logo
Top court asks poll body to include Aadhaar, EPIC in Bihar voter roll revision

Top court asks poll body to include Aadhaar, EPIC in Bihar voter roll revision

India Today4 days ago
The Supreme Court on Monday questioned the Election Commission of India (ECI) over its reluctance to accept Aadhaar and Voter ID Elector's Photo Identity Card (EPIC) as valid documents in the ongoing voter list revision in Bihar, pointing out that any document can be forged.A bench led by Justice Suryakant expressed concern over the exclusionary approach of the poll panel and stressed the need to include both documents in the verification process.advertisement"Any document on earth can be forged," Justice Suryakant observed, pressing the Election Commission to clarify why Aadhaar and EPIC were not being fully accepted, even though Aadhaar is already being sought in the registration form.
On July 10, the Supreme Court asked the Election Commission to include Aadhaar, EPIC, and ration card as valid documents for voter registration in Bihar's ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR), and said that it was necessary "in the interest of justice". The court also allowed the revision exercise to proceed.During today's hearing, the poll panel argued that Aadhaar is not proof of citizenship and raised concerns about fake ration cards, adding that large-scale forgery made it difficult to rely on them.However, the Commission conceded that Aadhaar could be submitted as proof of identity and that its number is already requested in the registration form.The top court responded by questioning the inconsistency, noting that if no document on the Election Commission's own list is conclusive, the same argument could apply to Aadhaar and EPIC."If tomorrow, even the other ten documents you've accepted are found forged, where is the mechanism to prevent that? Why allow mass exclusions and not mass inclusions?" the bench asked.The court also requested a timeline for the process if someone is excluded from the list.The hearing pertains to a petition challenging the exclusion of documents like Aadhaar and the alleged large-scale removals from the Bihar electoral rolls.Petitioners urged the court to halt the finalisation of the draft list, arguing that citizens would be forced to individually contest exclusions. Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the petitioners, requested an interim stay on the publication of the draft rolls scheduled for August 1.Furthermore, the court asked the counsels to submit a timeline for their arguments and said it will decide the hearing schedule tomorrow, July 29.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Why be touchy? Let's close it': Supreme Court on BJP leader's defamation case against Shashi Tharoor
'Why be touchy? Let's close it': Supreme Court on BJP leader's defamation case against Shashi Tharoor

Hindustan Times

time23 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

'Why be touchy? Let's close it': Supreme Court on BJP leader's defamation case against Shashi Tharoor

The Supreme Court on Friday indicated that the criminal defamation case against Congress MP Shashi Tharoor over his 2018 'scorpion sitting on a Shivling' remark about Prime Minister Narendra Modi should be brought to a close, Live Law reported. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor during the Monsoon session of Parliament, in New Delhi on July 28, 2025.(PTI) The matter came up before a bench of Justices MM Sundresh and NK Singh. While Shashi Tharoor's lawyer requested an adjournment, the complainant's counsel — representing Bharatiya Janata Party leader Rajeev Babbar — asked for the case to be listed on a non-miscellaneous day. In response, Justice Sundresh remarked, 'What non-miscellaneous day? Let us close this. Why do you want to be touchy about all this? Let us close all this. That way, administrators, political personalities and judges form the same group, they have sufficiently thicker skin. Don't worry.'

India's 1st mobile phone call was between Sukh Ram and Jyoti Basu
India's 1st mobile phone call was between Sukh Ram and Jyoti Basu

Hans India

time24 minutes ago

  • Hans India

India's 1st mobile phone call was between Sukh Ram and Jyoti Basu

New Delhi: It was exactly 30 years ago on 31st July 1995, when India's first mobile call was made, marking a new chapter in the country's communication history. The first call on 31 July 1995 was made between then Union Telecom minister Sukh Ram in Delhi to then Chief Minister of West Bengal Jyoti Basu in Kolkata. Since then, over the last three decades, this journey has not only revolutionised communication but also redefined the country's economic and social landscape. It all started in 1991, when Dr Manmohan Singh, then Finance Minister, dismantled the government monopoly in the sector and invited private investments. The National Telecom Policy of 1994 was followed, and the Government issued tenders for mobile licences. This became the game changer for India's telecom sector, which later became the poster boy of India's economic reforms. In 1997, following the Supreme Court directive, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) was constituted for dispute resolution and regulations of the Industry. Previously, the sector was regulated by the Department of Telecom, which was also a policy-maker, with conflicting interests for private players.

Opposition leaders request Lok Sabha discussion on Bihar electoral roll revision
Opposition leaders request Lok Sabha discussion on Bihar electoral roll revision

The Hindu

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Opposition leaders request Lok Sabha discussion on Bihar electoral roll revision

The Opposition INDIA bloc leaders have submitted a joint letter, asking for a discussion on special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Friday (August 1, 2025). In their letter to Mr. Birla, the Opposition MPs expressed deep concern over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar, especially a few months before the state Assembly elections. Rule 267 of the Rajya Sabha pertains to the suspension of a specific rule to allow for a motion on a particular matter. The signatories to the letter included Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Gandhi, Congress' Deputy Leader in the House Gaurav Gogoi, DMK's TR Baalu, NCP (SP)'s Supriya Sule, RSP's N K Premachandran, SP's Lalji Verma, TMC's Kakoli Ghose Dastidar, Shiv Sena (UBT)'s Arvind Savant and RJD's Abhay Kumar. 'We, the undersigned Members of Parliament representing various Opposition parties, wish to express our deep concern over the ongoing voter list revision in Bihar, especially a few months before the state assembly elections,' the Opposition MPs said in their letter. 'The revision of electoral rolls has direct implications on the right to vote and the conduct of free and fair elections. A special discussion in the Lok Sabha will allow Members to seek clarity and ensure transparency and accountability,' the letter said. INDIA bloc parties have been demanding a discussion on SIR and have also staged multiple protests inside and outside Parliament during the ongoing Monsoon session. The Opposition is also planning to take out a march to the Election Commission of India headquarters next week. (With PTI inputs)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store