logo
Trump Ejects National Security Adviser Mike Waltz - What's News

Trump Ejects National Security Adviser Mike Waltz - What's News

P.M. Edition for May 1. Secretary of State Marco Rubio will fill the role on an interim basis. President Trump announced that he will nominate Waltz—the first top official to lose his job in Trump's second term—as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. White House reporter Meridith McGraw discusses the significance of the staffing shuffle . And aviation reporter Andrew Tangel has the details on Trump's decision to commission an interim presidential plane by year's end, frustrated with Boeing's delay to deliver a new Air Force One. Plus, a U.S. federal judge deems the president's use of the Alien Enemies Act to allow deportations unlawful. Pierre Bienaimé hosts.
Full Transcript
This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated.
Pierre Bienaimé: National Security Adviser Mike Waltz is out, making him the first top official to lose his job in Trump's second term.
Meridith McGraw: Waltz had been seen as on the outs in the West Wing. At the same time, the president's sensitive to the idea that he's given the scalp to the press over the Signal episode.
Pierre Bienaimé: Plus President Trump decides to refurbish a Qatari airplane, frustrated by Boeing's delays in delivering a new Air Force One. And a federal judge rules that the president's use of the Alien Enemies Act to allow deportations is unlawful. It's Thursday, May 1st. I'm Pierre Bienaimé for The Wall Street Journal, filling in for Alex Ossola. This is the PM Edition of What's News, the top headlines and business stories that moved the world today. President Trump is replacing National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, making him the first top official to lose his job in Trump's second term. Trump announced on social media that Waltz would be nominated as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. He added that Secretary of State Marco Rubio will step in as interim National Security Adviser. The decision follows a report that Waltz added a journalist to a sensitive group chat on the non-government messaging app Signal roughly a month ago in which advisors discussed a bombing operation on Houthi rebels in Yemen. Meridith McGraw covers the White House and she joins me from there. Meridith, is this a promotion or what for Waltz?
Meridith McGraw: No, I wouldn't see it as a promotion, but it's certainly a serious game of musical chairs over here at the White House. Just after we were hearing rumblings, the National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, was going to be ousted. President Trump announced on Truth Social that he was actually just seeing moved into an empty seat and that would be the UN Ambassador that was going to be held by Elise Stefanik until she was asked to come back to her role as a member of Congress because of the tight margins there in the House.
Pierre Bienaimé: And with Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State as Interim National Security Adviser, what changes is he expected to bring, if any?
Meridith McGraw: Well, this is another hat that Secretary of State Marco Rubio is going to have to wear. There was a tweet, I can't take credit for it, but just added up all of the different roles that he's now been appointed to. And in addition to Secretary of State and now National Security Adviser, he's the acting USAID admin. He's also the acting archivist. So Trump is really placing a lot of responsibility in Marco Rubio and that signals to us not only how much Trump puts his respect and trust in Rubio in his administration and carrying out his foreign policy, but also how he's going to at least approach the NSA role for now.
Pierre Bienaimé: And what message is the White House sending with this reshuffle in staff?
Meridith McGraw: Waltz has been seen as on the outs in the West Wing and hadn't been as actively involved with some of the major foreign policy negotiations that are going on right now. You've seen Steve Witkoff has been traveling the world doing a lot of these big negotiations and deals. At the same time, the president's sensitive to the idea that he's given the scalp to the press over the Signal episode.
Pierre Bienaimé: That was Wall Street Journal reporter Meridith McGraw. Meridith, thank you.
Meridith McGraw: Thanks.
Pierre Bienaimé: A federal judge in Texas has ruled President Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act to detain and deport alleged members of a foreign gang unlawful. The judge who was nominated to the bench by Trump during his first term ruled the government can't detain the plaintiffs solely on the basis of the 18th century law. The order didn't bar officials from detaining or deporting people under other relevant immigration laws. The judge noted, it's the first direct ruling against Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act. The White House didn't immediately return a request for comment. Ahead of tomorrow's jobs report, a small cautionary sign, weekly filings for new unemployment benefits hit the highest level since February. In the last full week of April 241,000 Americans sought jobless benefits, well more than analysts were expecting. Still, the rise wasn't such a big jump that economists will be sounding the alarm just yet. Over the past year, there have been bigger increases that quickly reversed. Yesterday's better-than-expected earnings from Microsoft and Meta Platforms boosted markets, reassuring investors of the relative resilience of the Magnificent Seven tech giants in the face of tariff uncertainty. U.S. stocks rallied led by the Nasdaq Composite, which gained roughly 1.5%. The Dow moved up 0.2% and the S&P 500 gained just over 0.6%. Speaking of the Magnificent Seven, Amazon reported strong quarterly earnings that weren't affected by new tariffs on Chinese imports. The tech giant topped Wall Street projections. Amazon said its revenue grew by 9% in its first quarter to more than $155 billion, while its profit was over $17 billion. And Apple reported the highest March quarter revenue it's seen in more than two years. As people moved quickly to buy smartphones and other devices before new U.S. tariffs were announced in April. The company said sales rose 5% to $95 billion, ahead of analyst expectations. Coming up, President Trump is done waiting for Boeing to deliver a new Air Force One. He commissioned a smaller defense contractor to ready an interim presidential plane by the end of the year. That's after the break. President Trump wants a new Air Force One and in the short term he's moving to refurbish a Qatari luxury aircraft in order to get it. Trump wants to have the plane available for use as early as this fall. The U.S. government has commissioned L3Harris to retrofit the Boeing 747 with specialized systems, though it might not prove as capable as the current vehicles. This as Boeing continues work on a pair of Air Force One replacement jets that may not be delivered until around 2035. The project is also billions of dollars over budget after a series of supplier, engineering and manufacturing setbacks. So what does this project mean for Boeing? Andrew Tangel covers aviation for The Wall Street Journal and he joins me now. Andrew, how is Boeing looking at this development?
Andrew Tangel: This is symbolic in a ways of Boeing's problems with Air Force One replacement project and its other manufacturing and engineering problems in recent years. Boeing didn't comment for the article. But producing the Air Force One presidential jets has been a privilege and honor and point of pride for Boeing. And Trump has been so frustrated with the company's inability to get the planes that he did the deal for in his last term in office, that he has tasked a different company with finishing essentially an interim Air Force One jet to bridge the gap between the current aging Air Force One jets and the newer ones that Boeing is still plugging away on and will be done at some point in the years down the road, maybe after Trump leaves office.
Pierre Bienaimé: Could Boeing see its Air Force One contracts canceled and how big of a blow would that be for the company?
Andrew Tangel: That was under consideration, at least during the previous administration. It's unclear what the status of the Boeing contract is at this moment. Boeing, prior to Trump taking office the second time, informed the government that there were new delays that suggested the planes would not be delivered until 10 years away. Trump didn't like that news and has dispatched Elon Musk to speed up Boeing's project. And part of that work is involving reducing the requirements by the government to make it easier for Boeing to finish the planes. So how well Boeing can perform under what becomes of the new timeframe that the government and Boeing settle on, it remains to be seen. But if Boeing were to lose the contract, it would be a blow to Boeing's reputation.
Pierre Bienaimé: That was Wall Street Journal aviation reporter Andrew Tangel. Andrew, thank you.
Andrew Tangel: Thank you.
Pierre Bienaimé: Chief executives are leaving their posts at a record pace this year, according to Challenger Gray & Christmas, which tracks executive departures. Among U.S. businesses with at least 25 employees, over 2,200 CEOs bid farewell last year and more than 370 public company chiefs exited, roughly a quarter more than did in 2023. WSJ columnist Callum Borchers told our Your Money Briefing podcast that some of the middle managers who would've once been ushered up the career ladder to take the place of exiting CEOs are instead stalling out or calling it quits themselves.
Callum Borchers: It's one thing for the CEO who's already done it to go retreat to the beach, right? But it's another thing for the potential successors to go and do it early, but some are. I met a financial manager in his 40s named Ryan Beyer, for example. He's moved his family to Puerto Rico. He was a principal at a wealth management firm in the D.C. area. He's the type of rising star who could be in the leadership pipeline, but he took a buyout, left early. He's not retired. He's advising high net worth family offices. And he says, "Look, I earn less than I used to, but I'm fine with that because I'm available for my kids' school pickups and drop-offs. I never miss a baseball game." And we're seeing more of these Millennial and younger Gen Xers dialing back their professional ambitions a little bit in the name of work-life balance.
Pierre Bienaimé: You can listen to the full story on tomorrow's episode of Your Money Briefing. And Kohl's has fired its CEO Ashley Buchanan, after a board investigation discovered he had instructed the company to enter into a highly unusual business deal involving a woman with whom he has had a romantic relationship. That's according to people familiar with the situation. According to a regulatory filing, Buchanan caused the retailer to enter into a multimillion dollar consulting agreement with a woman who was part of the consulting team. Buchanan declined to comment. And that's What's News for this Thursday afternoon. Today's show was produced by Anthony Bansie with supervising producer Michael Kosmides. I'm Pierre Bienaimé for The Wall Street Journal. We'll be back with a new show tomorrow morning. Thanks for listening.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers
Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers

UPI

time18 minutes ago

  • UPI

Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers

President Donald Trump congratulates a cadet at the United States Military Academy graduation ceremony in Michie Stadium at West Point, New York, on May 24, and will review the Army's 250th birthday parade on June 14. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo June 7 (UPI) -- The U.S. Army celebrates its 250th birthday on June 14th in the nation's capital, which coincides with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, and will be marked by a parade that may include tanks, rocket launchers and more than 100 military vehicles. With the two birthdays occurring on the same day, the previously scheduled parade that was intended as a relatively small event at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., has grown in size and cost. Up to 300 soldiers and civilians, the U.S. Army Band and four cannons were initially slated to honor the Army's 250th birthday, with seating available for 120 attendees, The Washington Post reported. U.S. Army leaders last year sought a permit for the event, but Trump's election victory has changed its scope, while doubling as an unofficial celebration of the president's birthday. Axios reported the parade will live up to Trump's request for a showcase the U.S. miliatary's might, with dozens of tanks, rocket launchers, missiles and more than 100 other military aircraft and vehicles participating. About 6,600 Army troops will participate, and the Army is paying to house them in area hotels. The parade route has been moved to the northwest portion of Constitution Avenue and will include a flyover of F-22 fighter jets, World War II planes and Vietnam-era aircraft. The event is scheduled to start at 6:30 p.m. EDT at 23rd Street and continue along Constitution Avenue N.W. to 15th Street. Trump will review the parade on the Ellipse. The event has an estimated cost of nearly $45 million, including more than $10 million for road repairs after the heavy military equipment passes over. The parade's estimated cost has Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., skeptical about its benefits. "I would have recommended against the parade," Wicker told an interviewer on Thursday, but the Department of Defense wants to use it as a recruiting tool. "On the other hand, [Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth] feels that it will be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for thousands of young Americans to see what a great opportunity it is to participate in a great military force," Wicker said. "So, we'll see."

Russia pummels Kharkiv with drones and bombs, Ukraine says
Russia pummels Kharkiv with drones and bombs, Ukraine says

Boston Globe

time19 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Russia pummels Kharkiv with drones and bombs, Ukraine says

On Saturday afternoon, Russia dropped two more glide bombs on the city, killing at least one more resident and injuring at least 16 others, Terekhov said. Advertisement Photographs released by Ukraine's emergency services showed the upper floors of a residential block ablaze after the overnight strike, with white smoke pouring into the early morning sky. In other images, rescuers sifted through the charred wreckage of a gutted apartment. Parts of the photos were blurred, likely to hide the remains of two people killed in that strike, according to the rescuers. A third person died elsewhere in Kharkiv, and about 20 others were injured in the assault. Advertisement The local prosecutor's office said Saturday afternoon that six people were most likely still trapped under the rubble of an industrial facility in Kharkiv that was struck during the overnight attack. The attacks Saturday came as Russian forces about 100 miles north of Kharkiv pushed deeper into Ukraine's northeastern Sumy region, seizing two more villages and advancing their effort to carve out a buffer zone along the Russia-Ukraine border. Even in Kharkiv, a city of 1.3 million that over the years has learned to live with near-daily Russian bombardments, Saturday's attacks were a clear sign of Russia's strategy to intensify air assaults in a bid to overwhelm and break through Ukraine's air defenses. They came just a day after Russia launched one of its biggest air assaults of the war across Ukraine, involving more than 400 drones and more than 40 missiles, in what Russia described as retaliation for Ukraine's audacious attacks on its strategic bomber bases last weekend. President Donald Trump this past week compared the dual air assaults between Russia and Ukraine to 'two young children fighting like crazy.' 'They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart,' Trump said Thursday in an Oval Office news conference. 'They don't want to be pulled. Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.' In an interview with ABC News released Friday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy responded to the comment. 'We are not kids with Putin at the playground in the park,' he said, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'He is a murderer who came to this park to kill the kids.' In April, a Russian missile struck a playground in Zelenskyy's hometown, Kryvyi Rih, killing 19 civilians, including nine children. It was the deadliest strike against children since the beginning of the war, according to the United Nations. Advertisement Russia's intensified attacks have come alongside a new offensive in the east and in the northeastern Sumy region. The push into Sumy follows Russian forces driving Ukrainian troops back from parts of Russia's Kursk region, just across the border from Sumy. To prevent future incursions into Kursk, Putin announced last month that Russian forces would launch an offensive in Sumy to create a buffer zone along the border. In the past three weeks, Russian troops have seized about 10 villages in the area, gaining control of roughly 75 square miles of territory. 'It's clear this is already an offensive on Sumy region -- a full-scale offensive,' said Andrii, a 44-year-old company intelligence commander fighting there who declined to be identified with his full name for security reasons and due to military protocol. He said he saw the offensive not only as an effort to establish the buffer zone that Putin called for, but also as a strategy to pin down Ukrainian forces and prevent their redeployment to other front-line hot spots in the east. Andrii said Russian troops were currently pushing toward the village of Khotin, 6 miles from the border. If they seize it, he warned, the situation could turn critical. Khotin sits on high ground and lies less than 12 miles from the city of Sumy, the regional administrative center, close enough for Russian forces to strike it with drones and artillery. Sumy is home to about 250,000 people. More than 200 villages and settlements have been evacuated from the Sumy region over the past year because of the fighting. Advertisement This article originally appeared in

Negotiate or fight? Trump has colleges right where he wants them.
Negotiate or fight? Trump has colleges right where he wants them.

Politico

time22 minutes ago

  • Politico

Negotiate or fight? Trump has colleges right where he wants them.

President Donald Trump's campaign against two of the planet's best-known universities is laying bare just how unprepared academia was to confront a hostile White House. Schools never imagined facing an administration so willing to exercise government power so quickly — targeting the research funding, tax-exempt status, foreign student enrollment and financial aid eligibility schools need to function. That's left them right where the president wants them. Even as Ivy League schools, research institutions, and college trade associations try to resist Trump's attacks in court, campus leaders are starting to accept they face only difficult choices: negotiate with the government, mount a painful legal and political fight — or simply try to stay out of sight. Groundbreaking scientific research, financial aid for lower-income students and soft power as an economic engine once shielded schools' access to federal funds. Trump has now transformed those financial lifelines into leverage. And the diversity and independence of U.S. colleges and universities — something they've seen as a source of strength and competition — is straining efforts to form a singular response to the president. 'Perhaps it's a failure of imagination on the part of universities,' said Lee Bollinger, the former president of Columbia University. 'It feels now like there has been a naïveté on the part of universities. There's been no planning for this kind of thing.' Schools are accustomed to tension with their faculty, governing boards, legislatures and governors. But punishments for resisting the Trump administration plumbed untested levels of severity this week when the president issued an executive order to bar foreign students from entering the country to study at Harvard University as his administration threatened Columbia's academic accreditation. Even though Project 2025 — The Heritage Foundation's roadmap for a second Trump administration — previewed some of the tactics the administration would use, many school leaders may have underestimated the president's determination. 'It just seemed inconceivable that we would be in this position of having massive amounts of federal funding withheld, threats to have legislation that attacks your tax status, and now these new issues with international students,' Bollinger said. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday night that blocked Trump's directive to restrict Harvard's access to international students. But the administration is brandishing its response to Harvard's resistance as a warning to other schools who might resist, as federal officials pressure schools to negotiate the terms of a truce over the administration's complaints about campus antisemitism, foreign government influence and its opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. 'We've held back funding from Columbia, we've also done the same thing with Harvard,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon told House lawmakers this past week. 'We are asking, as Columbia has done, to come to the table for negotiations,' she said, just hours before telling the school's accreditor it was violating federal anti-discrimination laws. 'We've also asked Harvard. Their answer was a lawsuit.' A Harvard spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. 'What we've seen so far when it comes to Harvard is the playbook for holding these radical schools accountable is way deeper than anyone anticipated or expected,' a senior White House official told POLITICO. 'You're starting to get to the bone, so to speak, of holding these people accountable,' said the official, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss White House strategy. 'Harvard knows they cannot endure this for long, they just can't. They're going to have to come to the table, and we'll always be there to meet them. But this was a test case of what to do.' The university described Trump's latest foreign student order this week as 'yet another illegal retaliatory step.' A federal judge in May blocked a separate administration attempt to prevent Harvard from enrolling international students. Harvard is still locked in a legal fight over more than $2 billion in federal grants the White House blocked after the school refused to comply with demands to overhaul its admissions and disciplinary policies. Trump announced plans to cancel Harvard's tax-exempt status in early May, then later floated redistributing billions of dollars in university grants to trade schools. 'It is not our desire to bring these schools to their knees. The president reveres our higher educational facilities. He's a product of one,' the White House official said. 'But in order to hold these people accountable, we will be unrelenting in our enforcement of the law and hitting them where it hurts, which is their pocketbook.' Many institutions have chosen a more muted response following months of conflict, including major public institutions in states that have also grown reliant on the full-freight tuition paid by international students. 'Universities don't have as many degrees of freedom, at least in the public sector, as you might think they do,' said Teresa Sullivan, the former president of the University of Virginia. 'One reason they seem to be relatively slow to act is there's a certain disbelief — can this really be happening?' 'We seem to be in uncharted territory, at least in my experience,' Sullivan said. 'All of a sudden, the rules don't seem to apply. I think that's disconcerting. It shakes the ground beneath you, and you don't necessarily know what to do next.' Still, some higher education leaders are trying to confront the government. More than 650 campus officials have so far signed onto a joint statement that opposes 'the unprecedented government overreach and political interference now endangering American higher education.' Sullivan and a group of other former presidents used an op-ed in The Washington Post to argue the Trump administration's offensive 'won't be confined to Harvard University.' Trade associations including the American Council on Education, Association of American Universities, and Association of Public and Land-grant Universities have joined schools in a lawsuit to block some of Trump's research funding cuts. The Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a collective of school leaders, has also sued to challenge the Trump administration's attempts to target the legal status of thousands of foreign students. 'Your first obligation as president is you don't want to hurt the institution you represent,' Sullivan said of the relative silence coming from non-Ivy League institutions. 'These days it's hard to tell what hurts and what doesn't. I think that's the motive. The motive is not cowardice.' Schools still face a choice between negotiating with the government — and risk compromising on their principles — or inviting Trump's rage by putting up a fight. 'Every school has had an option to correct course and work with the administration, or stand firm in their violations of the law,' the administration official said. 'They have an option, they know very well what to do.' The real question, according to Bollinger, the former Columbia president, is how far the White House will go and how much resistance the schools are willing to put up. 'The power of government is so immense that if they want to destroy institutions, they can,' he said. 'What you do in that kind of environment is you stand on principle.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store