After complaining about too much focus on her courtroom catwalk... Antoinette Lattouf does a 360 and BRAGS about the designers who dressed her while asking her followers 'what is your favourite look?'

Daily Mail​

20 hours ago

Antoinette Lattouf has boasted about her recent courtroom looks in a social media post - despite previously complaining about the focus on her outfits in her case against the ABC.
Last week, the radio host, 41, was awarded $70,000 in damages after winning her unlawful termination case against the public broadcaster in the Federal Court.
After her win, she posted a gallery of images to Instagram in which she is seen parading all the stylish outfits she wore to court.
She also tagged the expensive designers who dressed her - even though she previously called out the media for their focus on her fashion.
'Court couture. Massive shoutout to the legends who styled, stitched, and slayed these looks into existence (all tagged),' Lattouf wrote.
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
'You didn't just dress me — you armoured me.
'Oh and to the tabloids losing it over the fact I cried, cared, wore couture and claimed: it's called being multidimensional — look it up babes.'
She then asked her followers: 'P.S. What was your fave look?'
For one of her looks, Lattouf wore a $1,399 black coat by Australian designer Rebecca Vallance and carried a $11,950 Chanel handbag.
She also put on a stylish display in a $990 blue suit jacket and $690 pants set by Farage.
During another court appearance , she opted for a $800 checked double-breasted blazer and $490 matching pants by Farage.
Lattouf also wore an all-white power suit consisting of a $899 blazer by Rebecca Vallance and matching $499 trousers and carried a $2,425 Jimmy Choo cocktail handbag.
On another day, she looked glamorous in a black designer dress by the Aussie designer, which retails for $799.
Lattouf was also dressed by Lillian Khallouf, opting for a $1200 white hourglass-shaped short dress.
Despite bragging about the outfits she wore during the trial, Lattouf previously slammed media for focusing on her appearance in February.
'I knew my appearance would be dissected, analysed, and judged—because that's what happens when you're a woman in the public eye.
'Women who had been down this road before tried to prepare me for what to expect,' she said.
'For the record, the outfits and accessories I wore were either loaned, borrowed or generously donated by folks in fashion (it also helps to have four sisters!)
'I was explicit that any GoFundMe money raised is solely for legal fees. The amount raised so far accounts for about a quarter of the cost of this litigation. Not a cent of it has been spent on anything else. The fact otherwise is being implied by some media outlets is pathetic and plain wrong.
'Anyway, while you're here, take a moment to appreciate this wild idea: you can seek justice and dress however you want while doing it. Crazy, huh?'
Daily Mail Australia has contacted Antoinette Lattouf for comment.
The casual radio host and Palestine advocate was hired for a week-long stint on ABC Radio Sydney 's Mornings program in December 2023.
She was let go after just three shifts for sharing a Human Rights Watch post that said Israel was using starvation as a 'weapon of war' in Gaza.
The ABC claimed it took Lattouf off the air because she failed to follow a direction not to post about Israel or the war in Gaza during her five-day shift.
But Justice Darryl Rangiah disagreed, finding pro-Israel lobbyists formed an 'orchestrated campaign' to pressure then-ABC chair Ita Buttrose to take Lattouf off air.
He found the ABC contravened the Fair Work Act by terminating Lattouf's employment 'for reasons including that she held a political opinion opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza'.
Justice Rangiah ordered the ABC to pay Lattouf compensation of $70,000, with the public broadcaster also potentially on the hook for 'pecuniary penalties' for breaking the law.