After 9 SpaceX Starship launches, some have been more successful than others
Since its first launch in April 2023, SpaceX has seen a mix of failed and successful launches. While not every launch is a success, the company often says that "success comes from what we learn."
SpaceX's first Starship flight test started with success as the spacecraft cleared the orbital launch pad for the first time. However, Starship experienced multiple engine outages, lost altitude and began to tumble. At that point, according to SpaceX, "the flight termination system was commanded on both the booster and ship."
The company experienced another issue during its first flight test beyond what SpaceX livestream hosts described as a "rapid unscheduled disassembly." While the rocket was built to be reusable, no part of the rocket was recovered.
Spacex Successfully Launches Giant Starship Rocket, Explodes Minutes Later
Months after its first flight test failed, SpaceX once again launched Starship. While SpaceX celebrated a number of major milestones with this launch and saw Starship make it further than the first flight, it still ended in failure.
Read On The Fox Business App
Starship's takeoff was successful in this second test, but the separation from the Super Heavy booster ended in an explosion. Despite this premature ending, SpaceX classified the separation itself and the Super Heavy booster's flip maneuver to being successful. Once again, the spacecraft experienced a "rapid unscheduled disassembly."
The third Starship test flight was the first to be considered a success. In its third test, it met the same key milestones as the first two, and it ultimately went further than either of its predecessors.
As the first successful test flight, the Starship was able to experience its first-ever reentry to Earth from space, which gave SpaceX "valuable data on heating and vehicle control during hypersonic reentry."
Celebrating the company's success, SpaceX founder Elon Musk vowed "Starship will take humanity to Mars" following the test flight.
SpaceX's fourth test flight was also a success from takeoff to reentry. Additionally, Starlink was able to capture live high-definition video throughout every phase of reentry, according to SpaceX.
"Flight 4 ended with Starship igniting its three center Raptor engines and executing the first flip maneuver and landing burn since our suborbital campaign, followed by a soft splashdown of the ship in the Indian Ocean one hour and six minutes after launch," SpaceX wrote in a summary of the launch on its website.
Musk celebrated in a post on X, saying that despite Starship losing "many tiles" and ending up with a "damaged flap," the spacecraft successfully made its soft landing in the ocean.
Starbase, Home To Elon Musk's Spacex, To Officially Become A Texas City
In the fifth flight test for SpaceX's Starship, the company achieved a major milestone as Mechazilla's mechanical arms successfully captured the Super Heavy booster, making the reusable design closer to reality. Musk hailed the achievement as "science fiction without the fiction part."
SpaceX celebrated the successful test in a post on X, saying that the ability to launch and return are "fundamental techniques" for Starship's reusable design.
Then-former President Donald Trump reacted to the launch during a campaign rally in Arizona just weeks before the 2024 election. Trump told a crowd of supporters that he "never saw anything like it." He joked that the booster needed a new paint job, which is "a lot cheaper than building a new one."
Spacex Dragon Capsule Sticks Splashdown Landing As Nasa Astronauts Return Home After Months Stuck In Space
Just over a month after SpaceX's impressive achievement during its October 2024 launch, the company saw another successful launch but did not execute a catch at the launch site as it did with its fifth test flight.
Not all the criteria for a booster catch were met, which led to the decision not to go through with the move, according to PBS, which cited SpaceX spokesman Dan Huot. The outlet added that Huot did not mention any specific issue. However, SpaceX says on its webpage dedicated to the launch that the booster pulled off a "pre-planned divert maneuver" before its splashdown in the Gulf of America.
In its first flight test of 2025, SpaceX saw its Starship experience another "rapid unscheduled disassembly." As the Starship upper stage performed its ascent burn to space, SpaceX lost contact approximately eight and a half minutes into the test flight.
Despite the issues with the Starship upper stage, the Super Heavy booster made a successful landing and was caught back at the launchpad.
On its seventh test flight, Starship was carrying mock satellites which SpaceX reportedly planned to use to practice releasing them, according to Reuters. Additionally, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was briefly forced to slow down and divert flights that could have been in the path of debris from the Starship, though normal operations eventually resumed.
Musk seemed to take it in stride, writing on X that "Success is uncertain, but entertainment is guaranteed!"
Starship's eighth test flight ended when several engines failed, and SpaceX lost connection with the spacecraft approximately nine and a half minutes after it was launched. Ultimately, Starship exploded off the coast of Florida.
While the flight was a failure, SpaceX was able to execute a successful booster catch for the third time.
The FAA said that the test impacted 240 flights, more than two dozen of which were forced to divert due to concerns about debris, according to Reuters. Additionally, the FAA issued ground stops for just over an hour in Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Orlando and Palm Beach.
In total, there were 171 departure delays, 28 flights were diverted, and 40 airborne flights were held for an average of 22 minutes, Reuters reported. The outlet said that the average delay time for the 171 flights was 28 minutes.
SpaceX's ninth Starship test flight ended in failure. The mission aimed to deploy eight Starlink simulator satellites and test reentry with 100 heat shield tiles intentionally removed.
The payload door failed to open during the flight. Any parts of the aircraft that did not disintegrate upon reentry landed in the Indian Ocean.
Despite the failure, Musk noted a "big improvement" since Starship's last flight as the craft made it to the scheduled engine cutoff. Additionally, he said there was "no significant loss of heat shield tiles during ascent."
Fox News Digital's Jasmine Baehr contributed to this report.Original article source: After 9 SpaceX Starship launches, some have been more successful than others
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
44 minutes ago
- CNBC
Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's harassment claims denied in court
A federal judge on Tuesday denied Elon Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's claims of a "years-long harassment campaign" by the Tesla CEO against the company he co-founded in 2015 and later abandoned before ChatGPT became a global phenomenon. In the latest turn in a court battle that kicked off last year, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Musk must face OpenAI's claims that the billionaire, through press statements, social media posts, legal claims and "a sham bid for OpenAI's assets" had attempted to harm the AI startup. Musk sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman last year over the company's transition to a for-profit model, accusing the company of straying from its founding mission of developing AI for the good of humanity, not profit. OpenAI countersued Musk in April, accusing the billionaire of engaging in fraudulent business practices under California law. Musk then asked for OpenAI's counterclaims to be dismissed or delayed until a later stage in the case. OpenAI argued in May its countersuit should not be put on hold, and the judge on Tuesday concluded that the company's allegations were legally sufficient to proceed. A jury trial has been scheduled for spring 2026.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How Tesla's Cybertruck could keep UK homes running for days
A Tesla could soon be used to keep the lights on in your home, or even to sell power back to the grid. Tesla cars could soon function as an effective "battery" to supply British homes with electricity as the electric vehicle (EV) maker's new energy venture also allows homeowners to sell surplus energy back to the grid. Elon Musk's company is plotting to enter the British energy market and supply households in the coming months. Tesla has sought approval for an energy licence and reportedly hopes to start supplying energy to homes and businesses in England, Scotland and Wales by next year. Tesla has been involved in the UK energy market since 2020, when it was granted a licence to be an electricity generator. How could a Tesla power a home? In the US, the group has been an electricity supplier for the past three years in Texas, where it supplies electricity via Tesla Electric. The company's "Powershare" technology means households that own one of Tesla Cybertruck models can essentially use their EV as a power source for the home. The process is referred to as V2X – vehicle-to-everything. Because of the sheer size of batteries in EVs, homeowners can effectively "store" electricity in their Tesla. When a power outage is detected, Powershare automatically provides back-up electricity for the home. The Cybertruck, for example, is capable of delivering 11.5 kilowatts of continuous power and is able to meet the energy needs of an average home for three days. The vehicle also has multiple 120V and 240V outlets, which can be used to power devices needed for, say, camping trips. Or even to turn the car into a remote workplace. Paired with other technology – such as home batteries - V2X could allow homes more control over how they buy and use electricity. Households in Texas have also been able to lower their electricity bills by powering a vehicle at night when electricity is cheap, and then using it to run home appliances during the day. What other functions might Tesla bring to the UK? Tesla Electric offers cheap, renewable energy, managed through a mobile app and is built particularly for people who own a Tesla Powerwall home battery or a Tesla vehicle. With Powerwall, consumers are encouraged to buy electricity at night and sell electricity back to the grid when prices are high – this means that the grid is more stable, and customers with Powerwalls can profit. Tesla currently offers Powerwall via energy provider Octopus in the UK. With multiple homes selling electricity to the grid, it works as a virtual power plant, which helps to support the grid at peak times. Tesla says: 'A virtual power plant (VPP) is a network of distributed energy sources such as homes with solar and battery systems, working together as a single power plant. The combined energy of these sources is used to support the electrical grid.' Tesla also sells solar panels, which can be used to top up Powerwall batteries. Declining sales across Europe The news comes amid a backdrop of waning demand for Tesla's electric vehicles across Europe in recent months. New car registrations in Britain and Germany more than halved in July from a year earlier. Some have argued Musk's political support for Donald Trump has impacted sales. However, it is also the case that competition has also increased. Sales of EVs made by China's BYD, for example, rose nearly five-fold in Germany and over four-fold in Britain in July. Nonetheless, industry figures showed an almost 60% plunge in the number of new Tesla registrations in the UK in July, compared with a year earlier. In further bad news for Musk, on 1 August a jury in Florida found Tesla liable to pay $243m (£180m) to victims of a 2019 fatal crash of an autopilot-equipped Model S. Jurors in the Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon, as well as her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo, $129m in compensatory damages plus $200m in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet. Tesla has said it will appeal the decision, which could encourage more legal action against the company.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is Baby Grok really for kids? X's AI past says otherwise
Elon Musk's xAI unveils plans for Baby Grok, a kid-friendly AI chatbot, amid questions over safety, trust, and Grok's controversial past Elon Musk's xAI is reportedly developing 'Baby Grok', a child-friendly version of its Grok AI chatbot. Early reports suggest that it could serve as an educational assistant for children, answering questions and guiding learning in a safe and age-appropriate manner. But creating a truly trustworthy AI for kids isn't just about censoring bad words; it requires rebuilding the AI's training and safety systems from the ground up, ensuring it can protect young users from harmful, biased, or misleading content. With AI now present in classrooms, homes, and even children's toys, the stakes are high. If Baby Grok succeeds, it could become a valuable tool for modern education. If it fails, it could become another high-profile example of AI safety gone wrong. So, how exactly would Baby Grok work? What challenges will it face, and can Musk's team really make it safe enough for kids? Let's dig into the details. Why is Elon Musk building Baby Grok now? Musk's AI company, xAI, launched Grok in 2023 as a bold alternative to ChatGPT, integrating it directly into X (formerly Twitter) for premium subscribers. Grok quickly made headlines for its humor, quick wit, and intentionally 'edgy' tone, a style that won over some fans but also drew sharp criticism when the AI produced inappropriate or offensive responses to user prompts. The pivot toward Baby Grok mirrors a broader industry shift toward AI in education. Tech giants like OpenAI, Google, and Meta are racing to build AI-driven tutoring systems, interactive study aids, and personalized learning companions. The global AI in education market is projected to grow from USD 3.79 billion in 2022 to USD 20.54 billion in 2027, at a CAGR of 45.6% from 2022 to 2027. For Musk, a 'safe-mode' version of Grok could serve multiple purposes: appealing to parents who are wary of unfiltered AI, offering schools a controlled digital learning assistant, and easing concerns from regulators pushing for stricter AI safety laws. At the same time, it could shield xAI from the brand damage that unmoderated, free-form AI can cause, something Grok's initial rollout proved all too well. What Baby Grok promises, and how it would work? Baby Grok is designed to be a smart, child-friendly learning assistant, not just a filtered version of Grok. Its key goals include. Translating complex topics into age-appropriate explanations Presenting subjects like math, science, or history in ways that match a child's comprehension level. Avoiding profanity, explicit content, and violence Going beyond simple word filters, ensuring context-sensitive awareness to keep conversations safe and respectful. Offering interactive learning games and storytelling Features like games and stories can make learning fun while supporting skill development, an approach that has been shown to improve engagement and emotional growth in children. Encouraging curiosity without overwhelming Providing thoughtful, manageable responses that spark interest without cognitive overload. Creating this experience takes more than flipping a 'safe mode' switch; it requires filtered training data, child-centered design, and continuous oversight to ensure Baby Grok is both safe and genuinely educational. How would Baby Grok actually keep conversations kid-friendly? Musk hasn't released technical specifications yet, but AI safety researchers stress that a truly safe children's AI requires a blend of technology, human oversight, and continuous updates: Custom training dataset: Rather than being trained on open internet data, which often includes adult, violent, or misleading content, Baby Grok would need a highly curated, education-first dataset (such as National Geographic Kids, BBC Bitesize, or NASA's Climate Kids). Real-time content filtering: Outputs should pass through advanced filters similar to Microsoft's Content Safety API or Google SafeSearch, which automatically block inappropriate language, explicit imagery, or unsafe suggestions. Human moderation: Since no filter is flawless, platforms like Roblox and Discord rely on moderation teams to review flagged content. Baby Grok would need the same level of vigilance. Adaptive safeguards: Online risks evolve fast. Ongoing updates guided by child psychologists, researchers, and organizations like eSafety are essential to keeping the AI responsive to emerging threats. Importantly, a 2025 benchmark study introduced MinorBench, a tool specifically designed to assess language models' compliance with child safety safeguards, and it revealed significant variability even among top AI systems like Grok in how well they refuse unsafe or inappropriate queries. Can an edgy adult AI be remade for children? Musk's challenge is credibility. Grok's 'uncensored' style was originally marketed as a feature for adults, a stark contrast to the thoughtful tone parents expect from child‑friendly tools. Platforms like YouTube Kids demonstrate how even strict filters can fail, and with generative AI, the risk is amplified; every response is created in real time, not pulled from a pre‑approved library. Researchers at the Center for Humane Technology emphasize that without deep safety integration, child-facing AI can still reproduce bias, misinformation, or harmful advice. A recent framework introduced in 2025, 'LLMs and Childhood Safety', underscores this risk by proposing protective measures for language models used with children, pointing out that current systems often lack the standards needed to reliably prevent harmful outputs, even when they're designed for younger audiences. Before you dive in, take a moment to watch this short video for a quick overview. It sets the stage perfectly. Once you're done, scroll back up and keep reading for the full story. Why is building AI for kids more complex than it looks? Developing AI for children involves meeting stricter legal and ethical standards that go well beyond typical AI design. First, there are data privacy protections. Tools like Baby Grok must comply with stringent child-specific laws such as COPPA in the U.S. and GDPR-K in Europe, which demand explicit parental consent and careful handling of minors' data. Equally important is bias reduction, ensuring the AI avoids reinforcing harmful stereotypes and treats all children fairly, regardless of background. Then there's the need for educational accuracy, meaning the AI's responses must be grounded in trusted sources like Britannica Kids or Scholastic Learn at Home. A 2025 study published in Nature Humanities and Social Sciences Communications reinforces that ethical design, transparency, and verified educational content are critical for AI systems targeting children. The challenge is not just building a smart tool but earning lasting trust from parents, educators, and regulators alike. What's next for Baby Grok? If xAI follows its usual rollout strategy, Baby Grok may begin in a closed beta reserved for Premium+ X subscribers. The company could then expand through integrations with classroom platforms or learning devices, partnerships with educational publishers, and features such as parent dashboards that offer conversation logs and usage controls. But success will largely depend on early safety testing. A single viral misstep, such as a child receiving harmful advice, could severely damage its reputation before it's widely adopted. A 2025 study on AI educational tools emphasizes the importance of establishing strong safety guardrails from the start, including prompt engineering, human-in-the-loop moderation, and continuous evaluation to ensure content remains curriculum-aligned and age-appropriate Can Baby Grok handle the weight of childhood? Baby Grok could redefine AI in education if it balances innovation with strong safety and transparency. But Musk's history of pushing fast, sometimes at the cost of polish, raises questions. Baby Grok represents xAI's bold move into child-focused AI amid rising demand for educational tech. Building a safe AI for kids isn't easy; it requires more than filters, involving retraining, oversight, and ethical design. Musk's credibility is under scrutiny, especially given Grok's edgy origins and controversial responses. Past platform failures show the risks of repurposing adult AI for children without deep safeguards. Trust will be the ultimate test, from parents, educators, and regulators alike. If successful, Baby Grok could set a new standard for child-safe AI. If not, it may serve as a cautionary tale in the history of AI development. The key issue isn't just 'Can Baby Grok be built?' but 'Will parents trust it?'. If xAI meets the highest safety benchmarks and proves its reliability through independent audits, it could set a new standard for kid-friendly AI. If not, it risks becoming yet another cautionary tale in the growing list of AI examples. This story is made with AI assistance and human editing. Solve the daily Crossword