Starmer steel deal shows Swinney how nationalisation should work
A compelling read it certainly wasn't but it helped pass the time before the sun started to go down and I could think about dinner.
Economists have never agreed on the benefits of nationalisation and history is littered with failed examples, particularly in the UK.
But the two leaders currently occupying Bute House and Downing Street certainly seem to be in agreement that it's a good thing.
And in many cases it is good but it's what you do with the assets as a Government after it is been taken into public control that is the important thing.
It is here that John Swinney and Sir Keir Starmer diverge dramatically if recent events are anything to go by.
Last week, a £500 million five-year deal was struck between Network Rail and British Steel to help save the Scunthorpe steelworks.
British Steel is to supply 337,000 tonnes of rail track, which will secure thousands of manufacturing jobs.
Why this is important is that it comes just two months after the UK Government used emergency powers to prevent the blast furnaces from immediate closure.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, said it 'truly transforms the outlook for British Steel and its dedicated workforce in Scunthorpe'.
British Steel is to supply a minimum of 337,000 tonnes of long and short rail.
A further 80-90,000 tonnes is to be provided by other European manufacturers and deals are expected to be announced shortly, the Department for Transport (DfT) said.
In March, Chinese firm Jingye, which bought British Steel in 2020, proposed to shut Scunthorpe's two blast furnaces and other key steelmaking operations.
Alan Simpson: The new £144m electric rail line without enough trains
Alan Simpson: Build more houses for rural Scots, not tax second home owners
Alan Simpson: NatureScot may be threatening a rare mussel it should be protecting
Alan Simpson: Scotland's tourism sector needs to be heard before it's too late
This came despite months of negotiations and a £500 million co-investment offer from the UK Government.
As a result, Jingye launched a consultation which it said would affect between 2,000 and 2,700 jobs.
In April, the UK Government used emergency powers to take control of British Steel and continue production at the site.
The Scunthorpe plant has been producing steel for Britain's railways since 1865.
The Network Rail contract, worth an estimated £500 million, starts on July 1 and is set to provide the company with 80% of its rail needs.
To ensure security of supply, Network Rail is set to award smaller contracts to some European manufacturers, who will supply specialist rail products alongside British Steel.
The agreement is the first major public procurement since the emergency legislation was passed.
Both Network Rail and the Scunthorpe steel plant are both owned by the UK Government and the swift deal is clearly a direct benefit of being nationalised.
No need for public procurement rules when both sites are state-owned.
The Government sees it as being complimentary to the UK and US trade deal which aims to lower tariffs and protect jobs across key sectors, including steel.
The deal also compares to the complete and utter horlicks that the Scottish Government has made following nationalisation of key industries.
Ministers, of course, took over the stricken Ferguson Marine shipyard in Port Glasgow in 2019 after it collapsed into administration.
It seemed to be the right decision as the shipyard's main customer was the state-owned ferry body CMAL, so a steady stream of orders should have been expected.
Instead the yard is facing an uncertain future after losing out on several publicly funded ferry building contracts.
Now ministers have even halted a vital subsidy for the yard that is needed to bring in vital work to keep it alive, it can be revealed.The development has raised alarm that the yard will not survive beyond any delivery of the much-delayed and over budget CalMac ferry Glen Rosa.
The yard's business plan to 2029 assumed that the Scottish Government would sanction a direct award of the small vessel replacement programme.
It was an integral part of a plan to deliver a 'sustainable, profitable, efficient and competitive yard'.
After it was decided that the £175m contract would go to a competitive tender, CMAL, the state-controlled ferry procurer declared in March that the job to build seven new loch-class electric ferries would go to Poland
.It previously awarded two other ferry contracts worth to £220m to Cemre Marin Endustri A.S (Turkey) - with Ferguson Marine again losing out.
Transport secretary Fiona Hyslop confirmed a 'substantial subsidy' was needed to allow it to get a direct uncontested contract to build seven new small ferries and secure its future.
But she admitted in correspondence with former community safety minister Ash Regan that that subsidy was not justified.
Ms Regan has raised concerns that it was 'not the direct award that's the issue it's the unwillingness to put public money behind a public asset'.
Ferguson Marine has been dogged with issues with the delivery of ferries Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa which were due online in the first half of 2018.
The last estimates suggest the costs of delivery of the vessels for CalMac will have soared to more than five times the original £97m cost.
The shipyard firm currently employs more than 400 staff including over 100 sub-contractors.
Goodness knows how they must be feeling, knowing full well that the Scottish Government is in the process of sinking the yard once and for all.
For all the arguments against nationalisation, no book on economics will ever list sheer incompetence by Government ministers as a reason it will fail.
While there are very good reasons that the yard is struggling, one of the main reasons is the sheer complexity of the two ferries which have made them very difficult to build.
As it was the current administration that insisted on the specifications of being dual fuel and 'green' then it seems extremely harsh for ministers to now throw the workforce under a bus.
Sir Keir Starmer's Government has shown exactly how nationalisation should work for the benefit of the workforce and the economy as a whole.
For it to be a success, there has to be a will, strategy and above all, economic competence amongst ministers.
Ministers at Holyrood have shown none of that and the Ferguson's workforce and islanders have been left high and dry as a result.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Blair 'helping' Scottish Labour with SNP election battle
It is expected to be a large part of Labour's campaigning next May as it seeks to make the problems in the NHS a central issue. It reportedly working on how to improve access to GPs and use technology to drive down waiting lists. There is no fee involved in the work. READ MORE: The former PM is a controversial figure inside and outwith Labour despite being the only person to lead the party to consecutive election wins. Mr Blair led Labour between 1995 and 2007. He was Prime Minister from 1997 for 10 years, winning three general elections. Scotland's NHS is facing huge problems, with one in six Scots on a waiting list for treatment. Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's health spokeswoman, told The Times: 'Our NHS is stretched to breaking point and technology is a way to ease that pressure — but the SNP is squandering the opportunity. "From GP practices using fax machines to doctors relying on pagers, the SNP is running an analogue health service in a digital age. GPs have been sounding the alarm about how a woeful lack of basic IT is holding them back — it's time we have a government that will listen. 'A Scottish Labour government will put Scotland on the cutting edge of medical innovation and modernise our NHS so it is fit for the future.' A Tony Blair Institute spokesman said: 'We are always happy to talk to any and all political parties who are interested in our work, all of which is published and publicly available." SNP MSP Clare Haughey said: 'That Anas Sarwar is taking advice on health from an organisation which has previously called for the selling of NHS patient's data for money is truly beyond belief. 'It is unbelievable that Scottish Labour are looking to the man that led us into the disastrous Iraq war to tell them what is best for Scotland. "Labour have nothing positive to offer Scotland - rather than listening to the people of Scotland, Labour are relying on the advice of has-beens like Tony Blair. "The SNP is the only party with a clear plan to build a better future for Scotland - improving our NHS, supporting families and workers through the cost-of-living crisis and creating new opportunities with the powers of independence."
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
How does America's Iran strike affect UK security?
What have we learned of material relevance to the UK's security from Trump's bombing of Iran's uranium enrichment sites? First, Trump does not need European support for offensives of global significance. This is a military version of the American unilateralism he manifested with his tariffs. It feels a lifetime away from the courtship between Bush and Blair more than 20 years ago that preceded the invasion of there is a conspicuous limit to how much sensitive information the American president will share even with a leader such as Keir Starmer, whom Trump says he likes. Note that on Tuesday the prime minister was at pains to try to persuade me that none of Trump's public statements were suggestive of an imminent US strike on Iran. I was sceptical and the PM insisted I was quite wrong. Starmer's denials make sense only if Trump did not confide in him and - possibly - misled Starmer and all European leaders will know that the corollary of the US as the supreme military superpower acting unilaterally is that European countries are under even more pressure to invest more in their/our own defences, because if Trump does not need us, he will feel even less obliged to help us. This week's NATO leaders meeting will now be even more about accelerating a rapid increase in European spending on defence than it would anyway have it is conspicuous that Starmer has not endorsed the American strike on three nuclear sites. Trump will have noticed. It is however unclear whether this will introduce tension into the relationship between Downing St and the UK intelligence experts continue to believe that it is impossible to eradicate the nuclear threat from Iran using only missile and air attacks, no matter how devastating the bombs that are deployed. This is why Starmer and foreign secretary David Lammy continue to hope Iran will come to the negotiating table. Sixth, this is a super high risk moment for the stability of the Middle East. But those who know the Iranian regime well tell me they believe the likeliest outcome is neither a major escalation of the conflict into a wider regional war or a peace breakthrough. They expect a tawdry muddling through that saves the face of the Tehran regime. Which means the pernicious tit-for-tat attacks between Iran and Israel would continue - till the next crisis. PS The UK and European position is that a sustainable end to Iran's conflict with Israel requires a ceasefire in Gaza and meaningful progress towards the creation of a peaceful Palestinian state. But European leaders shed no light on how this can possibly happen, given that Trump is so supportive of the belligerence of prime minister Netanyahu and his government.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
DWP offering three month lifeline for 150,000 carer's set to lose benefits – will you be impacted?
OVER 150,000 households receiving carer's allowance will start losing their payments from November 2026. Carer's allowance is a benefit for those who provide at least 35 hours of unpaid care each week, usually for a disabled or sick relative. 1 It is currently paid at £83.30 per week, and carers can earn a second income from a job. However, if they earn more than £196 a week, they lose the allowance entirely. One of the main ways to qualify for carer's allowance is by caring for someone who receives the daily living component of personal independence payments (PIP). In March, the government announced plans to tighten the rules for claiming PIP in an effort to save £5billion a year on welfare spending and encourage more people to return to work. On Wednesday, the government introduced the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill to Parliament. This proposed law outlines plans to make PIP eligibility rules stricter. Currently, people qualify for PIP by earning enough points across various tasks, such as cooking, cleaning, or managing money. Under the new rules, applicants will need to score at least four points on one specific daily living activity to qualify. This change means that having minor difficulties across several areas may no longer be enough to qualify for PIP. This change could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year, according to government's own impact assessment. As a knock-on effect, around 150,000 carers will no longer qualify for carer's allowance due to the stricter eligibility rules. However, the Bill also introduces measures to protect existing claimants who might lose their payments. If someone loses their PIP under the new rules, they will continue to receive payments for 13 weeks as a safety net. This 13-week grace period also applies to those receiving carer's allowance. The 13-week transition period is longer than the four weeks originally planned by the government. What is carer's allowance? CARER'S allowance is a UK benefit designed to help people who have caring responsibilities for more than 35 hours each week. Those eligible get £83.30 a week paid directly into bank accounts. To qualify, the person you care for must already get one of these benefits: Personal independence payment (PIP) - daily living component Disability living allowance - the middle or highest care rate Attendance allowance Constant attendance allowance at or above the normal maximum rate with an Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit Constant attendance allowance at the basic (full day) rate with a war disablement pension Armed forces independence payment You don't have to be related to the person or live with them to apply. But if you share caring responsibilities with someone else, only one of you can make a claim. The type of care you provide can vary, but includes things such as helping with washing or cooking, taking the person to medical appointments or helping out with household tasks such as shopping or organising bills. To get the benefit, you must also meet a certain set of criteria: You must be 16 or over You have to spend at least 35 hours a week caring for someone You need to have been in England, Scotland or Wales for at least two of the last three years (this does not apply if you're a refugee or have humanitarian protection status) You must normally live in England, Scotland or Wales or live abroad as a member of the armed forces (you might still be eligible if you're moving to or already living in an EEA country or Switzerland) You cannot be in full-time education You must not be studying for 21 hours a week or more You cannot be subject to immigration control You will also have to meet certain earnings criteria in order to get the benefit. Your earnings must also be £196 or less a week after tax, National Insurance and expenses. You can apply for the carer's allowance online by visiting Despite the longer grace period, campaigners, including the disability equality charity Scope, have warned that this extended period is only a temporary fix. They argue that once the payments stop, disabled people will still face the same extra costs of living. Food bank network Trussell said: "The last-minute details on protections offer something for a small proportion of people, but even they will still see a real-terms cut. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has also set out how the government proposes to slash incapacity benefits offered to those on Universal Credit. It also includes a proposal to hike the Universal Credit standard allowance above inflation over the next four years. What is PIP and who is eligible? HOUSEHOLDS suffering from a long-term illness, disability or mental health condition can get extra help through personal independence payments (PIP). The maximum you can receive from the Government benefit is £187.45 a week. PIP is for those over 16 and under the state pension age, currently 66. Crucially, you must also have a health condition or disability where you either have had difficulties with daily living or getting around - or both - for three months, and you expect these difficulties to continue for at least nine months (unless you're terminally ill with less than 12 months to live). You can also claim PIP if you're in or out of work and if you're already getting limited capability for work and work-related activity (LCWRA) payments if you claim Universal Credit. PIP is made up of two parts and whether you get one or both of these depends on how severely your condition affects you. You may get the mobility part of PIP if you need help going out or moving around. The weekly rate for this is either £29.70 or £77.05. On the daily living part of PIP, the weekly rate is either £73.90 or £110.40 - and you could get both elements, so up to £187.45 in total. You can claim PIP at the same time as other benefits, except the armed forces independence payment.
