‘Travesty of justice': MK Party slams Constitutional Court's dismissal of Ramaphosa case
Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers
MK Party has lashed out at the Constitutional Court, following its dismissal of the party's application challenging President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to place Minister Senzo Mchunu on special leave and appoint Professor Firoz Cachalia.
The court determined that the issue did not merit its consideration and should instead be referred to the High Court, a decision that has ignited outrage among members of the MK Party.
Speaking at court, MKP national spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, accused the judiciary of selectively applying justice, saying the ruling revealed "a travesty of justice" and exposed a legal system that "no longer serves the people."
'We are shocked, but not surprised. This is the same court that granted direct access to incarcerate President Jacob Zuma without trial,' Ndhlela said, referring to Zuma's 2021 contempt ruling.
'Now, when faced with Ramaphosa's alleged delinquency, they defer to technicalities.'
Ndhlela said the court's refusal to hear the matter directly flies in the face of its precedent.
'Why was direct access granted in the Zuma, Zondo Commission, and secret ballot matters—but now denied in a case affecting every South African? The inconsistency is glaring,' he added.
He also criticised the judiciary for allegedly shielding Ramaphosa from accountability.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'Phala Phala remains unresolved. The CR17 bank statements are still sealed. And now, even a basic attempt to hold the President to account through judicial channels is being stonewalled,' Ndhlela said.
Lady Justice is no longer blind—she has chosen a side, he stated.
The MK Party has not ruled out further legal or political steps.
'We will consult with our national leadership and legal team. But one thing is clear—South Africans must now ask if this judiciary still serves them,' he said.
Advocate Dali Mpofu SC, representing the MKP, echoed concerns about the legal reasoning behind the court's decision.
'The public must understand the difference between direct access and exclusive jurisdiction,' he said.
Mpofu said: 'Direct access is granted in exceptional cases of national interest. What could be more compelling than allegations that the sitting President manipulated state processes for political expediency?'
Mpofu also challenged what he called the court's double standards.
Direct access was granted in multiple high-profile cases involving Zuma, yet now it is deemed inappropriate for matters involving Ramaphosa. No one seems to ask why, he said.
While Mpofu declined to comment in detail on the merits of the case, he confirmed that the party's legal team would be consulting with their client to explore next steps.
'There's no case before the court now, but that could change. We may be back—here or elsewhere.'
The ConCourt's decision added fuel to the already simmering tensions between the MKP and South Africa's top courts.
With the 2026 local elections looming, the fallout from this judgment may become a rallying point for a party determined to position itself as the voice of the disillusioned.
kamogelo.moichela@iol.co.za
IOL Politics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
The shadows of human trafficking loom large in South Africa
This week, the recent observance of World Day Against Trafficking in Persons has amplified calls for urgent action against human trafficking in South Africa, a crime that is claimed to take advantage of the most vulnerable members of society. In a significant effort to address this critical issue, Deputy Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development Andries Nel recently launched Local Task Team Offices, aimed at bolstering anti-trafficking initiatives at ports of entry. This initiative is backed by a newly established policy framework designed to enhance the country's collective response to trafficking. Highlighting the impact of ongoing efforts, Nel pointed to the rescue of 234 identified trafficking victims over the past year. 'These are 234 lives saved, and there are many more whose lives are affected by trafficking,' he emphasised. The urgency of the situation is reflected in alarming global statistics; the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime reported a 25% increase in detected trafficking victims worldwide in 2024, with children making up 38% of those affected. According to Nel, Africa has become a significant source and destination for trafficking, with South Africa serving as both a source and transit hub. 'As a source country, South Africans are trafficked domestically and internationally. As a transit country, traffickers use our borders to move victims from neighbouring countries to other destinations,' Nel stated. He said in an encouraging development, South Africa's efforts to combat trafficking have led to an upgrade in its status from Tier Two Watch List to Tier Two in the 2024 US Department of State's Trafficking in Persons Report. In the current financial year alone, 32 new trafficking prosecutions have been initiated, with 67 ongoing cases involving 156 accused individuals currently before the courts. The collaborative ethos of this fight was echoed by Jason Cogill, CEO of the National Freedom Network (NFN), during this year's Human Trafficking Awareness Week, who emphasised the need for shared commitment: 'To effectively combat human trafficking, strategic networking, collaboration, and partnership are needed. Together, we are stronger. Together, we can end trafficking.' One story that highlights the gravity of the issue shared with the Saturday Star is of a young woman named Thandi, given to protect her identity from a small town in the Eastern Cape. Thandi was lured by a false promise of a job in the city and found herself trapped in a brothel, her freedom violently taken. After several harrowing months, she was identified as a trafficking victim during a police raid and brought to safety. "Those first weeks, I was so scared and broken. But the social workers and ladies at the safe house, they became like my sisters. They helped me see I still had a future," she shared her harrowing experience. Rescue was just the beginning of Thandi's road to recovery. Through the NFN's network, she entered a specialised aftercare shelter where she received medical attention and trauma counselling to begin healing the invisible wounds of abuse. Dr. Juliet Sambo, a lecturer at the Department of Social Work and Criminology at the University of Pretoria, shed further light on the complexities of trafficking. Sambo notes that economic disparity, alongside inadequate law enforcement, creates an environment where organised crime thrives. 'Official statistics are unreliable, obscuring the true scale of trafficking,' she explains, noting that women and children are disproportionately affected, making up 55.5% and 44.5% of victims, respectively. The horrific case of six-year-old Joshlin Smith, who went missing in February 2024, starkly illustrates the crisis. Sambo warns that trafficking is intimately tied to other illicit activities, with the internet playing a pivotal role in recruitment and exploitation. 'Human trafficking persists in South Africa due to a combination of gender inequality and economic instability,' she argued. Saturday Star
Eyewitness News
9 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
ConCourt sets aside five appoinments to the gender commission
CAPE TOWN - Parliament's public participation process has been found wanting by the Constitutional Court, which has set aside five appointments to the Commission of Gender Equality on Friday, including its chairperson and her deputy. Although the appointments were made more than two years ago and their suitability for the posts was not in dispute on Friday, the court said it could not allow the appointments to stand, given the flawed process followed. Parliament has now been given a year to restart the process. In 2022, Corruption Watch challenged the process by the Portfolio Committee on Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities for inviting public comment on the shortlisted candidates to serve as commissioners on the Commission for Gender Equality. The watchdog complained that 14 days was not enough time to make submissions, which were limited by length and could only be submitted online. The committee also refused to publish detailed information from candidates' CVs, such as their work experience, citing the Protection of Personal Information Act. However, the Constitutional Court said this interpretation of the act was incorrect and rendered the committee's conduct unreasonable. It added that had parliament published the candidates' CVs, the committee would have provided the type of information upon which meaningful and effective public participation could be based. 'Furthermore, even though the commissioners may have met the criteria for appointment, they were not necessarily the only candidates who did so or the most suitable candidates for selection. It follows that the appointment process is unconstitutional and that the appointments of the commissioners are invalid,' reads the unanimous judgment. The court said that although parliament's failures were procedural, with no suggestion that the commissioners did not meet the criteria for appointment, the public interest in a lawful appointment process outweighs the personal interests of the commissioners. The Commissioners could thus have their terms cut short within the next 12 months once a new process has been carried out. The five commissioners affected by this ruling include the chairperson, Advocate Nthabiseng Sepanya-Mogale, deputy chairperson Prabashni Naidoo, Thando Gumede, Bongani Ngomane, and Leonashia van der Merwe. They were appointed by the president on the recommendation of Parliament, for a five-year term from 1 March 2023.
TimesLIVE
11 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Five things to know about deputy chief justice Dunstan Mlambo
President Cyril Ramaphosa has appointed Dunstan Mlambo as deputy chief justice with effect from Friday. At 65, Mlambo brings nearly three decades of judicial experience and a lifetime of legal activism to his new role. Here are five things to know about the new deputy chief justice. 1. A legal career grounded in public interest and transformation Before joining the bench in 1997, Mlambo worked as a public interest and trade union lawyer, beginning as a legal assistant in the KaNgwane government. He later joined the Legal Resources Centre in 1987 before making a rare transition into corporate law, becoming an associate partner at Bowman Gilfillan in 1993. In 1995, he cofounded Mlambo & Modise Attorneys. His rise to the judiciary began with an appointment to the labour court and he later served in the Gauteng High Court (2000), Supreme Court of Appeal (2005) and as judge president of the labour court (2010) before assuming leadership of the Gauteng division of the high court in 2012. 2. Leading South Africa's busiest court division As judge president of the Gauteng High Court covering both Johannesburg and Pretoria Mlambo oversaw the country's most complex and demanding judicial workload. He led the division with innovation and foresight, introducing initiatives like the re-establishment of the commercial court in 2018 and mandatory civil mediation in 2025 to address case backlogs. His tenure also saw the creation of two new stand-alone high courts in Limpopo and Mpumalanga, an expansion of access to justice that many see as one of his most impactful legacies. 3. Key judgments that shaped jurisprudence Mlambo is more than an administrator — he's an influential jurist who has authored several landmark decisions: President of the Republic v Public Protector: Held former president Jacob Zuma personally liable for legal costs related to the 'State Capture' report. MultiChoice v NPA (Oscar Pistorius case): Allowed for the broadcasting of the high-profile trial. SAPS v Solidarity obo Barnard: Upheld affirmative action as a justifiable measure to address past discrimination — later affirmed by the Constitutional Court. These judgments reflect Mlambo's commitment to transparency, equality and the transformative spirit of the constitution. 4. A vision for transformative and accessible justice In his recent Judicial Service Commission (JSC) interview, Mlambo outlined a progressive vision rooted in the belief that South Africa's constitution must be a tool for economic justice. 'I think we adopted what is called a progressive constitution that seeks to uplift the blight of people,' he said, advocating for 'carefully crafted litigation' to dismantle bottlenecks that keep South Africans trapped in poverty. He also criticised Rule 46A, which allows banks to repossess homes, arguing that 'as a judiciary, we need to find a way of reforming these legal rules that form part of this conservative legal culture'. Mlambo is also a proponent of legal reform through technology and training, calling for a mediation act and suggesting the adoption of AI-driven legal tools as used in Brazil to boost efficiency. 5. Ethical leadership and accountability Mlambo has served on numerous local and international legal boards, including the Centre for the Advancement of Community Advice Offices (CAOSA), the International Legal Foundation and Africa Legal Aid. His ethical compass was evident when he revoked the appointment of an acting judge over sexual harassment complaints and supported chief justice Mandisa Maya's proposed sexual harassment policy. As he steps into this new chapter, all eyes will be on how he continues to reshape the country's legal landscape from one of the highest seats of judicial power.
