Knack announces candidacy for Edmonton mayor
Andrew Knack will run to be Edmonton's next mayor.
The Ward Nakota Isga councillor has served west Edmontonians for three terms.
'We've accomplished a lot. But we continue to face significant challenges. Many of us are worried about higher costs, and some don't feel as safe as they used to; others don't know when they will get access to some of the basic amenities that others in Edmonton have. We also face a time where people don't always feel heard in a world that feels more divisive and chaotic than before,' he said in a Thursday statement.
'I've knocked on countless doors, listened at community meetings, and have a proven track record of getting things done. Edmonton is a hard-working city, and it deserves a hard-working Mayor so we can continue to build up as we grow exponentially.'
His campaign will launch in June.
Knack is not the first councillor to announce his candidacy.
Current Ward pihêsiwin councillor Tim Cartmell promised in November he would run, as did former councillor Tony Caterina.
Only two candidates have already submitted the paperwork to be official nominees: Omar Mohammad, a pediatric dental surgeon, and Abdul Malik Chukwudi, a trained engineer who worked in the oil and gas sector.
Edmonton's current mayor, Amarjeet Sohi, won't be seeking re-election after losing as the federal Liberal party's candidate in the Edmonton Southeast riding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
34 minutes ago
- CBC
Trump's 'revenge tax' on other countries could hit U.S.
Social Sharing A controversial tax being proposed by President Donald Trump's administration that could cost Canadians and Canadian businesses billions is also likely to cost the U.S. government, according to an assessment by a non-partisan U.S. congressional office. It is also likely to cost American companies by prompting investors from countries hit with the tax to move investments out of the U.S, according to the assessment. Dubbed the "revenge tax," Section 899 of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act calls for a new withholding tax to be imposed on investment income paid out by American companies to investors who live in countries the U.S. government considers to have unfair or discriminatory taxes. Canada's digital services tax, which hits companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb with a tax on revenue from Canadian users, is among the taxes the U.S. considers discriminatory. Top Canadian officials acknowledge privately that they are concerned by the prospect of Trump's new withholding tax and are closely watching what is happening in Washington — as are Canadian investors, companies, investment advisors and tax lawyers. Digital services tax in crosshairs Federal Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne says he's standing by the tax — which has its first big payment due June 30. "The DST is in force and it's going to be applied," he told reporters on Parliament Hill last week. Two different versions of Section 899 are currently before Congress, but both versions risk hitting Canadians and Canadian companies with a new withholding tax. The version adopted by the House of Representatives would take effect quickly and impose a five per cent withholding tax on things like dividends to Canadians from U.S. companies, adding another five per cent each year to a maximum of 20 per cent. An amendment to that section, currently before the Senate, would delay the tax until 2027 and would top it out at 15 per cent. The Senate has not yet voted on the bill, although it is being pressured by Trump to approve the legislation by July 4, the U.S. national holiday. A study of Section 899 by the U.S. Congress's non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), which performs a function similar to Canada's Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer, predicts that the new tax would initially bring billions into the U.S. Treasury. However, it also predicts those revenues would then start to decline — and that by 2033 or 2034 it would actually lead to a drop in revenue. The version of Section 899 adopted by the House of Representatives is expected to rake in an estimated $116.3 billion US between 2025 and 2034 for the U.S. Treasury, with $12.5 billion US in 2026 rising to $28.7 billion US in 2027 and $31.8 billion US in 2028. However, the analysis projects that revenues would then start to decline. By 2033, the withholding tax is projected to cost the U.S. Treasury $4.8 billion US in lost revenue and, by 2034, $8.1 billion US. The amended version of Section 899 is projected to bring in only $52.2 billion US between 2025 and 2034. But by 2034 it too would cost the U.S. government $2.5 billion US in lost revenue. A source familiar with the JCT's work said its analysis assumes that the U.S. gross national product will remain fixed and foreign laws, like the DST, will not change. What it assumes will change, however, is the behaviour of individuals and companies to avoid the withholding tax. The JCT projects that the reduction in demand for direct and portfolio investment on the part of foreign investors will reduce the value of U.S. assets. In turn, that drop in value will lead to a loss in tax revenue for the U.S. Treasury. David Macdonald, senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said the JCT's analysis makes a very big assumption — that countries like Canada won't hit back at the U.S. with their own retaliatory taxes. He said the ongoing trade war has shown that Canada is willing to hit back. Should Canada retaliate, Macdonald said the U.S. is more exposed than Canada on the tax front because a lot of American companies operate here. "They make a lot more profits in Canada than Canadian companies make in profits operating in the U.S.," Macdonald said. Macdonald agreed with the JCT's assessment that the withholding tax could prompt an exodus of investment in U.S. securities, predicting that many companies are probably already figuring out ways to hedge their investments. He said this is bad for business and risks damaging the economies of both countries. "Nobody wins a trade war and nobody wins a tax war," said Macdonald.
CBC
34 minutes ago
- CBC
Toronto councillor wants speed cameras shut off until September
A Toronto councillor said he wants the city's speed camera program put on hold and is vowing to prompt a vote on the matter at Thursday's council meeting. Humber River-Black Creek Coun. Anthony Perruzza called the cameras "speed traps" in a news release and said he wants them shut off until September so city staff can review Toronto's approach to slowing down motorists. His appeal comes three months after the city doubled the number of automated speed cameras it uses to 150. The system launched in the summer of 2020, under former Mayor John Tory, with the goal of slowing down drivers in community safety zones, such as on roads next to schools, and areas where there have been serious collisions. Perruzza, without providing supporting evidence, said in a news release the cameras have "no meaningful impact." Perruzza's bid to pause the speed camera system comes weeks after Vaughan's city council opted to do just that after drivers there racked up more than 30,000 tickets in three weeks. Perruzza said he's heard from plenty of frustrated drivers in his ward. "Often, drivers are unaware that this camera exists here, and responsible drivers are ticketed despite traveling at speeds close to the posted limits," he said, leaving them feeling "unfairly penalized." The city always posts signs 90 days ahead of a speed camera being installed, and keeps signage in place where they are running. It also maintains a map of the speed camera locations. By the end of 2022, the city had collected some $34 million in fines from speeding drivers caught on camera. This March, Transportation Services head Barbara Gray maintained the program isn't focused on bringing in revenue. "If the cameras generated no revenue, that would be best, because that would mean that people weren't speeding," she said.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Pressure building on Liberals to rethink electric vehicle mandate
OTTAWA — As Canada approaches a critical starting point for its electric vehicle goals, pressure is building on Prime Minister Mark Carney's government to rethink its plan. Article content Starting next year, the Liberal plan to get more electric vehicles on the road will enter its first phase: mandating sales targets for car companies, which could purchase credits, including by spending on charging infrastructure, or face penalties for not complying. Article content Article content Article content The government has set a target of 20 per cent of new passenger vehicles sold in 2026 must be either battery-powered or hybrid, which increases to 60 per cent by 2030 and reaches 100 per cent by 2035. Article content Article content The goal is to reduce the country's emissions, taking direct aim at the transportation sector, which is among the top emitters. Article content But with plummeting electric car sales and Canada's auto sector under duress from a trade war with the U.S, which has abandoned its electrification goals under President Donald Trump, Carney's government must now decide whether to forge ahead or reconsider a core climate policy. 'They're going to have to make adjustments,' said Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association. 'I think they know that, the industry knows that. It's really a negotiation on where those adjustments land. Is this a time for stretch goals or is this a time for reality. What's the mix?' Article content He added that he had spoken to 'several ministers' this week. Article content Article content Brian Kingston, the president and CEO of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association, which represents Ford, General Motors and Stellantis and has long opposed the sales mandate, says the policy heaps on added costs at a time when keeping production in Canada has been made more difficult by U.S. tariffs Article content Article content 'At a time where companies are already facing tariff pressure, they are now going to face challenges selling vehicles in the Canadian market. Very difficult to make the case for Canada with this policy in place.' Article content Ford Canada CEO Bev Goodman was among the latest to call for the mandate to be scrapped, pointing to falling customer interest. Article content Statistics Canada bears that out, with the agency reporting a 45-per-cent drop in new zero-emission vehicles sold in March from the same month the year before. It said these new vehicles accounted for around seven per cent of vehicles sold in March 2025 — a figure critics point to as fuel to argue a 20 per cent sales target is unrealistic.
