Fed Officials Throw Cold Water On Hopes of a Summer Interest Rate Cut
The Federal Reserve is not likely to cut interest rates at its next two meetings in June and July, central officials said in interviews this week.
The Fed has kept interest rates at a higher-than-usual level this year as it waits to see how President Donald Trump's tariffs will affect the economy.
A weakening job market could push the Fed to lower rates, while surging inflation could force it to keep rates high. Tariffs could worsen both problems, posing a dilemma for the Fed.Expectations for when the Fed will cut interest rates keep getting kicked down the road.
Several bank policymakers indicated in speeches and interviews this week that the Federal Reserve is unlikely to lower its key fed funds rate at its two meetings this summer.
As of Tuesday afternoon, there was a 71% chance the Fed would keep its interest rates steady through its next two meetings, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool. The predictions of the Fed's next moves are calculated based on fed fund futures trading data.
That's a sharp reversal of expectations. As recently as a month ago, markets were pricing in more than a 90% chance of a rate cut by July.
In an interview on MSNBC on Monday, Raphael Bostic, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, said he favored waiting at least through the end of the summer before making any monetary policy moves."There's a lot of uncertainty. I think we'll have to wait three to six months to start to see where this settles out," Bostic said.Although Bostic is not a voting member of the Federal Open Market Committee that decides interest rates, non-voting members speak at the Fed's policy meetings and can influence the outcome by participating in discussions.John C. Williams, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, laid out a similar timeline Monday when speaking at a conference of the Mortgage Bankers Association, Bloomberg reported.'It's not going to be that in June we're going to understand what's happening here, or in July,' Williams said, according to Bloomberg. 'It's going to be a process of collecting data, getting a better picture, and watching things as they develop.'
Fed officials have indicated they're in the same boat as everyone else: uncertain of how President Donald Trump's tariff policies will change in the coming months, and how the economy will react to radically higher import taxes.
Amid the fog of uncertainty, Fed officials have said the best move is to wait and see what happens. That attitude, repeated by multiple officials in speeches and interviews this week, has quashed expectations the Fed would resume the series of rate cuts it started late last year, putting downward pressure on borrowing costs for credit cards, car loans, and other debt.Fed officials must decide whether to keep the Fed funds rate high to smother the last embers of the post-pandemic inflation flare-up or cut rates to bolster the economy and prevent a surge in unemployment. Economic forecasts anticipate the tariffs will worsen both problems, potentially leaving the Fed in a dilemma.In addition, the White House has cracked down on immigration, Congress is working on a significant overhaul of the tax code, and federal regulators have relaxed rules on businesses—all developments with unknown effects on the economy.
Alberto Musalem, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, became the latest official to repeat the "wait and see" mantra Tuesday when he spoke at the Economic Club of Minnesota.
"The range of possible economic outcomes for the next few quarters is wide," said Alberto Musalem, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis at the Economic Club of Minnesota Tuesday. "Major new trade, immigration, fiscal and regulatory policies could have a material impact on the economy in different ways and at different time horizons. As we get more clarity on these policies, the macroeconomic and monetary policy implications should become more evident."
Read the original article on Investopedia

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US Dollar Will Go Lower But Not in Disorderly Fashion, Nomura's Koo Says
Richard Koo, chief economist at Nomura Research Institute, shares his outlook for the US dollar, trade relations and bond yields. He speaks to Bloomberg's Haslinda Amin at the Nomura Investment Forum Asia in Singapore. (Source: Bloomberg)


Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
America's 'Smartest Minds' Will Be Beckoned to Australia: Jagadish
The Australian Academy of Science says the country has an unparalleled opportunity to attract talent leaving the United States amid Trump's foreign student visa crackdown. The academy's president, Chennupati Jagadish talks about the opportunities for Australia on "Bloomberg: The Asia Trade." (Source: Bloomberg)

Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Seven ways the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' could affect New Mexico
Jun. 2—A massive federal budget bill is winding its way through the Senate after passing the House in May. The controversial tax package would deliver on several of President Donald Trump's campaign promises and could mean big changes for New Mexicans. Democrats have criticized the bill for its cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and tax breaks for high-income earners, while some Republicans say the funding cuts don't go far enough to trim down the bloated federal budget and the ballooning deficit — the tax cuts alone would be paid for, in part, by increasing the country's deficit by $3.8 trillion over 10 years. On average, U.S. households would see an increase in resources from the government from 2026 to 2034, if the House budget bill makes it into law, according to a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis. But the bottom 10% of income earners would see a loss in household resources, primarily because of changes to Medicaid and SNAP. Meanwhile those in the top 10% would see an increase in household resources, because the taxes they owe would be reduced. Though House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) accused the CBO of shoddy math, saying the agency was more than $1 trillion off. Here's a look at how the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," could affect New Mexico. 1. Medicaid The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" would cut approximately $700 billion from Medicaid spending over the next 10 years and introduce new work requirements and co-pays. With a high poverty level, New Mexico has the highest rate of Medicaid enrollment. More than 90,000 New Mexico residents could lose health care coverage because of the changes. This provision faces opposition from several GOP senators; but conversely those in the House who pushed for more Medicaid cuts would turn against the bill if these cuts are watered down or eliminated. Medicaid represents the toughest of tight rope acts in this bill to get through both chambers to final passage. 2. Potential hospital closures The Medicaid funding cuts could also put more rural hospitals at risk of closing, Democrats have argued, because Medicaid and Medicare are important revenue sources for rural hospitals. Three of 27 inpatient rural hospitals in New Mexico are already at immediate risk of closing, according to a report from the Center for Healthcare Quality & Payment Reform. Overall, seven of the state's rural hospitals are at risk of closing. In part, that's because private insurance plans do not adequately compensate some rural hospitals for the services they provide, according to the report. Rural hospitals often already lose money on uninsured and Medicaid patients, but the hospitals not at risk of closure are often making enough profit on patient services from private health plans to balance those losses. 3. Food aid More than 460,000 New Mexicans receive SNAP benefits. The House bill would cut $267 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, spending over the next 10 years, in part by introducing a cost share with states. It would also introduce new work requirements to the program. The proposed changes could cost New Mexico $300 million. 4. Extending tax cuts The budget bill would extend 2017 tax cuts passed during Trump's first administration. That would prevent tax increases for 62% of taxpayers, which would happen if the tax cuts expire, according to the Tax Foundation. This would extend, or make permanent, tax cuts for most New Mexicans. Republicans have highlighted the benefits to working families, like making the child tax credit permanent. But Democrats have criticized some measures that would benefit the very wealthy, like permanently increasing the estate and gift tax exemption threshold to $15 million. 5. No tax on tips The House-passed budget bill includes no taxes on tips and overtime through 2028, fulfilling one of Trump's campaign promises. The idea of no tax on tips was appealing enough to voters that even former Vice-President Kamala Harris added it to her campaign platform. The Economic Policy Institute has criticized the idea, arguing that it helps relatively few workers, undermines pay increases for non-tipped workers and could expand the use of tipped workers, a system "rife with discrimination and worker abuse." New Mexico's restaurant industry, where tipped employees are often most visible, employs over 90,000 people in the state and generates more than $5.3 billion in annual sales, according to the New Mexico Restaurant Association. 6. Student loans and Pell Grants The budget bill would eliminate some repayment options for future federal student loan borrowers, and introduce a new, income-based repayment plan. Borrowers with loans disbursed before July 2026 could keep their current repayment plan. It would eliminate new borrowers' ability to pause loan payments during economic hardship. The bill also increases Pell Grant credit requirements and changes eligibility requirements. In the 2023-2024 academic year, there were 37,708 federal Pell Grant awards in New Mexico, according to the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities. 7. Preventing AI regulation The House bill includes a decade-long ban on state regulations of artificial intelligence. Adopting a light regulatory style for the AI industry will allow the AI supply chain to rapidly grow in the U.S., Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said during a Senate Commerce Committee hearing. "The country that leads in AI will shape the 21st century global order," Cruz said. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez signed onto a letter opposing the measure, along with attorneys general from 39 states and territories. A bill to penalize using AI-generated content for harassment or defamation was introduced in the state Legislature earlier this year. "Though it didn't pass, strong state-level protections are still urgently needed, and states must have the flexibility to regulate this emerging technology if Congress refuses to act," Torrez said in a statement. This provision faces an uphill battle in the Senate where even No. 2 Senate Republican John Cornyn, R-Texas, has said it could fail a Byrd Rule challenge, which says that every line in the budget must be related to the budget and not policy.