Sunderfolk Plays Like A Long Lost Edition Of Dungeons And Dragons
The same can be said for what are now called 'couch co-op' games. I built a lot of friendships during long sessions of Goldeneye, HALO and Super Smash Brothers. Games like Overcooked and Quiplash continue this fine tradition.
Sunderfolk, from Dreamhaven and their in-house studio Secret Door, brings these two aspects of gaming together for a game full of slightly silly adventures with very strong game play. They provided me with a review code for this article. I played the game with my family on our Nintendo Switch
Sunderfolk is a dungeon crawling adventure game where between one and four players get together to venture out of their sleepy little town to go on grand adventures. Players choose and customize a character and engage in short, tactical battles through an evolving story. Each character has their own strengths and as they evolve players can customize them to better fit their playstyle.
The console or computer running the game handles most of the things a Dungeon Master does such as enemies and developing the plot. Players control their characters via an app available for smartphones and tablets. Much like the games designed by Jackbox, players simply scan a QR code or enter a short one into the app and their device is connected, ready to play.
A lot of my fellow reviewers have compared Sunderfolk to being 'Jackbox, but D&D' It's an apt comparison because using someone's phone as their character sheet/action deck is very clever and removes a lot of the complexity in play. If a player is ever unsure about their next move, it's easy to quietly study options while other people take their turns.
There have been a few tabletop games that use an app as a central component to a game like this. Many of them stumble because they can't find the right balance of automated efficiency and narrative flexibility. Sunderfolk has an excellent balance between silly storytelling and serious mechanics.
Playing the game reminded me of my time playing D&D Fourth Edition. That version of the game focused on becoming a tactical, balanced board game. While it did that very well, many players thought it lost the storytelling flexibility that makes so many memorable D&D stories.
Here, the tightness of the tactical game shines. It's genuinely thrilling when the players coordinate their attacks and take out a threat as a team. I loved it when we were able to push, pull and bounce a bad guy around the battlefield before they had a chance to act.
The storytelling side of things also works well. It's just important enough for it to matter to the players but also full of goofy voices and opportunities for players to customize things. Anjali Bhimani provides all the voices needed to carry the tale forward with a wry tone that makes you think she's trying not to laugh at the awful names you've given her characters.
I recommend Sunderfolk for anyone who wants a taste of the D&D experience without getting wrapped up in the logistics. That includes the dice curious, gaming group that struggle to get the full crew together and board gamers who want a taste of role playing. This is also a great game for nerd families to get together and play for an adventure or two after dinner but before bed.
Sunderfolk is available now for Steam, PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, or Nintendo Switch.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
D-Wave Quantum CEO Alan Baratz goes one-on-one with Jim Cramer
D-Wave Quantum CEO Alan Baratz joins 'Mad Money' host Jim Cramer to talk quarterly results, the quantum computing space, its path to profitability and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
IonQ (IONQ) Falls After 2-Day Rally
We recently published IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ) is one of the worst-performing stocks on Tuesday. Shares of IonQ declined by 4.32 percent on Tuesday to finish at $43 apiece amid the lack of catalysts to sustain the recent two-day rally. In the previous trading days, IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ) grew alongside its quantum computing peers after a large US pension fund—the New Jersey State Pension Fund—increased its exposure in the quantum computing sector with the acquisition of shares in IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ), D-Wave Quantum Inc. (NYSE:QBTS), and Rigetti Computing Inc. (NASDAQ:RGTI). Photo by Anton Maksimov juvnsky on Unsplash In line with the transaction, the fund divested its stake in Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. (BABA). In other news, IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ) filed for a prospectus on behalf of several existing shareholders for the sale of more than 13 million IONQ common shares. IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ) said it will not receive any proceeds from the proposed sale. While we acknowledge the potential of IONQ as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
D-Wave CEO talks quantum computing's capabilities & what's next
D-Wave (QBTS) CEO Alan Baratz sits down with Julie Hyman on Market Catalysts to outline the quantum computing company's current offerings, growth opportunities, and business model. The CEO also shares his expectations for quantum computing advancements and competition with China in the space and teases potential upcoming acquisition plans. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. Turning to me now to discuss Alan Barrett, who is D-Wave's CEO. Thanks for being here. Thank you for having me. So obviously, there has been this huge upsurge in interest in and knowledge about quantum, although I think we're all still learning quite a bit about it. What do you think of all of these sort of competing timelines, especially when you guys are already making these machines? Making them and we have customers using them today as part of their business operations. So we're truly commercial. There are a number of different approaches to developing quantum computers. Some of them will take longer to mature, some of them are near term. At D-Wave, we provide what's called annealing quantum computers, and those are commercial today with companies like NTT DoCoMo or Ford, ArcelorMittal, Pattison Food Group, all using us today to help benefit their businesses. So for people who are interested in investing in something like quantum computing, what is the use case today for the computers that you're selling versus the next step and the step after that and the step after that? So, um, I think about it in three phases, near term, medium term, long term. In the near term, there are a broad array of problems that we typically think of as business optimization problems. This can be anything from workforce scheduling to manufacturing, plant floor optimization, even protein folding. And these problems can be addressed today with D-Wave's annealing quantum computers. And so the companies that I mentioned a minute ago are all using us for business optimization. In the medium term, I think that quantum is going to make a significant impact on AI and machine learning. Specifically, quantum computers are very fast and very energy efficient. And what this means is that all this rhetoric around AI requiring nuclear power plants and massive energy generation stations is likely not going to be required to anywhere near that level once quantum computers are a part of the training process. But when is that? I think that we may be able to get there within a year or two. We're not, this is medium term. We're not talking about long term. In fact, at D-Wave, we announced a few days ago a first step toward this by introducing an AI machine learning platform that developers can use to start investigating how to use quantum for large language model training. But we still have a ways to go on developing that technology and bringing a complete product to market. And then longer term, we're talking about, you know, almost unimaginable things like designer drugs where we could develop a drug that would address just your specific set of ailments. Um, so, you know, for people who are investing in stocks like yours and others, you know, obviously you've seen crazy gains in the stock that are are exponential. What do you think is still, um, sort of the biggest misconception or what do you, what kind of education do you have to do for investors and potential investors? Well, there are quite a few different quantum computing companies that are pursuing different approaches to developing their systems. And so I think you really need to take a look at which of these companies are talking about delivering products five or 10 years from now, and which of them are delivering products in the near term. I'm very proud of the fact that we are delivering products today that are creating value. And so I think that that's a really good place to start. But there is huge long-term opportunity as well. Um, and I, I should mention the opportunity there. You guys have been growing a lot, but you're still relatively small in terms of the revenue that you bring through the door. And so how quickly do you expect that to ramp up? At some point, is there sort of a tipping point? Yeah. So there are two components to our business model. One is a service-based component, what we call quantum compute as a service. And for commercial companies that really just care about leveraging quantum to get better solutions to their applications, quantum compute as a service is the ideal model. But it takes time to build a revenue base around that because it's a service-based business. It's a recurring revenue business goodness, more predictable revenue growth in the long term, but it takes time to build that base of revenue. We also sell systems. Now, we just started selling systems only about six months ago. We sold our first system to the Ulix Supercomputing Center in Germany. Um, that is a very complementary model because it's a to supercomputing centers, government labs, so not necessarily commercial. So more research based. More research based, but it's near-term revenue recognition. As soon as we install and deliver the system, we recognize revenue up front. So I think the two will work together very well to allow us to build both near-term revenue more rapidly, as well as that base of longer-term recurring revenue. Now, I, I know you guys have, um, you don't yet, haven't made a lot of acquisitions, but you're thinking about, thinking about how you want to make acquisitions. I don't know if that's the right way to put it, but what, where are you kind of in that process? And what would be complementary for you guys? So over the course of the last six months, we were fortunate enough to be able to raise a fair amount of cash through at the market transactions. And, and we thank all our shareholders, and we work every day to try to make them proud of D-Wave and comfortable with their investment. But we now have over 800 million in the bank, and that's well more than we need to achieve profitability, we believe, um, based on our normal, uh, course of business. So we are now looking at trying to accelerate growth through acquisitions. We haven't talked about what the acquisition strategy is. We've been working on it for the last few months. Um, I hope to be able to announce something in the near future, but we're very excited to now have the opportunity to pursue that. All right. Well, obviously, we'll stay in touch on that. And lastly, I wanted to sort of zoom back out. And I, I'm curious about the competition between the US and China. Um, we've obviously seen it in AI. How is that playing out in quantum computing? And is there a risk that we see, you know, them outpacing us as they have tried to do in some other technologies? There's absolutely a risk. So China is by far investing more in quantum than any other country. Um, they're leading at about 17 billion. Uh, if we take Europe, the EU, all those countries together, it's about 11 billion, and the US is at about 5 billion. So we are behind China significantly. In fact, you know, all countries in the world are well behind China. So I do think it's important for the US to really start focusing on a better strategy for quantum and really to up that investment. Have you gotten heard any glimmers of that from Washington? There's obviously been a lot of focus on AI there, but what about quantum? Yeah, I, I mean, look, the, the premier funding mechanism for quantum in the US is called the National Quantum Initiative. Uh, and that was put into place under the initial Trump administration. It was supposed to be renewed under Biden. It never got renewed. It still hasn't been renewed. So we really need to get focused on getting that renewed, getting the right programs in place, and making sure that the US is the leader in quantum computing.
