School debate contest with democrats as judges scrapped after shopping mall and university cancel bookings
The grand final and prize presentation ceremony, originally scheduled for last Saturday will be 'cancelled until further notice,' the organiser Zi3Sin6 Debate said in an Instagram post, adding that it 'deeply regrets' the move due to 'unavoidable changes.'
The competition was originally set to be held at the Citywalk shopping centre in Tsuen Wan, owned by developer Sino Group. The debate group was notified on Wednesday that the booking had been pulled due to 'urgent repairs,' according to its statement.
The group then booked to hold the competition at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, but the university withdrew the venue on Thursday 'after inquiring into more details about the competition,' the statement said.
The judges were to be former chairperson of the Democratic Party Emily Lau, and founding members of the now-defunct Civic Party Audrey Eu and Alan Leong. The Democratic Party, the city's largest opposition group with a three-decade history, is taking steps to disband.
HKFP has reached out to Sino Group and CUHK for confirmation.
'Unavoidable changes'
The debate group continued in its Chinese statement: 'We understand that the teams are in the process of preparing for the competition and we deeply regret the cancellation of the final as a result of these unavoidable changes.'
'We would like to extend our deepest apologies to all affected teams and those who are looking forward to participating in the final and would like to express our sincere gratitude to the judges, the teams and all the related parties for their understanding and support.'
Ming Pao reported that part of the Citywalk atrium where the competition was supposed to be held had been fenced off on Saturday, with a sign saying that the venue was temporarily closed 'due to emergency works.' Staff at the shopping mall said the ceiling needed replastering.
CUHK earlier in June also pulled its venue for an seminar held by Greenpeace, citing 'urgent maintenance' in one of its lecture halls. The environmental NGO's discussion on the city's eco-tourism policies was held online instead.
Speakers at the event included academics, industry representatives, and community representatives, such as Lam Chiu-ying, former chief of the Hong Kong Observatory and now chair of the Hong Kong Countryside Foundation; Ada Kong, programme director of Greenpeace East Asia; and Chan Kim-ching, researcher at Liber Research Community.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
8 hours ago
- HKFP
Jimmy Lai's nat. security trial: Judges question whether articles in pro-democracy Apple Daily ‘seditious'
Handpicked judges presiding over jailed media tycoon Jimmy Lai's national security trial have questioned whether content in his pro-democracy paper amounted to 'seditious publications,' as stipulated by the prosecution. The court continued hearing closing arguments on Tuesday after proceedings were twice delayed last week, first owing to bad weather and then to health concerns relating to the 77-year-old tycoon's heart. Delivering arguments for the seditious publications charge, lead prosecutor Anthony Chau referenced articles published in Lai's Apple Daily including an editorial calling for sanctions against Beijing and Hong Kong authorities. He said that those articles did not include 'rational criticism,' and that none of them provided recommendations or ventured 'to suggest any solutions.' But High Court judge Esther Toh, one of the three judges chosen to preside over the security trial, cast doubt on the prosecution's argument that critical articles must propose solutions to be considered not seditious. 'Did they actually have to venture that? You can write a critical article about the water problem, but do you have to venture to offer solutions?' Toh asked, appearing to reference a recent contract fraud case involving the drinking water supply at government offices. Judge Alex Lee pointed to Apple Daily articles calling for the now-shelved extradition bill which sparked widespread protests and unrest in 2019 to be withdrawn, saying: 'They were opposing the very introduction of the extradition bill… was that not a suggested solution?' The 2019 protests escalated into sometimes violent displays of dissent against police behaviour, amid calls for democracy and anger over Beijing's encroachment. Demonstrators demanded an independent probe into police conduct, amnesty for those arrested and a halt to the characterisation of protests as 'riots.' Lee on Tuesday added that an article could not be considered seditious if its purpose was to highlight pitfalls in governance, 'but if it was to defame the government causing the people to lose confidence or to turn hostile against the government, that would be a case of sedition.' Chau also referenced Lai's text messages directing the paper's English news division, which the court had earlier heard was set up to appeal for international support. Lai had told senior management that the paper was not supposed to have a 'balanced view' and only needed a view of the 'yellow' side — the colour associated with the city's pro-democracy movement, Chau added. Calls for sanctions 'in disguise' Besides the charge of conspiracy to publish seditious materials under colonial-era legislation, the tycoon also stands accused of two charges of conspiracy to commit foreign collusion under the Beijing-imposed national security law. He faces life behind bars if convicted. Based on Lai's prior exchanges with US politicians and diplomats, one could infer that the pro-democracy paper's criticism of the Chinese authorities were an 'indirect' means of calling on foreign governments to interfere, Chau told the court on Tuesday. That was after judge Toh asked whether the prosecution meant that the paper's articles were calls for sanctions 'in disguise.' The prosecution has alleged that Lai used his ties with foreign officials and politicians to impose sanctions against authorities in mainland China and Hong Kong. Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest, criminalising subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. Chau also maintained that the media baron had called for what the prosecution labelled 'Sanctions, Blockades, or Hostile activity' (SBHA) against the central Chinese authorities, despite not having made any open or direct requests for such actions after the enactment of Beijing's national security law in Hong Kong. The prosecution submitted that Lai had adopted a 'calculated and strategic approach' for foreign sanctions to be imposed on China and Hong Kong by deliberately and 'falsely' picturing the Chinese Communist Party in a negative light. Prosecutors named retired US army general Jack Keane, ex-US deputy secretary of defence Paul Wolfowitz, ex-US state department advisor Christian Whiton, and Mary Kissel, an advisor to then US secretary of state Mike Pompeo, as Lai's foreign connections, among others. Chau also told the court that Lai had admitted, during his testimony, that he continued international lobbying efforts even after the enactment of the national security law to inform foreign governments of what was happening in Hong Kong and to appeal for condemnation of the Hong Kong and Beijing authorities. However, he denied lobbying overseas governments to influence foreign policy. Chau is expected to conclude oral submissions of the prosecution's closing arguments on Wednesday.
HKFP
15 hours ago
- HKFP
Australia probes Nauru-China business deal
Australia was Tuesday investigating whether Pacific microstate Nauru breached a security treaty by inking a lucrative business deal with a Chinese company. Nauru last week announced it had signed a US$650 million economic development agreement with the China Rural Revitilisation and Development Corporation. Australian Minister for Pacific Island Affairs Pat Conroy said officials were looking into whether that deal complied with a recent security pact between Canberra and Nauru. '(Australia) is engaging with the government of Nauru about whether it activates parts of our treaty,' Conroy told reporters. 'That is a really important treaty for us — that helps position us as a security partner of choice with Nauru.' Australia and Nauru announced a landmark security treaty in December last year, advancing Canberra's aim of blunting China's growing regional influence. Under the deal, Nauru must seek Australia's agreement before it signs any bilateral accords on maritime security, defence and policing. Nauru also agreed to consult Australia if other parties look to strike agreements granting them access to critical infrastructure such as ports and airfields or its banking sector. In return, Nauru receives tens of millions of dollars to prop up its government budget and bolster its stretched police force. Nauru last year surprised many Pacific watchers when it abruptly severed diplomatic links with Taiwan in favour of Beijing. Nauru's Foreign Affairs Minister Lionel Aingimea travelled to Beijing to sign the business deal last week. The China Rural Revitilisation and Development Corporation agreed to invest in key sectors such as agriculture and fisheries, according to a Nauru government release. Nauru, population 12,500, is one of the world's smallest countries with a mainland measuring just 20 square kilometres (7.7 square miles). It is considered especially vulnerable to climate change.
HKFP
15 hours ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong summons UK, Australian diplomats after asylum granted to wanted activists
Hong Kong has summoned the UK and Australian consuls general to express 'strong opposition' over the two countries granting asylum to activists wanted by the city's national security police. Former pro-democracy Hong Kong lawmaker Ted Hui said in a social media post on Saturday that he had been granted asylum by the Australian government, while pro-independence activist Tony Chung said on Sunday that he had secured asylum status in the UK. Hui and Chung are among several overseas activists subject to HK$1 million police bounties over allegations that they have endangered national security while residing abroad. The Hong Kong government said on Monday that Eric Chan, the city's no. 2 official, summoned the Australian Consul-General in Hong Kong Gareth Williams, and the British Consul General in Hong Kong Brian Davidson. 'Harbours criminals' Chan 'solemnly pointed out that the HKSAR Government opposes any country harbouring offenders in any form and is strongly dissatisfied with any conduct that harbours criminals under any pretext,' a government spokesperson said in a statement. '[S]uch harbouring effectively allows certain individuals or organisations to be immune from legal consequences for their illegal acts, which is no different from granting a special privilege to break the law,' Chan was quoted as saying in the statement. According to the statement, Chan told the foreign envoys that the arrest warrants issued by the city's police were 'fully justified, necessary and legitimate,' while Hong Kong's courts will handle all cases 'in an independent, fair and just manner.' 'There is no question of political persecution in Hong Kong,' the government spokesperson said. Chan also said that human rights were protected in the city's national security laws and urged foreign governments to 'stop interfering' in Hong Kong affairs. Security chief Chris Tang also attended the meeting, according to the government statement. Hui, formerly a lawmaker of the Democratic Party, has been a vocal critic of Hong Kong and Beijing authorities, even after he resettled with his family in Adelaide in 2021. Hong Kong national security police have accused Hui of inciting secession, subversion, and foreign collusion and placed him on a wanted list in 2023. Chung, formerly the convenor of the now-disbanded pro-independence group Studentlocalism, left Hong Kong in late 2023, after serving a sentence for inciting secession and money laundering. Authorities accused him of breaching a post-release supervision order and declared him 'wanted' in December 2024. The arrest warrants targeting Hong Kong activists living overseas have been a friction point between the city government and western countries like the UK. Last month, after Hong Kong announced new arrest warrants targeting overseas activists, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper called the move 'another example of transnational repression.' Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong has also objected to Hong Kong's arrest warrants targeting people living in her country. 'Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to our democracy,' she said last month on X. The Hong Kong government has rejected foreign criticism, calling such statements 'smears with distorted facts.' Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest. It criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. The authorities say it restored stability and peace to the city, rejecting criticism from trade partners, the UN and NGOs.
