Auckland mayor's top executive liquidating personal firm owing $570k
Brown's chief of staff Jaswant Sailendra Singh (Jazz) called in the liquidators on June 4, for his property development company Traxx Investments Limited.
The first report by liquidators Steven Knov and Kieran Jones, dated June 11, shows Traxx has no assets, and its sole creditor, listed as preferential is Inland Revenue with the sum of $569,739.
A spokesman for the mayor said in a statement provided to Newsroom at the weekend that Brown 'has never heard of Traxx Investments nor has he received any advice about Jazz Singh's involvement with this company.'
Singh told Newsroom his employer, Auckland Council, was not aware of the liquidation, which he described as 'unrelated altogether' to his work there.
He said the existence of his business interest had been declared to the council, but not the liquidation.
Asked about the circumstances leading to the liquidation, he said 'I don't plan on talking to you about that.'
He said the liquidation was a voluntary thing which his advisors had told him to do.
In the liquidators' first report it said 'the liquidators have been advised that the reason for the failure of the company, which led to the appointment of the liquidators, is due to the company having insufficient assets to satisfy its liabilities.'
The report said they had yet to receive a claim from Inland Revenue.
Singh is the chief of staff in the mayor's office, and technically an Auckland Council staffer. Photo: Auckland Mayor's office
The role of chief of staff is the most senior position in the Auckland mayor's office and Singh has travelled overseas on occasions with Brown, and is one of the lead officials in discussions with the government and external entities. For example, one push by Auckland and other councils is to convince the central government to return a share of GST to local government.
Singh, previously a solicitor, has held senior management roles at Auckland Council for 14 years, and has been in the mayor's office for most of this term.
He was initially the head of Budget and Finance for the mayor, and became chief of staff in June 2024. Previously he had held roles in the council as general manager of procurement, head of risk, and manager of property and commercial legal services.
Singh is the sole director, and co-owner of Traxx Development Limited, and Traxx Property Investments Limited, with Companies Office records showing the other shareholder in both as Paul Michael Davies.
When Singh was made chief or staff, Brown was full of praise on Facebook:
'I'm pleased to announce that Jazz Singh will be my new chief of staff.
'As well as being a strong family man and a father of six, he's got strong business smarts and will be the first finance person in the role since the formation of the super city.
'Jazz is my current head of finance and budget and has played a key part in my long-term plan. He's well placed to deliver on my manifesto, bring the CCOs into line and stop wasting money!
'I'm glad he's agreed to lead my office's strong and capable team.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
5 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Letters: Maybe the Government should reward us with butter for reporting on road cones
The Minister for Workplace Relations wants motorists to report situations where they believe too many road cones are being used. The problem is that, like her, they wouldn't have a clue why road cones are used and what determines the numbers of cones used on any particular roadworks site. Roadworks construction sites are among the most dangerous of all construction work sites and for that we can partly thank the wonderful driving skills and utmost patience of the average New Zealand driver. Cones are spaced at distances (that determines their numbers) so as to deny drivers (as far as possible) the urge to change lanes, overtake others or to perform U-turns within the worksite, in addition to that most annoying of all factors, of actually slowing our vehicles down. The minister might consider visiting and observing the behaviour and activities of a busy site. She might then leave roadworker safety to people who know what they are doing. Ron Halewood, Rothesay Bay. Power to the people It is fantastic to see in the Herald (July 28) the first of four reports on the state of the power supply in New Zealand. For those of us who follow such aspects of our country's performance, it has been obvious for some years that we have been heading into serious trouble. It is also indeed sad that the people who now struggle the most to pay their power bills are those also struggling to pay for other necessities. Steve Clerk, Meadowbank. Respect for Māori I was very pleased to read Winston Peters' thoughtful comments on the immigrants flooding into Europe (July 27). He was quite concerned that those immigrants didn't salute the flag or respect the people who were there before them. Perhaps it's time that he reminded his coalition partners that New Zealand was not an empty space when the Pākehā arrived. The world of the Māori needs to be honoured, too. Terry Lord, Mt Wellington. Laws of the land We all know by now that Winston Peters will say something that resonates but may not be followed up. But I totally agree when he says that we should be very careful with immigration and, in particular, allowing it to change the fabric of our society. It is not at all a racist statement in that if you wish to come here to live, then you should be totally prepared to integrate and adapt to the culture of this country. Exactly the same in reverse applies when a Kiwi decides to live abroad. You have to accept that country's laws and culture, whether you like it or not. Paul Beck, West Harbour. Looting and influencing Winston Peters says immigrants are changing the fabric of the First World. Similarly, the colonisers changed the fabric of the independent and self-sufficient countries they went into, without permission being granted to do si. They did not just loot all the taonga but influenced the culture, fashion etc. Tsk tsk. Nishi Fahmy, Avondale. The impact of GST It is very sad that in this food-producing country that people need to choose between being warm or eating. GST, introduced by Sir Roger Douglas during the fourth Labour Government, had its last rise enacted under the Key Government, from 12.5% to 15%, while the top personal tax rate was lowered. This hit those who already spent most of their earnings on essentials but when the present government altered the tax thresholds, those on the least income barely benefited. It seems beyond those in power to look ahead and realise that today's children are the workers of the future and we need them to be healthy and educated. Those who are barely surviving are more likely to be filling hospital beds or have insufficient skills to be useful. Removing GST on dairy products and fresh fruit and vegetables and perhaps bread or meat would be much easier than hoping some third grocery chain will come and provide competition. Is it too much to hope that politicians can look ahead and use common sense? It may even get them some votes in the next election. Phyl Belsham, Mt Albert.
RNZ News
19 hours ago
- RNZ News
Builders awaiting detail on government's bid to drive costs down
A carpenter working in a workshop. Photo: 123rf Builders dealing with astronomical prices for building supplies are keenly waiting to see if the government's intervention will make any difference. The government has opened the door for builders to access approved supplies from overseas - such as plasterboard, cladding systems, external doors, and windows - in an attempt to bring down costs for consumers. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said the list would have the potential to reduce total building costs by thousands of dollars when building a home. Builders across New Zealand have faced increasing cost pressures. For example, New Zealand has some of the most expensive plasterboard in the world, paying around 38 percent more than Australia and 47 percent more than the UK, Penk said. Builder and managing director of Substruct Steve Brown said the government's changes were a good thing but wanted to see how it would play out. "Building prices just like everything has pretty much doubled over the last few years," Brown said. He said it is hard for builders to choose a new product that's "not tried and tested". "I've been in the industry for 30 years, there's some products that work and some that don't. So, to pick up a new product is kind of, a little bit scary when you gaurantee something for 10 years," Brown said. Registered Master Builders Association chief executive Ankit Sharma said the government's announcement would help to reduce the construction costs and increase product availability across the sector. "By allowing overseas products that meet standards to be used more readily, we can improve supply chain resilience, reduce delays and ultimately deliver more homes, faster and more affordably," Sharma said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Newsroom
a day ago
- Newsroom
Where to draw the line on terror
The Government is eyeing an overhaul of the country's terrorism legislation, which is necessary, it says, to keep New Zealanders safe in a rapidly evolving world and keep pace with modern threats. However, critics are warning the move could come at a steep price, specifically a loss of civil liberties. The proposed changes, still in the closed-door consultation phase with a handpicked selection of groups and experts, would give police and intelligence agencies broader powers to intervene earlier, redefine what constitutes a 'terrorist act' and expand preventative detention powers, all in the name of public safety. Today, The Detail speaks with Newsroom national affairs editor Sam Sachdeva and University of Waikato terrorism and firearms expert Alexander Gillespie about the potential changes to the Terrorism Suppression Act and how the Government will balance risk without resorting to overreach. 'What this is really about is are our current terror laws fit for purpose, and where do we draw the line between dealing with the very real threat that is posed by terrorist groups and terrorists, while still preserving the fundamental political freedoms and rights and liberties that all New Zealanders hold dear,' Sachdeva tells The Detail. He says critics, worried that those freedoms and rights are now at risk, are fired up. 'Look, they are. We have seen the Council for Civil Liberties, [and] the Free Speech Union has now come out as well, expressing some concern about this. 'So, it's early stages, but it seems like it's something that could quite easily animate or light a fire under a lot of these rights groups who are concerned.' The terror law, enacted in 2002 following the September 11 terror attacks, allows governments to formally designate people or groups as terrorist entities, freezing their assets and making it illegal to financially support, recruit for, or participate in a designated terrorist entity. Minor changes were made after the March 15 terror attack in 2019 and the New Lynn Countdown Supermarket attack in 2021. Sachdeva says among the new potential changes are making membership of a terrorist entity a criminal offence, creating new offences to capture public expressions of support for a terrorist act or designated entities – including showing insignia – and modernising definitions for terms like 'material support' to capture new online forms of support. Extending the renewal period for terrorist designations to five years, from three at present, is also being considered. The Government says there will be safeguards and judicial oversight. The proposed changes are expected to go before Parliament later this year. Professor of International Law Al Gillespie, speaking to The Detail from Vienna, where he is working on gun reforms, says the threat of a terror attack has long lingered in New Zealand, and while the likelihood of another attack will never be zero, the risk can be lowered. 'Part of reducing that risk is making sure the law is as good as it can be. That the balance between civil liberties and risk is correct. And that we have proportionate penalties for those who are willing to advocate the use of violence against civilians to change policy. 'I support looking at it … I think it's foreseeable that the tensions in our society are going to be around for the foreseeable future. And to make sure they are fit for purpose, because when I look back at recent times, our laws weren't fit for purpose, and now we need to be thinking, 'What more can we do?'' While the debate on security versus liberty and protection versus principle will undoubtedly continue, one thing is certain – in the fight against terror, New Zealand is searching for a line, but it will not be easy to draw. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
