Lawyers demand release of Imran Khan
A lawyers' convention held in Lahore on Saturday demanded the immediate release of former prime minister Imran Khan and political workers as it urged that all national issues be resolved through dialogue, while calling for avoiding the use of force.
A declaration issued after the convention organized by the Lahore High Court Bar and the Lahore Bar's All Pakistan Lawyers Convention also demanded that all political workers "who have been subjected to enforced disappearances outside the constitutional and legal framework" be immediately released.
The convention also strongly condemned the recent amendments to the Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act (PECA), stating that these changes violate fundamental rights — freedom of expression and press.
"The lawyers also express solidarity with journalists and media workers across Pakistan who are struggling for freedom of speech," the declaration added.
The convention also defended Pakistan's rightful claim to water under the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), which India unilaterally suspended after a militant attack in held Kashmir on April 22.
"The declaration strongly condemns India's attack on Pakistan's sovereignty. The prompt response of the Pakistan Armed Forces, especially the Pakistan Air Force, is highly appreciated," it added.
Addressing the convention, senior lawyer Salman Akram Raja earlier said lawyers carry the great responsibility to tell the people that their vote was stolen in the February 2024 elections.
"A system built on lies has been imposed on us. The 26th Constitutional Amendment is part of that falsehood. After rigging the elections, there was an attempt to control our courts," he said.
Raja, who belongs to Imran Khan's PTI, said those who rigged the elections cannot tolerate democracy in this country. He said for 78 years, democracy has repeatedly been attacked.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India in crosshairs as Bilawal scales up offensive
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, head of a parliamentary delegation that is touring world capitals to rally support for Pakistan following a recent confrontation with India, has warned that Pakistan may take more aggressive steps if India constructs new canals or dams on the three rivers within its territory. "India's threat to shut off the water supply to 240 million people in Pakistan is a violation of the UN Charter. Were they to act on it, Pakistan has been very clear: we'd consider that an act of war," he said in an interview with Sky News during his visit to the UK on Monday. He was referring to India's unilateral suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWTT) after the April 22 militant attack in the Pahalgam area of the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK). The attack brought the two nuclear armed countries to the brink of war with both the hostile neighbours launching missile, drones and airstrikes inside each other's territories during a four-day conflict suddenly brought to an end by a ceasefire announced by US President Donald Trump. Condemned weaponization of water by the eastern neighbour, Bilawal said," We can't allow this precedent to be set; we can't weaponize water Were they to build new canals or a new dam on the three rivers in Pakistan's domain, we'd have to take a more aggressive step." Bilawal, also the chairman of the PPP, said Pakistan had been at war with India before and also had many exchanges, but never had such a drastic step been taken. "At the moment, the threshold for conflict between India and Pakistan is the lowest it has ever been in our history. We've achieved a ceasefire, but we have not achieved peace." He said throughout the recent escalation, Pakistan had acted with restraint and responsibility, and even today, "Pakistan's message is that we want peacepeace through dialogue and diplomacy. We believe there is no military solution to any of the issues between India and Pakistan." He said that unfortunately, India refused to talk and the delegation was going from capital to capital, engaging with the international community, seeking their assistance in this pursuit for peace. "Pakistan believes there needs to be dialogue and diplomacy where we discuss all issuesterrorism, Kashmir, or waterand start moving forward." The former foreign minister said there is no legal term for suspending or holding the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in abeyance as besides Pakistan and India, it also includes international institutions as a party which require consensus for any changes. To a question, he said the water had not stopped flowing into Pakistan as India lacked the capacity at the moment to completely stop it, but they have delayed the release. To a question, Bilawal told the interviewer that Pakistan had taken effective action against terrorist groups under the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) framework and was removed from the FATF grey list, which evidenced the international community's endorsement of Pakistan's actions against such groups. He said the terrorist attack that took place on April 22 in India had nothing to do with Pakistan – carried out by an indigenous group within India. Reiterating Pakistan's stance that US President Trump deserved credit for the Pakistan-India ceasefire, he said throughout this episode, India had engaged in misinformation and disinformation. "They've not been honest with their own public, the media, or their allies, and this is one additional thing they're not honest about They went to war on the basis of a lie, and then they couldn't win that war. "They lied about the planes we shot down, they lied about the details of this terrorist attack," he said. Bilawal said India failed to name a single terrorist involved in this attack, reveal his identity or any information about border crossing. Emphasising the UK's "unique role" in the entire situation, he said the country should encourage India to engage in dialogue with Pakistan. "India said no to an impartial investigation when we asked for one into the terrorist attack. They say no to mediation, be it from the UK or the US, and they say no to dialogue with Pakistan. "If they're stuck in the status quo, we've lowered the conflict threshold between India and Pakistan to the point where any terrorist attack means war." Calling Pakistan's engagements with the UK "really positive," he said the UK government was keen to encourage both sides to engage in dialogue to deal with all issues. "It is only the Indians who are being difficult about this," he said. Meanwhile, the high-level Pakistani parliamentary delegation, led by Bilawal, engaged with eminent members of the British think tank, academia, and policymaking community at the prestigious Chatham House, one of the UK's leading think tanks focused on foreign and security policy issues. The closed-door discussion was held under the "Chatham House Rules," which is used around the world to encourage inclusive and open dialogue in meetings. Bilawal and other delegation members conveyed Pakistan's perspective on the recent escalation in South Asia while expressing serious concern about India's unprovoked military aggression that resulted in civilian casualties and posed a significant threat to regional stability. They underscored that India's actions constituted a clear violation of Pakistan's sovereignty, international law, and the United Nations Charter. The Pakistan delegation said Pakistan's armed forces, with the full support of the people of Pakistan, had given a befitting response to India, demonstrating Pakistan's resolve to defend its sovereignty, and thwarting India's ambitions to set any new so-called "normal" in the region. The delegation noted that the pending resolution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute remains the principal stumbling block to lasting peace and stability in the region. They urged the international community to support meaningful dialogue and ensure respect for international commitments and human rights.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
High courts run without permanent top judges
Following the passage of the 26th Constitutional Amendment, adhocism appears to be growing across the superior judiciary. Despite the lapse of four months, the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) has yet to convene a meeting to appoint permanent chief justices for the Sindh High Court, Peshawar High Court and Islamabad High Court. The Balochistan High Court also remained without a permanent chief justice for more than three months. On May 19, the JCP approved the appointment of Justice Muhammad Ejaz Swati as BHC chief justice, but only for a period of two weeks. He retired on June 5. Justice Rozi Khan Barech, who ranked second in the BHC's seniority list, has now been appointed acting chief justice. Similarly, Justice Sardar Sarfraz Dogar has been serving as acting chief justice of the Islamabad High Court for the past four months. His seniority is currently under challenge in the Supreme Court. While the litigation may explain the delay in appointing a permanent IHC chief justice, no clear reason exists for the prolonged delay in appointments for the other three high courts. Since the passage of the 18th Amendment, the JCP has not previously delayed the process of appointing permanent chief justices for the high courts. Under the new constitutional arrangement, the executive holds a dominant role in the appointment of judges to the superior judiciary. However, senior judges, particularly the Chief Justice of Pakistan, have made no serious effort to restore balance in the appointments process. During the tenure of the current CJP, Justice Yahya Afridi, approximately 50 judges have been appointed to the superior courts, with the executive playing a key role in nominating many of them. No judge can now become a permanent chief justice without the executive's support. The government has thus succeeded in maintaining "like-minded" acting chief justices in key high courts. With the backing of former CJP Qazi Faez Isa, the government previously managed to elevate Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan from the Lahore High Court to the Supreme Court, reportedly because he was not their preferred choice to lead the LHC. At present, the executive is reportedly reluctant to elevate incumbent LHC CJ Alia Neelum, as the Punjab government is said to be comfortable with the current provincial judiciary. It is also learnt that the executive remains indecisive regarding the appointment of a permanent chief justice for the Sindh High Court. "It is the PPP that will decide about the permanent chief justice of the SHC," a source added. Reports suggest that PPP legal minds are divided on the nomination for the next SHC chief justice. Similarly, Justice Syed Mohammad Attique Shah, who was second in the seniority list of PHC judges, has been appointed as acting chief justice of the Peshawar High Court. The appointment of a permanent PHC chief justice is being delayed for known reasons. Lawyers are increasingly vocal about the disregard for senior puisne judges of PHC and BHC in the appointment of acting chief justices. It is learnt that PHC judge Justice Ejaz Anwar is not in the good books of powerful circles. Therefore, despite his seniority, he was neither elevated to the Supreme Court nor appointed as acting chief justice. The same applies to Justice Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail, who, though appointed as acting chief justice, could not secure clearance from powerful circles. Reports also suggest that he is a victim of judicial politics, and his relationships with some senior judges are not cordial. The current situation indicates that both senior judges are unlikely to be appointed as permanent chief justices of their respective high courts. Advocate Abdul Moiz Jaferii commented on Islamabad, saying, "It is a way to continue the farce that is the new Dogar court. There's a bunch of good judges there, so let's keep them all hanging and distracted". Speaking on Sindh, Jaferii added, it has the effect of a perpetual carrot being dangled before the senior-most judges in the province. "Let's see what you can do to please uswithout us really asking you to do anything specific. By keeping the corner court empty, you keep everyone in the race. And when you don't know what you're racing for or how long the race is, you start running cautiously. That is good enough. And it is exactly what they want." Lawyers believe that senior judges, who are at the helm and beneficiaries of the 26th Amendment, must take steps to restore the institution, whose independence has been compromised for the past six months.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
'Bilawal wisely represents Pakistan globally'
Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah expressed profound admiration for PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, commending his courageous and insightful representation of Pakistan's position in the international media. He said that Bilawal's patriotic discourse not only enhanced the dignity of Pakistan's leadership but also instilled pride across the entire nation. The Indus Waters Treaty was a hot issue to awaken global conscience, which the PPP chairman highlighted at the international forum.
