logo
Major U.S. partnership aims to use fuel-break network to protect California forests from fires

Major U.S. partnership aims to use fuel-break network to protect California forests from fires

CBS News08-03-2025

SACRAMENTO — If you've ever flown over California's forests, you may have noticed long, cleared strips of land cutting through the trees. These are fuel breaks, which are strategically cleared areas to help slow the spread of wildfires.
Now, a new partnership between private and federal landowners aims to connect these fuel breaks into one unified defense system.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Forest Service are joining forces with Sierra Pacific Industries, a major lumber company, in a $75 million partnership to build and maintain fuel breaks throughout California and Oregon.
Right now, fuel breaks are scattered and disconnected. This agreement will connect them across private land owned by Sierra Pacific and public land creating a unified front to help protect communities and forests historically known to be at high risk for wildfires.
"When suppression efforts are launched, we have a better chance to combat these wildfires which we all know are a tremendous problem in California," said Matt Dias of the California Forestry Association.
It will take 23 projects over the next three years to add about 400 miles of new fuel breaks to the existing 2,200-mile network.
"When you have firefighting in addition to a fuel break, they stop fires 68% of the time," said Mark Emmerson, CEO of Sierra Pacific.
Emmerson knows the benefits of these fuel breaks first-hand, noting the communities of Butte Meadows and Forest Ranch were protected in last year's Park Fire due to the Highway 32 fuel break.
"These fuel breaks save properties, infrastructure, resources and lives," he said.
This partnership is driven and united by one goal: to build a stronger defense against wildfires.
"That's the vision, is having the industry the forest private sector as a whole stand up and stand tall to help the forest service get this done for the protection of resources in California.," Dias said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California to launch $105 million mortgage fund to aid disaster victims
California to launch $105 million mortgage fund to aid disaster victims

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

California to launch $105 million mortgage fund to aid disaster victims

California will launch a $105 million disaster relief program on Thursday to assist homeowners whose properties were damaged or rendered uninhabitable by recent wildfires and other declared disasters. The CalAssist Mortgage Fund, administered by the California Housing Finance Agency, will provide grants of up to $20,000 — equal to approximately three months of mortgage payments — to eligible homeowners struggling to recover from major disasters. 'Homeowners whose home was destroyed in a recent fire, flood, or other disaster deserve support in their recovery. We know that recovery takes time, and the state is here to support,' Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement. The fund will support those affected by disasters declared a state of emergency by the governor or receiving a federal major disaster declaration between January 2023 and January 2025. Incidents include the Eaton Fire, Palisades Fire, Park Fire and Tropical Storm Hilary. A full list of qualified incidents can be found here. CalHFA will also offer $25 million in housing counseling support through its National Mortgage Settlement Housing Counseling Program. None of the new relief funding affects the state's proposed budget for 2025-2026, according to the governor's office. Applications for the grant will open June 12 at The grants do not need to be repaid and are free to apply for. Approved funds will be sent directly to mortgage servicers on behalf of the homeowner. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers
Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers

It should be clear by now that, despite the assurances from President Donald Trump and his allies in government, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act—which passed the U.S. House of Representatives last month—not only won't reduce the federal budget deficit but will in fact increase the nation's debt load by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Given that Trump came into office promising to cut federal spending, it's worth looking at how Trump's bill does the opposite of what he and other Republicans say it does. And one of the more egregious things it does is boost corporate welfare for wealthy farmers. "The government provides agricultural subsidies—monetary payments and other types of support—to farmers or agribusinesses," says the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). "While some subsidies are given to promote specific farming practices, others focus on research and development, conservation practices, disaster aid, marketing, nutrition assistance, risk mitigation, and more." "In reality, this support is highly skewed toward the five major 'program' commodities of corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, and rice," according to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), an environmental advocacy organization. "Despite the rhetoric of 'preserving the family farm,' the vast majority of farmers do not benefit from federal farm subsidy programs and most of the subsidies go to the largest and most financially secure farm operations." The new bill will only make the problem worse: According to an analysis by the American Farm Bureau Federation, the bill "would increase agriculture-facing programs spending by $56.6 billion over the next decade," of which "$52.3 billion is tied to enhancements in the farm safety net." That "farm safety net" comprises most agricultural subsidy spending in any given year. It includes price and revenue guarantees for certain crops, ensuring farmers earn a set minimum on staples like corn and soybeans, as well as crop insurance assistance, covering up to 60 percent of farmers' insurance premiums in the event of price declines or poor harvests. The programs are a bad deal for taxpayers—indeed, for anybody but the very wealthiest agribusinesses. "Just in the last 10 years, crop insurance agents and the 14 companies the USDA allows to sell and service crop insurance policies…received almost $33.3 billion from the federal Crop Insurance Program," EWG Midwest director Anne Schechinger wrote in 2023. "In some years, up to one-third of crop insurance payments are made to companies and agents, not farmers." The new bill would make the program even more generous, tying payouts to inflation and putting taxpayers on the hook for even more insurance company operating costs. The bill would also increase the price minimums for many staple crops, though the increases for those grown in southern U.S. states go up exponentially: While corn would go up by 18 percent, and wheat and soybeans by more than 70 percent each, minimum prices for seed cotton, peanuts, and rice—grown primarily in the southern states—would each more than double, with the minimum price of rice going up 185 percent. Price minimums inherently distort the market, causing farmers to prioritize favored crops even if others would be better suited to the growing conditions—after all, if you're guaranteed a minimum price for what you sell, and you're covered for what doesn't grow, what do you have to lose? At the same time, "subsidies increase land prices, which benefits wealthy landowners at the expense of the many farmers who rent," writes Nan Swift of the R Street Institute. "Young farmers can't afford to rent or buy land at inflated prices. Likewise, young farmers often have smaller farms that don't benefit from the primary federal subsidy programs." Not only does the "Big Beautiful Bill" keep these programs intact, it expands them; it even introduces an "insurance pilot program" for "poultry growers." "The farm subsidy increases in the reconciliation bill are brazen. The GOP lavished the biggest subsidy increases on GOP parts of the country," writes Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute. "More importantly, in a supposed spending reform bill, the GOP doesn't just spare millionaire farmers from cuts, they aggressively expand inefficient farm giveaways by $57 billion." The post Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers appeared first on

Are egg prices falling in Texas? Here's how much a dozen costs in June 2025
Are egg prices falling in Texas? Here's how much a dozen costs in June 2025

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Are egg prices falling in Texas? Here's how much a dozen costs in June 2025

Your wallet might get a little break at the grocery store. According to the average price of a dozen eggs is $4.26. The average has been the lowest it has been since its March peak of $6.23, according to a report published on June 3 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service. According to the USDA, retail prices tend to follow wholesale prices with a delay due to several factors. 'Retail egg prices are influenced by wholesale egg prices, but additional factors such as pricing strategies and contracts can mute the impact of short-term fluctuations,' the USDA report said. 'As a result, retail price movements tend to lag directional changes made by wholesale prices. When wholesale prices spike, retailers occasionally and temporarily have sold eggs at a loss. As wholesale prices retreat, retail prices are slower to decline and often remain elevated for a longer period." Here's what to know about egg prices in Texas. Last time we reported on egg prices in Texas, the average price for a dozen was $5.43. Today, those prices remain largely unchanged, according to the World Population Review. The decline in national egg prices comes as the USDA reported fewer cases of bird flu last month. Bird flu cases declined significantly to 2.1 million cases in March, according to the USDA, compared to 12.64 million in February and 23.19 million in January. Yes, bird flu is still spreading, particularly the H5N1 strain. While the risk to the general public remains low, experts emphasize the need for continued surveillance and precautions. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there are 70 total national cases. However, in Texas, no reports have been made of poultry farms or other animals being affected. -USA Today Network reporter Betty Lin-Fisher contributed to this report. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Egg prices are down in the US. How much does a dozen cost in Texas?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store