Secretive Albanese government goes backward on transparency
Analysis by the Centre for Public Integrity shows Canberra's culture of secrecy has sunk to its worst point in more than a decade, with the proportion of freedom of information requests released in full plunging from almost half in 2021-22 to just 25 per cent under Labor in 2023-24.
The government is increasingly releasing documents to the public filled with black ink covering up key sections of text and Labor is more often ignoring Senate votes requesting details on policies and ministers' decision-making.
Independent senator David Pocock said the data under Anthony Albanese's watch was shameful compared to the prime minister's predecessor, Scott Morrison.
'To be more secretive than the government of a prime minister who had five secret ministries is something the Albanese government should be deeply embarrassed about and ensure they fix in their second term,' he said.
Rejection of freedom of information requests over nine years of Coalition government hovered between 10-18 per cent, but spiked to 24 per cent in Albanese's first term. And the proportion of documents granted in full dropped from almost 60 per cent in 2012 to 25 per cent in the year to July 2024.
Official reviews of these decisions to block information found that only 45 per cent of the refusals were made on legitimate grounds, meaning more than half the justifications for secrecy were flawed.
Attorney-General Michelle Rowland's spokesperson pointed out that the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner had its funding boosted by Labor, a move endorsed by the Centre for Public Integrity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
5 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Eye-watering cost to negotiate Victorian Indigenous treaty revealed amid government push to expand powers of state Voice
The Daniel Andrews and Jacinta Allan Labor governments have invested almost $400 million on negotiating a treaty with Indigenous Australians, with experts warning the costs could continue to mount. The Victorian government's Yoorrook Justice truth telling inquiry handed down its final report in early July after four years of proceedings and claimed the state had been illegally occupied and that Victoria's First Peoples had been subjected to genocide. The commission also made 100 wide-ranging recommendations to the Victorian government including providing Indigenous Australians with tax relief, financial reparations and called on the state to finalise a treaty agreement. The treaty, which was previously in negotiation stages is now set to progress to parliament, with Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan and the state's First People's Assembly confirming that legislation to pass the agreement would be tabled after the winter break. However, a fresh investigation into Victorian government budget papers found that the former Andrews government and the current Allan government had spent a total of $382 million on treaty deliberations alone over the past ten years. The bulk of the hefty sum was spent establishing the Treaty Authority, which has been touted as an 'independent umpire' that adjudicates negotiations. Members of the Treaty Authority tasked with deliberating with First Nations elders and community leaders were raking in salaries as high as $388,000 per year according to The Herald Sun. It is believed the state government also spent significant amounts of cash in aiding Indigenous group to prepare for briefings and presentations to official forums. A Victorian government spokesperson refused to verify the Herald Sun's $382 million figure but reiterated that $308 million had been poured into treaty discussions since the 2020-2021 state budget. Analysis by the Institute of Public Affairs revealed that the near $400 million sum was in fact a conservative estimate, and that between July 2016 and June 2025 727 meetings had been held between the state government and Indigenous groups to get a treaty agreement off the ground. The think tank stated that if the current trajectory held the callosal number of meetings would climb to 968 by June 2026. This comes to an average of 100 meetings per year since July 2016, or a meeting being held every two to three business days. The IPA's investigation into Victoria's budget documents futher uncovered that the Andrews-Allan Labor governments combined spending into Indigenous related initiatives, including treaty, truth-telling and state Voice measures equated to $776 million over the past decade. The IPA's Research Fellow Margaret Chambers said the Allan government needed to be transparent with the Victorian people and release a detailed summary of spending on Indigenous related policies. Ms Chambers also pressed the government to reveal its treaty plans and slammed Premier Allan for dividing the Victorian people. 'The Victorian government is not being honest and upfront with Victorians about its plan to divide the community on racial grounds,' Ms Chambers told the Herald Sun. 'With a Treaty scheduled to be finalised inside the next 12 months, and despite the volume of secret meetings over the past decade, very little is known about what this treaty will entail. 'Any Treaty will fundamentally change Victoria's legal structure and will likely require already financially stretched Victorian taxpayers to pay billions of dollars to activists aligned to the Allan government.' A joint statement released by the government the states First People's Assembly in early July stated the draft Treaty has been settled behind closed doors after a lengthy consultation phase and that Victoria's First People's Assembly would be made permanent. The state is also negotiating separate Treaties with local Indigenous communities.
West Australian
35 minutes ago
- West Australian
Women politicians in the US fight for 'potty parity'
For women state politicians in Kentucky, USA, choosing when to go to the bathroom has long required careful calculation. There are only two stalls for women on the third floor of the Kentucky Statehouse, where the House and Senate chambers are located. Female politicians — 41 of the 138-member legislature — needing a reprieve during a lengthy floor session have to weigh the risk of missing an important debate or a critical vote. None of their male colleagues face the same dilemma because, of course, multiple men's bathrooms are available. The legislature even installed speakers in the men's bathrooms to broadcast the chamber's events so they don't miss anything important. House Speaker David Osborne allows women to use his single-stall bathroom in the chamber, but even that attracts long lines. "You get the message very quickly: This place was not really built for us," said Lisa Willner, a Democrat from Louisville, reflecting on the photos of former lawmakers, predominantly male, that line her office. The issue of potty parity may seem comic, but its impact runs deeper than uncomfortably full bladders, said Kathryn Anthony, from the University of Illinois School of Architecture. "If you have an environment that is designed for half the population but forgets about the other half, you have a group of disenfranchised people and disadvantaged people," she said. There is hope for Kentucky's lady legislators. A $US300 million ($A451 million) renovation of the 155-year-old Capitol — scheduled for completion by 2028 at the earliest — aims to create more women's restrooms and end Kentucky's bathroom disparity. The Bluegrass State is among the last to add bathrooms to aging statehouses that were built when female legislators were not a consideration. In the $US392 million ($A589 million) renovation of the Georgia Capitol, expanding bathroom access is a priority, said Gerald Pilgrim, chief of staff with the state's Building Authority. It will introduce female facilities on the building's fourth floor, where the public galleries are located, and will add more bathrooms throughout to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. "We know there are not enough bathrooms," he said. There's no federal law requiring bathroom access for all genders in public buildings. Some 20 states have statutes prescribing how many washrooms buildings must have, but historical buildings — such as statehouses — are often exempt. Over the years, as the makeup of state governments has changed, statehouses have added bathrooms for women. When Tennessee's Capitol opened in 1859, the architects designed only one restroom — for men only — situated on the ground floor. According to legislative librarian Eddie Weeks, the toilet could only be "flushed" when enough rainwater had been collected. "The room was famously described as 'a stench in the nostrils of decency,'" Weeks said. Today, Tennessee's Capitol has a female bathroom located between the Senate and House chambers. It's in a cramped hall under a staircase, sparking comparisons to Harry Potter's cupboard bedroom, and it contains just two stalls. The men also just have one bathroom on the same floor, but it has three urinals and three stalls. Aftyn Behn, who was elected in 2023, said she wasn't aware of the disparity in facilities until contacted by The Associated Press. "I've apparently accepted that waiting in line for a two-stall closet under the Senate balcony is just part of the job," she said. "I had to fight to get elected to a legislature that ranks dead last for female representation, and now I get to squeeze into a space that feels like it was designed by someone who thought women didn't exist, or at least didn't have bladders," Behn said. In Colorado, female House representatives and staff were so happy to have a restroom added in the chamber's hallway in 1987 that they hung a plaque to honour Arie Taylor, the state's first black woman legislator, who pushed for the facility. The plaque, now inside a women's bathroom in the Capitol, reads: "Once here beneath the golden dome if nature made a call, we'd have to scramble from our seats and dash across the hall ... Then Arie took the mike once more to push an urge organic, no longer do we fret and squirm or cross our legs in panic." The poem concludes: "In memory of you, Arie (may you never be forgot), from this day forth we'll call that room the Taylor Chamber Pot."
Perth Now
35 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Women politicians in the US fight for 'potty parity'
For women state politicians in Kentucky, USA, choosing when to go to the bathroom has long required careful calculation. There are only two stalls for women on the third floor of the Kentucky Statehouse, where the House and Senate chambers are located. Female politicians — 41 of the 138-member legislature — needing a reprieve during a lengthy floor session have to weigh the risk of missing an important debate or a critical vote. None of their male colleagues face the same dilemma because, of course, multiple men's bathrooms are available. The legislature even installed speakers in the men's bathrooms to broadcast the chamber's events so they don't miss anything important. House Speaker David Osborne allows women to use his single-stall bathroom in the chamber, but even that attracts long lines. "You get the message very quickly: This place was not really built for us," said Lisa Willner, a Democrat from Louisville, reflecting on the photos of former lawmakers, predominantly male, that line her office. The issue of potty parity may seem comic, but its impact runs deeper than uncomfortably full bladders, said Kathryn Anthony, from the University of Illinois School of Architecture. "If you have an environment that is designed for half the population but forgets about the other half, you have a group of disenfranchised people and disadvantaged people," she said. There is hope for Kentucky's lady legislators. A $US300 million ($A451 million) renovation of the 155-year-old Capitol — scheduled for completion by 2028 at the earliest — aims to create more women's restrooms and end Kentucky's bathroom disparity. The Bluegrass State is among the last to add bathrooms to aging statehouses that were built when female legislators were not a consideration. In the $US392 million ($A589 million) renovation of the Georgia Capitol, expanding bathroom access is a priority, said Gerald Pilgrim, chief of staff with the state's Building Authority. It will introduce female facilities on the building's fourth floor, where the public galleries are located, and will add more bathrooms throughout to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. "We know there are not enough bathrooms," he said. There's no federal law requiring bathroom access for all genders in public buildings. Some 20 states have statutes prescribing how many washrooms buildings must have, but historical buildings — such as statehouses — are often exempt. Over the years, as the makeup of state governments has changed, statehouses have added bathrooms for women. When Tennessee's Capitol opened in 1859, the architects designed only one restroom — for men only — situated on the ground floor. According to legislative librarian Eddie Weeks, the toilet could only be "flushed" when enough rainwater had been collected. "The room was famously described as 'a stench in the nostrils of decency,'" Weeks said. Today, Tennessee's Capitol has a female bathroom located between the Senate and House chambers. It's in a cramped hall under a staircase, sparking comparisons to Harry Potter's cupboard bedroom, and it contains just two stalls. The men also just have one bathroom on the same floor, but it has three urinals and three stalls. Aftyn Behn, who was elected in 2023, said she wasn't aware of the disparity in facilities until contacted by The Associated Press. "I've apparently accepted that waiting in line for a two-stall closet under the Senate balcony is just part of the job," she said. "I had to fight to get elected to a legislature that ranks dead last for female representation, and now I get to squeeze into a space that feels like it was designed by someone who thought women didn't exist, or at least didn't have bladders," Behn said. In Colorado, female House representatives and staff were so happy to have a restroom added in the chamber's hallway in 1987 that they hung a plaque to honour Arie Taylor, the state's first black woman legislator, who pushed for the facility. The plaque, now inside a women's bathroom in the Capitol, reads: "Once here beneath the golden dome if nature made a call, we'd have to scramble from our seats and dash across the hall ... Then Arie took the mike once more to push an urge organic, no longer do we fret and squirm or cross our legs in panic." The poem concludes: "In memory of you, Arie (may you never be forgot), from this day forth we'll call that room the Taylor Chamber Pot."
