California Supreme Court sides with environmental groups in rooftop solar case
The unanimous decision sends the case brought by the three groups back to the appeals court.
The groups argue the utilities commission violated state law in 2022 when it cut the value of the credits that panel owners receive for sending their unused power to the electric grid by as much as 80%. The rules apply to Californians installing the panels after April 14, 2023.
The Supreme Court justices said the appeals court erred in Jan. 2024 when it ruled against the environmental groups. In that decision, the appeals court said that courts must defer to how the commission interpreted the law because it had more expertise in utility matters.
'This deferential standard of review leaves no basis for faulting the Commission's work,' the appeals court had concluded then in its opinion.
The environmental groups argued the appeals court ignored a 1998 law that said the commission's decisions should be held to the same standard of court review as those by other state agencies.
'The California Supreme Court has ruled in our favor that the CPUC is not above the law,' said Bernadette Del Chiaro, senior vice president at the Environmental Working Group, after Thursday's decision was published. The other groups filing the case are the Center for Biological Diversity and The Protect Our Communities Foundation.
The utilities commission did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the ruling.
More than 2 million solar systems sit on the roofs of homes, businesses and schools in California — more than any other state. Environmentalists say that number must increase if the state is to meet its goal, set by a 2018 law, of using only carbon-free energy by 2045.
The utilities commission has said that the credits given to the rooftop panel owners on their electric bill have become so valuable that they were resulting in 'a cost shift' of billions of dollars to those who do not own the panels. This has raised electric bills, especially hurting low-income electric customers, the commission says.
The credits for energy sent by the rooftop systems to the grid had been valued at the retail rate for electricity, which has risen fast as the commission has voted in recent years to approve rate increases the utilities have requested.
The state's three big for-profit electric utilities — Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric and San Diego Gas & Electric — have sided with commission in the case.
The utilities have long complained that electric bills have been rising because owners of the rooftop solar panels are not paying their fair share of the fixed costs required to maintain the electric grid.
For decades, the utilities have worked to reduce the energy credits aimed at incentivizing Californians to invest in the solar panel systems. The rooftop systems have cut into the utilities' sale of electricity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
The one issue where ‘26 Dems all agree
CHORUS OF COMPETITORS — The major Democratic candidates for governor have all quickly lined up behind their party in supporting efforts to redraw California's congressional districts mid-decade to counter Texas Republicans' attempts to do the same. Former Biden administration cabinet member Xavier Becerra told POLITICO that 'Politically, we must do it.' Toni Atkins, the former legislative leader, told Playbook that 'California has always led the way — and now we must because the fate of our democracy and the country's future depend on us stopping this Republican power grab.' A visible standout … The one notable exception has been billionaire mall magnate Rick Caruso, who has not entered the field but has been floated as a possible moderate Democratic candidate. Through a spokesperson, he declined to comment on whether he supported California's power play. BIG PICTURE: The near uniform response from others in the 2026 field has not afforded any of them a chance to stand out, much less a viral soundbite chewing out the president and Texas Republicans. But it has allowed them to stay in their party's good graces and cast themselves as leaders of the resistance as they seek a fundraising surge following former Vice President Kamala Harris' decision not to run. Key incentive … When former Rep. Katie Porter came out in support of California Democrats' redistricting play, she almost explicitly explained why Democratic candidates for governor stand to benefit from backing their party's redraw. It's a chance to bash President Donald Trump to anti-Trump voters. 'This is what I hear from Californians all the time as I'm running for governor: They want a fighter. They want someone who's going to stand up to Donald Trump and stand up to the Republican shenanigans,' Porter said on CNN last week. 'I think that Trump and Texas — Texas Republicans — are leaving us no choice. They are tinkering with the rules of our democracy.' Billionaire entrepreneur Stephen J. Cloobeck has taken his redistricting arguments in a similar anti-Trump direction, distributing a campaign ad comparing Trump's untrue claims that he won the 2020 election to his support for Texas redistricting. 'Cheaters gonna cheat. That's what he's doing in Texas,' a narrator says over clips of Trump speaking, 'changing the rules so that he can't lose.' Changing course … Even Democratic candidates including former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who backed the creation of California's independent redistricting commission, have called for the commission's map to be tossed out early. Villaraigosa in an interview said he wouldn't support the California Legislature unilaterally redrawing the state's lines, but he got on board once Democrats settled on putting the map that would be used before voters. 'We have to stand up to these efforts to rig an election,' Villaraigosa told Playbook, while railing against the GOP and president's agenda. 'We have to stand up because Californians are being disproportionately targeted here, on health care, on taxes, on tariffs, on education, and these raids.' Or as state Superintendent Tony Thurmond framed the state's process in a video address: 'California is fighting fire with fire, but because we're California, we're doing it in an open, transparent and responsible way.' Family ties … By falling into line, the candidates are also doing their party a solid. They may not be able to secure enough Democratic delegates to get a statewide party endorsement in the primary — especially if the field remains so sprawling — but maintaining relationships with Democratic insiders who have a more direct stake in redistricting could help with courting donors and endorsements. 'I won't stand by and watch a Texas takeover that ultimately gives Congress the green light to strip away more of our civil rights and harm Californians with even deeper program cuts,' former state Controller Betty Yee said in a statement supporting California's response. The Republican response … Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and conservative media personality Steve Hilton have also gone the way of their national party, stridently opposing California's redistricting gambit. Hilton issued a threat to sue the state over it, calling the maneuver 'a blatant, unconstitutional and illegal power grab designed to cement one‑party rule.' The redistricting play has given Bianco and Hilton a prime chance to rail against partisan line drawing not just now but through the 2026 election, knowing that if one of them makes it to the run-off, they'll likely be running against someone who supported Democrats' gerrymander. 'Dictator Gavin Newsom believes he has to destroy democracy in order to 'save it,'' Bianco said on social media, offering a flavor of the attacks he could launch at Democratic opponents on the issue. 'We're going to fight back, just like we did when he unlawfully banned people from going to church and opening their small businesses.' GOOD MORNING. Happy Wednesday. Thanks for waking up with Playbook. Like what you're reading? Sign up to get California Playbook in your inbox, and forward it to a friend. You can also text us at 916-562-0685 — save it as 'CA Playbook' in your contacts. Or drop us a line at dgardiner@ and bjones@ or on X — @DustinGardiner and @jonesblakej. WHERE'S GAVIN? Nothing official announced. BIG NEWS: On Wednesday, Aug. 27, POLITICO is hosting its inaugural California policy summit. At The California Agenda, some of the state's most prominent political figures including Sen. Alex Padilla, Katie Porter and Xavier Becerra will share the stage with influential voices in tech, energy, housing and other areas to chart the path forward for a state at the forefront of critical policy debates. The live and streamed event is free, but advanced registration is required. Request an invite here. MORE ON REDISTRICTING DIFFERENT TIMES — Common Cause, a good government watchdog that had previously been opposed to mid-cycle redistricting, is changing course. As POLITICO's Aaron Pellish reports, the group released a new policy statement Tuesday, stating that it will not condemn California's redistricting effort — which it called a 'counterbalancing measure' to Trump's push to draw several new Republican-leaning seats in Texas and around the country. In the statement, Common Cause said it will not endorse partisan gerrymandering in any case but is deciding now to not condemn actions taken by states like California given the context of Trump's efforts to 'lock in unaccountable power and silence voters.' 'We will not endorse partisan gerrymandering even when its motive is to offset more extreme gerrymandering by a different party,' Common Cause said. 'But a blanket condemnation in this moment would amount to a call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian efforts to undermine fair representation and people-powered democracy.' EDUCATION UCLA'S PARTIAL REPRIEVE — A federal judge ordered the Trump administration Tuesday to restore some of the funding it cut from UCLA in late July, handing a partial victory to the UC system as it faces a $1 billion settlement demand from the White House over alleged antisemitism on campus. As POLITICO's Eric He reports, it was not immediately clear how much money would be returned to the campus. Judge Rita F. Lin of the Northern District Court of California had already sided with the UC in June when she barred the National Science Foundation from terminating additional grants to UC researchers. In her ruling Tuesday, Lin said the foundation had violated that order by cutting off funding. NEWSOM V. HARVARD — Newsom on Tuesday called for Harvard President Alan Garber to resign following a report from The New York Times that the university is nearing a potential $500 million settlement with the Trump administration. 'Looks like Harvard has chosen to surrender,' Newsom posted on X. 'An absolute failure of leadership that will have demonstrable impacts to higher education across our country. He should be ashamed.' Newsom had blasted the Trump administration's demand of $1 billion from UCLA — a move that applied pressure to the public UC system not to capitulate as Ivy League institutions have after jousting with the president. He also said the state would sue. The governor personally, and through staff, communicated with members of the UC Board of Regents, UC Office of the President and UCLA regarding the Trump administration's settlement demands, according to Newsom's office. 'The governor sees this as an undemocratic assault on a vital public institution and he's not giving an inch,' said spokesperson Bob Salladay. 'There is no wiggle room here for him — he's all in with this fight.' SILICON VALLEY MAHAN'S MOD MAJORITY — San Jose Councilmember Anthony Tordillos was sworn into office Tuesday — delivering Mayor Matt Mahan a solid bloc of moderate Democrats to help implement his policy agenda at City Hall. Mahan, who backed Tordillos in a June special election, has irked Bay Area progressives and labor unions in recent years with his headline-grabbing moves, including a plan to tie the raises of some city employees to performance metrics and his vocal support for a ballot measure to increase prison sentences for drug- and theft-related offenses. But Tordillos' win provides Mahan with a firewall against his critics on the left. The new councilmember defeated a progressive, labor-backed candidate, Gabby Chavez-Lopez, by double digits in an expensive runoff contest. Mahan, in a recent interview with Playbook, seemed to bask in the outcome: 'Culturally, (Tordillos) and I are part of what … is going to be a majority bloc that focuses on what measurably improves outcomes, versus previous ideological commitments.' He added, 'Two-thirds of the electorate is not for the hyper-ideological progressive' approach to city government. CLIMATE AND ENERGY DEAL OR NO DEAL — The Trump administration is taking away California's backstop Trump-proofing tactics to protect its climate regulations: its voluntary deals with industry. On Tuesday, the FTC announced an agreement with four heavy-duty truck manufacturers and their trade association, declaring California's agreement with them 'unenforceable.' Read more in last night's edition of California Climate. TOP TALKERS LA CORRUPTION CASE — Prosecutors filed additional charges against Los Angeles City Councilmember Curren Price this week, the LA Times reports. Price had already been charged with 10 felony counts, including grand theft and perjury over allegations that he voted to approve projects that would financially benefit his wife, Del Richardson. Her consulting firm allegedly received more $150,000 in payments from developers before he voted on their projects. Price has denied any wrongdoing. Michael Schafler, Price's attorney, called the charges 'nothing more than an attempt to pile on to a weak case.' Price told the Times that 'there is no evidence whatsoever that Councilmember Price was aware of the alleged conflicts when he voted for the agenda items.' FEINSTEIN'S TREASURES — Dozens of items from the estate of the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein and her husband, the late financier Richard Blum, are going up for auction later this week. The collection included antique European furniture, opulent jewelry, historic artifacts, rare paintings and Persian and Tibetan rugs that once decorated the couple's former mansion on Billionaires' Row in San Francisco. Highlights of the collection, as SF Gate reports: 'a photograph of Feinstein posing with Queen Elizabeth II"; 'a German carved chest circa 1740 (valued from $800 to $1,200)"; and 'a Louis XV-style writing desk (valued from $500 to $700).' The most expensive item is a diamond and platinum solitaire ring valued from $40,000 to $60,000. AROUND THE STATE — Police departments eager to fill vacant jobs are increasingly hiring officers who were previously fired or dismissed from other agencies. (San Francisco Chronicle) — Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, who Trump recently suggested will have his show canceled next, revealed he recently secured Italian citizenship. (CNN) — Treacherous rip currents are pummeling beaches in San Diego County, with swells reaching 6 to 7 feet in some locations. (The San Diego Union-Tribune) — Trump's big spending bill includes a surprise boost for affordable housing developers in California: an increase to the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit. (CalMatters) PLAYBOOKERS SPOTTED: CARUSO MAKING ROUNDS — LA mega developer Rick Caruso, who's weighing a run for governor, was in Sacramento for a dinner and meetings — including a chat with POLITICO's Christopher Cadelago. Earlier in the day, he met at his home with Piers Morgan. STORK ALERT — J. Baylor Myers, VP of corporate development at BitGo and a former top aide to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin in the first Trump administration, and Dakota Myers, a paralegal in San Francisco, on Aug. 4 welcomed John Baylor Myers Jr, who came in at 8 pounds and 13 ounces. Pic … Another pic PEOPLE MOVES — Ivy Brittain is now regional director, state government affairs at the Plastics Industry Association. She was previously legislative affairs director at the Northern California Water Association. — Seamus Garrity is joining Mercury Public Affairs as a managing director. He will continue to work between LA and Sacramento and was previously a partner at Lighthouse Public Affairs. BIRTHDAYS — Margot Roosevelt … Chris Dhanaraj ... Emily Myerson … former Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen … BELATED B-DAY WISHES — (was Sunday): Ajita Talwalker Menon at Calbright College WANT A SHOUT-OUT FEATURED? — Send us a birthday, career move or another special occasion to include in POLITICO's California Playbook. You can now submit a shout-out using this Google form.
Los Angeles Times
7 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Unlike at Columbia, Trump's attack on UCLA is aimed at taxpayer money
President Trump's demand for a whopping $1-billion payment from UCLA sent shock waves through the UC system. For those of us on the inside, the announcement elicited a range of responses. Some faculty and staff reacted with horror, others voiced increasing fear about the ongoing assault on academic freedom, and some merely muttered in sad resignation to the new reality. I laughed. The president has decided to poke the bear — and the Bears and the Bruins, too. Whether Trump knows it or not, targeting the University of California is very different from going after private Ivy League institutions with deep historical ties to political power. Pressuring UC to pay a large sum has another dimension entirely: It's going after state tax dollars paid by the people of California. This should matter to folks on the left and the right, to those who venerate higher education and those who vote in favor of states' rights against federal overreach. Californians across the political spectrum should repurpose one of Trump's own slogans: 'Stop the steal.' Unlike Columbia and Brown, which have paid off the Trump administration, UC is a public institution. That means, as new UC President James Milliken said, 'we are stewards of taxpayer resources.' UC must answer to the people, not just to boards of trustees or senior administrators. Indeed, as a professor at UC Santa Barbara, I consider myself to be employed by my fellow Californians. My job is to contribute to the fundamental mission laid out in the state's 'Master Plan': to create new knowledge and educate the people of California. I take my responsibility even more seriously because I am also a product of UC; I earned my PhD at Berkeley and remain a proud Golden Bear. I am fully aware of what a positive effect a UC education can have on students and Californians everywhere. A $1-billion payment to the federal government would have huge consequences — not only on the people's university but also on the general welfare of our state, the world's fourth-largest economy. UC is the second-largest employer in the state. We generate $82 billion in economic activity every year. More than 84% of our students come from California, and their degrees are proven to increase their lifetime earning potential. UC health centers treat millions of people every year, providing essential medical care. According to one striking study, 'The economic output generated by UC-related spending is $4.4 billion larger than the economic output of the entire state of Wyoming and $16.1 billion larger than that of Vermont.' We accomplish that in large part with the people's money. For every dollar the state invests in us, we generate $21 of economic activity for the state. All of that activity generates $12 billion in tax revenue. We're a great engine of growth. You'd think a self-proclaimed genius and 'self-made' business tycoon would know a good deal when he sees one. To be sure, the supposed bases for demanding the extraordinary payment — antisemitism and civil rights abuses — are very serious. College students should expect to confront new ideas they may disagree with, but no one should be targeted for their beliefs. Full stop. But there are more effective remedies for addressing any failures, as have already been pursued at UCLA. For Trump, though, the accusations are the pretext for punishing institutions that he doesn't like and, as the Associated Press reports, rebuking political opponents such as Gov. Gavin Newsom. They are not reflective of a genuine concern for student rights. Many of us have already sounded the alarm about the increasing financial challenges the UC system faces. Even last year, we had reached a critical breaking point — and that was before losing federal grant money. But we haven't given up and neither should the people. We all must fight back against this attempted seizure of taxpayer funds. It's not enough to leave the task to political leaders; the people themselves must send the message. Californians can continue to resist federal incursions by making it clear to the UC Board of Regents, elected representatives and everyone else that Californians will not tolerate a federal pressure campaign to take our state's resources. There are many reasons to be alarmed by Trump's broader attack on higher education. But this time, Trump has crossed the public-private boundary and set his sights on state taxpayers' money. Because we fund it, UC and everything it produces belongs to us. That means we all — no matter where we fall on the political spectrum — must stop the steal. Giuliana Perrone, an associate professor of history at UC Santa Barbara, is the author of 'Nothing More than Freedom: The Failure of Abolition in American Law.'
CBS News
13 hours ago
- CBS News
Colorado mayors, business leaders warn of dangers if Xcel Energy expansion isn't approved
Xcel Energy filed a proposal for approval with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission in October of 2024, but interest in the topic is quickly garnering attention. Following a report on opposition to the plan, dozens of community and business leaders have gathered in support of it. "Thirty-eight mayors representing over half the state's population are really in favor of expanding the electric capacity for Excel Energy because of the long-term and long-range impacts it has on the state," said Heigh Williams, the executive director of the Metro Mayors Caucus and the former mayor of Thornton. The caucus sent a letter to the Public Utilities Commission strongly urging them to approve Xcel's capacity increase request. "I did have a couple of mayors who said, look, we have projects ready to go, but Xcel can't power these projects right now because we don't have the electrical capacity to do that," she said. Williams believes Colorado's statewide issue of affordable housing simply can't and won't be addressed without increased access to power. "The state legislature has been very clear the last couple of years, along with the governor, that they want more housing, and they want more housing around transit-oriented development," said Williams. "Guess what? We need the electric grid capacity to do all of those things." And as for businesses, Williams believes a denial from the PUC would send a loud message to the business world. "I think it puts a 'we're closed' sign out, you know, like Colorado can't provide the energy for a new business," she said. That's something Chris Fellows, a long-time Colorado land developer, is an expert on. "Xcel is really a government-sanctioned monopoly for providing power, and then if the PUC limits their ability to deliver the power, it sterilizes the growth," said Fellows. "It's a catch-22." Fellows is a member of the East Metro Area Business Coalition, composed of dozens of property owners who, combined, own around 40,000 acres in the eastern portion of the Denver metro area. "Everybody put together a forecast that showed how much property they owned, what it was zoned for, what the expected growth and demand would be for that project," said Fellows. "Then we provided that to Xcel so they could see our demands. We also submitted an intervener petition in the PUC process that's going right now to say that, hey, this is something we're concerned about." And concerns among different leaders stem from the same place. "We need to make sure there's enough energy to provide for the growth," said Fellows. The public was originally anticipating a vote on the plan Wednesday, but folks at the PUC have indicated there could be several more discussions in the coming weeks.
