&w=3840&q=100)
SIAC rules for Amazon in Future case, awards ₹23.7 crore damages
New Delhi
The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) has awarded ₹23.7 crore in damages, besides arbitration and litigation costs, to Amazon in its long-running dispute with the Kishore Biyani-led Future Group.
The three-member bench of the tribunal held that Future Group had breached the terms of its contract with Amazon by entering into a transaction with Reliance. It also told 11 promoters and parties of the Future Group, including Kishore Biyani, to pay the amount along with interest from March 9, 2022 till now.
The dispute pertains to a decision by the Future Group to sell its Big Bazaar retail business to Reliance Retail, a subsidiary of Reliance Industries.
Amazon had in 2022 argued before the Supreme Court of India that its ₹1,400-crore investment in the Future Group does not allow the latter to sell its assets to certain companies, which includes Reliance.
Amazon had, however, sought ₹1,436 crore damages, citing Future Retail Limited's (FRL) 'deteriorating value.'
SIAC ruled that Amazon was entitled to damages due to promoters' breaches of the Future Coupons Private Limited (FCPL) shareholders agreement, but rejected ₹1,436 crore damages sought by Amazon.
The tribunal reasoned that though all contractual obligations were fulfilled by Amazon, it would not have recovered its entire investment due to FRL'S deteriorating business value.
The tribunal said awarding Amazon damages in full would unfairly shield it from commercial loss it was bound to incur due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the deteriorating value of FRL.
Amazon was awarded ₹77.3 crore and Singapore dollars 68,550 as litigation cost.
In August 2020, Future Group, facing financial distress and debts of around ₹22,000 crore decided to sell its wholesale, logistics, and warehousing business to Reliance Industries for ₹24,713 crore. Amazon objected to this citing violation of their contractual obligations.
Amazon then started arbitration proceedings against Future Group in October 2020, obtaining an emergency arbitration award pausing the Future-Reliance deal.
Amazon and Future Group both took the matter to the Delhi High Court, Supreme Court of India, and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal to resolve the issue.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) had also imposed a fine of ₹200 crore on Amazon for non-disclosure of information on combinations under the Competition Act 2002.
Amazon had then moved the Supreme Court against the CCI ruling suspending approval for the ecommerce giant's 2019 deal investment in Future Group on January 10, 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Anthropic's Claude AI will now cut off abusive chats with users for its own ‘welfare'
Anthropic has said its most capable AI models, Claude Opus 4 and 4.1, will now exit a conversation with a user if they are being abusive or persistently harmful in their interactions. The move is aimed at improving the 'welfare' of AI systems in potentially distressing situations, the Amazon-backed company said in a blog post on Friday, August 15. 'We're treating this feature as an ongoing experiment and will continue refining our approach,' it said. Claude will also not be able to end chats on its own in cases where users might be at imminent risk of harming themselves or others, Anthropic further said. The new feature, developed as part of Anthropic's exploratory work on AI welfare, comes amid the emerging trend of users turning to AI chatbots like Claude or ChatGPT for low-cost therapy and professional advice. However, a recent study found that AI chatbots showed signs of stress and anxiety when users shared 'traumatic narratives' about crime, war, or car accidents. This could potentially make the chatbots less useful in therapeutic settings with people. Beyond AI welfare, Anthropic said Claude's ability to end chats also has broader relevance to model alignment and safeguards. Prior to rolling out Claude Opus 4, Anthropic said it studied the model's self-reported and behavioral preferences. The AI model showed a 'consistent aversion' to harmful prompts from users such as requests to generate sexual content involving minors and information related to terror acts. Claude Opus 4 showed 'a pattern of apparent distress when engaging with real-world users seeking harmful content' and a tendency to end such conversations with the user, as per the company. 'These behaviors primarily arose in cases where users persisted with harmful requests and/or abuse despite Claude repeatedly refusing to comply and attempting to productively redirect the interactions,' the company said. However, Anthropic has added a disclaimer as well, noting, 'We remain highly uncertain about the potential moral status of Claude and other LLMs, now or in the future.' This is because framing AI models in terms of their welfare or wellbeing risks anthropomorphising them. Several researchers argue that today's large language models (LLMs) do not possess genuine understanding or reasoning, describing them instead as stochastic systems optimised for predicting the next token. Anthropic has said it will keep exploring ways to mitigate risks to AI welfare, 'in case such welfare is possible.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Qantas Airways fined $58 million over illegally sacking over 1,800 workers during pandemic - The Economic Times Video
Qantas Airways, Australia's largest airline, has been fined A$90 million ($58.64 million) for illegally sacking over 1,800 ground staff and replacing them with contractors during the COVID-19 pandemic, a court ruled on Monday (August 18). In imposing a penalty close to the maximum available for breaching Australia's workplace laws, Federal Court of Australia Judge Michael Lee said it was to ensure it 'could not be perceived as anything like the cost of doing business'.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Qantas Airways fined $59mn for illegal pandemic layoffs
A judge on Monday (August 18, 2025) fined Qantas Airways 90 million Australian dollars ($59 million) for illegally firing more than 1,800 ground staff at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The penalty is in addition to the AUD 120 million ($78 million) in compensation that Australia's biggest airline had already agreed to pay its former employees. Qantas confirms personal data of over a million customers leaked in breach Australian Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said the outsourcing of 1,820 baggage handler and cleaner jobs at Australian airports in late 2020 was the 'largest and most significant contravention' of relevant Australian labour laws in their 120-year history. Qantas agreed in December last year to pay AUD 120 million ($78 million) in compensation to former staff after seven High Court judges unanimously rejected the Sydney-based airline's appeal against the judgment that outsourcing their jobs was illegal. The Transport Workers Union, which took the airline to court, had argued the airline should receive the largest fine available — AUD 12,12,12,000 ($7,89,69,735). Australia's Qantas confirms cyber incident at contact centre, customer data exposed Mr. Lee ruled that the minimum fine to create a deterrence should be AUD 90 million ($59 million), noting that Qantas executives had expected to save AUD 125 million ($81 million) a year through outsourcing the jobs. Mr. Lee questioned the sincerity of Qantas's apology for its illegal conduct, noting that the airline later unsuccessfully argued that it owed no compensation to its former staff. 'If any further evidence was needed of the unrelenting and aggressive litigation strategy adopted in this case by Qantas, it is provided by this effort directed to denying any compensation whatsoever to those in respect of whom Qantas was publicly professing regret for their misfortune,' Mr. Lee said. "I do think that the people in charge of Qantas now have some genuine regret, but this more likely reflects the damage that this case has done to the company rather than remorse for the damage done to the affected workers,' Mr. Lee added. 'Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson, who was the airline's chief financial officer during the layoffs,' said in a statement after Monday's (August 18, 2025) decision: 'We sincerely apologise to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result.' 'The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families,' she said. 'Over the past 18 months we've worked hard to change the way we operate as part of our efforts to rebuild trust with our people and our customers. This remains our highest priority as we work to earn back the trust we lost,' she added. Mr. Lee ruled that AUD 50 million ($33 million) of the fine go to the union, because no Australian government agency had shown interest in investigating or prosecuting Qantas. 'But for the union … , Qantas' contravening conduct would never have been exposed and it would never have been held to account for its unlawful conduct,' Mr. Lee said. 'Hence the union has brought to the attention of the court a substantial and significant transgression of a public obligation by a powerful and substantial employer,' Mr. Lee added. A hearing will be held at a later date to decide where the remaining AUD 40 million ($26 million) of the fine will go. Michael Kaine, national secretary of the union that represents 60,000 members, said he felt vindicated by Monday's ruling (August 18, 2025), which ends a five-year legal battle that Qantas had been widely expected to win. 'It is a significant — the most significant — industrial outcome in Australia's history and it sends a really clear message to Qantas and to every employer in Australia: Treat your work force illegally and you will be held accountable,' Mr. Kaine told reporters. 'Against all the odds, we took on a behemoth that had shown itself to be ruthless and we won,' Mr. Kaine added. Qantas has admitted illegally dealing with passengers as well as employees in its responses to pandemic economic challenges. Last year, Qantas agreed to pay AUD 120 million ($78 million) in compensation and a fine for selling tickets on thousands of cancelled flights. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, a consumer watchdog, sued the airline in the Federal Court alleging that Qantas engaged in false, misleading or deceptive conduct by advertising tickets for more than 8,000 flights from May 2021 through to July 2022 that had already been cancelled.
