Councillors consider completely demolishing Kirkcudbright Bridge
All options are currently being explored by Dumfries and Galloway Council officers, which includes a rebuild job on site – or potentially another bridge at different locations on the River Dee.
Various costings and proposals are currently being investigated and a range of options will be presented to councillors in October this year.
This news comes after it was revealed that the short term solution will see Kirkcudbright Bridge reopened to cars or light vans by July 2 (vehicles larger than three tonnes will not be allowed access).
READ MORE: National park supporters urge ministers not to scrap Galloway proposal
The issue is due to be discussed at the council's economy and infrastructure committee next Tuesday where councillors will be given a progress update.
A report by Duncan McDonald, the council's engineering design manager, will be tabled at the meeting.
He wrote: 'In parallel to reopening the bridge on Wednesday July 2, 2025, officers have started to consider options to develop an indicative cost of a new bridge as well as timescales associated with this.
'Due to the complexities of work required to develop a new bridge for Kirkcudbright it is anticipated that this will take years, however officers are committed to developing this and will follow due diligence in order to seek correct (elected) member approval."
READ MORE: Running festival seeks 'Braveheart' athletes for race across historic Stirling sites
The council was forced to close the bridge with little notice in March after a structural safety report from engineering consultant's Mott MacDonald.
The move has attracted criticism from locals due to it adding time onto journeys between the merse and the town centre. Traders have also experienced a significant drop in income.
Council officers are now poring over documents from a previous review of the bridge, which was conducted in the 1970s by consultants Fairhurst.
Fairhurst was commission to consider various other sites for a new bridge.
The council report produced for next week's committee explains: 'In their work, Fairhurst considered two primary locations for the new bridge. The first was directly over the existing bridge and required full demolition.
'A replacement temporary bridge was required to facilitate this, to ensure the Merse and Kirkcudbright communities remained connected during the demolition and construction work.'The second was upstream starting at Dee Road, spanning the Dee to the rear of the creamery (now demolished).'
Councillors will now be asked to allow officers to seek indicative costs and timescales for a new bridge within this year's public realm structures capital budget.
If agreed, officers will then come back with a full range of options to the full council meeting on October 2.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
3 days ago
- Daily Record
Dumfries and Galloway Council admits new Kirkcudbright bridge is 'years' away
The local authority has also ruled out installing a temporary crossing on cost grounds. A new bridge for Kirkcudbright is 'years' away. And a temporary crossing has been ruled out on cost grounds. The stark situation is outlined in a report for next week's meeting of the council's economy and resources infrastructure committee. The bridge, which is nearly 100 years old, was closed at the end of March after engineering experts Mott MacDonald raised safety concerns. It is due to reopen on July 2, allowing for cars and light vans up to three tonnes crossing the bridge in single file. Temporary traffic lights will be installed initially, with permanent lights in the pipeline. The reopening of the bridge has been welcomed by local residents, however, they are keen to see a new bridge as soon as possible. But in his report, engineering design manager Duncan McDonald states: 'Officers have started to consider options to develop an indicative cost of a new bridge as well as timescales associated with this. 'Due to the complexities of work required to develop a new bridge for Kirkcudbright, it is anticipated that this will take years, however, officers are committed to developing this and will follow due diligence in order to seek correct member approval.' The report outlines no fewer than seven stages that would need to be completed – from a feasbility study and options appraisal to finding a contractor and building the bridge. Galloway and West Dumfries MP John Cooper had called on the Army to build a temporary bridge while the main crossing couldn't be used. However, Mr McDonald says that building a Bailey Bridge – as used during World War Two – isn't practical. The width of the river would require several spans, not just one, requiring foundations to be built. That would mean riverbed and bank investigations which 'would take several months to organise and undertake at significant cost'. The foundations would also require a lengthy period of time, meaning there is little chance of a temporary bridge to be built 'within a reasonably short-term period'. Building a temporary bridge over the footprint of the existing one also has 'several major issues to be overcome and risks managed'. The report notes that Mott MacDonald feel 'after further analyses and complex modelling' they do not now feel there would be 'a significant risk to public safety' to reopen the bridge to three tonne vehicles – as long as traffic management measures are put inplace. Data indicates that 90 per cent of the 20,000 vehicle crossings on the bridge every week fall into the three-tonne car and light van limit, meaning reopening the bridge 'would see most of the travelling public either side of the Dee reconnected'.
Telegraph
4 days ago
- Telegraph
SNP forced to axe national park plan after farmers' backlash
SNP ministers have axed plans to create a new national park in Scotland following a backlash from farmers and residents. Mairi Gougeon, the Rural Affairs Secretary, told MSPs an official report had concluded that there was not 'sufficient local support to proceed' with the park in Galloway. In a statement to the Scottish Parliament, she said responses to a consultation showed 54 per cent of people were opposed to the plan compared to 42 per cent in favour. Taking account only of the views of residents, 57 per cent opposed the scheme and only 40 per cent backed it. More than eight out of 10 farmers and foresters were also hostile to the park. Ms Gougeon accepted her announcement 'will be very disappointing for those who have been campaigning for a new national park in Galloway over many years'. The Tories welcomed the decision but warned it could take 'years to heal' deep divisions in the area created by the scheme. SNP ministers announced last July that the region in south-west Scotland had been chosen from a five-strong shortlist as the possible site of the country's third national park. The status meant the area would be set aside for conservation, with most of the landscapes and accompanying plants and animals protected in their natural state. A consultation proposed that it be called the Kingdom of Galloway National Park and covers up to 3,400 sq km, or 1,300 sq miles, making it around twice as large as the one covering Loch Lomond and the Trossachs. But farmers warned that it will lead to extra red tape for their businesses and prioritise tourism and visitor access over their needs, thereby damaging food production. NFU Scotland said 93 per cent of its members in the area opposed the plan. A third national park is the latest in a series of commitments made in the power-sharing deal between Nicola Sturgeon's government and the Scottish Greens to be axed or delayed. The coalition between the two parties, titled the Bute House Agreement, fell apart last year when Humza Yousaf, the then first minister, kicked the Greens out of government. The Telegraph disclosed on Saturday that Holyrood insiders expected the plan to be shelved but Ms Gougeon went further by scrapping it altogether. She said: 'While there is substantial support for a national park and what it could deliver for the south-west of Scotland, there is also significant opposition.' Ms Gougeon said that NatureScot had concluded that 'the proposal does not have sufficient clarity, nor has it garnered sufficient local support to proceed to the next stage of designation'. Finlay Carson, the Scottish Tory MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, said: 'This a victory for common sense and a victory for local people in Galloway and Ayrshire. 'Ever since Green minister Lorna Slater got her hands on these proposals as part of the disastrous Bute House Agreement, the whole process became deeply flawed. It felt like a Green nationalist park was going to be imposed on these communities rather than one that they were initially keen to see.' Liz Hitschmann, co-founder of the No Galloway National Park campaign, said: 'We are very relieved the Scottish Government has recognised the strength of opposition to the imposition of a national park on our region, but the overwhelming response from local people directly affected was impossible to ignore.' Stephen Young, director of policy at landowners' body Scottish Land & Estates, said: 'The decision not to proceed with the Galloway National Park proposal is the right one by the Scottish Government and aligns with the clear views expressed by communities and businesses across the region.' But Mark Ruskell, a Scottish Greens MSP, said the decision was a 'betrayal' and 'the culmination of lack of confident political leadership and the dangerous influence of powerful vested interests'.
The National
26-05-2025
- The National
Councillors consider completely demolishing Kirkcudbright Bridge
All options are currently being explored by Dumfries and Galloway Council officers, which includes a rebuild job on site – or potentially another bridge at different locations on the River Dee. Various costings and proposals are currently being investigated and a range of options will be presented to councillors in October this year. This news comes after it was revealed that the short term solution will see Kirkcudbright Bridge reopened to cars or light vans by July 2 (vehicles larger than three tonnes will not be allowed access). READ MORE: National park supporters urge ministers not to scrap Galloway proposal The issue is due to be discussed at the council's economy and infrastructure committee next Tuesday where councillors will be given a progress update. A report by Duncan McDonald, the council's engineering design manager, will be tabled at the meeting. He wrote: 'In parallel to reopening the bridge on Wednesday July 2, 2025, officers have started to consider options to develop an indicative cost of a new bridge as well as timescales associated with this. 'Due to the complexities of work required to develop a new bridge for Kirkcudbright it is anticipated that this will take years, however officers are committed to developing this and will follow due diligence in order to seek correct (elected) member approval." READ MORE: Running festival seeks 'Braveheart' athletes for race across historic Stirling sites The council was forced to close the bridge with little notice in March after a structural safety report from engineering consultant's Mott MacDonald. The move has attracted criticism from locals due to it adding time onto journeys between the merse and the town centre. Traders have also experienced a significant drop in income. Council officers are now poring over documents from a previous review of the bridge, which was conducted in the 1970s by consultants Fairhurst. Fairhurst was commission to consider various other sites for a new bridge. The council report produced for next week's committee explains: 'In their work, Fairhurst considered two primary locations for the new bridge. The first was directly over the existing bridge and required full demolition. 'A replacement temporary bridge was required to facilitate this, to ensure the Merse and Kirkcudbright communities remained connected during the demolition and construction work.'The second was upstream starting at Dee Road, spanning the Dee to the rear of the creamery (now demolished).' Councillors will now be asked to allow officers to seek indicative costs and timescales for a new bridge within this year's public realm structures capital budget. If agreed, officers will then come back with a full range of options to the full council meeting on October 2.
