logo
Reeves refuses to rule out autumn tax raid

Reeves refuses to rule out autumn tax raid

Telegraph14 hours ago

Rachel Reeves has refused to rule out further tax rises in the Autumn as Cabinet colleagues pile pressure on the Chancellor to unleash more money for public spending.
Ms Reeves repeatedly declined to rule out raising taxes on families and businesses at an event on Thursday night as she prepares to set out Whitehall spending plans for the next three years.
'I'm not going to say that I'm not going to take any tax measures in the next four years,' she told an audience of business leaders at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) annual dinner.
Asked four times by CBI president Rupert Soames to reassure Britons they would not be subject to higher taxes, Ms Reeves could only commit to avoiding a repeat of the record £40bn tax raid she launched last Autumn.
'I'm not going to be able to write all four years of budgets sitting here this evening,' she said.
Economists have warned that a series of spending commitments made by Sir Keir Starmer, including restoring winter fuel payments to most pensioners and speculation that the two-child cap on benefits will be lifted, will force the issue and lead to higher taxes in the Autumn.
JP Morgan has estimated that taxes may need to rise by up to £24bn to cover recent policy announcements and to compensate for the hit to growth from higher tariffs.
Pressure is also building on Ms Reeves from Labour's Left after the leak of a memo sent to the Treasury by Angela Rayner's department ahead of the Spring Statement. It detailed potential tax rises that could have avoided spending cuts to balance the budget.
Ms Reeves on Thursday insisted the economy was 'turning the corner' even as she admitted that growth was too low, leaving families 'struggling with living standards not improving'.
Bosses warned that Labour's workers' rights overhaul was set to worsen the problem. A survey by the Institute of Directors published on Friday found over seven in 10 business leaders believed the upcoming Employment Rights Bill would have a negative impact on UK economic growth.
The Chancellor insisted growth around the world had been disappointing.
'None of our countries are growing at the rate that we used to or the rate that we want to. All of us are struggling with living standards not improving and our citizens are becoming restless,' she said.
Cabinet colleagues including deputy prime minister Ms Rayner are piling pressure on the Chancellor to release more money for government departments ahead of the Spending Review on Wednesday.
Ms Reeves also hinted that the Government was preparing a package of measures to help businesses deal with higher energy costs. She signalled her three year spending review would also unleash a wave of funding for infrastructure projects, from renewables to nuclear energy.
She said: 'I know that one of the questions that we need to answer is how we're going to make energy more affordable, particularly for some of our most intensive energy-using businesses where the price differential with other countries around the world is just too acute for many to be competitive.
'And so that's a question we will answer in the industrial strategy in a few weeks.'
The cost of power for factories in Britain is now about 50pc more expensive than in Germany and France, and four times as expensive as in the US.
The commons business select committee on Friday warned that high energy prices were holding back growth and urged ministers to address the issue as part of the upcoming industrial strategy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Copy Reform and you'll get eaten, Kinnock tells Starmer
Copy Reform and you'll get eaten, Kinnock tells Starmer

Telegraph

time19 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Copy Reform and you'll get eaten, Kinnock tells Starmer

Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader who now sits in the House of Lords, said the Prime Minister had been 'not well advised' on how to tackle the rise of Nigel Farage's party. He suggested that attempts to ape Reform's language were 'mortally stupid', and advised the party that 'achievement' in Government was the best way to counter the Reform threat. Lord Kinnock told Prospect Magazine: 'Appeasers get eaten. It's very important to remember that if people are offered two versions of a particular political brand, they will always choose the genuine one.' He added: 'If a progressive party is trying to use the vocabulary of isolationism or segregation or division, it's the same. It is silly to do that. It isn't evil, but it is very, very silly – maybe mortally stupid.' The former Labour leader's intervention is the latest development in growing tensions within the Labour Party about how to tackle the rising tide of Reform support. His remarks came after the Prime Minister announced measures to tackle immigration and a tightening of the system, warning that without such a move the UK risked becoming an 'island of strangers'. The speech followed Labour 's drubbing in the local elections last month, where Reform won hundreds of council seats and seized the parliamentary seat of Runcorn and Helsby. The comments were supported by some figures in Red Wall seats, which are under greater threat from the surge in Reform support, but denounced by many Left-wing Labour MPs. Lord Kinnock said: 'I think there are elements in and around the Labour party encouraging that as a way of responding to Reform, and they are fundamentally, 100 per cent, 22-carat wrong.' He added: 'I don't fear Reform, but I do think we ought to fight them rather harder and with more purpose.' The peer told the magazine: 'The playbook is familiar to anybody who studied the 1930s in Europe and or indeed in the United States of America. 'I'm not saying we are in any sense slipping towards some kind of fascist system… But those factors and the way in which they generate division and envy and isolationism – they're unhealthy features of any democracy.' On how to beat Reform, he said: 'Nothing replaces achievement in government, [concentrating on] what people regard to be the primary issues on the agenda, which is to say: health, decent jobs, affordable costs and wages that can meet those costs.' Lord Kinnock led the Labour Party before famously losing the 1992 election to Sir John Major despite the polls being in his favour, leading to another five years of Conservative rule. The pro-Europe politician said that decisions to use phrases such as 'island of strangers' and not to scrap the two-child benefit cap were based on post-Brexit preconceptions of the electorate. He said: 'Certainly there were elements among the advisory team who had an overreaction to the reason for, and the consequence of, the Brexit referendum vote. I think that overreaction has lasted through till now. 'I don't think that they are reactionary individuals. I don't think they're frightened individuals. I think they have overreacted to a misinterpretation of what happened in 2016.' The former leader went on to suggest that Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, should consider a wealth tax, citing as an example a two per cent levy on assets above £10 million. 'Property taxation in our country, asset taxation, is outdated,' he added, as he urged the party's senior figures to be bolder. 'There's a degree of steadiness from Keir which, on a good day, is very, very reassuring. However, that can translate into a paralytic caution. That means that this government, much as I love them – and they know I do – has got a kind of audacity deficit.' Lord Kinnock appeared at Sir Keir's victory speech on the morning of July 5, when the Prime Minister led the party to a landslide win.

£4million a DAY migrant hotel bill will continue to spiral unless Labour does three things
£4million a DAY migrant hotel bill will continue to spiral unless Labour does three things

The Sun

time25 minutes ago

  • The Sun

£4million a DAY migrant hotel bill will continue to spiral unless Labour does three things

Trip advisors THE woke brigade in the Home Office who spent years revolting against Tory efforts to curb illegal migration finally have an incentive to drop their opposition. Sensibly, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said she will spare deep cuts in the department — and potential job losses — IF it saves money on the spiralling hotel bill for migrants. 1 And the faster Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's army of leftie civil servants meet these new targets, the more cash she can keep for other projects. Skint Britain forks out £4million every day to house people who largely have no right to be here. The problem is that the number of new arrivals isn't slowing down. Unless Labour ends the golden ticket to the El Dorado paradise of benefits, free housing and illegal work, that hotel bill will continue to rise. Reform act He has Labour pedalling leftwards over welfare and the Tories rightwards on immigration. The Reform leader's ear is well-tuned to discontent with the Government. A desire for real change has delivered control of local councils to his fledgling party for the first time. His problem now is how to show Reform can actually govern — without falling into mini-meltdowns like the ones caused by the exits of chairman Zia Yusuf and MP Rupert Lowe. Reform's surge has been stunning. But being a one-showman band will only get Farage so far. Court out COULD the days of the European Court of Human Rights ruling over our borders finally be numbered? Even the head of the European Council, which oversees the unelected court, is starting to accept it will have to adapt to the public's concerns. Leaders across Europe are waking up to the problems caused by mass migration and want urgent legal reform. And Tory leader Kemi Badenoch is ready to quit the court — as is Reform. Roll with it Apparently, it all kicked off in Tokyo after tourists saw a waxwork of Greggs' pastry snack at Madame Tussauds. No word yet on whether it tasted better than a vegan sausage roll.

Family faces shock £1,400 demand for meter switch-off or face having no heating
Family faces shock £1,400 demand for meter switch-off or face having no heating

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Family faces shock £1,400 demand for meter switch-off or face having no heating

An energy firm tried to charge a Scots family £1,400 to change their meter before it is switched off this month, it has emerged. MSPs and consumer groups last night issued a warning to families that their energy supplier must pay the cost of replacing Radio Teleswitching Systems (RTS) meters. It follows revelations that a supplier tried to charge one Orkney household £1,400 to replace their meter, including £200 for a hotel booking, £382 for a ferry and £820 for a day's work. The supplier – which has not been named – only backtracked from forcing the family to pay when challenged by Liam McArthur, Liberal Democrat MSP for Orkney. It triggered a warning that customers should never pay for work which needs to take place before the RTS system is shut down at the end of this month. As of last month, 124,864 of the RTS meters still needed to be replaced in Scotland. Mr McArthur, said: 'I am deeply concerned to hear reports of some energy suppliers attempting to charge constituents to have their RTS meters replaced with smart meters. 'It is the obligation of suppliers to ensure customers have a working meter, and that there are no upfront costs for customers, including businesses, who pay for their meters through billing. 'Suppliers should also not be telling customers in places such as Orkney that they are required to cover costs related to accommodation or travel for engineers. This is simply not the case.' Mr McArthur said he contacted the supplier and it dropped the demand for payment. The RTS system – a feature of older electricity meters linked to heating and hot water usage – uses a longwave radio frequency to switch between peak and off-peak rates. But the technology is becoming obsolete and energy firms have a deadline to change customers' meters by June 30. It has led to concerns that some households could lose their heating and hot water if their meter is not replaced in time. Andrew Bartlett, chief executive of Advice Direct Scotland, which runs said: 'Suppliers should install smart meters at no cost. If that is not possible, they still have a duty to replace RTS meters with a suitable alternative, and customers should not be charged.' Advice Direct Scotland supported one customer who faced a £700 kitchen repair bill following a meter replacement, and another quoted £1,290 to move a fuse by an inch for a smart meter. Energy UK, which represents most suppliers but not the one responsible for imposing the £1,400 charge in Orkney, said: 'Customers should not expect to pay for an RTS meter replacement. We also urge customers to look out for scammers pretending to be suppliers.' A spokesman for Ofgem said: 'We will look into this and hold to account any supplier that breaches our rules.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store