Joe Rogan makes wild claim about ancient race of giant humans on Earth
Rogan and Tucker discussed how civilizations throughout history have had similar stories of enormous people, citing biblical references like the story of David and Goliath. While the two men agreed that there could still be undiscovered races of humans, Rogan was skeptical that the scientific community would allow such a history-changing discovery to be made public.
Rogan claimed that researchers who may potentially find giant human remains would be more inclined to say 'people can't handle this' and keep the information a secret. The podcast host added that the thought of hiding the discovery would be 'infuriating' and then made one more bombshell claim about the potential unearthing of giant bones. 'They're gonna kill you, they're gonna kill you. The scientists will kill you. They're gonna run you off the road,' Rogan exclaimed.
The 57-year-old noted that there are already conspiracy theories claiming the Smithsonian Museum in Washington is hiding proof giants existed in their basement. Rogan has frequently commented on various government cover-ups he believes to be true. Those include the conspiracy to keep the existence of UFOs and alien life hidden, the secret existence of government surveillance programs, and even a cover-up to hide the government's role in instigating the January 6 riot at the Capitol. Tucker, known for his viral history and pop culture videos, questioned why these giants aren't still alive today.
This led Rogan to speculate that giants in the distant past died out after a global cataclysm left them without enough food to survive. 'If you're that big, you need to eat a lot,' Rogan explained. 'They keep finding these additional types of humans ,' Rogan added, noting that researchers had recently discovered Denisovans, an extinct group of humans, closely related to Neanderthals, who lived up to 200,000 years ago. Despite citing a number of recent findings, Rogan quickly shot down the idea that scientists would come clean about finding a new race of immense beings.
'Who would put the cap on that?' Rogan asked. 'If they found a 10-foot human with a gigantic sword, would they just say 'we're wrong, giants existed.'' 'They might say people can't handle it. It's not outside the realm of possibility,' Rogan added. Rogan is not alone in his unconfirmed belief that Earth was once home to giant humans in prehistoric times. TikTok theorists claim that giants, many times taller than a normal human, have existed since ancient times, likely helped to build pyramids around the world, and may still be walking among us today.
As strange as it sounds, some scientists admit that there might be an element of truth to these claims. Giants, like the current world's tallest man Sultan Kosen who stands at 8 feet 1 inch (236.5cm) , are a very real scientific phenomenon. Likewise, archaeologists have uncovered the remains of an ancient culture that would have towered over their peers. The genetic traces of these huge people can still be found in the abnormal heights of groups scattered around the world.
In a medical sense, giants are real because of a condition called gigantism. Certain diseases can cause abnormal growth, leading to extreme height in some people. People with giantism have existed throughout history right back to ancient times. Some Paleolithic groups also had heights which exceeded that of the modern people who discovered them.
Rogan and Tucker also noted that Vikings from Iceland were also enormous compared to the people in nearby lands they raided hundreds of years ago. However, neither of these groups is a separate race from humans nor are their heights outside the bounds of human possibility. Scientists maintain that their height is either a product of a disease or fortunate genetics and good nutrition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Nasa astronaut Butch Wilmore retires after nine months in space
Nasa astronaut Butch Wilmore, who spent nine months in space with fellow crew member Suni Williams after their spacecraft experienced technical problems, has retired after a 25-year US space agency paid tribute to Mr Wilmore's service and praised his commitment as "truly exemplary", Nasa said in a Wilmore is a decorated US Navy captain who has flown in four different spacecrafts and accumulated 464 days in space during his saga captivated the world after what was meant to be an eight-day mission to the International Space Station (ISS) in June 2024 was dramatically extended, with the pair finally returning to Earth in March this year. Stephen Koerner, Acting Director of Nasa's Johnson Space Center, thanked Mr Wilmore for his dedication to space exploration."His lasting legacy of fortitude will continue to impact and inspire the Johnson workforce, future explorers, and the nation for generations," he Wilmore served as a test pilot before being selected by Nasa to become an astronaut in last mission was taking part in the first crewed test flight of the Starliner spacecraft with Ms Williams last year before the capsule suffered technical problems as it approached the ISS."Docking was imperative," Mr Wilmore told BBC News in May. "If we weren't able to dock, would we be able to make it back? We didn't know." They finally managed to dock after Mission Control on the ground helped them restart the craft's the spacecraft was deemed too risky to transport the astronauts home and the pair had to wait for a new ride to take them back to several delays over the next nine months, Mr Wilmore and Ms Williams finally made their homecoming aboard a SpaceX capsule. In his parting remarks, Mr Wilmore cited an "insatiable curiosity" that propelled him into space while always maintaining a connection to his home."Even as I ventured beyond Earth's limits, I remained attuned to the beauty and significance of the world below," he after retirement, astronauts often participate in studies to monitor their physical and mental health for the long-term effects of space travel on their Mr Wilmore and Ms Williams were given an extensive exercise regime after returning home as their bodies re-adapted to living with gravity.
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Harvard scientists say research could be set back years after funding freeze
Harvard University professor Alberto Ascherio's research is literally frozen. Collected from millions of U.S. soldiers over two decades using millions of dollars from taxpayers, the epidemiology and nutrition scientist has blood samples stored in liquid nitrogen freezers within the university's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The samples are key to his award-winning research, which seeks a cure to multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases. But for months, Ascherio has been unable to work with the samples because he lost $7 million in federal research funding, a casualty of Harvard's fight with the Trump administration. 'It's like we have been creating a state-of-the-art telescope to explore the universe, and now we don't have money to launch it,' said Ascherio. 'We built everything and now we are ready to use it to make a new discovery that could impact millions of people in the world and then, 'Poof. You're being cut off.'' Researchers laid off and science shelved The loss of an estimated $2.6 billion in federal funding at Harvard has meant that some of the world's most prominent researchers are laying off young researchers. They are shelving years or even decades of research, into everything from opioid addiction to cancer. And despite Harvard's lawsuits against the administration, and settlement talks between the warring parties, researchers are confronting the fact that some of their work may never resume. The funding cuts are part of a monthslong battle that the Trump administration has waged against some the country's top universities including Columbia, Brown and Northwestern. The administration has taken a particularly aggressive stance against Harvard, freezing funding after the country's oldest university rejected a series of government demands issued by a federal antisemitism task force. The government had demanded sweeping changes at Harvard related to campus protests, academics and admissions — meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Research jeopardized, even if court case prevails Harvard responded by filing a federal lawsuit, accusing the Trump administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university. In the lawsuit, it laid out reforms it had taken to address antisemitism but also vowed not to 'surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.' 'Make no mistake: Harvard rejects antisemitism and discrimination in all of its forms and is actively making structural reforms to eradicate antisemitism on campus," the university said in its legal complaint. 'But rather than engage with Harvard regarding those ongoing efforts, the Government announced a sweeping freeze of funding for medical, scientific, technological, and other research that has nothing at all to do with antisemitism.' The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the demands were sent in April. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel federal contracts for policy reasons. The funding cuts have left Harvard's research community in a state of shock, feeling as if they are being unfairly targeted in a fight has nothing to do with them. Some have been forced to shutter labs or scramble to find non-government funding to replace lost money. In May, Harvard announced that it would put up at least $250 million of its own money to continue research efforts, but university President Alan Garber warned of 'difficult decisions and sacrifices' ahead. Ascherio said the university was able to pull together funding to pay his researchers' salaries until next June. But he's still been left without resources needed to fund critical research tasks, like lab work. Even a year's delay can put his research back five years, he said. Knowledge lost in funding freeze 'It's really devastating,' agreed Rita Hamad, the director of the Social Policies for Health Equity Research Center at Harvard, who had three multiyear grants totaling $10 million canceled by the Trump administration. The grants funded research into the impact of school segregation on heart health, how pandemic-era policies in over 250 counties affected mental health, and the role of neighborhood factors in dementia. At the School of Public Health, where Hamad is based, 190 grants have been terminated, affecting roughly 130 scientists. 'Just thinking about all the knowledge that's not going to be gained or that is going to be actively lost," Hamad said. She expects significant layoffs on her team if the funding freeze continues for a few more months. "It's all just a mixture of frustration and anger and sadness all the time, every day." John Quackenbush, a professor of computational biology and bioinformatics at the School of Public Health, has spent the past few months enduring cuts on multiple fronts. In April, a multimillion dollar grant was not renewed, jeopardizing a study into the role sex plays in disease. In May, he lost about $1.2 million in federal funding for in the coming year due to the Harvard freeze. Four departmental grants worth $24 million that funded training of doctoral students also were cancelled as part of the fight with the Trump administration, Quackenbush said. 'I'm in a position where I have to really think about, 'Can I revive this research?'' he said. 'Can I restart these programs even if Harvard and the Trump administration reached some kind of settlement? If they do reach a settlement, how quickly can the funding be turned back on? Can it be turned back on?' The researchers all agreed that the funding cuts have little or nothing to do with the university's fight against antisemitism. Some, however, argue changes at Harvard were long overdue and pressure from the Trump administration was necessary. Bertha Madras, a Harvard psychobiologist who lost funding to create a free, parent-focused training to prevent teen opioid overdose and drug use, said she's happy to see the culling of what she called 'politically motivated social science studies.' White House pressure a good thing? Madras said pressure from the White House has catalyzed much-needed reform at the university, where several programs of study have 'really gone off the wall in terms of being shaped by orthodoxy that is not representative of the country as a whole.' But Madras, who served on the President's Commission on Opioids during Trump's first term, said holding scientists' research funding hostage as a bargaining chip doesn't make sense. 'I don't know if reform would have happened without the president of the United States pointing the bony finger at Harvard," she said. 'But sacrificing science is problematic, and it's very worrisome because it is one of the major pillars of strength of the country.' Quackenbush and other Harvard researchers argue the cuts are part of a larger attack on science by the Trump administration that puts the country's reputation as the global research leader at risk. Support for students and post-doctoral fellows has been slashed, visas for foreign scholars threatened, and new guidelines and funding cuts at the NIH will make it much more difficult to get federal funding in the future, they said. It also will be difficult to replace federal funding with money from the private sector. 'We're all sort of moving toward this future in which this 80-year partnership between the government and the universities is going to be jeopardized,' Quackenbush said. 'We're going to face real challenges in continuing to lead the world in scientific excellence.'
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hold the fries! How your favorite salty side can increase your risk of type 2 diabetes
A new study has found eating a certain amount of French fries a week can increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Nothing beats salt-coated fries straight out of the fryer, but next time you order a burger, you may want to tell the restaurant, 'Hold the fries!' A study published in The BMJ journal Wednesday found eating three servings of fries a week could increase your risk of developing type 2 diabetes by 20 percent. Those who eat fries five times a week have a 27 percent increased risk of the chronic disease, according to the study. But potato lovers should not fear, as researchers found those who eat similar amounts of boiled, baked, or mashed potatoes do not face an elevated risk of the disease. An international team, including an expert from the University of Cambridge, analyzed health data from more than 205,000 U.S. health workers, with repeated surveys about their diets, tracking their well-being over nearly four decades. During this extensive follow-up period, some 22,000 cases of type 2 diabetes were documented. 'The risks associated with potato intake varied by cooking method,' the researchers wrote. 'The association between higher potato intake and increased T2D risk is primarily driven by intake of French fries.' The research team also found that replacing three servings of potatoes each week with whole grains was found to lower the risk of type 2 diabetes by 8 percent. 'Replacing any form of potatoes, particularly French fries, with whole grains is estimated to lower the risk of T2D, reinforcing the importance of promoting whole grains as an essential part of a healthy diet,' researchers wrote. But replacing potatoes with white rice was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, they found. In a linked editorial, also published in The BMJ, experts from the U.S. and Denmark wrote: 'This finding also corresponds to the observed associations between high intake of ultra-processed foods and high risk of type 2 diabetes – French fries are often ultra-processed, whereas baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes are often minimally processed.' They added: 'With their relatively low environmental impact and their health impact, potatoes can be part of a healthy and sustainable diet, though whole grains should remain a priority.'
