logo
David Murdock, billionaire king of fruit and vegatables, dies at 102

David Murdock, billionaire king of fruit and vegatables, dies at 102

Yahooa day ago

In his astonishing rags-to-riches life, it seemed there was little David Murdock could not do by sheer determination.
The billionaire financier who transformed Dole into the world's largest producer of fruits and vegetables was a dyslexic high school dropout who made and lost a fortune by the time he was 40. He then moved to California to start again, becoming a mainstay on lists of the richest Americans.
One of the few self-set goals that Murdock failed to meet was his plan to celebrate his 125th birthday.
Murdock, who in his later years became a messianic promoter of exercise and healthful eating for longevity, died Monday at what he no doubt would have considered the premature age of 102, according to William Goldfield, a spokesperson for Dole Food Co., which Murdock led from 1985 to 2021.
Forbes estimated his net worth at $3.7 billion at the time of his death. He was a longtime resident of Lake Sherwood in Ventura County.
Well into his 80s, Murdock lifted weights several times a week, walked on a treadmill daily and drank smoothies made of 20 different kinds of fruit and vegetables including pulverized banana peels. He whipped them up himself in a Jack LaLanne juicer.
His health proselytizing was both public and private. He spent more than $500 million of his fortune on a nutrition research institute in Kannapolis, N.C., as well as founding the California Health and Longevity Institute, a medical spa in Westlake Village ('to teach people to eat because they eat wrong').
He also wasn't shy about scolding dining companions who committed such sins as buttering their bread or not eating all their vegetables.
'People are afraid to have dinner with him,' his friend and physician Rolland Dickson told the Wall Street Journal in 2006.
Murdock's immense wealth and business acumen came about with little formal education or social advantage.
He was born David Howard Murdock on April 10, 1923, in Kansas City, Mo., and grew up in the small town of Wayne, Ohio. His father was a traveling salesman. His mother took in laundry and scrubbed floors. She died from cancer when she was 42 and he was 17.
He was raised in a household where 'if it wasn't cooked in bacon grease, it didn't taste good," a by-then vegetarian Murdock told The Times in 2006.
At school his teachers told him he was stupid, and he believed them. He earned poor grades and dropped out after the ninth grade. No one recognized his dyslexia at the time. He went to work pumping gas and changing oil until he was drafted into the U.S. Army. He ranked the highest on an IQ test out of 1,500 men.
During his World War II service, an army buddy shared his love of books and for the rest of his life Murdock never stopped reading. He said that he was lucky to be uneducated because he spent his whole life learning. He consumed everything from 'Think and Grow Rich' by Napoleon Hill to Shakespearean sonnets.
When Murdock took over Dole, the first thing he did was to buy a stack of books on fruits and vegetables.
'There is nothing you can't learn reading. If you read the three best books on a subject, you'll know what you need to know,' he said more than once.
At age 22, he was out of the service, living in Detroit, broke and jobless. He did his reading at a diner counter. A friend who worked there would give him free sandwiches. But the place was for sale and his meal ticket was about to run out.
One evening he struck up a conversation with another diner at the counter. He told the man he was looking for a job and the man, who worked for a loan company, told him he should buy the little greasy spoon. With the man's help, he raised $1,200 and 18 months later, after fixing the place up, sold it for $1,900.
Murdock would go on to develop projects around the world and own a string of corporations, but he always kept the single penny and the one nickel that were in his pocket the night his destiny changed at the diner.
With $75 of the profit from the sale, he bought a car and headed to Phoenix. For 17 years, he built houses and office buildings, creating a multimillion-dollar enterprise. But the city became overbuilt and the housing boom went bust in the mid-1960s.
Murdock had to sell almost everything to pay off his debt. 'I had all my eggs in one basket and didn't even know it,' he told the Wall Street Journal.
At 43, he moved to Los Angeles to start over with what he could salvage of his fallen empire. He built homes and offices, but this time also bought companies. He specialized in undervalued corporations that produced basic goods such as bricks or towels. He could be ruthless in closing divisions and factories while in search of profits. Murdock even described himself as having a 'dictatorial streak.'
In the early 1980s, he became the largest shareholder in Occidental Petroleum. He then tried to take over the corporation, famously battling with chairman Armand Hammer, who called Murdock a 'barracuda.' In 1984, Occidental paid a 40% premium on Murdock's stock to get him out — he left with a reported $100 million.
In 1985, Murdock took over the nearly bankrupt Hawaiian real-estate company Castle & Cooke, which owned Dole, then a pineapple and banana producer, and the Hawaiian island of Lanai.
Investors complained Murdock was incommunicative. He seldom gave interviews or detailed reports of his financial plans. 'I don't believe in going back to Wall Street and shooting my mouth off,' he told The Times.
He split Castle & Cooke and Dole into separate publicly listed corporations in 1995, then took both private — Castle & Cooke in 2000 and Dole in 2003.
Murdock returned Dole to public trading in 2009, then in 2013, at age 90, reacquired it as a private company. He later reached two settlements with former Dole shareholders who claimed he had shortchanged them in that deal.
Along the way, he quietly turned Dole into an operation selling food products in countries across the globe.
In 2012, Murdock sold his portion of Lanai, 98% of the island, to fellow billionaire and Oracle Corp. founder Larry Ellison, saying, 'I have learned in life that change is inevitable and can be quite positive when guided in the right direction.'
In 2018, Murdock sold a 45% stake in Dole to Dublin, Ireland-based Total Produce Plc. for $300 million. In 2021, Dole returned to the market for its third run as a public company, and Murdock stepped down from its board.
There were times when the change he experienced was the result of deep personal loss.
In 1983, Murdock's wife Gabriele, well-known in the Southern California arts community, was diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer.
Murdock read everything he could on nutrition, trying to find a way to save her. She died in 1985 at age 43. He believed if he would have known about healthier eating habits earlier, he could have saved her, and his mother as well.
Eleven months later, his oldest son, Eugene, died in a swimming pool accident after hitting his head at 23. Another son, David II, died in a Los Angeles car accident at 36.
The corporate magnate slowly turned into a health guru with a populist bent.
The same man who built the Regency Club, which for 30 years catered to the business elite in Los Angeles, took Oprah Winfrey on his weekly trip to Costco to show her viewers healthy shopping tips.
For, though seeking longevity, Murdock also celebrated change.
'To step outside what you already know is the most exciting thing,' Murdock told the BBC in a 2010 interview.
He credited his triumphs to being able to envision possibilities.
'When I look at something, I look not at what is there. But what could be there,' he said. 'In order to do the impossible, you must see the invisible.'
Bloomberg News contributed to this article.
Sign up for Essential California for the L.A. Times biggest news, features and recommendations in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The True Beginning of America's Anti-Vaccine Era
The True Beginning of America's Anti-Vaccine Era

Atlantic

timean hour ago

  • Atlantic

The True Beginning of America's Anti-Vaccine Era

When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. accepted his new position as health secretary, he made a big show of distancing himself from his past life. 'News reports have claimed that I am anti-vaccine or anti-industry,' Kennedy, who has for decades promoted the debunked notion that vaccines cause autism and has baselessly sown doubt over the ability of the U.S. government to vet shots, said at his confirmation hearing in January. 'I am neither. I am pro-safety.' But for all Kennedy's talk, this week he did exactly what a person would do if they were trying to undermine the scientific consensus on vaccination in the United States. He abruptly dismissed the entire expert committee that advises the CDC on its nationwide vaccine recommendations—and began to fill the roster with like-minded people ready to cast doubt on the benefits of vaccination. Like Kennedy, few of these new appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice, or ACIP, have openly embraced the notion that they are anti-vaccine. But among them are individuals who have spoken out against COVID vaccines and policies, claimed vaccine injuries for their own children, and falsely linked COVID shots to deaths—or even baselessly accused those vaccines of ' causing a form of acquired immunity deficiency syndrome.' In January, I wrote that remaking the committee in exactly this way would be an especially harmful blow to Americans' health: Perhaps more than any other body of experts in the U.S., ACIP guides the nation's future preparedness against infectious disease. By appointing a committee that is poised to legitimize more of his own radical views, Kennedy is giving his skewed version of scientific reality the government's imprimatur. Whether he will admit to it or not, he is serving the most core goal of the anti-vaccine movement—eroding access to, and trust in, immunization. In an emailed statement, Health and Human Services Press Secretary Emily G. Hilliard reiterated that 'Secretary Kennedy is not anti-vaccine—he is pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-accountability,' and added that his 'evidence-based approach puts accountability and radical transparency first, which will restore trust in our public health system.' (Kennedy, notably, promised Senator Bill Cassidy during his confirmation process that he would maintain ACIP, as Cassidy put it, 'without changes.') Since the 1960s, ACIP has lent government policy on vaccines the clout of scientific evidence. Its mandate is to convene experts across fields such as infectious disease, immunology, pediatrics, vaccinology, and public health to carefully vet the data on immunizations, weigh their risks and benefits, and vote on recommendations that guide the public on how to use them—who should get vaccines, and when. Those guidelines are then passed to the CDC director, who—with only the rarest of exceptions—accepts that advice wholesale. 'These recommendations are what states look to, what providers look to,' Rupali Limaye, an expert in vaccine behavior at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told me. Medicare, for instance, is required to fully cover the vaccines that ACIP recommends; ACIP also determines which vaccines are covered by the Vaccines for Children Program, which provides free vaccines for children whose families cannot afford them. The experts who serve on ACIP have the opportunity, more than just about any of their scientific peers, to translate their vaccine rhetoric into reality. So far, Kennedy has dismissed the 17 people who were serving on ACIP, and filled eight of the newly open slots. Most of the new nominees have an obvious bone to pick with at least some vaccines, especially COVID shots, and have publicly advocated for limiting their use. Among the new members, for instance, is Robert Malone, a controversial physician who has spoken at anti-vaccine events, where he has denounced COVID vaccines and, without evidence, suggested that they can worsen coronavirus infections. Another appointee is Vicky Pebsworth, who serves on the board of the National Vaccine Information Center, an anti-vaccine nonprofit previously known as Dissatisfied Parents Together. A third, Retsef Levi, a health-care-management expert, called for the administration of COVID vaccines to be halted in 2023, and has questioned the shots' safety, despite a large body of evidence from clinical trials supporting their continued use. Overall, 'this is not a list that would increase confidence in vaccine decisions,' Dorit Reiss, a vaccine-policy expert at UC San Francisco, told me. (None of these new ACIP members returned a request for comment.) The next ACIP meeting is scheduled for the end of this month—and the agenda includes discussion about anthrax vaccines, chikungunya vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines, cytomegalovirus vaccine, human-papillomavirus vaccine, influenza vaccines, Lyme-disease vaccine, meningococcal vaccines, pneumococcal vaccines, and RSV vaccines. That's a big slate of topics for a brand-new panel of members, Paul Offit, a pediatrician and vaccine expert who has previously served on ACIP, told me: Depending on how the meeting is structured, and on the input from CDC scientists, these new committee members could substantially alter the guidelines on several immunizations—perhaps so much so that certain shots could stop being recommended to certain groups of Americans. Based on the composition of the committee so far, Offit predicts that eventually the new ACIP will push the CDC away from full-throated endorsement of many of these vaccines. Even subtle changes in the wording of CDC recommendations—a should swapped for a may —can have big ripple effects, Limaye told me. Insurers, for instance, may be more reluctant to cover vaccines that are not actively endorsed by the CDC; some states—especially those in which vaccines have become a political battleground—may stop mandating those types of shots. If the CDC softens its recommendations, 'we will likely see more partisan divides' in who opts for protection nationwide, Jason Schwartz, a vaccine-policy expert at Yale, told me. Pharmaceutical companies may, in turn, cut down production of vaccines that don't have full CDC backing—perpetuating a cycle of reduced availability and reduced enthusiasm. And primary-care physicians, who look to the CDC's vaccination schedule as an essential reference, may shift the language they use to describe childhood shots, nudging more parents to simply opt out. Historically, medical and public-health associations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, have aligned their vaccine recommendations with ACIP's—because those recommendations were all driven by scientific evidence. Now, though, scientific consensus and government position are beginning to diverge: Multiple groups of physicians, scientists, and public-health scholars have issued statements condemning the vaccine decisions of Kennedy and his allies; a number of prominent scientists have now banded together to form a kind of alt-ACIP, dubbing themselves the Vaccine Integrity Project. As the views of fringe vaccine groups become the government's stance, Americans may soon have to choose between following the science or following what their nation's leaders say. Identifying as 'anti-vaccine' has historically been taboo: In a nation where most people remain largely in favor of shots, the term is pejorative, an open acknowledgement that one's views lie outside of the norm. But the more vaccine resistance infiltrates HHS and its advisers, the more what's considered normal may shift towards Kennedy's own views on vaccines; ACIP's reputation for evidence-backed thinking could even gild those views with scientific legitimacy. Assembling one's own team of friendly experts is an especially effective way to sanewash extremism, Reiss told me, and to overturn the system through what appear to be normal channels. If the nation's most prominent group of vaccine advisers bends toward anti-vaccine, the term loses its extremist edge—and the scientists who argue, based on sound data, that vaccines are safe and effective risk being labeled anti-government.

Hundreds of laid-off CDC employees can return to work. But some won't be back
Hundreds of laid-off CDC employees can return to work. But some won't be back

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hundreds of laid-off CDC employees can return to work. But some won't be back

Hundreds of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention employees are being allowed to return to work as of Wednesday. A fired CDC employee says she's happy for them, but she feels confused by the whole situation. 'It was always my dream to serve the public,' said Sarah Boim. She told Channel 2's Bryan Mims she worked as a health communications specialist for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for one year before she went on paid administrative leave in February. The government terminated her in May. Boim helped found Fired But Fighting, an organization working to have all CDC employees rehired and to remove Robert F. Kennedy as Health and Human Services secretary. She said she's grateful hundreds of laid-off employees can go back to their jobs at the CDC. 'I'm so happy for them, but I'm also a little confused because the government decided these people were doing critical work,' Boim said. She said these 460-plus employees couldn't do their critical work for more than 70 days. The U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services confirmed that notices went out Wednesday to these 460 or so workers, saying they could return to the CDC. In April, about 2,400 CDC employees were laid off, about 18% of the CDC's staff. RELATED STORIES: Hundreds of laid-off CDC employees are being reinstated Protesters rally outside CDC offices in DeKalb County after advisory committee fired CDC official who oversaw COVID-19 vaccine recommendations has resigned following HHS rollback The Department of Health and Human Services confirms these rehired employees are part of four divisions. They include the National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and Tuberculosis Prevention. Employees reinstated also include lab scientists who track lead poisoning. 'For every public health position that's lost, lives are at risk. So, multiply that by 2,000 just here at CDC. And you can see that we're really in a dire situation,' Boim said. [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter] Andrew Nixon, Health and Human Services spokesperson, responded with a written statement, saying the nation's critical health functions remain intact. 'HHS is streamlining operations without compromising mission-critical work. Enhancing the health and well-being of all Americans remains our top priority,' the statement said.

Dried Fruit Recall Map Shows 19 States With New Warning
Dried Fruit Recall Map Shows 19 States With New Warning

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Dried Fruit Recall Map Shows 19 States With New Warning

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Turkana Food Inc. has issued a recall for their dried apricots because the package label does not disclose that the product contains sulfites. Newsweek reached out to the company via phone Thursday and left a voicemail. Why It Matters Numerous recalls have been initiated this year due to the potential for the following: damaged products, foodborne illness, contamination and undeclared food allergens. Millions of Americans experience food sensitivities or food allergies every year. According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the nine "major" food allergens in the U.S. are eggs, milk, fish, wheat, soybeans, Crustacean shellfish, sesame, tree nuts and peanuts. What To Know According to the FDA alert, the Floria brand dried apricots have an expiration date of November 2026. The impacted product has a LOT number of 440090478-15-333 that can be found at the bottom of the packaging. The product has a UPC Label of 2539560010 that can be seen on a sticker at the top of the package, the FDA says. The dried apricots were distributed in Florida, Kentucky, Virginia, New York, New Jersey, Tennessee, Massachusetts, Texas, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Maryland, Ohio, Alabama, Missouri and California. There have been no reported illnesses as of Thursday, the FDA says. The alert also has pictures of the recalled product that potential customers can cross reference. Below is a map of the impacted states: What People Are Saying The FDA alert in part: "The recall was the result of a routine sampling performed by the New York State Department of Agriculture and markets which revealed that the finished products contained Sulfites that were not listed on the product labelling. The company has ceased production and distribution of the products as FDA and the company continue their investigation to correct the issue with the manufacturer." In an email to Newsweek in January, the FDA said: "Most recalls in the U.S. are carried out voluntarily by the product manufacturer and when a company issues a public warning, typically via news release, to inform the public of a voluntary product recall, the FDA shares that release on our website as a public service. "The FDA's role during a voluntary, firm-initiated, recall is to review the recall strategy, evaluate the health hazard presented by the product, monitor the recall, and as appropriate alert the public and other companies in the supply chain about the recall," the FDA continued. It added: "The FDA provides public access to information on recalls by posting a listing of recalls according to their classification in the FDA Enforcement Report, including the specific action taken by the recalling company. The FDA Enforcement Report is designed to provide a public listing of products in the marketplace that are being recalled." Additional information on recalls can be found via the FDA's Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts. What Happens Next Customers who have purchased the recalled dried apricots are asked not to eat them and return them to the original place of purchase for a refund, the FDA says. People with additional questions may call Turkana Foods Inc. at 908-810-8800 on weekdays from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. ET.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store