Should hospitality workers have to pay tax on tips?
Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers confirmed in a Dáil statement that there are no plans to alter the tax treatment of tips, which are treated as taxable income and are therefore subject to USC, PAYE, and PRSI.
O'Flynn accused the Government of 'penalising low-paid workers for doing their jobs well', and said that a tip is 'not a wage and it's not a bonus – it's a gesture of appreciation'.
So today we're asking you:
Should hospitality workers have to pay tax on tips?
Poll Results:
No
(840)
Yes
(166)
If they make above a certain threshold in tips
(89)
Unsure
(25)
Yes
No
Unsure
If they make above a certain threshold in tips
Vote
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Twelve times more properties available for short-term lets than for renters, new figures show
There are 12 times more 'entire' properties available for rent on short-term letting platforms than there are available for long-term living, new figures show. Nearly 22,000 properties advertised on short-term letting websites are offering tourists, holidaymakers, and those heading to concerts and events the opportunity to rent 'entire' houses or properties. This compares to just 1,800 properties or fewer that were available for hard-pressed renters countrywide on Tourism Minister Peter Burke confirmed 34,000 short-term lets were advertised across four platforms in May — up from 33,000 in April. He said 'approximately 64% of these properties are advertised as 'entire' houses and apartments' — about 21,760 properties. In Dublin, some 3,850 (55%) of 7,010 properties available for short-term let offered the entire property. In response to a parliamentary question from Social Democrats housing spokesperson Rory Hearne, Mr Burke said as there was no register, there was 'no way of knowing whether these are people's principal private residences or otherwise'. He also noted there was an annual 10% increase in the short-term letting sector. The number of properties available for renters across the country on has differed over the last week. On Wednesday, there were 1,800 properties countrywide. This dropped to 1,688 properties on Thursday. By Friday, this had fallen further to 1,669, and decreased further to 1,633 on Monday. There were 868 properties for rent on Daft in Dublin on Friday. This fell to 838 on Monday. In May, the same month as the short-term letting data was captured, there were 15,747 people classified as homeless. This included 4,844 children. There were 2,273 families in emergency accommodation. The latest homelessness figures for June rose to 15,915, including 4,958 children and 2,230 families. Mr Hearne told the Irish Examiner the number of properties available shows the 'real negative impact of short-term lets on the housing disaster'. 'There are twice as many entire properties being let as short-term lets (21,760) as the number of households who are homeless (2,320 families and 7,060 individuals),' he said. That we could house everyone in homelessness twice over in the number of full homes being let short-term is a shocking indictment of the Government's housing failures. 'The increasing impact of short-term lets is a result of a rampant lack of regulation and enforcement, resulting from a policy failure on the part of the Government. 'These houses did not just spring up on the market like mushrooms. They were allowed to by policy and a lack of enforcement.' A short-term let is when a property is rented out for periods not exceeding 15 days. Currently, people must apply for planning permission to rent out their principal private residence for less than 14 days at a time. This is not required if the owner rents out the property for fewer than 90 days a year. If the property is not their principal private residence, the 90-day exemption does not apply, and planning permission is needed for the property to become a short-term let. In April, Mr Burke secured Cabinet approval to progress the general scheme of the new Short-Term Letting and Tourism Bill. However, it will not go through the full legislative process in the Oireachtas until later this year. The proposed legislation will introduce a register for all short-term lets from May 2026, with Fáilte Ireland put in charge of implementing and managing the register. Hosts offering accommodation for periods up to 21 nights will be obliged to register and hold a valid registration number. This must be displayed when advertising their property. The legislation will restrict short-term lets in towns with populations of more than 10,000 people. However, people in these towns will still be allowed to rent out their primary residences for up to 90 days. The bill will also introduce sanctions for hosts who do not have a registration number. An administrative financial sanction procedure will also be introduced for platforms that do not comply with their obligations.
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Nature is worryingly absent from the National Development Plan review
Albert Einstein once said, look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. But even somebody with the cerebral capacity of Einstein would struggle to understand and get their head around the latest National Development Plan. This is a plan which purports to chart the progress of the country over the coming years, but which bizarrely fails to allocate any finance to nature in the middle of, what our current Taoiseach had referred to as, a biodiversity crisis. Low on detail, high on promises was how the Irish Examiner's Mick Clifford Podcast accurately described the NDP. Unfortunately when it comes to nature, it was worse – no detail and not even a promise. The gutting of nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund (ICNF) to finance transport, energy and water infrastructure projects in the National Development Plan is very alarming, deeply disappointing and flies in the face of the Government's previous guarantees on nature restoration. The decision is even more concerning given that the Programme for Government committed that the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund will 'ensure ongoing protection for our environment for future generations', while also committing to the development of Ireland's Nature Restoration Plan which requires ambitious nature restoration at land and at sea under the EU's flagship Nature Restoration Law. However, the National Development Plan announced by the Government this week has allocated nothing to nature, instead taking €3.15 billion from the Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund for transport, energy and water infrastructure. It appears that the Government is saying one thing but doing the opposite on nature restoration. It has decided to gut Nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund, instead using the budget to fund investment in transport, energy and water infrastructure. The Environmental Pillar has repeatedly criticised the absence of ringfencing for nature within the ICN fund, criticism that has been fully vindicated this week by the Government's shortsightedness. There is now a genuine concern that nature restoration funding is losing out to infrastructure projects that prioritise economic growth over measures to address the biodiversity emergency. It seems like a cynical sleight of hand to use ICN funding for a project that has been talked about for decades in various different forms and which pre-dates the fund. The Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund's purpose is to support State expenditure: where there is a significant deterioration in the economic or fiscal position of the State, and in the years 2026 to 2030, on designated environmental projects. But, while everyone acknowledges that we are living in uncertain times economically, the Government is not proposing to invoke the 'economic deterioration' provision, designed 'to provide for countercyclical capital expenditure in the event of an economic or fiscal downturn' (NTMA), so all the allocated spending for 2026 to 2030 must therefore be for 'designated environmental projects'. Under Section 20 of the Future Ireland Fund and Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund Act 2024, such projects must contribute to the achievement of various national and EU environmental regulations such as on water quality, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, the Birds and Habitats Directives, the National Biodiversity Action Plan and the Wildlife Act. However, the proposed allocation of the €3.15 billion that can be spent before 2030, laid out by Government in the NDP, contains no allocation for nature and looks much more like what the fund would be spent on if the 'economic deterioration' condition was being invoked to ensure 'countercyclical capital expenditure' in infrastructure. This is not an argument against funding for Metrolink. Ireland needs greater investment in public transport – whether it is Metrolink in Dublin, light rail in other major cities, expanded bus routes and active transport infrastructure. But in this case, there is over €100 billion of other money allocated to infrastructure by 2030 under the NDP so that provision clearly does not apply. This is not to mention the billions of euros in Apple back-taxes which Jack Chambers in a budget statement last October said provided the country with one-off revenue that has the capacity to be transformational and address the known challenges that we face in housing, energy, water and transport infrastructure. An artist's impression of the MetroLink rail project's Tara Street entrance. The Government has decided to gut Nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund, instead using the budget to fund investment in transport, energy and water infrastructure. File picture And then, there's the €305 million from the sale of the final AIB shares. It is all the more disappointing therefore that the dedicated Climate and Nature Fund is being diverted from its nature focus to further boost infrastructure spending which is not short of other funding. The lack of any funding for nature in the financial allocations for the NDP is even more shocking and worrying given that the State is currently engaging in an extensive consultation process involving farmers, fishers and environmentalists to inform the development of a national Nature Restoration Plan. The financing of that plan remains a key concern for all stakeholders. Ireland's Nature Restoration Plan has to be underpinned by significant investment. The Government has repeatedly told farmers that any nature restoration under the Nature Restoration Law would be funded and voluntary and that the main burden of restoration would take place on public lands. They have clearly been misleading farmers and Irish society as there is no indication that the Government intends to allocate new and additional funding towards nature restoration. And there is no sign that the Government is willing to take the kind of action that is needed to utilise Coillte and Bord Na Mona lands to the extent that is needed to achieve Ireland's legally binding targets. The Environmental Pillar is calling for the ringfencing of a substantial proportion of the Climate and Nature Fund for spending on nature. And we are in the fortunate position of knowing how much and where to invest that money. Unlike the vague and abstract NDP, a detailed financial needs assessment for biodiversity is available. Ireland needs greater investment in public transport – whether it is Metrolink in Dublin, light rail in other major cities, expanded bus routes and active transport infrastructure. File photo: Sasko Lazarov / The National Parks and Wildlife Service tasked UCD with carrying out a Biodiversity Financial Needs Assessment on how much would be required to reach the targets of the 4th National Biodiversity Action Plan 2023-2030 and international obligations including the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030. This was delivered in 2021 and updated in 2023 to take account of the draft Nature Restoration Law. The study estimated the expenditure required for nature restoration in Ireland at €463.5m per annum, according to the report Funding Ireland's Biodiversity: A Financial Needs Assessment for Biodiversity in Ireland. And last year, Natural Capital Ireland was commissioned by the Irish Environmental Network to deliver a report on high-level recommendations for funding nature restoration in Ireland. This project brought together a diverse group of subject matter experts from academia, business, environmental NGOs, farming, government departments, and semi-state bodies to workshop high-level recommendations for funding nature restoration. These would be good places for the Government to start if it's serious about nature restoration. Nature is conspicuous by its absence in the National Development Plan. Given that we are at a crucial time in relation to the biodiversity crisis in Ireland, it is inexcusable that no funding was earmarked for nature restoration. Biodiversity supports and underpins our society, whether it is food production or clean air or a stable climate. It is imperative that nature is adequately funded. Ciarán Brennan is communications officer at the Irish Environmental Network
The Irish Sun
11 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
€16 electricity price hike fear for EVERY Irish household as data centre costs cut amid €250 budget energy credit calls
SINN Fein is demanding the Government intervene and stop another price increase on electricity bills. The Commission for Regulation of Utilities is preparing to increase the network cost on bills to pay for future capital investment. 2 Sinn Fein's energy spokesman, Meath TD Darren O'Rourke 2 Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe said they are not prepared to come up with a package of energy credits to help families in this years budget Credit: Getty Images - Getty Yet at the same time the price of power for the big data centres around the country, which use up a large percentage of the Irish supply, are to be reduced. Sinn Fein slammed the proposed price increase for consumers and price cut for the data centres and said the timing is all wrong - especially with over 300,000 householders in arrears. It wants the Government to come up with a package of energy credits to help families in the forthcoming 2026 October Budget. The party's energy spokesman, Meath TD Darren O'Rourke, fumed: 'The CRU is preparing to hike the network costs that you have to pay but to cut them for data centres. 'The same data centres are hoarding more and more of the energy we produce, stalling the delivery of badly needed homes and putting our grid under real pressure. 'Big energy companies are intent on continuing to jack up their energy prices, all while raking in eye-watering profits. 'The Government pretends these issues are outside of their control but they are not. They are political decisions. 'They need to scrap the cut to costs for data centres and crucially use this Budget to bring forward badly needed support to help families and small businesses who are struggling with sky high energy costs. 'The Budget must include energy credits and extend the reduced VAT on electricity and gas bills until the end of the year.' Energy Minister Darragh O'Brien has already firmly ruled out energy credits to help with electricity and heating bills in October's budget. He said the €250 credits handed out to every Irish household as part of Budget 2025 cost the State €3.5billion. But the Fianna Fail man said the lower nine per cent VAT rate on gas and electric should be retained to avoid hiking energy prices further. Speaking to the Independent, he said: "I will be bringing an interim report to Government in advance of the Budget and we will assess that as to what measures can be taken. IRISH CUSTOMERS PAYING MORE "I think the vat reduction from 13.5 per cent to nine per cent is a very important one, one that I would like to see extended into next year. That decision will be taken at Budget time." Recent figures from Eurostat showed that Irish consumers are paying on average €350 a year more for their electricity than most European countries. Irish people pay on average €1,800 a year for their electricity - 30 per cent more than the rest of the EU. The proposed increase at the moment from the Commission for Regulation of Utilities will add at least €6 a year on household customer bills. The money will be used to pay for ESB Networks and Eirgrid's proposed €14billion investment over the next five years to upgrade their networks in Ireland to meet current and future demand. Both ESB and Eirgrid are seeking €16 a year on bills. The final decision will be made later in the year.
