Prosecutors push to clarify Washington's hate crime law
King County prosecutors want state legislators to tweak how Washington defines a hate crime, which they say would make the anti-bias law easier to enforce.
Why it matters: Local prosecutors say that they've struggled to get a conviction in some cases that involve racial or anti-LGBTQ bias simply because the perpetrators may have had other motives, too.
What they're saying:"Jurors are interpreting the law to require that a defendant's bias be the only motive," Yessenia Manzo, a prosecutor who handles hate crimes in the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, told a panel of state senators this month.
That's a problem "because most hate crimes are mixed-motive," Manzo said.
Even in cases where bias is the driving factor, "every defendant comes up with some sort of other excuse for their violence," Manzo told members of the state Senate Law & Justice Committee during a public hearing last week.
The latest: House Bill 1052 would amend state law so a hate crime wouldn't be defined as a crime committed "because of" a victim's race or identity, but "in whole or in part because of" such factors.
The bill, which the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office is supporting, passed out of the Senate committee Thursday.
Zoom in: During a House committee hearing in January, Manzo highlighted a case in which King County prosecutors say they were unable to get a conviction on a hate crime charge because jurors thought bias wasn't the sole motive.
In that case, prosecutors said the defendant berated a Black neighbor, used a racial slur and threatened to shoot the neighbor and his dogs, blaming sleep deprivation for his behavior, Manzo said. The defendant was convicted of harassment but not of the hate crime charge.
The other side: State Rep. Hunter Abell (R-Inchelium) said during a House floor debate last month that the "in whole or in part" language of House Bill 1052 "is so broad as to be effectively meaningless."
Opponents said the bill also raises concerns about freedom of expression.
"We need to proceed very carefully when we regulate speech," state Rep. Jim Walsh (R-Aberdeen) said on the House floor.
What's next: The bill has been amended since it passed the state House on a 61-31 vote last month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP senators express 'concerns,' 'skepticism' over Trump's spending bill after Musk rant
A cohort of Senate Republicans already troubled by the House GOP's version of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" found a common ally in Elon Musk, who again trashed the legislation on Tuesday. Musk, who just exited his tenure as Trump's efficiency bloodhound leading the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) last week, doubled down on his position that the House's reconciliation package was an "abomination." White House Stands By Tax Bill After Musk Calls It A 'Disgusting Abomination' "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk said on X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination." "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong," he continued. "You know it." Senate Republicans have already vowed to make changes to the colossal bill, which includes the president's desires on tax, energy, immigration, defense and national debt policies. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., lauded Musk for his work with DOGE, but noted that the Senate GOP and the tech-billionaire had "a difference of opinion." Read On The Fox News App Elon Musk Criticism Of Trump Tax Bill Frustrates Some Republicans: 'No Place In Congress' He didn't believe that Musk's comments would derail the bill entirely in the upper chamber, either. Thune has pledged to get the bill to the president's desk by Independence Day. "The legislation, as passed by the House, can be approved here in the Senate, can be strengthened in the Senate, in a number of ways," Thune said. "We intend to do that, but when it's all said and done, we'll send it back to the House and hope that they can pass it and put it on the president's desk." Still, fractures have emerged among lawmakers, with some viewing the bill through the same lens as Musk. "Well, he has some of the same skepticism I have, you know, towards the big, beautiful bill," said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. Trump Criticizes Rand Paul Over Tax Bill Opposition: 'Votes No On Everything' Paul has vowed not to support the bill as is without a serious overhaul to the legislation that would nix a $5 trillion increase to the nation's debt ceiling — a stance that has gotten him into hot water with Trump. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., has similarly pledged not to support the bill unless much steeper spending cuts are achieved. The House's product includes $1.5 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade, but Johnson would like to see a return to pre-pandemic spending levels, which would effectively amount to a roughly $6 trillion cut in spending. "I share his concerns," Johnson said of Musk. "I also appreciate what he and President Trump did with his DOGE effort." And Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, a fiscal hawk whose views are closely aligned with Johnson's, argued in response to the tech billionaire's social media post that "federal spending has become excessive." "The resulting inflation harms Americans and weaponizes government," Lee said on X. "The Senate can make this bill better. It must now do so." Other Senate Republicans, including those with outstanding concerns with the current legislation, were much less receptive to Musk's tirade against the bill. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., has remained steadfast in his position that he would not support the current Medicaid proposals in the House's bill, especially if they cut benefits to his constituents and people across the country. When asked his reaction to Musk's rant, he shrugged, "Well, he's entitled to his opinion, it's a free country." Sen. Jim Justice, R-W.V., who has expressed reservations on the contents of the megabill, was more blunt. "My reaction to that is just simply this — and y'all may like this or not like this — but you know, Donald Trump is our president, not Elon Musk," he article source: GOP senators express 'concerns,' 'skepticism' over Trump's spending bill after Musk rant
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man Who Tried To Lawlessly Do Congress' Job For It Criticizes ‘Pork-Filled' Bill
Black-eyed and officially, allegedly on the outskirts of the Trump administration, Elon Musk is saying more about his recently discovered objections to the reconciliation package that passed the House last month and will make sweeping cuts to Medicaid if it makes its way through the Senate. The world's richest man is, of course, not bothered by the ways in which Republicans plan to gut the social safety net program outlined in the bill. Rather he believes it does too much to actually fund the government and it rubs up against his Department Of Government Efficiency work. Before officially exiting the Trump administration — though President Trump, perhaps tellingly, is still insisting that that is not actually happening — Musk told CBS News that he believed the size of the 'massive spending bill' 'undermines' the work that his DOGE cronies have been doing for the past five months. That work has, of course, been constitutionally backwards, if not illegal, as he's used a sweeping mandate from Trump as an opening to freeze and rescind funds that were appropriated by Congress. The Trump White House is dragging its feet to try to force Congress to actually sign elements of Elon's DOGE rampage into law via a rescissions package — a method for codifying the unilateral withholding of congressionally authorized federal funds that even some Senate Republicans have acknowledged might be necessary to make any of DOGE's work lawful. It appears Musk's beef with the spending bill — which will raise the debt ceiling and also gut other social safety net programs like SNAP for the purpose of making Trump's 2017 tax cuts, that mostly benefited the wealthy, permanent — runs deeper than his concerns that Congress shouldn't authorize new federal spending when he's trying to wipe out that concept. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on Twitter Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt,' he added. Musk has broken with the Trump administration while effectively serving as a member of it a few times, including on Trump's disastrous tariff plan. Facing plummeting Tesla sales, unflattering headlines about drug use and after only bringing about a mere fraction of the trillions he promised to cut in federal spending, Musk has again publicly broken with the Trump White House — though its unclear if its all a show for an audience of certain shareholders. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) on Tuesday acknowledged there's a line item included in House Republicans' reconciliation package that she didn't realize had been shoved into the legislation at close to the last minute: Specifically, a provision that blocks states from passing laws to regulate AI over the course of the next decade. Obviously, take all this with a grain of salt. The AI provision was a known element of the bill that was reported on before it passed the House. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,' she said on Twitter Tuesday. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there … This needs to be stripped out in the Senate.' A new estimate from two top universities found that House Republicans' reconciliation package could lead to more than 51,000 deaths annually if enacted. Researchers from Yale University and University of Pennsylvania estimate that the Medicaid cuts in the GOP bill, which would result in millions losing their Medicaid and Marketplace coverage, as well as the rollback of nursing home staffing rules could take approximately 42,500 lives. In addition, the expiration of the enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) Premium Tax Credits could take an additional 8,811 deaths, bringing the total to more than 51,000, researchers say. 'Despite some of the callous sarcasm from Republican members of Congress lately, the stakes for this bill are truly life and death for tens of thousands of Americans,' Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-OR) said in a Tuesday statement in response to the estimates. If you were wondering, Wyden is referring to Sen. Joni Ernst's (R-IA) recent unhinged 'Well, we're all going to die,' moment. 'Taking away health insurance and benefits like home care and mental health care from seniors, people with disabilities, kids, and working families will be deadly,' Wyden added. 'This analysis shows the dire consequences of moving ahead with this morally bankrupt effort.' Back from their recess, the Senate is starting to take up the House-passed reconciliation package. We will see if Senate Republicans will try to make changes to any of the Medicaid-related amendments in coming days. — Emine Yücel The Democratic National Committee apparently parked a taco truck outside of the RNC headquarters this afternoon to try to get under Trump's skin about his trade policies about an apparent nickname he's been given by Wall Street traders. Per Axios: The Democratic National Committee is commandeering a taco truck to mock Trump's apparent fury at the slogan 'Trump Always Chickens Out,' or 'TACO,' Axios has learned. Why it matters: Democrats clearly think they have found a way to get under the president's skin. Trump was asked about the mantra — used by Wall Street traders to predict his response to tariff-induced market dips — at a press conference Wednesday, and he lashed out in response. Trump White House Hires Harvard Law Review 'Whistleblower' Some Dems Warn Colleagues: Crypto Bill Could Inject Some 19th Century Chaos Into US Economy Kristi Noem Cowed By Sheriffs Into Retreating From Latest Anti-Immigrant Broadside Democrats' Hamlet Moment Isn't the Start of a Solution But the Heart of the Problem Meet Josh Divine, the Trump Judicial Nominee Who Argued Christians Are 'Obligated Ethically to Impose Their Beliefs On Others' He Built an Airstrip on Protected Land. Now He's in Line to Lead the Forest Service. Navy mulls new name for USNS Harvey Milk and ships named for civil rights leaders
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The key dynamics shaping a busy month of primaries: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. We may be entering the summer of an off-year, but June is still shaping up to be a big election month. Steve Kornacki breaks down what to watch in the New Jersey, Virginia and New York City primaries in the coming weeks. Plus, Scott Wong talks to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries about his 'more is more' strategy for taking on President Donald Trump — and whether Democrats' message is breaking through. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here. — Adam Wollner Have a question for the NBC News Politics Desk about Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' this month's elections or anything else happening on the world of politics? Send your questions to politicsnewsletter@ and we may answer them in a future edition of the newsletter. The next three weeks will bring primaries in the three most closely watched races of 2025. Here are the key dynamics to watch: New Jersey: Both parties will nominate gubernatorial candidates in the Garden State on June 10. Barring a complete shock, this will serve as a coronation for Republican Jack Ciattarelli, who was already leading by wide margins in the polls when President Donald Trump endorsed him several weeks ago. The Democratic contest isn't as clear-cut, but there is a favorite: Rep. Mikie Sherrill has separated herself from the six-candidate field in the most recent polling and enjoys strong backing from the state's still-powerful (though probably not as much as before) county political machines. The combination of Trump's surprising strength in New Jersey last year and Gov. Phil Murphy's unexpectedly close re-election in 2021 has Democratic leaders apprehensive about their November prospects. Many concluded that Sherrill, a Navy veteran who flipped a GOP-held district to win her House seat in 2018, would be their most electable option. Worth keeping an eye on, though, is a pair of mayors. Jersey City's Steve Fulop is portraying his candidacy as a war against political bossism and has aligned with local anti-establishment candidates. And Newark's Ras Baraka will try to couple support from Black voters (over 20% of the primary electorate) with appeal to the party's broader progressive base, especially after his high-profile arrest at an ICE detention facility. But both have lagged in polling and their overlapping appeal to progressives only complicates each other's path. Once the matchup is set, the general election will feature a clash of two long-term trends. On the one hand, New Jersey has only elected a governor from the party that controls the White House once in the last nine races — an ominous harbinger for the GOP. But it also hasn't handed the same party power in Trenton for three straight elections since 1961 — a feat Democrats are trying to pull off this year. Something will have to give. Virginia: On June 17, Virginia Democrats and Republicans will officially set their slates for the fall. Both gubernatorial nominations are already settled: Lt. Gov. Winsome Earl-Sears for the Republicans and Rep. Abigail Spanberger for the Democrats. And the general election picture already looks clearer in Virginia than in New Jersey. Polling has consistently shown Spanberger — who, like Sherrill, flipped a Republican seat en route to Congress in 2018 — ahead of Earl-Sears. And in 11 of the last 12 gubernatorial races, Virginians have sided against whichever party controlled the White House at the time. New York City: And then there's the mayoral primary in the Big Apple on June 24, the city's first with a ranked-choice voting system. Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo is the front-runner on the Democratic side, but the two most recent polls show Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani emerging from the crowded field as his main competition. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, has tapped into support from voters who tend to be younger, college-educated and progressive. He also runs significantly better with white voters than nonwhite voters. While certainly large, Mamdani's coalition is not broad enough demographically to win the primary — at least not yet. But his rapid rise presents some interesting potential scenarios. If Mamdani ends up toppling Cuomo, the former governor could still run in the general election anyway, on the ballot line of a party he just created. It's a move that his father, Mario Cuomo, tried back in 1977, after he fell short in the Democratic mayoral primary. There's also the leftist Working Families Party, which also has its own general election ballot line. Its leaders have indicated they have no plans to let Cuomo have that line even if he wins the Democratic primary. More recently, the party formally recommended that voters rank Mamdani as their top choice in the Democratic primary. If Mamdani misses narrowly in the Democratic primary, could he still run this fall as the WFP's candidate? Would someone else? On top of all of this, New York City Mayor Eric Adams is still officially running. He's bypassing the Democratic primary but has ballot lines of his own for the general election. Few think Adams can actually win in November, but his potential to grab a sizable chunk of votes could make a third-party bid more enticing for another candidate. In the chaotic opening weeks of President Donald Trump's second administration, Democrats debated whether to push back on every norm-shattering executive action, or pick and choose their spots and hope Trump would prove to be his own worst enemy. That debate has been settled, with Democrats aggressively taking on Trump in the courts, in the streets and on social media. At the center of that messaging strategy is House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., who privately has been urging his members to be more visible in their districts and on digital media, and has stepped up his own activity in recent weeks. Rather than his regular, once-a-week news conference in the Capitol, Jeffries now holds as many as three press briefings with reporters each week in Washington. He is also making weekly appearances on popular podcasts outside the traditional political media circuit, including those hosted by Stephen A. Smith, Tony Kornheiser, Jon Stewart, Katie Couric and Scott Galloway. 'We are in a 'more is more' environment. These aren't ordinary times, and they require an extraordinary response,' Jeffries said in a phone interview with NBC News on Tuesday, one of roughly two dozen digital media interviews he has participated in since February. After suffering a bruising defeat in the last presidential election and still years out from the next one, Democrats are without a clear national leader. And the party's base has displayed a hunger for a new and younger generation of voices to take charge. That has opened the door for Jeffries, 54, to assume an even bigger role in the party, even as he is still coming into national prominence and — less than three years removed from succeeding Nancy Pelosi as House Democrats' leader — not yet a household name. The flood-the-zone strategy is a marked change for a politician with a reputation for being cautious and calculated. But if that game plan pays off and Democrats manage to win control of the House in next year's midterm elections, Jeffries would be the favorite to become speaker — and the party's most powerful member in Washington. 'He's meeting the moment,' Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., an influential progressive in the party, told NBC News in an interview. 'And that's why I say he's, right now, the leader of the Democratic Party.' Read more from Scott → 👀 With friends like these: Days after his White House send-off, Elon Musk slammed the GOP's massive bill for Trump's agenda as a 'disgusting abomination.' Read more → ✂️ Rescissions: The White House sent congressional leaders a request to claw back $9.4 billion in approved spending, codifying DOGE cuts to USAID, NPR and PBS, among other areas. Read more → ⏱️ Clock's ticking: Trump's ambitious plan to broker dozens of trade deals with some of the United States' closest trading partners has begun to show cracks, with his 90-day pause for most country-specific tariffs winding down in just over a month. Read more → 🔵 Succession: Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas officially jumped into the race to be the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, setting up a generational battle to succeed the late Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va. Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin also set the special election to fill the seat previously held by Connolly for Sept. 9. ⚖️ In the courts: Newark Mayor Ras Baraka is suing interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba, alleging she violated his constitutional rights and defamed him when he was arrested at a federal immigration detention center last month. Read more → ➡️ Phase two: Democratic attorneys general from California, Massachusetts and New Jersey laid out their plans for the next phase of the legal battle against Trump in an interview with NBC News. Read more → 🌀 Just kidding: Acting Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator David Richardson was joking when he said he was not aware of the upcoming hurricane season, the Department of Homeland Security said in a statement. Read more → Follow live politics updates → That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner. If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@ And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here. This article was originally published on
