemption. The government had challenged the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruling of August 2024, which rejected the retrospective tax demand, stating that it would place an additional burden on airlines.
A bench comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and K.V. Viswanathan on Monday refused to admit the customs department's appeal and dismissed it.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) N. Venkataraman, appearing for the customs department, argued that nearly ₹100 crore in tax revenue was at stake. He also submitted that the interpretation of the 2017 notification is already under challenge before the Supreme Court.
'Even if the 2021 notification is struck down for being retrospective, our case survives because duties of customs under the 2017 notification include IGST. All I am requesting is that if we win on the 2017 notification, the benefit of that ruling should apply to these bills [and] other imports as well,' he said.
The court, however, rejected the argument, stating: 'You can't do it by a retrospective amendment… If the 2017 notification did not cover IGST, you cannot use the 2021 notification to impose it retrospectively.'
The government has announced that a uniform IGST rate of 5 per cent on all aircraft and aircraft engine parts will come into effect from 15 July. Last week, the 53rd GST Council recommended a uniform 5 per cent tax on imports of parts, components, testing equipment, tools, and toolkits of aircraft, irrespective of their HSN code. The aim is to reduce operational costs, resolve tax credit issues, and attract investment.
IndiGo has also challenged the constitutionality of the 2021 notification before the Delhi High Court. On 4 March, the High Court struck down the additional tax imposed on the repair cost of goods re-imported into India after being sent abroad for maintenance.
The airline's parent company argued that it had already paid import duties on overseas repairs as part of the import of services and should not be taxed again upon the re-import of the repaired aircraft parts. IndiGo, which is principally engaged in the transportation of passengers and goods by air within and outside India, sends its goods to maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) service providers outside the country. Once repaired, the goods are re-imported.
S.R. Patnaik, Partner and Head of Taxation Practice at law firm Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, said the Supreme Court's decision to dismiss the revenue's plea reinforces a vital principle in tax jurisprudence—that retrospective tax demands must pass the test of fairness and legal certainty.
'This ruling provides much-needed reassurance to businesses that tax exemptions, once validly claimed, will not be reopened by retrospective changes. It will likely influence how courts approach other cases involving retrospective levies, and hence, it is expected that the tax authorities shall use their powers in a more restrained manner,' he said.
'This precedent strengthens challenges in sectors like online gaming, where the retrospective levy of GST on the face value of bets is under judicial scrutiny. The ruling signals that tax certainty cannot be achieved by imposing obligations retrospectively, a development that certainly restores hope among taxpayers,' said Karan Sarawagi, an advocate practising in the Bombay High Court.
'The Supreme Court's decision is rooted in the jurisprudential principle that notifications are inherently prospective in nature. Since this was a notification and not a legislative clarification, its applicability should always be considered prospective, starting from the date of its publication in the official gazette,' said Sachin Sharma, Managing Partner of KSV Tax Consultants.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Supreme Court strikes down exemption from green clearance for educational buildings
Noting that education too has become a 'flourishing industry' now, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down the exemption granted to construction projects related to industrial sheds, schools, colleges, and hostels from obtaining prior environmental clearance under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006. A bench of CJI B R Gavai and Justice Vinod Chandran quashed the part of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change notification of January 29, 2025, granting the exemption. The bench said: 'We see no reason behind the exemption…If any construction activity of an area more than 20,000 sqm is carried out, it will naturally have an effect on the environment, even if the building is for educational purpose. We see no reason to discriminate the other buildings…We are of the view that the exemption of applicability of the 2006 notification to the projects and activities qua industrial sheds, schools, colleges, hostels, and educational institutions does not appear to be in tune with the purpose of the Environmental Protection Act.' The decision came on a plea by NGO Vanashakti.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
SC asks man to give wife 4cr city flat as alimony, says no to 12cr and car
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday used its exclusive powers under Article 142 to dissolve a marriage by asking the man to gift the wife a flat worth Rs 4 crore in a posh Mumbai area while rejecting her demand for additional Rs 12 crore and a BMW car. A bench of CJI B R Gavai, and Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria said the acrimonious second marriage of both parties has broken down irreparably, requiring dissolution of the troubled eight-year-old matrimonial alliance, which was an attempt by both the man and woman to give married life a second chance. It said, though, that the permanent alimony received by the woman from the annulment of her first marriage cannot be the basis for determining the size of alimony in the dissolution of the second marriage. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai Accepting the arguments of senior advocate Madhavi Divan and Prabhjit Jauhar and taking into consideration the level of her education —an engineer with a master's in management—the bench said that the gift of a flat in Mumbai by her husband would be sufficient alimony, especially as he is unemployed at present. It ordered the man to complete the gift deed for her before Aug 30 and pay the apartment dues of Rs 26 lakh to Kalpataru Society on Dr SS Road, Mumbai, by Sept 1. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo Brushing aside her demand for Rs 12 crore and a BMW, based on the man's profile on LinkedIn, the bench said, "We refuse to place any reliance on the 'LinkedIn' profile. We also reckon the fact that the respondent-wife was gainfully employed and has the educational qualifications as also the potential, by way of her experience in the field of information technology, to maintain herself. The gift of the encumbrance free apartment would suffice insofar as the compensation for separation". It added, "All proceedings pending between the parties shall stand closed and there shall be no further proceedings initiated by either party, relatable to their marriage, which stands dissolved by this judgment."


India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Brazil's Lula says ‘will not call Trump,' aims to strengthen ties with Modi, Xi
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said on Tuesday that he will not call US President Donald Trump, saying Trump does not want to talk. Lula referred to the day the tariffs were imposed as "the most regrettable" day in the bilateral relations between the Lula said will speak with other world leaders, including India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi. "I will call Xi Jinping, I will call Prime Minister Modi. I won't call Putin, because he can't travel now. But I will call many Presidents," Lula said as quoted by local media. advertisementThese leaders represent nations within Brics, a coalition that has drawn warnings from the US. Trump has said that countries supporting Brics policies that conflict with US interests will face an additional 10% IMPOSES 50% TARIFFS ON BRAZIL The United States imposed an additional 40% tariff on Brazil, bringing the total tariff amount to 50% on Brazilian imports. This has caused a serious strain between the two countries. Lula said Brazil will use all available tools, including the World Trade Organisation (WTO), to defend its trade Trump had said Lula could "call him anytime" to talk about trade. Brazil's finance minister, Fernando Haddad, welcomed Trump's move and said Lula would be ready to take such a call. However, Lula has made it clear that he will not be the one to start the conversation with RISE AFTER BOLSONARO'S ARRESTThe tensions are not only about trade. The United States recently condemned a decision by Brazil's Supreme Court to place former President Jair Bolsonaro under house arrest before his trial on charges of plotting a US State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs called Justice Alexandre de Moraes a "US-sanctioned human rights abuser" and accused him of using Brazil's courts to silence opposition voices. They demanded Bolsonaro be allowed to speak de Moraes, who is sanctioned by the US under the Magnitsky Act for alleged human rights violations, said he would continue his duties despite the sanctions.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersTune InMust Watch