
Hitler's Oligarchs
He was among the richest men in the world. He made his first fortune in heavy industry. He made his second as a media mogul. And in January 1933, in exchange for a political favor, Alfred Hugenberg provided the electoral capital that made possible Adolf Hitler's appointment as chancellor. Before Hugenberg sealed his pact with Hitler, a close associate had warned Hugenberg that this was a deal he would come to regret: 'One night you will find yourself running through the ministry gardens in your underwear trying to escape arrest.'
In my recent book, Takeover: Hitler's Final Rise to Power, I chronicled the fraught relationship between the tyrant and the titan, but my story ended in January 1933, so I did not detail the subsequent impact on Hugenberg's fortunes, let alone the catastrophic consequences that lay ahead for other corporate leaders, their companies, and their country.
In the '20s and early '30s, the Hitler 'brand' was anathema to capitalists and corporate elites. His National Socialist German Worker's Party was belligerently nationalistisch but also unapologetically sozialistisch —a true Arbeiter Partei, or 'working man's party.' Its 25-point political platform explicitly targeted bankers and financiers, calling for 'breaking the bondage of interest,' as well as industrialists who profited from wartime production. Profits were to be confiscated by the state without compensation, and corporate executives charged with treason. Platform Point 13 was explicit: 'We demand the nationalization of all existing corporate entities.'
Through the 1920s, businessmen preferred to place their political bets with conservative, centrist, business-friendly politicians, such as those in the Center Party or the Bavarian People's Party or the right-wing but decidedly pro-business German Nationalists. Out of necessity, then, the National Socialists had to derive most of its financing via storm troopers standing on street corners begging for contributions and from admission fees to Hitler rallies. Among the exceptions to this were socialites—Viktoria von Dirksen, Helene Bechstein, Elsa Bruckmann—who were smitten with Hitler. But the most significant exception was Fritz Thyssen.
Thyssen, heir to one of Germany's leading industrial fortunes, had been an early financier of the Nazi movement. He first met Hitler in the autumn of 1923 after attending a beer-hall rally. 'It was then that I realised his oratorical gifts and his ability to lead the masses,' Thyssen recalled in his 1941 memoir, I Paid Hitler. 'What impressed me most, however, was the order that reigned in his meetings, the almost military discipline of his followers.' Thyssen provided the party, by his own estimate, approximately 1 million reichsmarks—more than $5 million today—and also helped finance the acquisition and refurbishment of a Munich palace as the Nazi Party headquarters. Most important, Thyssen arranged for Hitler to speak to his fellow industrialists in Düsseldorf on January 27, 1932.
Read: How Hitler dismantled a democracy in 53 days
'The speech made a deep impression on the assembled industrialists,' Thyssen said, 'and in consequence of this a number of large contributions flowed from the resources of heavy industry into the treasuries of the National Socialist party.' This financing, estimated at a still-cautious 2 million marks annually, was channeled through a trusted intermediary: Alfred Hugenberg.
Hugenberg had served as a director of Krupp A.G., the large steelmaker and arms manufacturer, during the Great War, and had subsequently founded the Telegraph Union, a conglomerate of 1,400 associated newspapers intended to provide a conservative bulwark against the liberal, pro-democracy press. Hugenberg also bought controlling shares in the country's largest movie studio, enabling him to have film and the press work together to advance his right-wing, antidemocratic agenda. A reporter for Vossische Zeitung, a leading centrist daily newspaper, observed that Hugenberg was 'the great disseminator of National Socialist ideas to an entire nation through newspapers, books, magazines and films.'
To this end, Hugenberg practiced what he called Katastrophenpolitk, 'the politics of catastrophe,' by which he sought to polarize public opinion and the political parties with incendiary news stories, some of them Fabrikationen— entirely fabricated articles intended to cause confusion and outrage. According to one such story, the government was enslaving German teenagers and selling them to its allies in order to service its war debt. Hugenberg calculated that by hollowing out the political center, political consensus would become impossible and the democratic system would collapse. As a right-wing delegate to the Reichstag, Hugenberg proposed a 'freedom law' that called for the liberation of the German people from the shackles of democracy and from the onerous provisions of the Versailles Treaty. The law called for the treaty signatories to be tried and hanged for treason, along with government officials involved with implementing the treaty provisions. The French ambassador in Berlin called Hugenberg 'one of the most evil geniuses of Germany.'
Though both Hitler and Hugenberg were fiercely anti-Communist, antidemocratic, anti-immigrant, and anti-Semitic, their attempts at political partnership failed spectacularly and repeatedly. The problem lay not in ideological differences but in the similarity of their temperaments and their competing political aspirations. Like Hitler, Hugenberg was inflexible, stubborn, and self-righteous. When challenged, he doubled down. Hugenberg had spoken of a 'third Reich' as early as 1919, well before Hitler was a force on the political scene, and he envisioned himself as the future Reichsverweser, or 'regent of the Reich.' His followers greeted him with 'Heil Hugenberg!' Joseph Goebbels noted that Hitler invariably emerged from his meetings with Hugenberg red-faced and 'mad as shit.'
But by late January 1933, the two men's fates were inextricably entangled. Hugenberg, who had leveraged his wealth into political power, had become the leader of the German National People's Party, which had the votes in the Reichstag that Hitler needed to be appointed chancellor. Hitler had the potential to elevate Hugenberg to political power. As one Hitler associate explained the Hitler-Hugenberg dynamic: 'Hugenberg had everything but the masses; Hitler had everything but the money.'
After cantankerous negotiation, a deal was reached: Hugenberg would deliver Hitler the chancellorship, in exchange for Hugenberg being given a cabinet post as head of a Superministerium that subsumed the ministries of economics, agriculture, and nutrition. Once in the cabinet, Hugenberg didn't hesitate to meddle in foreign relations when it suited him. Reinhold Quaatz, a close Hugenberg associate, distilled Hugenberg's calculus as follows: 'Hitler will sit in the saddle but Hugenberg holds the whip.'
The New York Times expressed astonishment that Hugenberg, an 'arch-capitalist' who stood 'in strongest discord with economic doctrines of the Nazi movement,' was suddenly in charge of the country's finances. Hitler's 'socialist mask' had fallen, the Communist daily Red Banner proclaimed, arguing that 'Hugenberg is in charge, not Hitler!' The weekly journal Die Weltbühne dubbed the new government 'Hitler, Hugenberg & Co.'
As self-proclaimed 'economic dictator,' Hugenberg kept pace with Hitler in outraging political opponents and much of the public. He purged ministries. He dismantled workers' rights. He lowered the wages of his own employees by 10 percent. 'The real battle against unemployment lies singularly and alone in reestablishing profitability in economic life,' one of Hugenberg's newspapers editorialized, arguing that the goal of economic policy should be to rescue 'the professions, and those most negatively affected: the merchant middle class.' Hugenberg declared a temporary moratorium on foreclosures, canceled debts, and placed tariffs on several widely produced agricultural goods, violating trade agreements and inflating the cost of living. 'It just won't do,' Hitler objected in one cabinet meeting, 'that the financial burdens of these rescue measures fall only on the poorest.' Let them suffer awhile, Hugenberg argued. 'Then it will be possible to even out the hardships.' The economy fell into chaos. The press dubbed Hugenberg the Konfusionsrat —the 'consultant of confusion.'
Hugenberg didn't care about bad press. He was accustomed to being one of the most unpopular personalities in the country. Vorwärts, the socialist newspaper, depicted him as a puffed-up frog with spectacles. Hitler called him a Wauwau, or 'woof woof.' Even his close associates referred to him as 'the Hamster.' But Hugenberg lived by the golden rule: He who had the gold ruled. Earlier, when disagreements had arisen over the rightward turn of the German National Party, Hugenberg simply expelled the dissenters and financed the party's entire budget from his own resources. Hitler could aspire to be dictator of the Third Reich, but Hugenberg was already dictator of the economy.
In late June 1933, while Hitler was trying to assuage international concerns about the long-term intentions of his government, Hugenberg appeared in London at an international conference on economic development. To the surprise of everyone, including the other German-delegation members present, Hugenberg laid out an ambitious plan for economic growth through territorial expansion. 'The first step would consist of Germany reclaiming its colonies in Africa,' Hugenberg explained. 'The second would be that the 'people without space''— Volk ohne Raum —'would open areas in which our productive race would create living space.' The announcement made headlines around the world. 'Reich Asks for Return of African Lands at London Parley,' read one New York Times headline. Below that, a subhead continued: 'Also seeks other territory, presumably in Europe.'
From the March 1932 issue: Hitler and Hitlerism: a man of destiny
Konstantin von Neurath, Hitler's foreign minister, tried to walk back the Hugenberg statement, asserting that Hugenberg had expressed only a personal opinion, not government policy. Hugenberg dug in his heels, retorting that, as economic minister, when he said something, he was speaking for the entire government. Foreign policy was just an extension of economic policy. Confusion and embarrassment followed.
Back in Berlin, Neurath insisted in a cabinet meeting that 'a single member cannot simply overlook the objections of the others' and that Hugenberg 'either did not understand these objections, which were naturally clothed in polite form, or he did not want to understand them.' Hitler sought to mediate, saying that 'what had already happened was no longer of any interest.' But Hugenberg wouldn't back down: He wanted the issue resolved and on his terms. 'It was a matter between Hitler and me as to who was going to seize the initiative,' Hugenberg later admitted. Hitler prevailed. On June 29, 1933, Hugenberg resigned his minister post.
By then Hitler no longer needed either Hugenberg's corporate contacts or his Reichstag delegates. The bankers and industrialists who had once shunned the crass, divisive, right-wing extremist had gradually come to embrace him as a bulwark against the pro-union Social Democrats and the virulently anti-capitalist Communists. Six months earlier, three weeks before Hitler's appointment as chancellor, the banker Kurt Baron von Schröder had met with Hitler at Schröder's villa in a fashionable quarter of Cologne. The arrangements were cloak-and-dagger: Hitler made an unscheduled, early-morning exit from a train in Bonn, entered a hotel, ate a quick breakfast, then departed in a waiting car with curtained rear windows to be driven to the Schröder villa while a decoy vehicle drove in the opposite direction. Hitler walked out of the meeting with a 30 million reichsmark credit line that saved his political movement from bankruptcy.
Once Hitler was in power, there was no longer need for secrecy or subterfuge. On Monday, February 20, 1933, Hermann Göring, one of two Nazis ministers in the Hitler cabinet and the president of the Reichstag, hosted a fundraiser at his official residence for the Nazi Party in advance of upcoming elections. The event was presided over by Hjalmar Schacht, a respected banker and co-founder of a centrist political party who saw Hitler as the best bet against left-wing political forces and had lobbied President Paul von Hindenburg to appoint Hitler chancellor.
Among the two dozen industrialists, bankers, and businessmen in attendance, the most prominent was Gustav Krupp von Bohlen, known as 'the cannon king' for his armament production. 'I was astonished,' Schacht recalled, 'because I knew that this same Krupp von Bohlen had refused an invitation from Fritz Thyssen to attend an event with the Rhine-Westfalen industrialists four weeks earlier.'
Perhaps equally surprising was the presence at this fundraiser of four directors from the board of the giant chemical and pharmaceutical conglomerate I.G. Farben, which had to that point been staunchly pro-democracy, pro–Weimar Republic, and anti–National Socialist. (The Nazis derided the company, which employed many Jewish scientists, as 'an international capitalist Jewish company.')
Hitler himself stunned party attendees by showing up as the unannounced guest of honor. Clad in a suit and tie rather than a brown storm trooper's uniform, Hitler addressed the assembled corporate elite, warning of the dangers of communism and trumpeting his appointment as chancellor as a 'great victory' that he saw as a mandate for radical change. He outlined his plans to restore the power of the military, assert totalitarian control over the country, destroy the parliamentary system, and crush all political opponents by force. 'Private enterprise cannot be maintained in the age of democracy,' Hitler told them.
Jeffrey Goldberg: Trump: 'I need the kind of generals that Hitler had'
After Hitler departed, Schacht spoke of the need for additional campaign financing in advance of the upcoming elections. Hermann Göring added that the election, scheduled for March 5, 'will surely be the last one for the next 10 years, probably even for the next 100 years.' By day's end, the fundraiser had generated 3 million reichsmarks, the equivalent of $15 million today.
The following three weeks delivered a series of blows to the Weimar Republic that resulted in its demise: the arson attack on the Reichstag on February 27, which saw the very symbol of parliamentarian democracy consumed in flame; the March 5 elections from which the Nazis emerged with a mandate for Hitler's reforms; and the passing of an 'enabling law,' on March 23, that established Hitler as unchallenged dictator. In a letter to Hitler, Gustav Krupp wrote, 'The turn of political events is in line with the wishes which I myself and the board of directors have cherished for a long time.'
German corporations, large and small, helped retool the Weimar Republic as the Third Reich. Ferdinand Porsche designed the Volkswagen, a 'car for the people.' Mercedes-Benz provided Hitler and his chief lieutenants with bulletproof sedans. Hugo Boss designed the black uniforms for the SS. Krupp supplied armaments. Miele produced munitions. Allianz provided insurance for concentration camps. J.A. Topf & Sons manufactured crematoria ovens. A dismayed executive at Deutsche Bank, which was involved in the expropriation of Jewish businesses, sent a letter to the chairman of his supervisory board: 'I fear we are embarking on an explicit, well- planned path toward the annihilation of all Jews in Germany.'
For the industrialists who helped finance and supply the Hitler government, an unexpected return on their investment was slave labor. By the early 1940s, the electronics giant Siemens AG was employing more than 80,000 slave laborers. (An official Siemens history explains that although the head of the firm, Carl Friedrich von Siemens, was 'a staunch advocate of democracy' who 'detested the Nazi dictatorship,' he was also 'responsible for ensuring the company's well-being and continued existence.')
By October 1942, I.G. Farben and its subsidiaries were using slave laborers in 23 locations. The life expectancy of inmates at an I.G. Farben facility at Auschwitz was less than four months; more than 25,000 people lost their lives on the construction site alone. As corporate practices adapted to evolving political realities, the company aligned its wide technological and human resources with government priorities. Jews were purged from the corporate ranks. The I.G. Farben pharmaceutical division, Bayer, supported Nazi medical experiments. A postwar affidavit alleges that Bayer paid 170 reichsmarks for 150 female Auschwitz prisoners. 'The transport of 150 women arrived in good condition,' the affidavit reads. 'However, we were unable to obtain conclusive results because they died during the experiments,' and 'we would kindly request that you send us another group of women to the same number and at the same price.' Although recent investigations have questioned the veracity of this particular affidavit, Bayer's involvement in medical experimentation on Auschwitz inmates is undisputed.
The I.G. Farben company Degussa owned a chemical subsidiary that produced a cyanide-based pesticide known as Zyklon B, used primarily for fumigating ships, warehouses, and trains—and, after 1942, as a homicidal agent at Nazi extermination facilities. Company logs confirm the delivery of an estimated 56 tons of Zyklon B from 1942 to 1944; more than 23.8 tons were sent to Auschwitz, where it served as the primary instrument of death for the more than 1 million Jewish people murdered there.
In August 1947, 24 senior I.G. Farben managers were placed on trial for their role in Nazi aggression and atrocity. In his opening statement before the court, the prosecutor Telford Taylor said of these executives, 'They were the magicians who made the fantasies of Mein Kampf come true. They were the guardians of the military and state secrets.' The 15,638 pages of courtroom testimony, along with the 6,384 documents submitted as evidence—purchase orders, internal memos, board minutes—indicated that these Farben executives knew the exact number of airplane and truck ties, the running feet of tank tread, the amount of explosives, as well as the precise number of canisters of Zyklon B gas delivered to Auschwitz. The defense attorney for the chairman of I.G. Farben's supervisory board argued that his client was 'no robber, no plunderer, no slave dealer,' but rather just a 60-year-old senior executive doing what senior executives were paid to do—run the company with an eye to the bottom line. If he collaborated with the government, it was out of 'a feeling of personal responsibility to the company.' Twenty-three I.G. Farben directors were eventually charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity; 13 of them were convicted and sentenced to prison.
From the February 1937 Issue: Hitler looks eastward
At the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nuremberg in 1945, Gustav Krupp was indicted as a major war criminal alongside the likes of Göring and Hans Frank, but he was too ill to stand trial. Instead, his son was tried in 1947, in The United States of America v. Alfried Krupp, et al. The indictment charged the younger Krupp, alongside 11 Krupp corporate directors, with crimes against humanity and war crimes, for participating in 'the murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, and use for slave labor of civilians.' Alfried Krupp reportedly never expressed remorse, at one point telling a war-crimes trial observer, 'We Krupps never cared much about political ideas. We only wanted a system that worked well and allowed us to work unhindered. Politics is not our business.'
As for Alfred Hugenberg? Unlike other early private-sector Hitler enablers such as Fritz Thyssen and Hjalmar Schacht—both of whom ended up in concentration camps after crossing Hitler—Hugenberg got off lightly. Hugenberg withdrew to his sprawling estate, Rohbraken, in the former feudal province of Lippe, where he lived as the local regent while his business empire was gradually whittled away.
The German Nationalist Party was disbanded as soon as Hugenberg stepped down from his cabinet post in June 1933. In December of that year, the Telegraph Union was taken over by the ministry of propaganda and absorbed into a newly created entity, the German News Office. In 1943, Hugenberg's publishing house, Scherl Verlag, was acquired by the Nazi publisher, Eher Verlag. By war's end, the defrocked cabinet minister and disenfranchised media mogul was diminished and dissipated but still defiant.
On September 28, 1946, Hugenberg was arrested by the British military police. He was detained for five months, and his assets were frozen. After a formal hearing, Hugenberg was deemed to be a 'lesser evildoer'—officially, a ' Mitläufer,' the lowest order of complicity in the Nazi regime—on the grounds that he had left his cabinet post in the first months of the Hitler regime and had never been a member of the Nazi Party. With undiminished temerity, Hugenberg balked at even that lesser charge. Having been stripped of most of his business empire, Hugenberg saw himself as a victim of, not a participant in, the Nazi regime. He appealed the hearing's determination and won. He was declared 'untainted,' which allowed him to lay claim to his frozen assets. Unrepentant to his dying day, Hugenberg refused to publicly countenance any suggestion of guilt or responsibility for Hitler's excesses.
On the morning of Tuesday, January 31, 1933, less than 24 hours after enabling Hitler's appointment as chancellor, Hugenberg reportedly spoke with Carl Friedrich Goerdeler, a fellow conservative and the mayor of Leipzig. 'I've just committed the greatest stupidity of my life,' Hugenberg allegedly told Goerdeler. 'I have allied myself with the greatest demagogue in the history of the world.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump scorns Merkel legacy during new German chancellor's White House visit
Donald Trump has heaped criticism on the former German chancellor Angela Merkel for opening up her country to refugees, telling her successor: 'I told her it shouldn't have happened.' During an appearance with the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, on Thursday, Trump was asked about the sweeping travel restrictions on 19 countries that he announced the previous day. 'We want to keep bad people out of our country … of course, you have a little problem too with some of the people that were allowed into your country,' Trump said to Merz, in an apparent reference to a number of attacks in Germany involving refugees. Merz replied: 'Yes we do,' before Trump continued: 'It's not your fault … It shouldn't have happened. I told her it shouldn't have happened, but it did. But you have your own difficulty with that, and we do.' He was referring to Merkel, but did not call her by name. The former chancellor visited the White House in 2017, during Trump's first term of office, when she was given a grilling by Trump over her so-called open-door policy, which allowed around 1 million refugees – mainly from Syria and Iraq – into Germany. Merz's highly anticipated visit had been viewed with trepidation in Berlin, amid fears that the German leader may face another Oval Office ambush, such as those endured by Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and the president of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa. In the end, all the criticism was levied at Merkel, a former political rival of Merz. Trump also made a dig about Merkel's enthusiasm for the building of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which brought gas from Russia to Europe. During the 35-minute press conference, Merz struggled to get a word in, though as German commentators noted, that was probably to the relief of his advisers, who feared there were a number of issues on which Trump might have pilloried him, from defence spending to immigration. When he did manage to speak, the former corporate lawyer mostly focused on Ukraine and the need to end the conflict, in particular by bringing the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, to account. Merz also pushed back several times on Trump's narrative that Ukraine and Russia were equally to blame for the war. Related: Trump says it may be better to let Ukraine and Russia 'fight for a while' 'I'm here, Mr President, to talk to you later on how we could contribute to that goal [to end the war]. We are all looking for measures and for instruments to bring this terrible war to an end,' Merz said. He compared the US role in ending the conflict with the part US troops played in defeating the Nazi dictatorship. He noted that Friday will mark the 81st anniversary of D-day, in which tens of thousands of US troops joined allied troops in invading Normandy. The US, he said, was 'again, in the very strong position to do something' about ending the war. Trump, he said, was the 'key person in the world' who could stop the war 'by putting pressure on Russia'. Trump praised Germany for having agreed to boost its defence spending to 5% of GDP, after years-long demands from Washington for it to do so. Asked by a German journalist whether Berlin was 'doing enough on defence', Trump said: 'I know you're spending more money on defence now. Quite a bit more money. That's a positive.' But to some nervous laughter in the room, he quipped that he was 'not sure if Gen MacArthur would have said it's positive,' a reference to the supreme commander for the allied powers, among whose focuses was postwar demilitarisation. Merz prepared for the visit in part by talking to other leaders who have met Trump in recent months to gather tips about the best way to handle him. Merkel has said that she prepared for her first Trump visit – when he was less well-known as a politician – by reading a 1980s interview with him in Playboy and watching episodes of The Apprentice. Merz was put up for the night in the official government guest house, Blair House, which his advisers said was a signal that the two leaders – who refer to one other by their first names – were on a good footing. Merz presented Trump with a gold-framed birth certificate of his grandfather, Friedrich Trump, who emigrated from Germany in 1885, as well as a book titled News from the Land of Freedom – German Immigrants Write Home, which is a collection of letters written by German émigrés in the US to their families back in Germany. 'It is a small present to remind him of his family,' Merz said. He has also invited Trump to Germany to visit his grandfather's home village.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump news at a glance: Elon Musk rift deepens as president says ‘poor guy's got a problem'
Donald Trump appeared in no mood to patch things up with former top adviser Elon Musk on Friday, doubling down on his new hostility towards the Tesla and Space X tycoon with a number of disparaging statements. The US president appeared to deny reports of a potential peacemaking phone call with Musk, telling ABC News he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to his former confidant right now. The president also spoke to CNN, saying: 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' Trump told Politico that the relationship with Musk was 'going very well, never done better'. Here are the key Trump administration stories of the day: Donald Trump appeared to dismiss a peace overture from his former close political ally Elon Musk, calling him someone who had 'lost his mind' as the extraordinary falling out between the two men looked set to continue. The US president and the richest person in the world – who had been tasked with slashing the federal government – fell out in spectacular fashion on Thursday in a series of escalating social media posts that roiled the political world. Read the full story Kilmar Ábrego García – the man whom the Trump administration mistakenly deported from Maryland to El Salvador in March – returned to the US on Friday to face criminal charges. In a press briefing, the US attorney general, Pam Bondi, said a federal grand jury in Tennessee had indicted the 29-year-old father on counts of illegally smuggling undocumented people as well as conspiracy to commit that crime. Read the full story The US supreme court on Friday permitted the so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge), a key player in Donald Trump's drive to slash the federal workforce, broad access to the personal information of millions of Americans in Social Security Administration data systems while a legal challenge plays out. The court's brief, unsigned order did not provide a rationale for siding with Doge. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal justices dissented. Read the full story The US economy added 139,000 jobs in May, a slowdown compared with recent months as American businesses cope with uncertainty around Donald Trump's continuing trade war. Read the full story A staffer for Missouri Republican senator Eric Schmitt was previously fired from Ron DeSantis's unsuccessful presidential campaign after making a video containing neo-Nazi imagery, and later peddled far-right conspiracy theories in a Marco Rubio-linked thinktank. Read the full story A Republican representative is facing a widespread backlash after saying that a Sikh should not have conducted a prayer in the US House. Mary Miller, an Illinois representative, on Friday published – then deleted – a post saying that Giani Singh, a Sikh Granthi from southern New Jersey, should not have delivered the House's morning prayer. Read the full story Enrique Tarrio, the former national leader of the far-right Proud Boys group, and four other members convicted of orchestrating the deadly 6 January 2021 US Capitol attack are suing the federal government for allegedly violating their rights. Russia is at war with Britain, the US is no longer a reliable ally and the UK has to respond by becoming more cohesive and more resilient, according to a former White House adviser. Senior US administration officials will meet with a Chinese delegation in London on Monday for the next round of trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing, Donald Trump said on Friday. An event by the International Pride Orchestra this week swung from classical Gershwin favourites to choral patriotism to high drag in a rebuff to Trump's takeover of the Kennedy Center and its subsequent snub of the LBGTQ+ ensemble. Catching up? Here's what happened on .
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Eric Schmitt employs staffer linked to campaign video with Nazi imagery
It feels like a distant memory now, but back in 2023, then-presidential hopeful Ron DeSantis faced widespread condemnation and ultimately fired a campaign staffer who circulated a video that featured Nazi imagery. Backlash to the video at the time came from liberals and MAGA types alike, as you can see in the replies and other posts addressed to Republican strategist Luke Thompson, who first highlighted the video. As NBC News noted, the fired staffer, Nathan Hochman, had been seen as something of a thought leader in the MAGA movement and had previously praised neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes' influence on young men (in 2022, Hochman distanced himself from those remarks and from Fuentes, saying he thought Fuentes' 'politics are both wrong on the merits and profoundly immoral'). At the time of his firing, the campaign declined to specify to NBC News why Hochman had been let go, and Hochman would not comment on the video to Semafor. In 2024, Hochman suggested to political blog Florida Politics that he was unaware the imagery was connected to Nazis when he promoted it. But it appears that since his departure from Team DeSantis, Hochman has gone up in the world — from staffing a failed presidential campaign to a position with a sitting senator. The newsletter Liberal Currents and The Guardian both report that Hochman now works for Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri. And the public affairs website LegiStorm, which maintains a database of congressional employees, lists Hochman as a policy adviser in Schmitt's office. (Schmitt's office didn't immediately respond to MSNBC's request for comment.) And at the same time the senator employs this man who promoted Nazi iconography, Schmitt is aiding the Trump administration's authoritarian assault on campuses and universities. Schmitt has promoted — both online and from the Senate floor — the bogus claim that diversity measures fuel antisemitism. The hypocrisy is glaring: If only the senator were as dogged in rooting out bigotry in his own office, perhaps Hochman would not be working there. This all speaks to a point Democratic Rep. Greg Casar highlighted during a recent House hearing: The conservative movement has a pattern of platforming people known for antisemitic statements. Given recent news headlines, you'd be forgiven for thinking Republicans are running some sort of affirmative action program for racists. You may remember Marko Elez, the employee in Trump's dubiously named Department of Government Efficiency who was rehired with an even broader remit over federal agencies after being dismissed for unearthed social media posts such as 'Just for the record, I was racist before it was cool.' My colleague Steve Benen has written about Pentagon spokesperson Kingsley Wilson, a pro-extremist influencer with a history of promoting racist and antisemitic claims. There's also Darren Beattie, a current high-ranking official at the State Department who has a history of promoting racist extremism and associating with white nationalists known for antisemitic views. Which makes Hochman just the latest right-wing extremist to find himself with an influential job in government. This article was originally published on